World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Peter J. Scammells

Peter J. Scammells

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Chemistry 57 11090 10007 260 248 260 11519

Peter J. Scammells publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Peter J. Scammells between 1986 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Peter J. Scammells published across 41 years, from 1986 to 2026, averaging 7.2 papers a year. Output peaked at 21 publications in 2014. 9 of the 297 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1986 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 21. Peak 21 publications in 2014. 1986: 1 publication 1987: 0 publications 1988: 0 publications 1989: 1 publication 1990: 0 publications 1991: 6 publications 1992: 1 publication 1993: 1 publication 1994: 7 publications 1995: 1 publication 1996: 5 publications 1997: 1 publication 1998: 8 publications 1999: 5 publications 2000: 3 publications 2001: 7 publications 2002: 5 publications 2003: 6 publications 2004: 6 publications 2005: 4 publications 2006: 6 publications 2007: 7 publications 2008: 13 publications 2009: 12 publications 2010: 11 publications 2011: 10 publications 2012: 9 publications 2013: 18 publications 2014: 21 publications 2015: 11 publications 2016: 15 publications 2017: 9 publications 2018: 17 publications 2019: 18 publications 2020: 6 publications 2021: 11 publications 2022: 6 publications 2023: 5 publications 2024: 15 publications 2025: 8 publications 2026: 1 publication
1986 2026

297 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Peter J. Scammells: publications per year, 1986 to 2026
Year Publications
1986 1
1987 0
1988 0
1989 1
1990 0
1991 6
1992 1
1993 1
1994 7
1995 1
1996 5
1997 1
1998 8
1999 5
2000 3
2001 7
2002 5
2003 6
2004 6
2005 4
2006 6
2007 7
2008 13
2009 12
2010 11
2011 10
2012 9
2013 18
2014 21
2015 11
2016 15
2017 9
2018 17
2019 18
2020 6
2021 11
2022 6
2023 5
2024 15
2025 8
2026 1
Total 297
Download as CSV

Peter J. Scammells publication distribution in Chemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Chemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peter J. Scammells sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000 1,250
Bar chart with 63 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 61–80 to 1,295+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,350. Most scientists, 1,350, have 161–180 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,295 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 241–260 publications, is where this scientist sits. 61–80 publications: 66 scientists 81–100 publications: 302 scientists 101–120 publications: 623 scientists 121–140 publications: 918 scientists 141–160 publications: 1,218 scientists 161–180 publications: 1,350 scientists 181–200 publications: 1,344 scientists 201–220 publications: 1,281 scientists 221–240 publications: 1,216 scientists 241–260 publications: 1,100 scientists 261–280 publications: 979 scientists 281–300 publications: 939 scientists 301–320 publications: 764 scientists 321–340 publications: 643 scientists 341–360 publications: 628 scientists 361–380 publications: 522 scientists 381–400 publications: 459 scientists 401–420 publications: 397 scientists 421–440 publications: 327 scientists 441–460 publications: 270 scientists 461–480 publications: 265 scientists 481–500 publications: 252 scientists 501–520 publications: 201 scientists 521–540 publications: 185 scientists 541–560 publications: 148 scientists 561–580 publications: 148 scientists 581–600 publications: 132 scientists 601–620 publications: 114 scientists 621–640 publications: 104 scientists 641–660 publications: 91 scientists 661–680 publications: 92 scientists 681–700 publications: 73 scientists 701–720 publications: 57 scientists 721–740 publications: 54 scientists 741–760 publications: 67 scientists 761–780 publications: 45 scientists 781–800 publications: 46 scientists 801–820 publications: 39 scientists 821–840 publications: 32 scientists 841–860 publications: 36 scientists 861–880 publications: 29 scientists 881–900 publications: 26 scientists 901–920 publications: 24 scientists 921–940 publications: 14 scientists 941–960 publications: 23 scientists 961–980 publications: 28 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 15 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 29 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 12 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 19 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 12 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 6 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 8 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 12 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 5 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 6 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 14 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 7 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 2 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 6 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 4 scientists 1,281–1,294 publications: 6 scientists 1,295+ publications: 100 scientists
61–80 publications 1,295+

This scientist: 260 publications — 53rd percentile

53% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,295 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Chemistry scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 17,934 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
61–80 66
81–100 302
101–120 623
121–140 918
141–160 1,218
161–180 1,350
181–200 1,344
201–220 1,281
221–240 1,216
241–260 1,100 260
261–280 979
281–300 939
301–320 764
321–340 643
341–360 628
361–380 522
381–400 459
401–420 397
421–440 327
441–460 270
461–480 265
481–500 252
501–520 201
521–540 185
541–560 148
561–580 148
581–600 132
601–620 114
621–640 104
641–660 91
661–680 92
681–700 73
701–720 57
721–740 54
741–760 67
761–780 45
781–800 46
801–820 39
821–840 32
841–860 36
861–880 29
881–900 26
901–920 24
921–940 14
941–960 23
961–980 28
981–1,000 15
1,001–1,020 29
1,021–1,040 12
1,041–1,060 19
1,061–1,080 12
1,081–1,100 6
1,101–1,120 8
1,121–1,140 12
1,141–1,160 5
1,161–1,180 6
1,181–1,200 14
1,201–1,220 7
1,221–1,240 2
1,241–1,260 6
1,261–1,280 4
1,281–1,294 6
1,295+ 100
Download as CSV

Peter J. Scammells D-index placement in Chemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Chemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peter J. Scammells sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 61 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 40–41 to 159+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,051. Most scientists, 1,051, have 56–57 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 159 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 56–57 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 40–41 D-Index: 289 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 612 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 808 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 776 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 835 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 861 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 872 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 933 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,051 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 930 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 882 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 834 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 731 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 775 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 683 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 646 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 561 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 501 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 437 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 388 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 354 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 292 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 275 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 254 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 235 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 185 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 192 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 155 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 163 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 125 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 105 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 105 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 112 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 88 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 68 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 69 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 65 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 79 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 61 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 44 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 37 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 40 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 33 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 26 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 34 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 35 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 25 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 27 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 17 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 16 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 20 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 20 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 15 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 9 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 16 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 11 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 9 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 3 scientists 158 D-Index: 3 scientists 159+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40–41 D-Index 159+

This scientist: 57 D-Index — 39th percentile

39% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 159 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Chemistry scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 17,934 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
40–41 289
42–43 612
44–45 808
46–47 776
48–49 835
50–51 861
52–53 872
54–55 933
56–57 1,051 57
58–59 930
60–61 882
62–63 834
64–65 731
66–67 775
68–69 683
70–71 646
72–73 561
74–75 501
76–77 437
78–79 388
80–81 354
82–83 292
84–85 275
86–87 254
88–89 235
90–91 185
92–93 192
94–95 155
96–97 163
98–99 125
100–101 105
102–103 105
104–105 112
106–107 88
108–109 68
110–111 69
112–113 65
114–115 79
116–117 61
118–119 44
120–121 37
122–123 40
124–125 33
126–127 26
128–129 34
130–131 35
132–133 25
134–135 27
136–137 17
138–139 16
140–141 20
142–143 20
144–145 15
146–147 9
148–149 9
150–151 16
152–153 11
154–155 9
156–157 3
158 3
159+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Peter J. Scammells is affiliated with Monash University in Australia and has a research profile primarily rooted in biochemistry, genetics, and molecular biology, with significant contributions to medicine. Their work spans multiple subfields including molecular biology, cellular and molecular neuroscience, public health, environmental and occupational health, oncology, and organic chemistry.

Their research topics cover a range of areas, notably:

  • Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling
  • Pharmacological Receptor Mechanisms and Effects
  • Malaria Research and Control
  • Neuropeptides and Animal Physiology
  • Peptidase Inhibition and Analysis
  • Computational Drug Discovery Methods
  • Adenosine and Purinergic Signaling

Frequent publication venues for the scientist include:

  • Journal of Medicinal Chemistry
  • eLife
  • European Journal of Medicinal Chemistry
  • ChemMedChem
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)

Notable recent papers include:

  • "Positive allosteric mechanisms of adenosine A1 receptor-mediated analgesia," 2021, Nature
  • "Genetic and chemical validation of Plasmodium falciparum aminopeptidase PfA-M17 as a drug target in the hemoglobin digestion pathway," 2022, eLife
  • "Rapid Elaboration of Fragments into Leads by X-ray Crystallographic Screening of Parallel Chemical Libraries (REFiLX)," 2020, Journal of Medicinal Chemistry
  • "API ionic liquids: probing the effect of counterion structure on physical form and lipid solubility," 2020, RSC Advances
  • "Driving antimalarial design through understanding of target mechanism," 2020, Biochemical Society Transactions

Frequent co-authors in their collaborative work are:

  • Arthur Christopoulos
  • Ben Capuano
  • Céline Valant
  • Sheena McGowan
  • Manuela Jörg

Best Publications

  • Biodegradable ionic liquids : Part II. Effect of the anion and toxicology

    M Teresa Garcia;Nicholas Gathergood;Peter John Scammells

  • Biodegradable ionic liquids: Part I. Concept, preliminary targets and evaluation

    Nicholas Gathergood;Nicholas Gathergood;M Teresa Garcia;Peter John Scammells

  • Biodegradable ionic liquids : Part III. The first readily biodegradable ionic liquids

    Nicholas Gathergood;Peter John Scammells;M Teresa Garcia

  • Ionic Liquids: The Neglected Issues

    Peter John Scammells;Janet L Scott;Robert D Singer

  • The role of kinetic context in apparent biased agonism at GPCRs

    Carmen Klein Herenbrink;David A. Sykes;Prashant Donthamsetti;Meritxell Canals

  • Structure of the Adenosine A1 Receptor Reveals the Basis for Subtype Selectivity

    Alisa Glukhova;David M. Thal;Anh T. Nguyen;Elizabeth A. Vecchio

  • Biodegradable pyridinium ionic liquids: design, synthesis and evaluation

    Jitendra Rameshlal Harjani;Robert D Singer;M Teresa Garcia;Peter John Scammells

  • Design and Preparation of Room-Temperature Ionic Liquids Containing Biodegradable Side Chains

    Nicholas Gathergood;Peter J. Scammells

  • A Novel Mechanism of G Protein-coupled Receptor Functional Selectivity: MUSCARINIC PARTIAL AGONIST McN-A-343 AS A BITOPIC ORTHOSTERIC/ALLOSTERIC LIGAND

    Celine Valant;Karen Joan Gregory;Nathan Eric Hall;Peter John Scammells

  • Phosphonium ionic liquids: design, synthesis and evaluation of biodegradability

    Farzad Atefi;M Teresa Garcia;Robert D Singer;Peter John Scammells

  • Transformation of Poorly Water-Soluble Drugs into Lipophilic Ionic Liquids Enhances Oral Drug Exposure from Lipid Based Formulations

    Yasemin Sahbaz;Hywel David Williams;Tri-Hung Nguyen;Jessica Anne Saunders

  • Positive allosteric mechanisms of adenosine A1 receptor-mediated analgesia

    Christopher J. Draper-Joyce;Christopher J. Draper-Joyce;Rebecca Bhola;Jinan Wang;Apurba Bhattarai

  • Further investigation of the biodegradability of imidazolium ionic liquids

    Jitendra Rameshlal Harjani;Jeff Farrell;M Teresa Garcia;Robert D Singer

  • 2-Amino-3-aroyl-4,5 alkylthiophenes: agonist allosteric enhancers at human A1 adenosine receptors

    Joel M. Linden;Ray A. Ollson;Peter J. Scammells

  • Ionic liquids provide unique opportunities for oral drug delivery: structure optimization and in vivo evidence of utility

    Hywel David Williams;Yasemin Sahbaz;Leigh Ford;Tri-Hung Nguyen

  • 2-Amino-3-benzoylthiophene allosteric enhancers of A1 adenosine agonist binding: new 3, 4-, and 5-modifications.

    Henning Lütjens;Andrea Zickgraf;Heidi Figler;Joel Linden

  • Allosteric modulators of the adenosine A1 receptor: synthesis and pharmacological evaluation of 4-substituted 2-amino-3-benzoylthiophenes.

    Luigi Aurelio;Celine Valant;Celine Valant;Bernard Luke Flynn;Patrick M Sexton;Patrick M Sexton

  • Separation of on-target efficacy from adverse effects through rational design of a bitopic adenosine receptor agonist

    Celine Valant;Lauren Therese May;Luigi Aurelio;Chung Hui Chuo

  • A Monod-Wyman-Changeux mechanism can explain G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) allosteric modulation

    Meritxell Canals;J. Robert Lane;Adriel Wen;Peter J. Scammells

  • 2-Aminothiophene-3-carboxylates and carboxamides as adenosine A1 receptor allosteric enhancers.

    George Nikolakopoulos;Heidi Figler;Joel Linden;Peter John Scammells

Frequent Co-Authors

Arthur Christopoulos
Arthur Christopoulos Monash University
Patrick M. Sexton
Patrick M. Sexton Monash University
Colin W. Pouton
Colin W. Pouton Monash University
Ronald J. Quinn
Ronald J. Quinn Griffith University
Joel Linden
Joel Linden University of Virginia
Raymond S. Norton
Raymond S. Norton Monash University
Christopher J.H. Porter
Christopher J.H. Porter Monash University
Steven E. Bottle
Steven E. Bottle Queensland University of Technology
Jonathan M. White
Jonathan M. White University of Melbourne
Edward R. T. Tiekink
Edward R. T. Tiekink Sunway University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Chemistry in the USA opens doors to various interdisciplinary career paths that often require additional qualifications. For example, professionals interested in law enforcement or legal assistance might consider an online associates in criminal justice. These programs provide foundational knowledge essential for roles in public safety and legal systems.

Cost is an important factor when selecting a program. Understanding how much does a criminal justice degree cost can help students budget and plan effectively for their education, ensuring they make informed financial decisions.

For those looking to merge Chemistry expertise with legal work, paralegal careers in pharmaceutical or chemical law can be lucrative. Knowing what types of paralegals make the most money aids in choosing the right specialization and advancing in this competitive field.

Additionally, roles like pharmaceutical sales representatives combine scientific knowledge with business acumen. If you're considering such a career, it's helpful to research how much do pharmaceutical sales reps make to align your expectations and career goals.

Best Scientists Citing Peter J. Scammells

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles