World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
38
Citations
5578
World Ranking
8577
National Ranking
3650

Mouhsin M. Shafi publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mouhsin M. Shafi sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 134 publications — 35th percentile

35% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Mouhsin M. Shafi D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mouhsin M. Shafi sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 38 D-Index — 12th percentile

12% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Mouhsin M. Shafi is affiliated with Harvard Medical School in the United States. Their research spans multiple fields within neuroscience and medicine, emphasizing topics related to brain function, neurostimulation, and cognitive disorders. The scientist's publication record reflects engagement in both foundational and applied areas of brain research.

The main fields of study covered by Mouhsin M. Shafi include:

  • Neuroscience
  • Medicine

The subfields of study feature a focus on:

  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Neurology
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine
  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine
  • Developmental Neuroscience

The primary topics of their scientific work involve:

  • Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
  • Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
  • Neural dynamics and brain function
  • Intensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders
  • Anesthesia and Neurotoxicity Research
  • Anesthesia and Sedative Agents

Mouhsin M. Shafi has collaborated frequently with several coauthors, including:

  • Álvaro Pascual-Leone (42 joint publications)
  • Recep A. Ozdemir (30 joint publications)
  • Peter J. Fried (23 joint publications)
  • Emiliano Santarnecchi (19 joint publications)
  • Stephanie S. Buss (18 joint publications)

The scientist has published extensively in a variety of journals, with frequent appearances in:

  • Brain Stimulation (14 publications)
  • Alzheimer's & Dementia (8 publications)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (6 publications)
  • Scientific Reports (4 publications)
  • Clinical Neurophysiology (3 publications)

Selected recent papers by Mouhsin M. Shafi include:

  • Safety and recommendations for TMS use in healthy subjects and patient populations, with updates on training, ethical and regulatory issues: Expert Guidelines (2020, Clinical Neurophysiology)
  • TMS combined with EEG: Recommendations and open issues for data collection and analysis (2023, Brain Stimulation)
  • Individualized perturbation of the human connectome reveals reproducible biomarkers of network dynamics relevant to cognition (2020, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences)
  • Impact of multisession 40Hz tACS on hippocampal perfusion in patients with Alzheimer's disease (2021, Alzheimer's Research & Therapy)
  • Network-level macroscale structural connectivity predicts propagation of transcranial magnetic stimulation (2020, NeuroImage)

Best Publications

  • Safety and recommendations for TMS use in healthy subjects and patient populations, with updates on training, ethical and regulatory issues: Expert Guidelines

    Simone Rossi;Andrea Antal;Sven Bestmann;Marom Bikson

  • Postoperative Delirium and Postoperative Cognitive Dysfunction: Overlap and Divergence.

    Daiello La;Racine Am;Yun Gou R;Marcantonio Er

  • Variability in neuronal activity in primate cortex during working memory tasks.

    M. Shafi;Y. Zhou;J. Quintana;C. Chow

  • TMS combined with EEG: Recommendations and open issues for data collection and analysis

    Unknown

  • Exploration and Modulation of Brain Network Interactions with Noninvasive Brain Stimulation in Combination with Neuroimaging

    Mouhsin M. Shafi;M. Brandon Westover;M. Brandon Westover;Michael D. Fox;Michael D. Fox;Alvaro Pascual-Leone;Alvaro Pascual-Leone;Alvaro Pascual-Leone

  • Characterizing and Modulating Brain Circuitry through Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Combined with Electroencephalography

    Faranak Farzan;Marine Vernet;Mouhsin M. D. Shafi;Alexander Rotenberg

  • The probability of seizures during EEG monitoring in critically ill adults

    M. Brandon Westover;Mouhsin M. Shafi;Mouhsin M. Shafi;Matt T. Bianchi;Lidia M.V.R. Moura

  • Continuous electroencephalography predicts delayed cerebral ischemia after subarachnoid hemorrhage: A prospective study of diagnostic accuracy

    Eric S. Rosenthal;Siddharth Biswal;Sahar F. Zafar;Kathryn L. O'Connor

  • Individualized perturbation of the human connectome reveals reproducible biomarkers of network dynamics relevant to cognition

    Recep A. Ozdemir;Ehsan Tadayon;Pierre Boucher;Davide Momi

  • Impact of multisession 40Hz tACS on hippocampal perfusion in patients with Alzheimer’s disease

    Unknown

  • Sensitivity of quantitative EEG for seizure identification in the intensive care unit

    Hiba A. Haider;Rosana Esteller;Cecil D. Hahn;M. Brandon Westover

  • EEG spectral power abnormalities and their relationship with cognitive dysfunction in patients with Alzheimer's disease and type 2 diabetes.

    Christopher S.Y. Benwell;Christopher S.Y. Benwell;Paula Davila-Pérez;Peter J. Fried;Richard N. Jones

  • Absence of early epileptiform abnormalities predicts lack of seizures on continuous EEG

    Mouhsin M. Shafi;M. Brandon Westover;Andrew J. Cole;Ronan D. Kilbride

  • EEG Microstate Correlates of Fluid Intelligence and Response to Cognitive Training

    Emiliano Santarnecchi;Emiliano Santarnecchi;Arjun R. Khanna;Christian S. Musaeus;Christian S. Musaeus;Christopher S. Y. Benwell;Christopher S. Y. Benwell

  • Exploring the efficacy of a 5-day course of transcranial direct current stimulation (TDCS) on depression and memory function in patients with well-controlled temporal lobe epilepsy

    Anli Liu;Anli Liu;Andrew Bryant;Ashlie Jefferson;Daniel Friedman

  • Spectrogram screening of adult EEGs is sensitive and efficient

    Lidia M.V.R. Moura;Mouhsin M. Shafi;Marcus Ng;Sandipan Pati

  • Physiological consequences of abnormal connectivity in a developmental epilepsy

    Mouhsin M. Shafi;Marine Vernet;Debby Klooster;Catherine J. Chu

  • Network-level macroscale structural connectivity predicts propagation of transcranial magnetic stimulation.

    Davide Momi;Recep A. Ozdemir;Ehsan Tadayon;Pierre Boucher

  • Reproducibility of cortical response modulation induced by intermittent and continuous theta-burst stimulation of the human motor cortex.

    Recep A. Ozdemir;Pierre Boucher;Peter J. Fried;Davide Momi

  • Modulation of EEG Functional Connectivity Networks in Subjects Undergoing Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation

    Mouhsin M. Shafi;Mouhsin M. Shafi;M. Brandon Westover;M. Brandon Westover;Lindsay Oberman;Sydney S. Cash

  • Safety and recommendations for TMS use in healthy subjects and patient populations, with updates on training, ethical and regulatory issues: Expert Guidelines

    S Rossi;A Antal;S Bestmann;M Bikson

  • Real-time segmentation of burst suppression patterns in critical care EEG monitoring.

    M. Brandon Westover;Mouhsin M. Shafi;ShiNung Ching;Jessica J. Chemali;Jessica J. Chemali

Frequent Co-Authors

Alvaro Pascual-Leone
Alvaro Pascual-Leone Harvard University
Emiliano Santarnecchi
Emiliano Santarnecchi Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
M. Brandon Westover
M. Brandon Westover Harvard University
Sydney S. Cash
Sydney S. Cash Harvard University
Daniel Z. Press
Daniel Z. Press Harvard Medical School
Michael D. Fox
Michael D. Fox Harvard University
Sharon K. Inouye
Sharon K. Inouye Harvard Medical School
Andrew J. Cole
Andrew J. Cole Harvard University
Edward R. Marcantonio
Edward R. Marcantonio Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
Richard N. Jones
Richard N. Jones Brown University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in neuroscience opens doors to a range of related fields, especially in psychology, therapy, and social work. Many students interested in brain sciences also explore online programs that offer flexibility and practical career training.

For those focused on helping families and individuals, marriage and family masters programs provide key clinical skills. Alternatively, a masters in psychology can deepen understanding of behavior and mental health, with applications in both research and counseling.

Not ready for graduate school? A psychology degree online offers a solid foundation for entry-level roles or future advanced study. For socially minded individuals, msw programs with high acceptance rate can lead to impactful positions in social work and community support.

Exploring these related degrees can broaden your career opportunities while utilizing your neuroscience background in diverse and rewarding ways.

Best Scientists Citing Mouhsin M. Shafi

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles