World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Social Sciences and Humanities 34 6822 6335 3313 3021 84 10283

Lee Branstetter publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Lee Branstetter between 1995 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Lee Branstetter published across 31 years, from 1995 to 2025, averaging 3.2 papers a year. Output peaked at 10 publications in 2022. 4 of the 100 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6 8 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1995 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 10. Peak 10 publications in 2022. 1995: 1 publication 1996: 1 publication 1997: 0 publications 1998: 1 publication 1999: 0 publications 2000: 4 publications 2001: 2 publications 2002: 4 publications 2003: 3 publications 2004: 3 publications 2005: 3 publications 2006: 7 publications 2007: 1 publication 2008: 3 publications 2009: 1 publication 2010: 8 publications 2011: 4 publications 2012: 1 publication 2013: 5 publications 2014: 3 publications 2015: 0 publications 2016: 2 publications 2017: 6 publications 2018: 6 publications 2019: 6 publications 2020: 0 publications 2021: 4 publications 2022: 10 publications 2023: 7 publications 2024: 2 publications 2025: 2 publications
1995 2025

100 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Lee Branstetter: publications per year, 1995 to 2025
Year Publications
1995 1
1996 1
1997 0
1998 1
1999 0
2000 4
2001 2
2002 4
2003 3
2004 3
2005 3
2006 7
2007 1
2008 3
2009 1
2010 8
2011 4
2012 1
2013 5
2014 3
2015 0
2016 2
2017 6
2018 6
2019 6
2020 0
2021 4
2022 10
2023 7
2024 2
2025 2
Total 100
Download as CSV

Lee Branstetter publications per year - data summary

  • Lee Branstetter, a Social Sciences and Humanities scholar from Carnegie Mellon University, has 100 publications recorded across 31 years, from 1995 to 2025.
  • The oldest publication on record dates to 1995 and the most recent to 2025.
  • The most productive year is 2022, with 10 publications.
  • The least productive years with any output are 1995, 1996, 1998, 2007 and others, with 1 publication each.
  • 4 of the 31 years in the span carry no publications at all (1997, 1999, 2015 and 2020).
  • The rate of publication averages 3.2 papers per year over the whole span, or 3.7 per year counting only the 27 years with at least one publication.
  • The last 5 years on the chart (2021-2025) hold 25 publications, 25% of the career total.
  • Split into equal eras - 1995-2005: 22 publications (2.0 per year); 2006-2016: 35 publications (3.2 per year); 2017-2025: 43 publications (4.8 per year).
  • Comparing the opening and closing eras, the overall trend of publication is rising.

Lee Branstetter publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Lee Branstetter sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 54 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 44–53 to 570+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 474. Most scientists, 474, have 114–123 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 84–93 publications, is where this scientist sits. 44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44–53 publications 570+

This scientist: 84 publications — 6th percentile

6% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
44–53 28
54–63 61
64–73 161
74–83 225
84–93 301 84
94–103 390
104–113 406
114–123 474
124–133 453
134–143 434
144–153 407
154–163 411
164–173 391
174–183 313
184–193 319
194–203 304
204–213 285
214–223 246
224–233 213
234–243 170
244–253 167
254–263 162
264–273 138
274–283 138
284–293 113
294–303 106
304–313 95
314–323 101
324–333 81
334–343 69
344–353 56
354–363 36
364–373 42
374–383 41
384–393 44
394–403 27
404–413 30
414–423 20
424–433 29
434–443 29
444–453 25
454–463 19
464–473 21
474–483 11
484–493 17
494–503 7
504–513 6
514–523 12
524–533 10
534–543 7
544–553 6
554–563 12
564–569 8
570+ 100
Download as CSV

Lee Branstetter publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the publication count of all 7,777 Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 54 ranges running from 44–53 to 570+ publications.
  • Lee Branstetter, a Social Sciences and Humanities scholar from Carnegie Mellon University, records 84 publications - the 6th percentile of the discipline.
  • 6% of ranked Social Sciences and Humanities scientists score the same or lower than Lee Branstetter, and about 94% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 164–173 publications range, and Lee Branstetter ranks below the median.
  • The most crowded range is 114–123 publications, holding 474 scientists (6% of the field).
  • 57% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 174–183 publications), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 570 publications or more, 100 scientists in all (1% of the field).

Lee Branstetter D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Lee Branstetter sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 71 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 100+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 313. Most scientists, 313, have 42 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 34 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 34 D-Index — 13th percentile

13% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 177
31 210
32 222
33 188
34 181 34
35 243
36 261
37 272
38 278
39 300
40 297
41 308
42 313
43 300
44 269
45 260
46 228
47 251
48 203
49 186
50 187
51 166
52 138
53 141
54 131
55 137
56 109
57 129
58 95
59 105
60 106
61 86
62 94
63 77
64 79
65 59
66 68
67 51
68 49
69 40
70 43
71 40
72 50
73 46
74 43
75 45
76 45
77 30
78 25
79 31
80 29
81 18
82 21
83 26
84 15
85 15
86 19
87 19
88 12
89 7
90 19
91 20
92 13
93 9
94 13
95 8
96 7
97 6
98 6
99 6
100+ 97
Download as CSV

Lee Branstetter D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the discipline H-index (D-index) of all 7,777 Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 71 ranges running from 30 to 100+ D-Index.
  • Lee Branstetter, a Social Sciences and Humanities scholar from Carnegie Mellon University, records 34 D-Index - the 13th percentile of the discipline.
  • 13% of ranked Social Sciences and Humanities scientists score the same or lower than Lee Branstetter, and about 87% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 45 D-Index range, and Lee Branstetter ranks below the median.
  • The most crowded range is 42 D-Index, holding 313 scientists (4% of the field).
  • 59% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 47 D-Index), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more, 97 scientists in all (1% of the field).

Overview

Lee Branstetter is affiliated with Carnegie Mellon University in the United States. Their research primarily spans the fields of Economics, Econometrics and Finance, as well as Business, Management and Accounting. Within these domains, Branstetter has contributed notably to subfields such as Economics and Econometrics, General Economics, Econometrics and Finance, Strategy and Management, Computer Science Applications, and Management of Technology and Innovation.

The scientist's work addresses a range of topics closely related to innovation, trade, and economic growth. Key themes in their research include:

  • Innovation Policy and R&D
  • Global trade and economics
  • Energy, Environment, Economic Growth
  • International Business and FDI
  • Firm Innovation and Growth
  • Online Learning and Analytics
  • Intellectual Property and Patents

Branstetter's recent publications reveal a focus on the interface between government policy, firm productivity, and industrial dynamics. Notable papers include:

  • "Picking winners? Government subsidies and firm productivity in China" (2023), published in Journal of Comparative Economics
  • "Does "Made in China 2025" work for China? Evidence from Chinese listed firms" (2024), published in Research Policy
  • "Generic competition and the incentives for early-stage pharmaceutical innovation" (2022), published in Research Policy
  • "The dark side of the boom: Dutch disease, competition with China, and technological upgrading in Colombian manufacturing" (2023), published in Journal of International Economics
  • "The Challenges of Chinese Industrial Policy" (2024), published in Entrepreneurship and Innovation Policy and the Economy

The venues where Branstetter frequently publishes include:

  • SSRN Electronic Journal
  • Research Policy
  • Academy of Management Proceedings
  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
  • Journal of Comparative Economics

Collaboration has been a consistent element of their work, with frequent co-authors being:

  • Guangwei Li
  • Mengjia Ren
  • Danielle R. Thomas
  • Kenneth R. Koedinger
  • Kamal Saggi

Best Publications

  • Is foreign direct investment a channel of knowledge spillovers? Evidence from Japan's FDI in the United States

    Lee G. Branstetter

  • Do Stronger Patents Induce More Innovation? Evidence from the 1988 Japanese Patent Law Reforms

    Mariko Sakakibara;Lee Branstetter

  • Do Stronger Intellectual Property Rights Increase International Technology Transfer? Empirical Evidence from U. S. Firm-Level Panel Data

    Lee G. Branstetter;Raymond Fisman;C. Fritz Foley

  • Japanese Research Consortia: A Microeconometric Analysis of Industrial Policy

    Lee G. Branstetter;Mariko Sakakibara

  • Are knowledge spillovers international or intranational in scope

    Lee G Branstetter

  • China's Embrace of Globalisation

    Lee Branstetter;Nicholas Lardy

  • When Do Research Consortia Work Well and Why? Evidence from Japanese Panel Data

    Lee G. Branstetter;Mariko Sakakibara

  • Does Cash Flow Cause Investment and R& D: An Exploration Using Panel Data for French, Japanese, and United States Scientific Firms

    Bronwyn H. Hall;Jacques Mairesse;Lee Branstetter;Bruno Crepon.

  • Do Entry Regulations Deter Entrepreneurship and Job Creation? Evidence from Recent Reforms in Portugal

    Lee G Branstetter;Francisco Lima;Lowell J Taylor;Ana Venâncio

  • Trade and Foreign Direct Investment in China: A Political Economy Approach

    Lee G. Branstetter;Lee G. Branstetter;Robert C. Feenstra;Robert C. Feenstra

  • Are Knowledge Spillovers International or Intranational in Scope? Microeconometric Evidence from the Japan and the United States

    Lee Branstetter

  • Intellectual Property Rights, Imitation, and Foreign Direct Investment: Theory and Evidence

    Lee Branstetter;Raymond Fisman;C. Fritz Foley;Kamal Saggi

  • China's Embrace of Globalization

    Lee Branstetter;Nicholas Lardy

  • Do Stronger Intellectual Property Rights Increase International Technology Transfer? Empirical Evidence from U.S. Firm-Level Data

    Lee Branstetter;Lee Branstetter;Raymond J. Fisman;Raymond J. Fisman;C. Fritz Foley;C. Fritz Foley

  • IS ACADEMIC SCIENCE DRIVING A SURGE IN INDUSTRIAL INNOVATION? EVIDENCE FROM PATENT CITATIONS ∗

    Lee G. Branstetter;Yoshiaki Ogura

  • Does intellectual property rights reform spur industrial development

    Lee G. Branstetter;Ray Fisman;C. Fritz Foley;Kamal Saggi

  • Intellectual Property Rights, Foreign Direct Investment, and Industrial Development

    Lee G. Branstetter;Kamal Saggi

  • Regulation and welfare: evidence from paragraph IV generic entry in the pharmaceutical industry

    Lee Branstetter;Chirantan Chatterjee;Matthew J. Higgins

  • The Incredible Shrinking Portuguese Firm

    Serguey Braguinsky;Lee G. Branstetter;André Regateiro

  • Vertical Keiretsu and Knowledge Spillovers in Japanese Manufacturing: An Empirical Assessment

    Lee Branstetter

  • Do Entry Regulations Deter Entrepreneurship and Job Creation? Evidence from Recent Reforms in Portugal

    Lee G. Branstetter;Francisco Lima;Lowell J. Taylor;Ana Venancio

Frequent Co-Authors

C. Fritz Foley
C. Fritz Foley Harvard University
J. Bradford Jensen
J. Bradford Jensen Georgetown University
Raymond Fisman
Raymond Fisman Boston University
Kamal Saggi
Kamal Saggi Vanderbilt University
Robert C. Feenstra
Robert C. Feenstra University of California, Davis
Jacques Mairesse
Jacques Mairesse Maastricht University
Peter K. Schott
Peter K. Schott Yale University
Neil Gandal
Neil Gandal Tel Aviv University
James Harrigan
James Harrigan University of Virginia
Bronwyn H. Hall
Bronwyn H. Hall University of California, Berkeley

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Social Sciences and Humanities in the USA opens doors to a variety of online degree options that support diverse career goals. For those interested in advanced psychology practice, online psych d programs offer flexibility and the chance to build clinical skills from anywhere.

If your passion lies in family and relationship counseling, there are mft programs online designed for efficient training and faster completion. Many opt for master's degrees to boost career prospects, but often wonder, how much is a masters in psychology? Fortunately, a range of affordable options makes higher education more accessible.

For working professionals aiming for leadership roles in education, accelerated edd programs enable rapid upskilling while balancing other commitments. Whether you seek counseling, teaching, or research roles, online degrees provide flexible, relevant pathways tailored to your ambitions.

Best Scientists Citing Lee Branstetter

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles