World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Ecology and Evolution

D-Index
77
Citations
23430
World Ranking
951
National Ranking
358

Joseph M. Kiesecker publications per year

1994: 2 publications 1995: 4 publications 1996: 6 publications 1997: 5 publications 1998: 5 publications 1999: 9 publications 2000: 3 publications 2001: 12 publications 2002: 6 publications 2003: 3 publications 2004: 5 publications 2005: 3 publications 2006: 5 publications 2007: 5 publications 2008: 1 publications 2009: 3 publications 2010: 8 publications 2011: 9 publications 2012: 3 publications 2013: 6 publications 2014: 3 publications 2015: 4 publications 2016: 7 publications 2017: 12 publications 2018: 3 publications 2019: 14 publications 2020: 8 publications 2021: 7 publications 2022: 10 publications 2023: 8 publications 2024: 5 publications 2025: 2 publications
1994 2025

186 publications in total across all disciplines

Joseph M. Kiesecker publication distribution in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Ecology and Evolution in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Joseph M. Kiesecker sits on this spectrum.

37–41 publications: 2 scientists 42–46 publications: 9 scientists 47–51 publications: 10 scientists 52–56 publications: 31 scientists 57–61 publications: 56 scientists 62–66 publications: 91 scientists 67–71 publications: 92 scientists 72–76 publications: 127 scientists 77–81 publications: 173 scientists 82–86 publications: 236 scientists 87–91 publications: 227 scientists 92–96 publications: 240 scientists 97–101 publications: 333 scientists 102–106 publications: 280 scientists 107–111 publications: 300 scientists 112–116 publications: 285 scientists 117–121 publications: 305 scientists 122–126 publications: 287 scientists 127–131 publications: 278 scientists 132–136 publications: 289 scientists 137–141 publications: 273 scientists 142–146 publications: 262 scientists 147–151 publications: 246 scientists 152–156 publications: 235 scientists 157–161 publications: 205 scientists 162–166 publications: 199 scientists 167–171 publications: 174 scientists 172–176 publications: 164 scientists 177–181 publications: 173 scientists 182–186 publications: 189 scientists 187–191 publications: 170 scientists 192–196 publications: 139 scientists 197–201 publications: 128 scientists 202–206 publications: 117 scientists 207–211 publications: 115 scientists 212–216 publications: 107 scientists 217–221 publications: 124 scientists 222–226 publications: 81 scientists 227–231 publications: 82 scientists 232–236 publications: 85 scientists 237–241 publications: 75 scientists 242–246 publications: 66 scientists 247–251 publications: 81 scientists 252–256 publications: 69 scientists 257–261 publications: 70 scientists 262–266 publications: 55 scientists 267–271 publications: 64 scientists 272–276 publications: 49 scientists 277–281 publications: 48 scientists 282–286 publications: 44 scientists 287–291 publications: 45 scientists 292–296 publications: 36 scientists 297–301 publications: 39 scientists 302–306 publications: 38 scientists 307–311 publications: 30 scientists 312–316 publications: 34 scientists 317–321 publications: 25 scientists 322–326 publications: 22 scientists 327–331 publications: 28 scientists 332–336 publications: 30 scientists 337–341 publications: 22 scientists 342–346 publications: 30 scientists 347–351 publications: 26 scientists 352–356 publications: 22 scientists 357–361 publications: 29 scientists 362–366 publications: 21 scientists 367–371 publications: 12 scientists 372–376 publications: 18 scientists 377–381 publications: 17 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 21 scientists 392–396 publications: 13 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 15 scientists 407–411 publications: 8 scientists 412–416 publications: 9 scientists 417–421 publications: 8 scientists 422–426 publications: 4 scientists 427–431 publications: 10 scientists 432–436 publications: 10 scientists 437–441 publications: 5 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 10 scientists 452–456 publications: 2 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 7 scientists 472–476 publications: 6 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 3 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 4 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 8 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 5 scientists 522–526 publications: 4 scientists 527–530 publications: 5 scientists 531+ publications: 100 scientists
37 publications 531+

This scientist: 165 publications — 60th percentile

60% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 531 publications or more.

Joseph M. Kiesecker D-index placement in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Ecology and Evolution scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Joseph M. Kiesecker sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 95 scientists 31 D-Index: 123 scientists 32 D-Index: 191 scientists 33 D-Index: 245 scientists 34 D-Index: 252 scientists 35 D-Index: 244 scientists 36 D-Index: 249 scientists 37 D-Index: 244 scientists 38 D-Index: 254 scientists 39 D-Index: 254 scientists 40 D-Index: 280 scientists 41 D-Index: 274 scientists 42 D-Index: 266 scientists 43 D-Index: 233 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 208 scientists 46 D-Index: 201 scientists 47 D-Index: 213 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 172 scientists 50 D-Index: 209 scientists 51 D-Index: 199 scientists 52 D-Index: 153 scientists 53 D-Index: 169 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 148 scientists 56 D-Index: 120 scientists 57 D-Index: 146 scientists 58 D-Index: 137 scientists 59 D-Index: 140 scientists 60 D-Index: 104 scientists 61 D-Index: 119 scientists 62 D-Index: 118 scientists 63 D-Index: 99 scientists 64 D-Index: 77 scientists 65 D-Index: 100 scientists 66 D-Index: 86 scientists 67 D-Index: 83 scientists 68 D-Index: 75 scientists 69 D-Index: 94 scientists 70 D-Index: 57 scientists 71 D-Index: 68 scientists 72 D-Index: 59 scientists 73 D-Index: 63 scientists 74 D-Index: 66 scientists 75 D-Index: 60 scientists 76 D-Index: 42 scientists 77 D-Index: 49 scientists 78 D-Index: 39 scientists 79 D-Index: 37 scientists 80 D-Index: 43 scientists 81 D-Index: 41 scientists 82 D-Index: 45 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 40 scientists 85 D-Index: 35 scientists 86 D-Index: 55 scientists 87 D-Index: 24 scientists 88 D-Index: 24 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 25 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 27 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 23 scientists 96 D-Index: 12 scientists 97 D-Index: 14 scientists 98 D-Index: 19 scientists 99 D-Index: 16 scientists 100 D-Index: 14 scientists 101 D-Index: 5 scientists 102 D-Index: 21 scientists 103 D-Index: 16 scientists 104 D-Index: 10 scientists 105 D-Index: 7 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 7 scientists 108 D-Index: 6 scientists 109 D-Index: 9 scientists 110 D-Index: 11 scientists 111 D-Index: 12 scientists 112 D-Index: 9 scientists 113 D-Index: 7 scientists 114 D-Index: 3 scientists 115 D-Index: 8 scientists 116 D-Index: 5 scientists 117 D-Index: 11 scientists 118 D-Index: 4 scientists 119 D-Index: 2 scientists 120 D-Index: 5 scientists 121+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 121+

This scientist: 77 D-Index — 89th percentile

89% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 121 D-Index or more.

Overview

Joseph M. Kiesecker is affiliated with The Nature Conservancy in the United States and focuses primarily on Environmental Science. Their research spans several subfields, including Global and Planetary Change, Ecology, Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law, Environmental Engineering, and Economics and Econometrics.

The scientist's work addresses multiple topics related to environmental and conservation science. Major areas of study include:

  • Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
  • Environmental Conservation and Management
  • Economic and Environmental Valuation
  • Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management
  • Energy and Environment Impacts
  • Species Distribution and Climate Change
  • Zoonotic diseases and public health

Recent publications by Joseph M. Kiesecker feature collaborations with various coauthors and appear in notable scientific venues. Examples of these papers include:

  • Potential for Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Machine Learning (ML) Applications in Biodiversity Conservation, Managing Forests, and Related Services in India, 2022, Sustainability
  • Four steps for the Earth: mainstreaming the post-2020 global biodiversity framework, 2021, One Earth
  • Local conditions and policy design determine whether ecological compensation can achieve No Net Loss goals, 2020, Nature Communications
  • Mammals, wildlife trade, and the next global pandemic, 2021, Current Biology
  • Indigenous Peoples' lands are threatened by industrial development; conversion risk assessment reveals need to support Indigenous stewardship, 2023, One Earth

Joseph M. Kiesecker frequently collaborates with several researchers. Their most frequent coauthors include:

  • James R. Oakleaf
  • Christina M. Kennedy
  • Justin A. Johnson
  • Stephen Polasky
  • Rachel Neugarten

The scientist's work is published in a range of journals and platforms, with recurrent contributions to:

  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
  • One Earth
  • Nature Communications
  • Scientific Data
  • Sustainability

Best Publications

  • Natural climate solutions

    Bronson W. Griscom;Bronson W. Griscom;Justin Adams;Peter W. Ellis;Richard A. Houghton

  • Complex causes of amphibian population declines

    Joseph M. Kiesecker;Andrew R. Blaustein;Lisa K. Belden

  • Complexity in conservation: lessons from the global decline of amphibian populations

    Andrew R. Blaustein;Joseph M. Kiesecker

  • UV Repair and Resistance to Solar UV-B in Amphibian Eggs: A Link to Population Declines?

    A R Blaustein;P D Hoffman;D G Hokit;J M Kiesecker

  • Ultraviolet radiation, toxic chemicals and amphibian population declines

    Andrew R. Blaustein;John M. Romansic;Joseph M. Kiesecker;and Audrey C. Hatch

  • Managing the middle: A shift in conservation priorities based on the global human modification gradient.

    Christina M. Kennedy;James R. Oakleaf;David M. Theobald;Sharon Baruch‐Mordo

  • Synergism between trematode infection and pesticide exposure: A link to amphibian limb deformities in nature?

    Joseph M. Kiesecker

  • Policy Development for Biodiversity Offsets: A Review of Offset Frameworks

    Bruce A. McKenney;Joseph M. Kiesecker

  • Energy Sprawl or Energy Efficiency: Climate Policy Impacts on Natural Habitat for the United States of America

    Robert I. McDonald;Joseph Fargione;Joe Kiesecker;William M. Miller

  • Amphibian Breeding and Climate Change

    Andrew R. Blaustein;Lisa K. Belden;Deanna H. Olson;David M. Green

  • Negative effects of changing temperature on amphibian immunity under field conditions

    T. R. Raffel;J. R. Rohr;J. M. Kiesecker;P. J. Hudson

  • Synergism between UV-B radiation and a pathogen magnifies amphibian embryo mortality in nature.

    Joseph M. Kiesecker;Andrew R. Blaustein

  • FOREST CANOPY AND THE PERFORMANCE OF LARVAL AMPHIBIANS

    D. K. Skelly;L. K. Freidenburg;J. M. Kiesecker

  • POPULATION DIFFERENCES IN RESPONSES OF RED-LEGGED FROGS (RANA AURORA) TO INTRODUCED BULLFROGS

    Joseph M. Kiesecker;Andrew R. Blaustein

  • Amphibian Breeding Distribution in an Urbanized Landscape

    Michael J. Rubbo;Joseph M. Kiesecker

  • Development by design: blending landscape‐level planning with the mitigation hierarchy

    Joseph M Kiesecker;Holly Copeland;Amy Pocewicz;Bruce McKenney

  • Ambient UV-B radiation causes deformities in amphibian embryos

    Andrew R. Blaustein;Joseph M. Kiesecker;Douglas P. Chivers;Robert G. Anthony

  • Effects of Introduced Bullfrogs and Smallmouth Bass on Microhabitat Use, Growth, and Survival of Native Red‐Legged Frogs (Rana aurora)

    Joseph M. Kiesecker;Andrew R. Blaustein

  • The use of chemical cues in predator recognition by western toad tadpoles

    Joseph M. Kiesecker;Douglas P. Chivers;Andrew R. Blaustein

  • Behavioral reduction of infection risk

    Joseph M. Kiesecker;David K. Skelly;Karen H. Beard;Evan Preisser

Frequent Co-Authors

Andrew R. Blaustein
Andrew R. Blaustein Oregon State University
Douglas P. Chivers
Douglas P. Chivers University of Saskatchewan
Lisa K. Belden
Lisa K. Belden Virginia Tech
Jeffrey S. Evans
Jeffrey S. Evans The Nature Conservancy
Joseph Fargione
Joseph Fargione The Nature Conservancy
Adolfo Marco
Adolfo Marco Spanish National Research Council
David K. Skelly
David K. Skelly Yale University
Lee B. Kats
Lee B. Kats Pepperdine University
James E. M. Watson
James E. M. Watson University of Queensland
Bronson W. Griscom
Bronson W. Griscom Conservation International

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Interested in advancing your career or exploring new directions after studying Ecology and Evolution? Many graduates pursue additional online degrees in related fields, particularly in healthcare and environmental sciences. Programs such as asn to np programs allow those with an associate degree in nursing to bridge towards a nurse practitioner role—combining scientific knowledge with patient care.

For those without a previous nursing background, direct entry msn programs online offer accelerated pathways into healthcare. These flexible programs are designed for career changers, enabling students to leverage their science education towards impactful careers.

Choosing the right institution is essential for online learners. If you’re debating between leading universities, this breakdown—which school is better snhu vs wgu—provides valuable insights on curriculum quality, cost, and flexibility.

For registered nurses ready to advance, rn to bsn to msn online programs offer affordable and efficient transitions to leadership and specialized practice. With strong demand in both environmental and healthcare sectors, these online degrees can significantly expand your career options.

Best Scientists Citing Joseph M. Kiesecker

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles