World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Chemistry 73 5116 4647 39 38 285 15280

Anette Müllertz publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Anette Müllertz between 1990 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Anette Müllertz published across 36 years, from 1990 to 2025, averaging 9.9 papers a year. Output peaked at 32 publications in 2016. 21 of the 356 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1990 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 32. Peak 32 publications in 2016. 1990: 2 publications 1991: 0 publications 1992: 1 publication 1993: 0 publications 1994: 3 publications 1995: 3 publications 1996: 3 publications 1997: 5 publications 1998: 2 publications 1999: 0 publications 2000: 2 publications 2001: 5 publications 2002: 1 publication 2003: 1 publication 2004: 2 publications 2005: 5 publications 2006: 5 publications 2007: 10 publications 2008: 8 publications 2009: 4 publications 2010: 12 publications 2011: 11 publications 2012: 20 publications 2013: 25 publications 2014: 30 publications 2015: 14 publications 2016: 32 publications 2017: 24 publications 2018: 15 publications 2019: 19 publications 2020: 21 publications 2021: 24 publications 2022: 14 publications 2023: 12 publications 2024: 9 publications 2025: 12 publications
1990 2025

356 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Anette Müllertz: publications per year, 1990 to 2025
Year Publications
1990 2
1991 0
1992 1
1993 0
1994 3
1995 3
1996 3
1997 5
1998 2
1999 0
2000 2
2001 5
2002 1
2003 1
2004 2
2005 5
2006 5
2007 10
2008 8
2009 4
2010 12
2011 11
2012 20
2013 25
2014 30
2015 14
2016 32
2017 24
2018 15
2019 19
2020 21
2021 24
2022 14
2023 12
2024 9
2025 12
Total 356
Download as CSV

Anette Müllertz publication distribution in Chemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Chemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Anette Müllertz sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000 1,250
Bar chart with 63 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 61–80 to 1,295+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,350. Most scientists, 1,350, have 161–180 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,295 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 281–300 publications, is where this scientist sits. 61–80 publications: 66 scientists 81–100 publications: 302 scientists 101–120 publications: 623 scientists 121–140 publications: 918 scientists 141–160 publications: 1,218 scientists 161–180 publications: 1,350 scientists 181–200 publications: 1,344 scientists 201–220 publications: 1,281 scientists 221–240 publications: 1,216 scientists 241–260 publications: 1,100 scientists 261–280 publications: 979 scientists 281–300 publications: 939 scientists 301–320 publications: 764 scientists 321–340 publications: 643 scientists 341–360 publications: 628 scientists 361–380 publications: 522 scientists 381–400 publications: 459 scientists 401–420 publications: 397 scientists 421–440 publications: 327 scientists 441–460 publications: 270 scientists 461–480 publications: 265 scientists 481–500 publications: 252 scientists 501–520 publications: 201 scientists 521–540 publications: 185 scientists 541–560 publications: 148 scientists 561–580 publications: 148 scientists 581–600 publications: 132 scientists 601–620 publications: 114 scientists 621–640 publications: 104 scientists 641–660 publications: 91 scientists 661–680 publications: 92 scientists 681–700 publications: 73 scientists 701–720 publications: 57 scientists 721–740 publications: 54 scientists 741–760 publications: 67 scientists 761–780 publications: 45 scientists 781–800 publications: 46 scientists 801–820 publications: 39 scientists 821–840 publications: 32 scientists 841–860 publications: 36 scientists 861–880 publications: 29 scientists 881–900 publications: 26 scientists 901–920 publications: 24 scientists 921–940 publications: 14 scientists 941–960 publications: 23 scientists 961–980 publications: 28 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 15 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 29 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 12 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 19 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 12 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 6 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 8 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 12 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 5 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 6 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 14 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 7 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 2 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 6 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 4 scientists 1,281–1,294 publications: 6 scientists 1,295+ publications: 100 scientists
61–80 publications 1,295+

This scientist: 285 publications — 59th percentile

59% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,295 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Chemistry scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 17,934 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
61–80 66
81–100 302
101–120 623
121–140 918
141–160 1,218
161–180 1,350
181–200 1,344
201–220 1,281
221–240 1,216
241–260 1,100
261–280 979
281–300 939 285
301–320 764
321–340 643
341–360 628
361–380 522
381–400 459
401–420 397
421–440 327
441–460 270
461–480 265
481–500 252
501–520 201
521–540 185
541–560 148
561–580 148
581–600 132
601–620 114
621–640 104
641–660 91
661–680 92
681–700 73
701–720 57
721–740 54
741–760 67
761–780 45
781–800 46
801–820 39
821–840 32
841–860 36
861–880 29
881–900 26
901–920 24
921–940 14
941–960 23
961–980 28
981–1,000 15
1,001–1,020 29
1,021–1,040 12
1,041–1,060 19
1,061–1,080 12
1,081–1,100 6
1,101–1,120 8
1,121–1,140 12
1,141–1,160 5
1,161–1,180 6
1,181–1,200 14
1,201–1,220 7
1,221–1,240 2
1,241–1,260 6
1,261–1,280 4
1,281–1,294 6
1,295+ 100
Download as CSV

Anette Müllertz D-index placement in Chemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Chemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Anette Müllertz sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 61 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 40–41 to 159+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,051. Most scientists, 1,051, have 56–57 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 159 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 72–73 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 40–41 D-Index: 289 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 612 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 808 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 776 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 835 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 861 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 872 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 933 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,051 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 930 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 882 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 834 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 731 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 775 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 683 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 646 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 561 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 501 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 437 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 388 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 354 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 292 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 275 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 254 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 235 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 185 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 192 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 155 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 163 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 125 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 105 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 105 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 112 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 88 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 68 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 69 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 65 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 79 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 61 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 44 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 37 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 40 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 33 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 26 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 34 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 35 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 25 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 27 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 17 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 16 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 20 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 20 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 15 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 9 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 16 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 11 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 9 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 3 scientists 158 D-Index: 3 scientists 159+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40–41 D-Index 159+

This scientist: 73 D-Index — 73rd percentile

73% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 159 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Chemistry scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 17,934 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
40–41 289
42–43 612
44–45 808
46–47 776
48–49 835
50–51 861
52–53 872
54–55 933
56–57 1,051
58–59 930
60–61 882
62–63 834
64–65 731
66–67 775
68–69 683
70–71 646
72–73 561 73
74–75 501
76–77 437
78–79 388
80–81 354
82–83 292
84–85 275
86–87 254
88–89 235
90–91 185
92–93 192
94–95 155
96–97 163
98–99 125
100–101 105
102–103 105
104–105 112
106–107 88
108–109 68
110–111 69
112–113 65
114–115 79
116–117 61
118–119 44
120–121 37
122–123 40
124–125 33
126–127 26
128–129 34
130–131 35
132–133 25
134–135 27
136–137 17
138–139 16
140–141 20
142–143 20
144–145 15
146–147 9
148–149 9
150–151 16
152–153 11
154–155 9
156–157 3
158 3
159+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Anette Müllertz is affiliated with the University of Copenhagen in Denmark. Their research primarily spans the field of Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics, with a significant focus on Pharmaceutical Science. Their work also intersects with Molecular Biology, Food Science, Materials Chemistry, and Biomedical Engineering.

The main topics addressed in Müllertz's research include:

  • Drug Solubility and Delivery Systems
  • Advanced Drug Delivery Systems
  • Crystallization and Solubility Studies
  • Analytical Chemistry and Chromatography
  • Gastrointestinal motility and disorders
  • Analytical Methods in Pharmaceuticals
  • Proteins in Food Systems

Their scholarly output includes numerous publications in recurrent journals such as:

  • International Journal of Pharmaceutics
  • European Journal of Pharmaceutics and Biopharmaceutics
  • Pharmaceutics
  • European Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences
  • Journal of Drug Delivery Science and Technology

Frequent collaborators in their research include Thomas Rades, Ragna Berthelsen, Patrick Augustijns, Siriporn Okonogi, and Anja Boisen, reflecting collaborative efforts across various projects in the pharmaceutical sciences.

Some of the recent papers featuring Müllertz's work are:

  • Impact of gastrointestinal physiology on drug absorption in special populations--An UNGAP review, 2020, European Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences
  • Current challenges and future perspectives in oral absorption research: An opinion of the UNGAP network, 2021, Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews
  • Fasted and fed state human duodenal fluids: Characterization, drug solubility, and comparison to simulated fluids and with human bioavailability, 2021, European Journal of Pharmaceutics and Biopharmaceutics
  • INFOGEST inter-laboratory recommendations for assaying gastric and pancreatic lipases activities prior to in vitro digestion studies, 2021, Journal of Functional Foods
  • In Vitro Evaluation of Self-Nano-Emulsifying Drug Delivery Systems (SNEDDS) Containing Room Temperature Ionic Liquids (RTILs) for the Oral Delivery of Amphotericin B, 2020, Pharmaceutics

Best Publications

  • In vitro models for the prediction of in vivo performance of oral dosage forms

    Edmund S. Kostewicz;Bertil Abrahamsson;Marcus Brewster;Joachim Brouwers

  • A dynamic in vitro lipolysis model: I. Controlling the rate of lipolysis by continuous addition of calcium

    Niels Hønberg Zangenberg;Anette Müllertz;Henning Gjelstrup Kristensen;Lars Hovgaard

  • Lipid-based formulations for oral administration of poorly water-soluble drugs.

    Huiling Mu;René Holm;René Holm;Anette Müllertz

  • Successful oral delivery of poorly water-soluble drugs both depends on the intraluminal behavior of drugs and of appropriate advanced drug delivery systems

    Ben J. Boyd;Christel A.S. Bergström;Zahari Vinarov;Martin Kuentz

  • Toward the establishment of standardized in vitro tests for lipid‐based formulations, part 1: Method parameterization and comparison of in vitro digestion profiles across a range of representative formulations

    Hywel David Williams;Philip J Sassene;Karen Kleberg;Jean-Claude Bakala-N'Goma

  • New perspectives on lipid and surfactant based drug delivery systems for oral delivery of poorly soluble drugs.

    Anette Müllertz;Anayo Ogbonna;Shan Ren;Thomas Rades

  • Comparison of drug transporter gene expression and functionality in Caco-2 cells from 10 different laboratories.

    Rose Hayeshi;Constanze Hilgendorf;Per Artursson;Patrick Augustijns

  • A dynamic in vitro lipolysis model. II: Evaluation of the model.

    Niels Hønberg Zangenberg;Anette Müllertz;Henning Gjelstrup Kristensen;Lars Hovgaard

  • Bile salts and their importance for drug absorption.

    René Holm;Anette Müllertz;Huiling Mu

  • In vitro and in vivo performance of novel supersaturated self-nanoemulsifying drug delivery systems (super-SNEDDS).

    N. Thomas;R. Holm;A. Müllertz;T. Rades;T. Rades

  • Solubilisation of poorly water-soluble drugs during in vitro lipolysis of medium- and long-chain triacylglycerols.

    Janne Ørskov Christensen;Kirsten Schultz;Birgitte Mollgaard;Henning Gjelstrup Kristensen

  • Examination of oral absorption and lymphatic transport of halofantrine in a triple-cannulated canine model after administration in self-microemulsifying drug delivery systems (SMEDDS) containing structured triglycerides.

    Rene Holm;Christopher John H Porter;Glenn A Edwards;Anette Mullertz

  • In vivo in vitro correlations for a poorly soluble drug, danazol, using the flow-through dissolution method with biorelevant dissolution media

    Vibeke Hougaard Sunesen;Betty Lomstein Pedersen;Henning Gjelstrup Kristensen;Anette Müllertz

  • Bioavailability of probucol from lipid and surfactant based formulations in minipigs: influence of droplet size and dietary state.

    Flemming Seier Nielsen;Kamilla Buchberg Petersen;Anette Müllertz

  • Bioavailability of seocalcitol II: development and characterisation of self-microemulsifying drug delivery systems (SMEDDS) for oral administration containing medium and long chain triglycerides.

    Mette Grove;Anette Müllertz;Jeanet Løgsted Nielsen;Gitte Pommergaard Pedersen

  • Morphological observations on a lipid-based drug delivery system during in vitro digestion.

    Dimitrios G. Fatouros;Bjorn Bergenstahl;Anette Mullertz

  • Toward the Establishment of Standardized in Vitro Tests for Lipid-Based Formulations. 2. The Effect of Bile Salt Concentration and Drug Loading on the Performance of Type I, II, IIIA, IIIB, and IV Formulations during in Vitro Digestion

    Hywel David Williams;Mette Uhre Anby;Philip J Sassene;Karen Kleberg

  • In vitro lipolysis models as a tool for the characterization of oral lipid and surfactant based drug delivery systems.

    Anne T. Larsen;Philip Sassene;Anette Müllertz

  • A comparison of the solubility of danazol in human and simulated gastrointestinal fluids.

    Betty Lomstein Pedersen;Anette Müllertz;Helle Brøndsted;Henning Gjelstrup Kristensen

  • In vitro digestion testing of lipid-based delivery systems: calcium ions combine with fatty acids liberated from triglyceride rich lipid solutions to form soaps and reduce the solubilization capacity of colloidal digestion products

    Ravi Devraj;Hywel David Williams;Dallas Warren;Anette Mullertz

  • Characterising the behaviour of poorly water soluble drugs in the intestine: application of biorelevant media for solubility, dissolution and transport studies.

    Karen Kleberg;Jette Jacobsen;Anette Müllertz

Frequent Co-Authors

Thomas Rades
Thomas Rades University of Copenhagen
Anja Boisen
Anja Boisen Technical University of Denmark
Jukka Rantanen
Jukka Rantanen University of Copenhagen
Christopher J.H. Porter
Christopher J.H. Porter Monash University
Colin W. Pouton
Colin W. Pouton Monash University
Frédéric Carrière
Frédéric Carrière Aix-Marseille University
Hans Lennernäs
Hans Lennernäs Uppsala University
Björn Bergenståhl
Björn Bergenståhl Lund University
Lars Wågberg
Lars Wågberg Royal Institute of Technology

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Chemistry in the USA opens doors to diverse career paths that often require specialized education. For example, individuals interested in legal aspects related to chemistry can explore a paralegal degree, which provides relevant knowledge about regulations and intellectual property in chemical industries.

Pharmaceutical careers are also a popular choice among chemistry graduates. Those who wish to enter sales within this field might focus on becoming a drug rep, learning about the drug rep salary and typical career trajectories. This pathway combines scientific understanding with strong communication skills.

For those aiming at more clinical roles, understanding the steps to become a pharmacist is essential. Pharmacists play a key role in healthcare by applying chemistry knowledge to drug formulation and patient care.

Another specialized option involves working in forensic or medical settings as an autopsy technician. Insights about the autopsy tech salary and job outlook can help guide decisions for chemistry graduates interested in this career.

Best Scientists Citing Anette Müllertz

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles