World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Stefan Stolte

Stefan Stolte

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Chemistry 51 13821 12439 1015 897 125 11338

Stefan Stolte publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Stefan Stolte between 2005 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Stefan Stolte published across 21 years, from 2005 to 2025, averaging 7.3 papers a year. Output peaked at 12 publications in 2022. 20 of the 153 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2005 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 12. Peak 12 publications in 2022. 2005: 1 publication 2006: 1 publication 2007: 6 publications 2008: 6 publications 2009: 3 publications 2010: 4 publications 2011: 10 publications 2012: 11 publications 2013: 9 publications 2014: 11 publications 2015: 11 publications 2016: 7 publications 2017: 8 publications 2018: 4 publications 2019: 7 publications 2020: 6 publications 2021: 8 publications 2022: 12 publications 2023: 8 publications 2024: 11 publications 2025: 9 publications
2005 2025

153 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Stefan Stolte: publications per year, 2005 to 2025
Year Publications
2005 1
2006 1
2007 6
2008 6
2009 3
2010 4
2011 10
2012 11
2013 9
2014 11
2015 11
2016 7
2017 8
2018 4
2019 7
2020 6
2021 8
2022 12
2023 8
2024 11
2025 9
Total 153
Download as CSV

Stefan Stolte publication distribution in Chemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Chemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Stefan Stolte sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000 1,250
Bar chart with 63 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 61–80 to 1,295+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,350. Most scientists, 1,350, have 161–180 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,295 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 121–140 publications, is where this scientist sits. 61–80 publications: 66 scientists 81–100 publications: 302 scientists 101–120 publications: 623 scientists 121–140 publications: 918 scientists 141–160 publications: 1,218 scientists 161–180 publications: 1,350 scientists 181–200 publications: 1,344 scientists 201–220 publications: 1,281 scientists 221–240 publications: 1,216 scientists 241–260 publications: 1,100 scientists 261–280 publications: 979 scientists 281–300 publications: 939 scientists 301–320 publications: 764 scientists 321–340 publications: 643 scientists 341–360 publications: 628 scientists 361–380 publications: 522 scientists 381–400 publications: 459 scientists 401–420 publications: 397 scientists 421–440 publications: 327 scientists 441–460 publications: 270 scientists 461–480 publications: 265 scientists 481–500 publications: 252 scientists 501–520 publications: 201 scientists 521–540 publications: 185 scientists 541–560 publications: 148 scientists 561–580 publications: 148 scientists 581–600 publications: 132 scientists 601–620 publications: 114 scientists 621–640 publications: 104 scientists 641–660 publications: 91 scientists 661–680 publications: 92 scientists 681–700 publications: 73 scientists 701–720 publications: 57 scientists 721–740 publications: 54 scientists 741–760 publications: 67 scientists 761–780 publications: 45 scientists 781–800 publications: 46 scientists 801–820 publications: 39 scientists 821–840 publications: 32 scientists 841–860 publications: 36 scientists 861–880 publications: 29 scientists 881–900 publications: 26 scientists 901–920 publications: 24 scientists 921–940 publications: 14 scientists 941–960 publications: 23 scientists 961–980 publications: 28 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 15 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 29 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 12 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 19 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 12 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 6 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 8 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 12 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 5 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 6 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 14 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 7 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 2 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 6 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 4 scientists 1,281–1,294 publications: 6 scientists 1,295+ publications: 100 scientists
61–80 publications 1,295+

This scientist: 125 publications — 7th percentile

7% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,295 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Chemistry scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 17,934 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
61–80 66
81–100 302
101–120 623
121–140 918 125
141–160 1,218
161–180 1,350
181–200 1,344
201–220 1,281
221–240 1,216
241–260 1,100
261–280 979
281–300 939
301–320 764
321–340 643
341–360 628
361–380 522
381–400 459
401–420 397
421–440 327
441–460 270
461–480 265
481–500 252
501–520 201
521–540 185
541–560 148
561–580 148
581–600 132
601–620 114
621–640 104
641–660 91
661–680 92
681–700 73
701–720 57
721–740 54
741–760 67
761–780 45
781–800 46
801–820 39
821–840 32
841–860 36
861–880 29
881–900 26
901–920 24
921–940 14
941–960 23
961–980 28
981–1,000 15
1,001–1,020 29
1,021–1,040 12
1,041–1,060 19
1,061–1,080 12
1,081–1,100 6
1,101–1,120 8
1,121–1,140 12
1,141–1,160 5
1,161–1,180 6
1,181–1,200 14
1,201–1,220 7
1,221–1,240 2
1,241–1,260 6
1,261–1,280 4
1,281–1,294 6
1,295+ 100
Download as CSV

Stefan Stolte D-index placement in Chemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Chemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Stefan Stolte sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 61 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 40–41 to 159+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,051. Most scientists, 1,051, have 56–57 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 159 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 50–51 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 40–41 D-Index: 289 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 612 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 808 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 776 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 835 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 861 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 872 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 933 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,051 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 930 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 882 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 834 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 731 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 775 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 683 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 646 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 561 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 501 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 437 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 388 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 354 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 292 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 275 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 254 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 235 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 185 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 192 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 155 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 163 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 125 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 105 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 105 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 112 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 88 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 68 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 69 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 65 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 79 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 61 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 44 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 37 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 40 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 33 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 26 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 34 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 35 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 25 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 27 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 17 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 16 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 20 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 20 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 15 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 9 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 16 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 11 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 9 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 3 scientists 158 D-Index: 3 scientists 159+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40–41 D-Index 159+

This scientist: 51 D-Index — 23rd percentile

23% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 159 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Chemistry scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 17,934 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
40–41 289
42–43 612
44–45 808
46–47 776
48–49 835
50–51 861 51
52–53 872
54–55 933
56–57 1,051
58–59 930
60–61 882
62–63 834
64–65 731
66–67 775
68–69 683
70–71 646
72–73 561
74–75 501
76–77 437
78–79 388
80–81 354
82–83 292
84–85 275
86–87 254
88–89 235
90–91 185
92–93 192
94–95 155
96–97 163
98–99 125
100–101 105
102–103 105
104–105 112
106–107 88
108–109 68
110–111 69
112–113 65
114–115 79
116–117 61
118–119 44
120–121 37
122–123 40
124–125 33
126–127 26
128–129 34
130–131 35
132–133 25
134–135 27
136–137 17
138–139 16
140–141 20
142–143 20
144–145 15
146–147 9
148–149 9
150–151 16
152–153 11
154–155 9
156–157 3
158 3
159+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Stefan Stolte is affiliated with TU Dresden in Germany and has contributed extensively to the field of Environmental Science. Their research spans a variety of subfields including Pollution, Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis, Environmental Chemistry, Catalysis, and Biomedical Engineering. The core topics of their work focus on Pharmaceutical and Antibiotic Environmental Impacts, Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Ionic Liquids Properties and Applications, Electrochemical Analysis and Applications, Toxic Organic Pollutants Impact, Microplastics and Plastic Pollution, and Effects and Risks of Endocrine Disrupting Chemicals.

Stolte's recent papers reflect these diverse interests and are published in prominent journals. Notable works include "Review of the toxic effects of ionic liquids" (2021) in The Science of The Total Environment, "The green platform molecule gamma-valerolactone - ecotoxicity, biodegradability, solvent properties, and potential applications" (2021) in Green Chemistry, "Toward the Proactive Design of Sustainable Chemicals: Ionic Liquids as a Prime Example" (2021) in Chemical Reviews, "Environmental contamination by microplastics originating from textiles: Emission, transport, fate and toxicity" (2022) in Journal of Hazardous Materials, and "Ecotoxicity screening evaluation of selected pharmaceuticals and their transformation products towards various organisms" (2020) in Environmental Science and Pollution Research.

These publications collectively explore the environmental and toxicological impacts of various chemical substances, with particular attention to emerging contaminants such as ionic liquids and microplastics, highlighting the intersection of chemistry and environmental health.

Frequent coauthors in Stolte's research include Marta Markiewicz, Stephan Beil, Piotr Stepnowski, Hilmar Börnick, and Anna Białk-Bielińska. Their collaboration has resulted in substantial output, as reflected in joint works spanning several years.

The main venues where Stolte publishes comprise:

  • Journal of Hazardous Materials
  • Green Chemistry
  • SSRN Electronic Journal
  • Environmental Science and Pollution Research
  • The Science of The Total Environment

This selection of journals underscores a consistent presence in publications centered on environmental science, chemistry, and toxicology.

In total, Stolte has contributed significantly to the study of environmental contaminants, chemical properties, and their ecological and health effects, situating their expertise firmly within environmental science research globally.

Best Publications

  • Design of sustainable chemical products--the example of ionic liquids.

    J Ranke;S Stolte;R Störmann;J Arning

  • The nanoparticle biomolecule corona: lessons learned – challenge accepted?

    Dominic Docter;Dana Westmeier;Marta Markiewicz;Stefan Stolte;Stefan Stolte

  • Effects of different head groups and functionalised side chains on the aquatic toxicity of ionic liquids

    Stefan Stolte;Jürgen Arning;Ulrike Bottin-Weber;Anja Müller

  • The influence of anion species on the toxicity of 1-alkyl-3-methylimidazolium ionic liquids observed in an (eco)toxicological test battery

    Marianne Matzke;Stefan Stolte;Karen Thiele;Tanja Juffernholz

  • Lipophilicity parameters for ionic liquid cations and their correlation to in vitro cytotoxicity.

    Johannes Ranke;Anja Müller;Ulrike Bottin-Weber;Frauke Stock

  • Anion effects on the cytotoxicity of ionic liquids

    Stefan Stolte;Jürgen Arning;Ulrike Bottin-Weber;Marianne Matzke

  • Progress in evaluation of risk potential of ionic liquids—basis for an eco-design of sustainable products

    Bernd Jastorff;Kerstin Mölter;Peter Behrend;Ulrike Bottin-Weber

  • Primary biodegradation of ionic liquid cations, identification of degradation products of 1-methyl-3-octylimidazolium chloride and electrochemical wastewater treatment of poorly biodegradable compounds

    Stefan Stolte;Salha Abdulkarim;Jiirgen Arning;Anne-Katrin Blomeyer-Nienstedt

  • Eco)toxicity and biodegradability of selected protic and aprotic ionic liquids

    Brezana Peric;Jordi Sierra;Esther Martí;Robert Cruañas

  • Review of the toxic effects of ionic liquids

    Chul-Woong Cho;Thi Phuong Thuy Pham;Yufeng Zhao;Stefan Stolte

  • Antimicrobial and surface activity of 1-alkyl-3-methylimidazolium derivatives

    Justyna Łuczak;Christian Jungnickel;Izabela Łącka;Stefan Stolte

  • Ecotoxicity evaluation of selected sulfonamides.

    Anna Białk-Bielińska;Stefan Stolte;Jürgen Arning;Ute Uebers

  • Environmental and health impact assessment of Liquid Organic Hydrogen Carrier (LOHC) systems – challenges and preliminary results

    M. Markiewicz;Y. Q. Zhang;A. Bösmann;N. Brückner

  • Qualitative and quantitative structure activity relationships for the inhibitory effects of cationic head groups, functionalised side chains and anions of ionic liquids on acetylcholinesterase

    Jiirgen Arning;Stefan Stolte;Andrea Böschen;Frauke Stock

  • Electrochemical degradation of sulfonamides at BDD electrode: kinetics, reaction pathway and eco-toxicity evaluation.

    Aleksandra Fabiańska;Anna Białk-Bielińska;Piotr Stepnowski;Stefan Stolte

  • Hydrolysis of sulphonamides in aqueous solutions.

    Anna Białk-Bielińska;Stefan Stolte;Marianne Matzke;Aleksandra Fabiańska

  • The green platform molecule gamma-valerolactone – ecotoxicity, biodegradability, solvent properties, and potential applications

    Florian Kerkel;Marta Markiewicz;Stefan Stolte;Eva Müller

  • Ionic liquids as lubricants or lubrication additives: An ecotoxicity and biodegradability assessment

    Stefan Stolte;Stephanie Steudte;Olatz Areitioaurtena;Francesco Pagano

  • Imidazolium based ionic liquids in soils: effects of the side chain length on wheat (Triticum aestivum) and cress (Lepidium sativum) as affected by different clays and organic matter

    Marianne Matzke;Stefan Stolte;Jürgen Arning;Ute Uebers

  • Biodegradability of 27 pyrrolidinium, morpholinium, piperidinium, imidazolium and pyridinium ionic liquid cations under aerobic conditions

    Jennifer Neumann;Stephanie Steudte;Chul-Woong Cho;Jorg Thöming

  • Toxicity and biodegradability of dicationic ionic liquids

    Stephanie Steudte;Stephanie Steudte;Steve Bemowsky;Maria Mahrova;Ulrike Bottin-Weber

Frequent Co-Authors

Piotr Stepnowski
Piotr Stepnowski University of Gdańsk
Bernd Jastorff
Bernd Jastorff University of Bremen
Yeoung-Sang Yun
Yeoung-Sang Yun Jeonbuk National University
Ingo Krossing
Ingo Krossing University of Freiburg
Ralf Dringen
Ralf Dringen University of Bremen
Mirza Cokoja
Mirza Cokoja Technical University of Munich
Klaus Wurst
Klaus Wurst University of Innsbruck
Katarina Edwards
Katarina Edwards Uppsala University
Fritz E. Kühn
Fritz E. Kühn Technical University of Munich
Iseult Lynch
Iseult Lynch University of Birmingham

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students pursuing Chemistry in the USA, exploring related fields such as forensic science can open diverse career opportunities. Many professionals interested in applying chemical knowledge to criminal investigations find pathways in forensic careers rewarding. To begin your journey, understanding how to become an autopsy technician offers insight into practical roles where chemistry and biology intersect in medical examinations.

Online education makes it easier to enter these specialized fields. For those seeking flexible learning options, the best online colleges for forensic science provide affordable and accredited programs tailored to developing skills needed in crime labs and forensic analysis.

Further advancing your career with a master's degree can deepen your expertise, especially in niche areas like forensic psychology. Programs offering a masters in forensic psychology online allow graduates to expand their understanding of the psychological aspects involved in forensic cases, blending science with human behavior studies.

Exploring various forensic science careers reveals the breadth of options available to chemistry graduates, ranging from crime scene investigation to toxicology and legal consulting. These paths underscore the interdisciplinary nature of forensic science and the importance of specialized education combined with practical experience.

By choosing the right educational program and career pathway, students can strategically position themselves for success in an evolving job market that values scientific expertise and analytical skills.

Learn more about how to become an autopsy technician, explore the best online colleges for forensic science, consider a masters in forensic psychology online, and discover a variety of forensic career paths.

Best Scientists Citing Stefan Stolte

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles