What is he best known for?
The fields of study he is best known for:
- Paleontology
- Ecology
- Genus
Jorge F. Genise focuses on Paleontology, Trace fossil, Ecology, Cretaceous and Paleoecology.
His work on Ichnology, Taphonomy and Aeolian processes as part of general Paleontology research is often related to Interpretation, thus linking different fields of science.
Jorge F. Genise studies Ichnotaxon which is a part of Trace fossil.
His study in the field of Brood and Hymenoptera is also linked to topics like Humanities.
In his study, which falls under the umbrella issue of Cretaceous, Single species, Cycad and Mesozoic is strongly linked to Southern Hemisphere.
His Sedimentary structures study combines topics in areas such as Systematics and Nomenclature, International Code of Zoological Nomenclature.
His most cited work include:
- Names for trace fossils: a uniform approach (323 citations)
- Insect Trace Fossil Associations in Paleosols: The Coprinisphaera Ichnofacies (152 citations)
- The ichnologic record of the continental invertebrate invasion; evolutionary trends in environmental expansion, ecospace utilization, and behavioral complexity (129 citations)
What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?
His primary areas of study are Paleontology, Trace fossil, Ecology, Cretaceous and Brood.
Ichnotaxon, Paleogene, Facies, Insect and Ichnology are the subjects of his Paleontology studies.
His work focuses on many connections between Ichnology and other disciplines, such as Sedimentology, that overlap with his field of interest in Sedimentary depositional environment.
His Trace fossil study also includes
- Dung beetle that connect with fields like Phytolith,
- Southern Hemisphere which intersects with area such as Paleoecology.
His study in the fields of Nest, Diphaglossinae, Mammal and Hymenoptera under the domain of Ecology overlaps with other disciplines such as Humanities.
Jorge F. Genise combines subjects such as Crayfish and Mesozoic with his study of Cretaceous.
He most often published in these fields:
- Paleontology (56.36%)
- Trace fossil (54.55%)
- Ecology (35.45%)
What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2016-2021)?
- Trace fossil (54.55%)
- Paleontology (56.36%)
- Archaeology (10.00%)
In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:
His primary areas of investigation include Trace fossil, Paleontology, Archaeology, Ecology and Ichnofacies.
In his works, he conducts interdisciplinary research on Trace fossil and Trace.
He has researched Paleontology in several fields, including Ecological succession and Cricket.
His Archaeology research includes themes of Taxon, Fauna and Cenozoic.
His work on Diphaglossinae and Southern Hemisphere as part of general Ecology research is frequently linked to Cell cluster and Paleobotany, bridging the gap between disciplines.
His Ichnofacies research incorporates elements of Shrubland, Aeolian processes, Archipelago, Mediterranean climate and Dung beetle.
Between 2016 and 2021, his most popular works were:
- A new interpretation and palaeoecological significance of the fossil bee cell cluster Rosellichnus patagonicus (Celliformidae) (8 citations)
- 100 Ma sweat bee nests: Early and rapid co-diversification of crown bees and flowering plants (5 citations)
- The earliest burst of necrophagous dung beetles in South America revealed by the Cenozoic record of Coprinisphaera (5 citations)
In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:
- Ecology
- Paleontology
- Genus
Jorge F. Genise spends much of his time researching Archaeology, Paleontology, Trace fossil, Ecology and Cenozoic.
His work deals with themes such as Diphaglossinae and Interpretation, which intersect with Archaeology.
Jorge F. Genise carries out multidisciplinary research, doing studies in Paleontology and South american.
Trace fossil connects with themes related to Paleopedology in his study.
In the field of Ecology, his study on Crown, Paleoecology, Woodland and Southern Hemisphere overlaps with subjects such as Paleobotany.
This overview was generated by a machine learning system which analysed the scientist’s
body of work. If you have any feedback, you can
contact us
here.
