World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
56
Citations
9355
World Ranking
3718
National Ranking
1419

F. J. Schmidlin publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where F. J. Schmidlin sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 178 publications — 55th percentile

55% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

F. J. Schmidlin D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where F. J. Schmidlin sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 56 D-Index — 63rd percentile

63% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Overview

F. J. Schmidlin is affiliated with the National Aeronautics and Space Administration in the United States. Their research spans multiple scientific disciplines, with a focus on Earth and Planetary Sciences, Chemistry, and Chemical Engineering.

Their scholarly work includes contributions to subfields such as Atmospheric Science, Spectroscopy, and Bioengineering. The research topics they have addressed cover areas including Atmospheric Ozone and Climate, Spectroscopy and Laser Applications, and Analytical Chemistry and Sensors.

Schmidlin's recent publications include the paper titled An automated method for preparing and calibrating electrochemical concentration cell (ECC) ozonesondes, published in 2020 in the journal Atmospheric Measurement Techniques. This paper represents their work on atmospheric measurement methodologies and instrumentation.

  • Recent paper: An automated method for preparing and calibrating electrochemical concentration cell (ECC) ozonesondes, 2020, Atmospheric Measurement Techniques

Their frequent co-author is Bruno Hoegger, indicating collaboration in their research endeavors.

  • Frequent co-author: Bruno Hoegger

The publication venues in which Schmidlin has contributed primarily include Atmospheric Measurement Techniques, reflecting a focus on precise measurement methods in atmospheric sciences.

  • Frequent publication venue: Atmospheric Measurement Techniques

Best Publications

  • Empirical wind model for the upper, middle and lower atmosphere

    A.E. Hedin;E.L. Fleming;A.H. Manson;F.J. Schmidlin

  • Assessment of the performance of ECC‐ozonesondes under quasi‐flight conditions in the environmental simulation chamber: Insights from the Juelich Ozone Sonde Intercomparison Experiment (JOSIE)

    Herman G.J. Smit;Wolfgang Straeter;Bryan J. Johnson;Samuel J. Oltmans

  • Southern Hemisphere Additional Ozonesondes (SHADOZ) 1998–2000 tropical ozone climatology 1. Comparison with Total Ozone Mapping Spectrometer (TOMS) and ground-based measurements

    Anne M. Thompson;Jacquelyn C. Witte;Richard D. McPeters;Samuel J. Oltmans

  • Long-term changes in tropospheric ozone

    S.J. Oltmans;A.S. Lefohn;J.M. Harris;I. Galbally

  • Absolute accuracy of water vapor measurements from six operational radiosonde types launched during AWEX-G and implications for AIRS validation

    Larry M. Miloshevich;Holger Vömel;David N. Whiteman;Barry M. Lesht

  • Southern Hemisphere Additional Ozonesondes (SHADOZ) 1998–2000 tropical ozone climatology 2. Tropospheric variability and the zonal wave-one

    Anne M. Thompson;Jacquelyn C. Witte;Samuel J. Oltmans;Francis J. Schmidlin

  • SABER observations of mesospheric temperatures and comparisons with falling sphere measurements taken during the 2002 summer MaCWAVE campaign

    Christopher J. Mertens;Francis J. Schmidlin;Richard A. Goldberg;Ellis E. Remsberg

  • Recent tropospheric ozone changes – A pattern dominated by slow or no growth

    S.J. Oltmans;S.J. Oltmans;A.S. Lefohn;D. Shadwick;J.M. Harris

  • Validation of Tropospheric Emission Spectrometer (TES) nadir ozone profiles using ozonesonde measurements

    Ray Nassar;Jennifer A. Logan;Helen M. Worden;Inna A. Megretskaia

  • Trends of ozone in the troposphere

    S. J. Oltmans;A. S. Lefohn;H. E. Scheel;J. M. Harris

  • Atmospheric comparison of electrochemical cell ozonesondes from different manufacturers, and with different cathode solution strengths: The Balloon Experiment on Standards for Ozonesondes

    Terry Deshler;Jennifer L. Mercer;Herman G. J. Smit;Rene Stubi

  • Southern Hemisphere Additional Ozonesondes (SHADOZ) 1998–2004 tropical ozone climatology: 3. Instrumentation, station‐to‐station variability, and evaluation with simulated flight profiles

    Anne M. Thompson;Jacquelyn C. Witte;Herman G. J. Smit;Samuel J. Oltmans

  • A Comparison of Water Vapor Measurements Made by Raman Lidar and Radiosondes

    R. A. Ferrare;S. H. Melfi;D. N. Whiteman;K. D. Evans

  • Intercontinental chemical transport experiment ozonesonde network study (IONS) 2004 : 1. Summertime upper troposphere/lower stratosphere ozone over northeastern North America.

    Anne M. Thompson;Jesse B. Stone;Jacquelyn C. Witte;Sonya K. Miller

  • AIRS/AMSU/HSB validation

    E. Fetzer;L.M. McMillin;D. Tobin;H.H. Aumann

  • Large upper tropospheric ozone enhancements above midlatitude North America during summer: In situ evidence from the IONS and MOZAIC ozone measurement network

    Owen R. Cooper;Owen R. Cooper;A. Stohl;M. Trainer;A. M. Thompson

  • Validation of Aura Microwave Limb Sounder Ozone by ozonesonde and lidar measurements

    Y. B. Jiang;L. Froidevaux;A. Lambert;N. J. Livesey

  • Validation of mesosphere and lower thermosphere winds from the high resolution Doppler imager on UARS

    M. D. Burrage;W. R. Skinner;D. A. Gell;P. B. Hays

  • First reprocessing of Southern Hemisphere ADditional OZonesondes (SHADOZ) ozone profiles (1998-2016): 2. Comparisons with satellites and ground-based instruments

    Anne M. Thompson;Jacquelyn C. Witte;Chance Sterling;Chance Sterling;Allen Jordan;Allen Jordan

  • Intercontinental chemical transport experiment ozonesonde network study (IONS) 2004. 2. Tropospheric ozone budgets and variability over northeastern North America

    Anne M. Thompson;Jesse B. Stone;Jacquelyn C. Witte;Sonya K. Miller

Frequent Co-Authors

David N. Whiteman
David N. Whiteman Goddard Space Flight Center
Werner Singer
Werner Singer University of Rostock
M. J. Newchurch
M. J. Newchurch University of Alabama in Huntsville
Franz-Josef Lübken
Franz-Josef Lübken University of Rostock
Holger Vömel
Holger Vömel National Center for Atmospheric Research
David W. Tarasick
David W. Tarasick Environment and Climate Change Canada
Anne M. Thompson
Anne M. Thompson Goddard Space Flight Center
Samuel J. Oltmans
Samuel J. Oltmans National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
Edward V. Browell
Edward V. Browell Langley Research Center
Bryan J. Johnson
Bryan J. Johnson National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those passionate about Environmental Sciences, exploring related online degrees can open diverse career opportunities. Many professionals pursue advanced education to deepen their expertise or shift into leadership roles. Programs like an edd without dissertation allow educators and environmental advocates to earn doctoral degrees while avoiding lengthy dissertation requirements, making it more accessible for working adults.

Transitioning from an education specialist degree to a doctorate is simplified through eds to edd programs. These pathways are ideal for environmental educators seeking advanced credentials to enhance their impact in the field.

Those interested in the social aspects of environmental work, such as community advocacy or policy development, might consider affordable options like online dsw programs. These programs blend social work with environmental justice, preparing graduates to address complex societal challenges.

Additionally, a broad foundation can be built through an affordable online general studies degree, which offers flexibility for students to tailor their learning towards environmental priorities. Exploring these pathways supports a sustainable career in environmental sciences with a variety of specialization options.

Best Scientists Citing F. J. Schmidlin

Trending Scientists