What is he best known for?
The fields of study he is best known for:
- Law
- Artificial intelligence
- Epistemology
Giovanni Sartor mainly investigates Argumentation theory, Epistemology, Artificial intelligence, Argument and Philosophy of law.
Giovanni Sartor has included themes like Teleological reasoning, Dialectic and Expected utility hypothesis in his Argumentation theory study.
Giovanni Sartor has researched Epistemology in several fields, including Element and Case-based reasoning.
His research in the fields of Deductive reasoning, Non-monotonic logic and Defeasible estate overlaps with other disciplines such as Proof theory.
His Argument study integrates concerns from other disciplines, such as Rule of inference, Defeasible reasoning and Set.
His Philosophy of law research includes elements of Obligation, Legal aspects of computing, Legal realism, Law and economics and Sources of law.
His most cited work include:
- Argument-based extended logic programming with defeasible priorities (563 citations)
- A dialectical model of assessing conflicting arguments in legal reasoning (293 citations)
- A model of legal reasoning with cases incorporating theories and values (199 citations)
What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?
His main research concerns Epistemology, Argumentation theory, Law, Law and economics and Artificial intelligence.
His Epistemology and Argument, Normative, Defeasible reasoning, Legal reasoning and Deontic logic investigations all form part of his Epistemology research activities.
His Argumentation theory study combines topics from a wide range of disciplines, such as Defeasible estate, Dialectic, Interpretation and Philosophy of law.
His Law and economics study incorporates themes from Context and Proportionality.
Giovanni Sartor is interested in Defeasible logic, which is a branch of Artificial intelligence.
His studies deal with areas such as Probabilistic logic and Probabilistic argumentation as well as Argumentation framework.
He most often published in these fields:
- Epistemology (26.12%)
- Argumentation theory (27.25%)
- Law (17.98%)
What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2016-2021)?
- Argumentation theory (27.25%)
- Epistemology (26.12%)
- Law (17.98%)
In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:
His primary scientific interests are in Argumentation theory, Epistemology, Law, Philosophy of law and Dialectic.
His study in Argumentation theory is interdisciplinary in nature, drawing from both Defeasible estate, Persuasion, Defeasible reasoning and Legal reasoning.
His study in Epistemology focuses on Argument in particular.
His work on Artificial intelligence expands to the thematically related Argument.
His Law research focuses on Artificial intelligence and law and how it relates to Knowledge management and Informal logic.
In his work, Data science is strongly intertwined with Legal aspects of computing, which is a subfield of Philosophy of law.
Between 2016 and 2021, his most popular works were:
- On legal contracts, imperative and declarative smart contracts, and blockchain systems (64 citations)
- The Ethical Knob: ethically-customisable automated vehicles and the law (31 citations)
- CLAUDETTE: an automated detector of potentially unfair clauses in online terms of service (24 citations)
In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:
- Law
- Artificial intelligence
- Epistemology
Giovanni Sartor spends much of his time researching Argumentation theory, Philosophy of law, Defeasible estate, Legal aspects of computing and Epistemology.
His Argumentation theory study also includes
- Legal reasoning which connect with Defeasible argumentation and Non-monotonic logic,
- Defeasible reasoning which intersects with area such as Trace.
His Philosophy of law research incorporates elements of Distributed ledger, Blockchain, Imperative programming and Engineering management.
As part of his studies on Defeasible estate, Giovanni Sartor often connects relevant areas like Dialectic.
In most of his Epistemology studies, his work intersects topics such as Interpretation.
His study looks at the relationship between Argumentation framework and fields such as Agency, as well as how they intersect with chemical problems.
This overview was generated by a machine learning system which analysed the scientist’s
body of work. If you have any feedback, you can
contact us
here.
