World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Christopher J.H. Porter

Christopher J.H. Porter

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
91
Citations
30951
World Ranking
2315
National Ranking
53

Christopher J.H. Porter publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Christopher J.H. Porter sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 414 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 849 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 950 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 841 scientists 207–216 publications: 735 scientists 217–226 publications: 709 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 418 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 197 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 60 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 293 publications — 77th percentile

77% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

Christopher J.H. Porter D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Christopher J.H. Porter sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 317 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 900 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,026 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,150 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,236 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,163 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,131 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,032 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 715 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 72 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 91 D-Index — 88th percentile

88% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Overview

Christopher J.H. Porter is a researcher affiliated with Monash University in Australia. Their academic work spans several interrelated fields including Medicine and Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology. Within these, key subfields consist of Oncology, Molecular Biology, Pharmaceutical Science, Immunology, and Surgery.

Porter's research primarily covers topics related to drug delivery and the lymphatic system. Major areas of focus include the Lymphatic System and Diseases, Drug Solubility and Delivery Systems, Drug Transport and Resistance Mechanisms, RNA Interference and Gene Delivery, Advanced Drug Delivery Systems, Advanced Biosensing and Bioanalysis Techniques, and Nanoparticle-Based Drug Delivery.

Frequent coauthors who have collaborated extensively with Porter include:

  • Natalie L. Trevaskis (21 collaborations)
  • Enyuan Cao (12 collaborations)
  • Sifei Han (11 collaborations)
  • Orlagh M. Feeney (11 collaborations)
  • Gracia Gracia (10 collaborations)

Porter has published numerous papers in well-regarded scientific journals. Venues with multiple publications by Porter include Molecular Pharmaceutics, Pharmaceutical Research, Journal of Controlled Release, European Journal of Pharmaceutics and Biopharmaceutics, and The Journal of Urology.

Some recent publications by Porter are:

  • "Current challenges and future perspectives in oral absorption research: An opinion of the UNGAP network" (2021), Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews
  • "Mesenteric lymphatic dysfunction promotes insulin resistance and represents a potential treatment target in obesity" (2021), Nature Metabolism
  • "Lipophilic Conjugates of Drugs: A Tool to Improve Drug Pharmacokinetic and Therapeutic Profiles" (2021), Pharmaceutical Research
  • "Beyond the Endosomal Bottleneck: Understanding the Efficiency of mRNA/LNP Delivery" (2024), Advanced Functional Materials
  • "Smart design approaches for orally administered lipophilic prodrugs to promote lymphatic transport" (2021), Journal of Controlled Release

Best Publications

  • Lipids and lipid-based formulations: optimizing the oral delivery of lipophilic drugs

    Christopher John Porter;Natalie Trevaskis;William Neil Charman

  • Strategies to Address Low Drug Solubility in Discovery and Development

    Hywel David Williams;Natalie Trevaskis;Susan Ann Charman;Ravi Shanker

  • Formulation of lipid-based delivery systems for oral administration: materials, methods and strategies.

    Colin William Pouton;Christopher John Porter

  • Enhancing intestinal drug solubilisation using lipid-based delivery systems.

    Christopher John Porter;Colin William Pouton;Jean Cuine;William Neil Charman

  • Physicochemical and Physiological Mechanisms for the Effects of Food on Drug Absorption: The Role of Lipids and pH

    William N. Charman;Christopher J.H. Porter;Sabena Mithani;Jennifer B. Dressman

  • Minimum information reporting in bio-nano experimental literature.

    Matthew Faria;Mattias Björnmalm;Kristofer J. Thurecht;Stephen J. Kent

  • From sewer to saviour - targeting the lymphatic system to promote drug exposure and activity.

    Natalie Trevaskis;Lisa Michelle Kaminskas;Christopher John Porter;Christopher John Porter

  • Formulation design and bioavailability assessment of lipidic self-emulsifying formulations of halofantrine

    Shui-Mei Khoo;Andrew J Humberstone;Christopher J.H Porter;Glenn A Edwards

  • In vitro assessment of oral lipid based formulations.

    Christopher J.H Porter;William N Charman

  • Lipid-based delivery systems and intestinal lymphatic drug transport : A mechanistic update

    Natalie Trevaskis;William Neil Charman;Christopher John Porter

  • Intestinal lymphatic drug transport: an update.

    Christopher J.H. Porter;William N. Charman

  • 50 years of oral lipid-based formulations: Provenance, progress and future perspectives ☆

    Orlagh M. Feeney;Matthew F. Crum;Claire L. McEvoy;Natalie L. Trevaskis

  • Effect of Short‐, Medium‐, and Long‐Chain Fatty Acid‐Based Vehicles on the Absolute Oral Bioavailability and Intestinal Lymphatic Transport of Halofantrine and Assessment of Mass Balance in Lymph‐Cannulated and Non‐cannulated Rats

    Suzanne M. Caliph;William N. Charman;Christopher J.H. Porter

  • Using polymeric precipitation inhibitors to improve the absorption of poorly water-soluble drugs: A mechanistic basis for utility.

    Dallas Warren;Hassan Benameur;Christopher John Porter;Colin William Pouton

  • Non-phagocytic uptake of intravenously injected microspheres in rat spleen: Influence of particle size and hydrophilic coating

    Seyed Moghimi;C. J.H. Porter;I. S. Muir;L. Illum

  • Toward the establishment of standardized in vitro tests for lipid‐based formulations, part 1: Method parameterization and comparison of in vitro digestion profiles across a range of representative formulations

    Hywel David Williams;Philip J Sassene;Karen Kleberg;Jean-Claude Bakala-N'Goma

  • Evaluation of the in-vitro digestion profiles of long and medium chain glycerides and the phase behaviour of their lipolytic products.

    Leab Sek;Christopher J H Porter;Ann Marie Kaukonen;William N Charman

  • The mechanisms of pharmacokinetic food-drug interactions - A perspective from the UNGAP group.

    Mirko Koziolek;Stefano Alcaro;Patrick Augustijns;Abdul W. Basit

  • Lymphatic Transport of Proteins After Subcutaneous Administration

    Christopher J.H. Porter;Susan A. Charman

  • Susceptibility to lipase-mediated digestion reduces the oral bioavailability of danazol after administration as a medium-chain lipid-based microemulsion formulation.

    Christopher John H Porter;Ann Marie Kaukonen;Ann Marie Kaukonen;Benjamin James Boyd;Glenn A Edwards

Frequent Co-Authors

Colin W. Pouton
Colin W. Pouton Monash University
Benjamin James Boyd
Benjamin James Boyd Monash University
Susan A. Charman
Susan A. Charman Monash University
Anette Müllertz
Anette Müllertz University of Copenhagen
Tony Velkov
Tony Velkov University of Melbourne
Nigel W. Bunnett
Nigel W. Bunnett New York University
Thomas P. Davis
Thomas P. Davis University of Queensland
Peter J. Scammells
Peter J. Scammells Monash University
John A. Windsor
John A. Windsor University of Auckland

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a career in Biology or Biochemistry opens doors to a wide range of advanced degrees and professional pathways, many of which are now available online. Students can expand their expertise with specialized programs that align with healthcare, pharmaceuticals, exercise science, and more.

For those interested in healthcare leadership, a doctorate in healthcare management enables graduates to move into executive roles, overseeing hospital systems or policy organizations. Alternatively, if pharmaceutical research or clinical work appeals to you, pharmd online programs provide essential training to become a licensed pharmacist.

If your interests lean toward sports science or human movement, consider exploring degree options in these areas. An online exercise science degree blends biology with fitness, preparing graduates to work in rehabilitation, athletic training, or wellness coaching. Similarly, kinesiology online programs offer in-depth knowledge of physical health and movement, creating pathways into both research and applied health professions.

Each of these online degrees can complement a foundation in Biology or Biochemistry, broadening your career opportunities in today’s evolving scientific landscape.

Best Scientists Citing Christopher J.H. Porter

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles