World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Award Badge
Economics and Finance
UK
2024

D-Index & Metrics

Economics and Finance

D-Index
74
Citations
46770
World Ranking
360
National Ranking
39

Rachel Griffith publication distribution in Economics and Finance in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Economics and Finance in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Rachel Griffith sits on this spectrum.

42–46 publications: 1 scientists 47–51 publications: 12 scientists 52–56 publications: 7 scientists 57–61 publications: 23 scientists 62–66 publications: 32 scientists 67–71 publications: 36 scientists 72–76 publications: 56 scientists 77–81 publications: 57 scientists 82–86 publications: 70 scientists 87–91 publications: 86 scientists 92–96 publications: 72 scientists 97–101 publications: 106 scientists 102–106 publications: 97 scientists 107–111 publications: 96 scientists 112–116 publications: 101 scientists 117–121 publications: 103 scientists 122–126 publications: 102 scientists 127–131 publications: 108 scientists 132–136 publications: 107 scientists 137–141 publications: 111 scientists 142–146 publications: 94 scientists 147–151 publications: 96 scientists 152–156 publications: 100 scientists 157–161 publications: 74 scientists 162–166 publications: 68 scientists 167–171 publications: 91 scientists 172–176 publications: 76 scientists 177–181 publications: 75 scientists 182–186 publications: 61 scientists 187–191 publications: 66 scientists 192–196 publications: 68 scientists 197–201 publications: 71 scientists 202–206 publications: 60 scientists 207–211 publications: 56 scientists 212–216 publications: 44 scientists 217–221 publications: 51 scientists 222–226 publications: 65 scientists 227–231 publications: 48 scientists 232–236 publications: 59 scientists 237–241 publications: 37 scientists 242–246 publications: 37 scientists 247–251 publications: 41 scientists 252–256 publications: 43 scientists 257–261 publications: 33 scientists 262–266 publications: 34 scientists 267–271 publications: 39 scientists 272–276 publications: 25 scientists 277–281 publications: 29 scientists 282–286 publications: 29 scientists 287–291 publications: 26 scientists 292–296 publications: 31 scientists 297–301 publications: 31 scientists 302–306 publications: 24 scientists 307–311 publications: 28 scientists 312–316 publications: 24 scientists 317–321 publications: 13 scientists 322–326 publications: 14 scientists 327–331 publications: 25 scientists 332–336 publications: 18 scientists 337–341 publications: 16 scientists 342–346 publications: 18 scientists 347–351 publications: 15 scientists 352–356 publications: 17 scientists 357–361 publications: 19 scientists 362–366 publications: 16 scientists 367–371 publications: 17 scientists 372–376 publications: 7 scientists 377–381 publications: 18 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 19 scientists 392–396 publications: 9 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 13 scientists 407–411 publications: 13 scientists 412–416 publications: 5 scientists 417–421 publications: 10 scientists 422–426 publications: 6 scientists 427–431 publications: 12 scientists 432–436 publications: 9 scientists 437–441 publications: 9 scientists 442–446 publications: 10 scientists 447–451 publications: 12 scientists 452–456 publications: 8 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 4 scientists 472–476 publications: 5 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 7 scientists 487–491 publications: 8 scientists 492–496 publications: 5 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 4 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 7 scientists 517–520 publications: 7 scientists 521+ publications: 99 scientists
42 publications 521+

This scientist: 333 publications — 87th percentile

87% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 521 publications or more.

Rachel Griffith D-index placement in Economics and Finance in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Economics and Finance scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Rachel Griffith sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 126 scientists 31 D-Index: 147 scientists 32 D-Index: 157 scientists 33 D-Index: 178 scientists 34 D-Index: 171 scientists 35 D-Index: 141 scientists 36 D-Index: 132 scientists 37 D-Index: 129 scientists 38 D-Index: 130 scientists 39 D-Index: 120 scientists 40 D-Index: 117 scientists 41 D-Index: 113 scientists 42 D-Index: 114 scientists 43 D-Index: 97 scientists 44 D-Index: 115 scientists 45 D-Index: 86 scientists 46 D-Index: 78 scientists 47 D-Index: 83 scientists 48 D-Index: 62 scientists 49 D-Index: 74 scientists 50 D-Index: 50 scientists 51 D-Index: 66 scientists 52 D-Index: 69 scientists 53 D-Index: 55 scientists 54 D-Index: 67 scientists 55 D-Index: 61 scientists 56 D-Index: 62 scientists 57 D-Index: 45 scientists 58 D-Index: 34 scientists 59 D-Index: 47 scientists 60 D-Index: 46 scientists 61 D-Index: 36 scientists 62 D-Index: 37 scientists 63 D-Index: 56 scientists 64 D-Index: 50 scientists 65 D-Index: 32 scientists 66 D-Index: 28 scientists 67 D-Index: 30 scientists 68 D-Index: 24 scientists 69 D-Index: 25 scientists 70 D-Index: 22 scientists 71 D-Index: 21 scientists 72 D-Index: 26 scientists 73 D-Index: 24 scientists 74 D-Index: 23 scientists 75 D-Index: 12 scientists 76 D-Index: 14 scientists 77 D-Index: 15 scientists 78 D-Index: 15 scientists 79 D-Index: 17 scientists 80 D-Index: 17 scientists 81 D-Index: 11 scientists 82 D-Index: 10 scientists 83 D-Index: 16 scientists 84 D-Index: 11 scientists 85 D-Index: 5 scientists 86 D-Index: 9 scientists 87 D-Index: 13 scientists 88 D-Index: 9 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 6 scientists 91 D-Index: 4 scientists 92 D-Index: 8 scientists 93 D-Index: 10 scientists 94 D-Index: 11 scientists 95 D-Index: 6 scientists 96 D-Index: 4 scientists 97 D-Index: 4 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100 D-Index: 8 scientists 101+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 101+

This scientist: 74 D-Index — 91st percentile

91% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 101 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2024 - Research.com Economics and Finance in United Kingdom Leader Award

Overview

Rachel Griffith is affiliated with the University of Manchester in the United Kingdom. Their research primarily focuses on fields related to Economics, Econometrics, and Finance, with notable attention to subfields including Economics and Econometrics, General Health Professions, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, General Economics, Econometrics and Finance, and Physiology.

The scientist's publications cover a range of topics, including:

  • Economics of Agriculture and Food Markets
  • Labor market dynamics and wage inequality
  • Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
  • Employment and Welfare Studies
  • Economic Growth and Productivity
  • Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth
  • Economic and Environmental Valuation

Recent papers authored or co-authored by Rachel Griffith include:

  • How Well Targeted Are Soda Taxes?, 2020, American Economic Review
  • Could COVID-19 Infect the Consumer Prices Index?*, 2020, Fiscal Studies
  • The Impact of COVID-19 on Share Prices in the UK*, 2020, Fiscal Studies
  • The Use of Scanner Data for Economics Research, 2022, Annual Review of Economics
  • The decline of home-cooked food, 2022, Fiscal Studies

The frequent co-authors collaborating with Rachel Griffith include:

  • Martin O'Connell
  • Richard Blundell
  • Peter Levell
  • John Van Reenen
  • Philippe Aghion

Publication venues where Griffith has contributed multiple works include:

  • Fiscal Studies
  • SSRN Electronic Journal
  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
  • American Economic Review
  • Annual Review of Economics

Best Publications

  • Competition and Innovation: an Inverted-U Relationship

    Philippe Aghion;Nicholas Bloom;Richard Blundell;Rachel Griffith

  • Mapping the Two Faces of R&D: Productivity Growth in a Panel of OECD Industries

    Rachel Griffith;Stephen Redding;John Van Reenen

  • Market share, market value and innovation in a panel of British manufacturing firms

    Richard Blundell;Rachel Griffith;John Van Reenen

  • Mapping The Two Faces Of R&D: Productivity Growth In A Panel Of OECD Industries

    Rachel Griffith;Stephen J. Redding;John Van Reenen

  • Competition and Innovation: An Inverted-U Relationship*

    Unknown

  • THE EFFECTS OF ENTRY ON INCUMBENT INNOVATION AND PRODUCTIVITY

    Philippe Aghion;Richard Blundell;Rachel Griffith;Peter Howitt

  • Taxes and the location of production: evidence from a panel of US multinationals

    Michael P. Devereux;Rachel Griffith

  • Innovation and Productivity across Four European Countries

    Rachel Griffith;Elena Huergo;Jacques Mairesse;Bettina Peters

  • Corporate income tax reforms and international tax competition

    Michael P. Devereux;Rachel Griffith;Alexander Klemm

  • Do R&D tax credits work? evidence from a panel of countries 1979 - 1997

    Nicolas Bloom;Rachel Griffith;John Van Reenen

  • Dynamic count data models of technological innovation

    Richard Blundell;Rachel Griffith;John van Reenen

  • R&D and Absorptive Capacity: Theory and Empirical Evidence*

    Rachel Griffith;Stephen Redding;John Van Reenen

  • Dynamic count data models of technological innovation

    Richard Blundell;Rachel Griffith;John Van Reenen

  • Evaluating tax policy for location decisions

    Michael P. Devereux;Rachel Griffith

  • Competition and Growth: Reconciling Theory and Evidence

    Philippe Aghion;Rachel Griffith

  • Individual effects and dynamics in count data models

    Richard Blundell;Rachel Griffith;Frank Windmeijer

  • The taxation of discrete investment choices

    Michael Devereux;Rachel Griffith

  • R&D and absorptive capacity: theory and empirical evidence

    Rachel Griffith;Stephen Redding;John van Reenen

  • Competition and Innovation: An Inverted U Relationship

    Philippe Aghion;Philippe Aghion;Philippe Aghion;Nicholas Bloom;Nicholas Bloom;Richard W. Blundell;Rachel Griffith;Rachel Griffith

  • Firm location decisions, regional grants and agglomeration externalities

    Michael P. Devereux;Rachel Griffith;Helen Simpson

  • The geographic distribution of production activity in the UK

    Michael P Devereux;Rachel Griffith;Helen Simpson

  • How Special is the Special Relationship? Using the impact of US R&D spillovers on UK firms as a test of technology sourcing

    Rachel Griffith;Rupert Harrison;John Van Reenen

  • VERTICAL INTEGRATION AND TECHNOLOGY: THEORY AND EVIDENCE

    Daron Acemoglu;Philippe Aghion;Rachel Griffith;Fabrizio Zilibotti

  • Competition and Growth

    P. Aghion;R Griffith

  • Taxes and the location of production: evidence from a panel of US multinationals

    Michael Devereux;Rachel Griffith

Frequent Co-Authors

John Van Reenen
John Van Reenen London School of Economics and Political Science
Philippe Aghion
Philippe Aghion London School of Economics and Political Science
Richard Blundell
Richard Blundell University College London
Michael P. Devereux
Michael P. Devereux University of Oxford
Stephen J. Redding
Stephen J. Redding Stanford University
Nicholas Bloom
Nicholas Bloom Stanford University
Peter Howitt
Peter Howitt Brown University
Aviv Nevo
Aviv Nevo University of Pennsylvania
Andy Neely
Andy Neely University of Cambridge
Jonathan Haskel
Jonathan Haskel Imperial College London

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Economics and Finance in the USA opens doors to various interdisciplinary careers. Many students expand their skills by exploring online degrees in complementary fields that provide both flexibility and affordability.

For those interested in understanding people management within organizations, a master degree in human resources can be completed online without high costs. This equips you for HR leadership roles or consulting.

Clear communication is essential in finance-based careers. Choosing an affordable online master's degree in communications boosts your ability to share complex economic concepts with clarity.

If you aspire to manage projects or teams, a cheap project management degree online teaches vital leadership and organizational skills required across industries.

Ambitious professionals may also consider year long mba programs to fast-track their expertise in business strategy, management, and global markets.

Pursuing these online pathways broadens your career prospects and helps you adapt to the dynamic demands of the modern workforce.

Best Scientists Citing Rachel Griffith

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles