World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
76
Citations
56066
World Ranking
1880
National Ranking
899

Michael D. Fox publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michael D. Fox sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 189 publications — 59th percentile

59% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Michael D. Fox D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michael D. Fox sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 76 D-Index — 80th percentile

80% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Michael D. Fox is affiliated with Harvard University in the United States. Their research primarily spans the fields of Neuroscience and Medicine, with a substantial body of work focusing on Cognitive Neuroscience, Neurology, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, and Psychiatry and Mental Health.

The scientist's research topics include Functional Brain Connectivity Studies, Neurological disorders and treatments, Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies, Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications, EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces, Parkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments, and Neural dynamics and brain function.

Frequent coauthors of Michael D. Fox are:

  • Shan H. Siddiqi
  • Frédéric Schaper
  • Alexander L. Cohen
  • Andreas Horn
  • Jordan Grafman

Michael D. Fox has published extensively in several venues, most notably:

  • Biological Psychiatry
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Brain stimulation
  • Annals of Neurology
  • Brain

Among recent significant publications are:

  • "Safety and recommendations for TMS use in healthy subjects and patient populations, with updates on training, ethical and regulatory issues: Expert Guidelines" (2020), Clinical Neurophysiology
  • "Distinct Symptom-Specific Treatment Targets for Circuit-Based Neuromodulation" (2020), American Journal of Psychiatry
  • "Using Brain Imaging to Improve Spatial Targeting of Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for Depression" (2020), Biological Psychiatry
  • "Causal mapping of human brain function" (2022), Nature Reviews. Neuroscience
  • "Brain stimulation and brain lesions converge on common causal circuits in neuropsychiatric disease" (2021), Nature Human Behaviour

Best Publications

  • The human brain is intrinsically organized into dynamic, anticorrelated functional networks

    Michael D. Fox;Abraham Z. Snyder;Justin L. Vincent;Maurizio Corbetta

  • Spontaneous fluctuations in brain activity observed with functional magnetic resonance imaging.

    Michael D. Fox;Marcus E. Raichle

  • Distinct brain networks for adaptive and stable task control in humans

    Nico U. F. Dosenbach;Damien A. Fair;Francis M. Miezin;Alexander L. Cohen

  • Spontaneous neuronal activity distinguishes human dorsal and ventral attention systems

    Michael D. Fox;Maurizio Corbetta;Abraham Z. Snyder;Justin L. Vincent

  • Resting-state connectivity biomarkers define neurophysiological subtypes of depression

    Andrew T Drysdale;Logan Grosenick;Logan Grosenick;Jonathan Downar;Katharine Dunlop

  • Intrinsic functional architecture in the anaesthetized monkey brain.

    J. L. Vincent;G. H. Patel;M. D. Fox;A. Z. Snyder

  • The Global Signal and Observed Anticorrelated Resting State Brain Networks

    Michael D. Fox;Dongyang Zhang;Abraham Z. Snyder;Marcus E. Raichle

  • Clinical Applications of Resting State Functional Connectivity

    Michael D Fox;Michael D. Greicius

  • Safety and recommendations for TMS use in healthy subjects and patient populations, with updates on training, ethical and regulatory issues: Expert Guidelines

    Simone Rossi;Andrea Antal;Sven Bestmann;Marom Bikson

  • Individual Variability in Functional Connectivity Architecture of the Human Brain

    Sophia Mueller;Sophia Mueller;Danhong Wang;Michael D. Fox;B.T. Thomas Yeo;B.T. Thomas Yeo

  • Coherent spontaneous activity identifies a hippocampal-parietal memory network.

    Justin L. Vincent;Abraham Z. Snyder;Michael D. Fox;Benjamin J. Shannon

  • Efficacy of Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Targets for Depression Is Related to Intrinsic Functional Connectivity with the Subgenual Cingulate

    Michael D. Fox;Michael D. Fox;Michael D. Fox;Randy L. Buckner;Matthew P. White;Michael D. Greicius

  • Towards a consensus regarding global signal regression for resting state functional connectivity MRI

    Kevin Murphy;Michael D. Fox;Michael D. Fox

  • Intrinsic fluctuations within cortical systems account for intertrial variability in human behavior.

    Michael D. Fox;Abraham Z. Snyder;Justin L. Vincent;Marcus E. Raichle

  • Coherent spontaneous activity accounts for trial-to-trial variability in human evoked brain responses

    Michael D Fox;Abraham Z Snyder;Jeffrey M Zacks;Marcus E Raichle

  • Mapping Symptoms to Brain Networks with the Human Connectome.

    Michael D Fox

  • A method for using blocked and event-related fMRI data to study “resting state” functional connectivity

    Damien A. Fair;Bradley L. Schlaggar;L B A Alexander Cohen;Francis M. Miezin

  • Connectivity Predicts deep brain stimulation outcome in Parkinson disease.

    Andreas Horn;Martin Reich;Johannes Vorwerk;Ningfei Li

  • Red blood cells are the major source of alpha-synuclein in blood.

    Robin Barbour;Kristin Kling;John P. Anderson;Kelly Banducci

  • Resting-state networks link invasive and noninvasive brain stimulation across diverse psychiatric and neurological diseases.

    Michael D. Fox;Randy L. Buckner;Hesheng Liu;M. Mallar Chakravarty;M. Mallar Chakravarty

Frequent Co-Authors

Alvaro Pascual-Leone
Alvaro Pascual-Leone Harvard University
Juho Joutsa
Juho Joutsa Turku University Hospital
Marcus E. Raichle
Marcus E. Raichle Washington University in St. Louis
Abraham Z. Snyder
Abraham Z. Snyder Washington University in St. Louis
Andreas Horn
Andreas Horn Harvard University
Hesheng Liu
Hesheng Liu Peking University
Randy L. Buckner
Randy L. Buckner Harvard University
Giulio Ruffini
Giulio Ruffini Light Prescriptions Innovators (Spain)
Maurizio Corbetta
Maurizio Corbetta University of Padua
Emiliano Santarnecchi
Emiliano Santarnecchi Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Michael D. Fox

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles