World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Ecology and Evolution

D-Index
50
Citations
9936
World Ranking
3836
National Ranking
1346

David E. Naugle publication distribution in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Ecology and Evolution in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David E. Naugle sits on this spectrum.

37–41 publications: 2 scientists 42–46 publications: 9 scientists 47–51 publications: 10 scientists 52–56 publications: 31 scientists 57–61 publications: 56 scientists 62–66 publications: 91 scientists 67–71 publications: 92 scientists 72–76 publications: 127 scientists 77–81 publications: 173 scientists 82–86 publications: 236 scientists 87–91 publications: 227 scientists 92–96 publications: 240 scientists 97–101 publications: 333 scientists 102–106 publications: 280 scientists 107–111 publications: 300 scientists 112–116 publications: 285 scientists 117–121 publications: 305 scientists 122–126 publications: 287 scientists 127–131 publications: 278 scientists 132–136 publications: 289 scientists 137–141 publications: 273 scientists 142–146 publications: 262 scientists 147–151 publications: 246 scientists 152–156 publications: 235 scientists 157–161 publications: 205 scientists 162–166 publications: 199 scientists 167–171 publications: 174 scientists 172–176 publications: 164 scientists 177–181 publications: 173 scientists 182–186 publications: 189 scientists 187–191 publications: 170 scientists 192–196 publications: 139 scientists 197–201 publications: 128 scientists 202–206 publications: 117 scientists 207–211 publications: 115 scientists 212–216 publications: 107 scientists 217–221 publications: 124 scientists 222–226 publications: 81 scientists 227–231 publications: 82 scientists 232–236 publications: 85 scientists 237–241 publications: 75 scientists 242–246 publications: 66 scientists 247–251 publications: 81 scientists 252–256 publications: 69 scientists 257–261 publications: 70 scientists 262–266 publications: 55 scientists 267–271 publications: 64 scientists 272–276 publications: 49 scientists 277–281 publications: 48 scientists 282–286 publications: 44 scientists 287–291 publications: 45 scientists 292–296 publications: 36 scientists 297–301 publications: 39 scientists 302–306 publications: 38 scientists 307–311 publications: 30 scientists 312–316 publications: 34 scientists 317–321 publications: 25 scientists 322–326 publications: 22 scientists 327–331 publications: 28 scientists 332–336 publications: 30 scientists 337–341 publications: 22 scientists 342–346 publications: 30 scientists 347–351 publications: 26 scientists 352–356 publications: 22 scientists 357–361 publications: 29 scientists 362–366 publications: 21 scientists 367–371 publications: 12 scientists 372–376 publications: 18 scientists 377–381 publications: 17 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 21 scientists 392–396 publications: 13 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 15 scientists 407–411 publications: 8 scientists 412–416 publications: 9 scientists 417–421 publications: 8 scientists 422–426 publications: 4 scientists 427–431 publications: 10 scientists 432–436 publications: 10 scientists 437–441 publications: 5 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 10 scientists 452–456 publications: 2 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 7 scientists 472–476 publications: 6 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 3 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 4 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 8 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 5 scientists 522–526 publications: 4 scientists 527–530 publications: 5 scientists 531+ publications: 100 scientists
37 publications 531+

This scientist: 183 publications — 67th percentile

67% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 531 publications or more.

David E. Naugle D-index placement in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Ecology and Evolution scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David E. Naugle sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 95 scientists 31 D-Index: 123 scientists 32 D-Index: 191 scientists 33 D-Index: 245 scientists 34 D-Index: 252 scientists 35 D-Index: 244 scientists 36 D-Index: 249 scientists 37 D-Index: 244 scientists 38 D-Index: 254 scientists 39 D-Index: 254 scientists 40 D-Index: 280 scientists 41 D-Index: 274 scientists 42 D-Index: 266 scientists 43 D-Index: 233 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 208 scientists 46 D-Index: 201 scientists 47 D-Index: 213 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 172 scientists 50 D-Index: 209 scientists 51 D-Index: 199 scientists 52 D-Index: 153 scientists 53 D-Index: 169 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 148 scientists 56 D-Index: 120 scientists 57 D-Index: 146 scientists 58 D-Index: 137 scientists 59 D-Index: 140 scientists 60 D-Index: 104 scientists 61 D-Index: 119 scientists 62 D-Index: 118 scientists 63 D-Index: 99 scientists 64 D-Index: 77 scientists 65 D-Index: 100 scientists 66 D-Index: 86 scientists 67 D-Index: 83 scientists 68 D-Index: 75 scientists 69 D-Index: 94 scientists 70 D-Index: 57 scientists 71 D-Index: 68 scientists 72 D-Index: 59 scientists 73 D-Index: 63 scientists 74 D-Index: 66 scientists 75 D-Index: 60 scientists 76 D-Index: 42 scientists 77 D-Index: 49 scientists 78 D-Index: 39 scientists 79 D-Index: 37 scientists 80 D-Index: 43 scientists 81 D-Index: 41 scientists 82 D-Index: 45 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 40 scientists 85 D-Index: 35 scientists 86 D-Index: 55 scientists 87 D-Index: 24 scientists 88 D-Index: 24 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 25 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 27 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 23 scientists 96 D-Index: 12 scientists 97 D-Index: 14 scientists 98 D-Index: 19 scientists 99 D-Index: 16 scientists 100 D-Index: 14 scientists 101 D-Index: 5 scientists 102 D-Index: 21 scientists 103 D-Index: 16 scientists 104 D-Index: 10 scientists 105 D-Index: 7 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 7 scientists 108 D-Index: 6 scientists 109 D-Index: 9 scientists 110 D-Index: 11 scientists 111 D-Index: 12 scientists 112 D-Index: 9 scientists 113 D-Index: 7 scientists 114 D-Index: 3 scientists 115 D-Index: 8 scientists 116 D-Index: 5 scientists 117 D-Index: 11 scientists 118 D-Index: 4 scientists 119 D-Index: 2 scientists 120 D-Index: 5 scientists 121+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 121+

This scientist: 50 D-Index — 56th percentile

56% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 121 D-Index or more.

Overview

David E. Naugle is affiliated with the University of Montana in the United States and conducts research primarily in environmental science. Their work has a significant focus on rangeland and wildlife management, fire effects on ecosystems, and ecology and vegetation dynamics studies.

Their research spans multiple specialized subfields, including ecology, global and planetary change, nature and landscape conservation, environmental chemistry, and management, monitoring, policy, and law. These areas reflect a broad approach to studying the interaction of natural systems and human influence.

David E. Naugle has contributed to the scientific community with recent papers that cover a range of topics related to rangelands and ecosystem management. Notable papers include:

  • Improving Landsat predictions of rangeland fractional cover with multitask learning and uncertainty (2021) published in Methods in Ecology and Evolution
  • The elevational ascent and spread of exotic annual grass dominance in the Great Basin, USA (2021) in Diversity and Distributions
  • Annual and 16-Day Rangeland Production Estimates for the Western United States (2021) in Rangeland Ecology & Management
  • Herbaceous production lost to tree encroachment in United States rangelands (2022) in Journal of Applied Ecology
  • Woody Plant Encroachment and the Sustainability of Priority Conservation Areas (2020) in Sustainability

The scientist regularly collaborates with other researchers, with frequent coauthors including Brady Allred, Jeremy D. Maestas, Matthew Jones, Joseph T. Smith, and Scott L. Morford. These collaborations have contributed to a robust body of work.

The venues where David E. Naugle has most frequently published demonstrate a consistent focus on applied ecology and wildlife science. These venues include:

  • Rangeland Ecology & Management
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Journal of Applied Ecology
  • Biological Conservation
  • Journal of Wildlife Management

The scientist's research topics broadly encompass:

  • Rangeland and Wildlife Management
  • Fire effects on ecosystems
  • Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies
  • Turfgrass Adaptation and Management
  • Forest Management and Policy
  • Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
  • Landslides and related hazards

Best Publications

  • Vulnerability of Northern Prairie Wetlands to Climate Change

    W. Carter Johnson;Bruce V. Millett;Tagir Gilmanov;Richard A. Voldseth

  • Greater Sage‐Grouse Population Response to Energy Development and Habitat Loss

    Brett L. Walker;David E. Naugle;Kevin E. Doherty

  • Ecosystem services lost to oil and gas in North America

    Brady W. Allred;W. Kolby Smith;W. Kolby Smith;Dirac Twidwell;Julia H. Haggerty

  • Greater sage-grouse winter habitat selection and energy development

    Kevin E. Doherty;David E. Naugle;Brett L. Walker;Jon M. Graham

  • Prairie Wetland Complexes as Landscape Functional Units in a Changing Climate

    W. Carter Johnson;Brett Werner;Glenn R. Guntenspergen;Glenn R. Guntenspergen;Richard A. Voldseth

  • A landscape approach to conserving wetland bird habitat in the Prairie Pothole Region of eastern South Dakota

    David E. Naugle;Rex R. Johnson;Michael E. Estey;Kenneth F. Higgins

  • A Dynamic Landsat Derived Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI) Product for the Conterminous United States

    Nathaniel P. Robinson;Brady W Allred;Matthew O. Jones;Alvaro Moreno

  • Innovation in rangeland monitoring: annual, 30 m, plant functional type percent cover maps for U.S. rangelands, 1984–2017

    Matthew O. Jones;Brady W. Allred;David E. Naugle;Jeremy D. Maestas

  • Managing multiple vital rates to maximize greater sage‐grouse population growth

    Rebecca L. Taylor;Brett L. Walker;David E. Naugle;L. Scott Mills

  • Incorporating Landscape Attributes into Models for Migratory Grassland Bird Conservation

    Kristel K. Bakker;David E. Naugle;Kenneth F. Higgins

  • Improving Landsat predictions of rangeland fractional cover with multitask learning and uncertainty

    Brady W. Allred;Brandon T. Bestelmeyer;Chad S. Boyd;Christopher Brown

  • Area Sensitivity in North American Grassland Birds: Patterns and Processes

    Christine A. Ribic;Rolf R. Koford;James R. Herkert;Douglas H. Johnson

  • EFFECTS OF WIND TURBINES ON UPLAND NESTING BIRDS IN CONSERVATION RESERVE PROGRAM GRASSLANDS

    Krecia L. Leddy;Kenneth F. Higgins;David E. Naugle

  • Scale-dependent habitat use in three species of prairie wetland birds

    David E. Naugle;Kenneth F. Higgins;Sarah M. Nusser;W. Carter Johnson

  • Saving sage-grouse from the trees: A proactive solution to reducing a key threat to a candidate species

    Sharon Baruch-Mordo;Jeffrey S. Evans;Jeffrey S. Evans;John P. Severson;David E. Naugle;David E. Naugle

  • West Nile virus: pending crisis for greater sage-grouse

    David E. Naugle;Cameron L. Aldridge;Brett L. Walker;Todd E. Cornish

  • Mapping Oil and Gas Development Potential in the US Intermountain West and Estimating Impacts to Species

    Holly E. Copeland;Kevin E. Doherty;David E. Naugle;Amy Pocewicz

  • Vegetation sampling and measurement

    Kenneth F. Higgins;Kurt J. Jenkins;Gary K. Clambey;Daniel W. Uresk

  • Terrestrial primary production for the conterminous United States derived from Landsat 30 m and MODIS 250 m

    Nathaniel P. Robinson;Brady W. Allred;William K. Smith;Matthew O. Jones

  • Greater Sage-Grouse Nesting Habitat: The Importance of Managing at Multiple Scales

    Kevin E. Doherty;David E. Naugle;Brett L. Walker

  • Predicting risk of habitat conversion in native temperate grasslands.

    Scott E. Stephens;Johann A. Walker;Darin R. Blunck;Aneetha Jayaraman

Frequent Co-Authors

Brady W. Allred
Brady W. Allred University of Montana
Jeffrey S. Evans
Jeffrey S. Evans The Nature Conservancy
Christian A. Hagen
Christian A. Hagen Oregon State University
Dirac Twidwell
Dirac Twidwell University of Nebraska–Lincoln
Kerry P. Reese
Kerry P. Reese University of Idaho
Joseph M. Kiesecker
Joseph M. Kiesecker The Nature Conservancy
Michael J. Falkowski
Michael J. Falkowski Colorado State University
Glenn R. Guntenspergen
Glenn R. Guntenspergen United States Fish and Wildlife Service
Jonathan A. Jenks
Jonathan A. Jenks South Dakota State University
Samuel D. Fuhlendorf
Samuel D. Fuhlendorf Oklahoma State University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Ecology and Evolution builds a foundation for rewarding careers, but many students are also interested in alternative health and science pathways. Online education has made these options more accessible than ever. For instance, those seeking fast, affordable options in healthcare can explore the cheapest online accelerated bsn programs to jumpstart a nursing career.

Accelerated online programs can lead to rapid advancement. Some students opt for the 6-month rn to bsn program online, enabling registered nurses to earn their bachelor’s degree in a streamlined timeframe. If you're considering advanced practice roles, understanding how long does it take to become a nurse practitioner is essential for planning your academic journey.

Many science graduates also explore mental health careers, such as psychiatric nurse practitioners. Interested in salary potential? Find insights about pmhnp salary by state to inform your career decision. With diverse online pathways, transitioning from ecology or evolutionary studies to healthcare is both achievable and financially smart.

Best Scientists Citing David E. Naugle

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles