World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Ecology and Evolution

D-Index
48
Citations
6859
World Ranking
4298
National Ranking
1492

Brett K. Sandercock publication distribution in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Ecology and Evolution in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Brett K. Sandercock sits on this spectrum.

37–41 publications: 2 scientists 42–46 publications: 9 scientists 47–51 publications: 10 scientists 52–56 publications: 31 scientists 57–61 publications: 56 scientists 62–66 publications: 91 scientists 67–71 publications: 92 scientists 72–76 publications: 127 scientists 77–81 publications: 173 scientists 82–86 publications: 236 scientists 87–91 publications: 227 scientists 92–96 publications: 240 scientists 97–101 publications: 333 scientists 102–106 publications: 280 scientists 107–111 publications: 300 scientists 112–116 publications: 285 scientists 117–121 publications: 305 scientists 122–126 publications: 287 scientists 127–131 publications: 278 scientists 132–136 publications: 289 scientists 137–141 publications: 273 scientists 142–146 publications: 262 scientists 147–151 publications: 246 scientists 152–156 publications: 235 scientists 157–161 publications: 205 scientists 162–166 publications: 199 scientists 167–171 publications: 174 scientists 172–176 publications: 164 scientists 177–181 publications: 173 scientists 182–186 publications: 189 scientists 187–191 publications: 170 scientists 192–196 publications: 139 scientists 197–201 publications: 128 scientists 202–206 publications: 117 scientists 207–211 publications: 115 scientists 212–216 publications: 107 scientists 217–221 publications: 124 scientists 222–226 publications: 81 scientists 227–231 publications: 82 scientists 232–236 publications: 85 scientists 237–241 publications: 75 scientists 242–246 publications: 66 scientists 247–251 publications: 81 scientists 252–256 publications: 69 scientists 257–261 publications: 70 scientists 262–266 publications: 55 scientists 267–271 publications: 64 scientists 272–276 publications: 49 scientists 277–281 publications: 48 scientists 282–286 publications: 44 scientists 287–291 publications: 45 scientists 292–296 publications: 36 scientists 297–301 publications: 39 scientists 302–306 publications: 38 scientists 307–311 publications: 30 scientists 312–316 publications: 34 scientists 317–321 publications: 25 scientists 322–326 publications: 22 scientists 327–331 publications: 28 scientists 332–336 publications: 30 scientists 337–341 publications: 22 scientists 342–346 publications: 30 scientists 347–351 publications: 26 scientists 352–356 publications: 22 scientists 357–361 publications: 29 scientists 362–366 publications: 21 scientists 367–371 publications: 12 scientists 372–376 publications: 18 scientists 377–381 publications: 17 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 21 scientists 392–396 publications: 13 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 15 scientists 407–411 publications: 8 scientists 412–416 publications: 9 scientists 417–421 publications: 8 scientists 422–426 publications: 4 scientists 427–431 publications: 10 scientists 432–436 publications: 10 scientists 437–441 publications: 5 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 10 scientists 452–456 publications: 2 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 7 scientists 472–476 publications: 6 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 3 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 4 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 8 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 5 scientists 522–526 publications: 4 scientists 527–530 publications: 5 scientists 531+ publications: 100 scientists
37 publications 531+

This scientist: 183 publications — 67th percentile

67% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 531 publications or more.

Brett K. Sandercock D-index placement in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Ecology and Evolution scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Brett K. Sandercock sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 95 scientists 31 D-Index: 123 scientists 32 D-Index: 191 scientists 33 D-Index: 245 scientists 34 D-Index: 252 scientists 35 D-Index: 244 scientists 36 D-Index: 249 scientists 37 D-Index: 244 scientists 38 D-Index: 254 scientists 39 D-Index: 254 scientists 40 D-Index: 280 scientists 41 D-Index: 274 scientists 42 D-Index: 266 scientists 43 D-Index: 233 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 208 scientists 46 D-Index: 201 scientists 47 D-Index: 213 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 172 scientists 50 D-Index: 209 scientists 51 D-Index: 199 scientists 52 D-Index: 153 scientists 53 D-Index: 169 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 148 scientists 56 D-Index: 120 scientists 57 D-Index: 146 scientists 58 D-Index: 137 scientists 59 D-Index: 140 scientists 60 D-Index: 104 scientists 61 D-Index: 119 scientists 62 D-Index: 118 scientists 63 D-Index: 99 scientists 64 D-Index: 77 scientists 65 D-Index: 100 scientists 66 D-Index: 86 scientists 67 D-Index: 83 scientists 68 D-Index: 75 scientists 69 D-Index: 94 scientists 70 D-Index: 57 scientists 71 D-Index: 68 scientists 72 D-Index: 59 scientists 73 D-Index: 63 scientists 74 D-Index: 66 scientists 75 D-Index: 60 scientists 76 D-Index: 42 scientists 77 D-Index: 49 scientists 78 D-Index: 39 scientists 79 D-Index: 37 scientists 80 D-Index: 43 scientists 81 D-Index: 41 scientists 82 D-Index: 45 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 40 scientists 85 D-Index: 35 scientists 86 D-Index: 55 scientists 87 D-Index: 24 scientists 88 D-Index: 24 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 25 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 27 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 23 scientists 96 D-Index: 12 scientists 97 D-Index: 14 scientists 98 D-Index: 19 scientists 99 D-Index: 16 scientists 100 D-Index: 14 scientists 101 D-Index: 5 scientists 102 D-Index: 21 scientists 103 D-Index: 16 scientists 104 D-Index: 10 scientists 105 D-Index: 7 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 7 scientists 108 D-Index: 6 scientists 109 D-Index: 9 scientists 110 D-Index: 11 scientists 111 D-Index: 12 scientists 112 D-Index: 9 scientists 113 D-Index: 7 scientists 114 D-Index: 3 scientists 115 D-Index: 8 scientists 116 D-Index: 5 scientists 117 D-Index: 11 scientists 118 D-Index: 4 scientists 119 D-Index: 2 scientists 120 D-Index: 5 scientists 121+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 121+

This scientist: 48 D-Index — 51st percentile

51% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 121 D-Index or more.

Overview

Brett K. Sandercock is affiliated with Kansas State University in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on environmental science, with extensive work across related subfields including ecology, ecological modeling, nature and landscape conservation, global and planetary change, and the integration of ecology, evolution, behavior, and systematics.

The main topics covered in Sandercock's work involve species distribution and climate change, avian ecology and behavior, wildlife ecology and conservation, ecology and vegetation dynamics studies, climate variability and models, marine animal studies overview, and fish ecology and management studies.

Sandercock has contributed multiple publications to a variety of academic venues. The most frequent publication venues include The Auk, Global Change Biology, Ornithological Applications, Wader Study, and Ecology and Evolution.

Their recent papers demonstrate a focus on migratory birds, climate impacts, and conservation biology. Notable recent papers include:

  • Animal migration to northern latitudes: environmental changes and increasing threats (2021, Trends in Ecology & Evolution)
  • The future distribution of wetland birds breeding in Europe validated against observed changes in distribution (2022, Environmental Research Letters)
  • Benefits of protected areas for nonbreeding waterbirds adjusting their distributions under climate warming (2020, Conservation Biology)
  • Annual adult survival drives trends in Arctic-breeding shorebirds but knowledge gaps in other vital rates remain (2020, Ornithological Applications)
  • Impacts of predator-mediated interactions along a climatic gradient on the population dynamics of an alpine bird (2020, Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences)

Sandercock collaborates frequently with several researchers who contribute to similar fields of study. These frequent co-authors include Aleksi Lehikoinen, Alaaeldin Soultan, Diego Pavón-Jordán, Jon E. Brommer, and Élie Gaget.

Best Publications

  • The avian gut microbiota: community, physiology and function in wild birds

    Kirsten Grond;Brett K. Sandercock;Brett K. Sandercock;Ari Jumpponen;Lydia H. Zeglin

  • Estimation of Demographic Parameters from Live‐Encounter Data: a Summary Review

    Brett K. Sandercock

  • Is hunting mortality additive or compensatory to natural mortality? Effects of experimental harvest on the survival and cause-specific mortality of willow ptarmigan.

    Brett K. Sandercock;Erlend B. Nilsen;Henrik Brøseth;Hans C. Pedersen

  • Genetic similarity between mates and extra-pair parentage in three species of shorebirds

    Donald Blomqvist;Malte Andersson;Clemens Küpper;Innes C. Cuthill

  • Survival rates of a neotropical parrot: implications for latitudinal comparisons of avian demography

    Brett K. Sandercock;Steven R. Beissinger;Scott H. Stoleson;Rebecca R. Melland

  • Demographic Sensitivity of Population Change in Northern Bobwhite

    Brett K. Sandercock;William E. Jensen;Christopher K. Williams;Roger D. Applegate

  • ESTIMATING DORMANCY AND SURVIVAL OF A RARE HERBACEOUS PERENNIAL USING MARK–RECAPTURE MODELS

    Richard P. Shefferson;Brett K. Sandercock;Joyce Proper;Steven R. Beissinger

  • LIFE HISTORY STRATEGIES IN EXTREME ENVIRONMENTS: COMPARATIVE DEMOGRAPHY OF ARCTIC AND ALPINE PTARMIGAN

    Brett K. Sandercock;Brett K. Sandercock;Kathy Martin;Susan J. Hannon

  • Estimation of survival rates for wader populations: a review of mark-recapture methods

    Brett K. Sandercock

  • Unexpected diversity in socially synchronized rhythms of shorebirds

    Martin Bulla;Mihai Valcu;Adriaan M. Dokter;Alexei G. Dondua

  • Patterns and drivers of intraspecific variation in avian life history along elevational gradients: a meta‐analysis

    W. Alice Boyle;W. Alice Boyle;Brett K. Sandercock;Kathy Martin;Kathy Martin

  • Effects of wind energy development on nesting ecology of Greater Prairie-Chickens in fragmented grasslands

    Lance B. Mcnew;Lyla M. Hunt;Andrew J. Gregory;Samantha M. Wisely

  • Space use by female Greater Prairie‐Chickens in response to wind energy development

    V. L. Winder;L. B. McNew;A. J. Gregory;L. M. Hunt

  • ANNUAL SURVIVAL RATES OF WINTERING SPARROWS: ASSESSING DEMOGRAPHIC CONSEQUENCES OF MIGRATION

    Brett K. Sandercock;Alvaro Jaramillo

  • Animal migration to northern latitudes: environmental changes and increasing threats

    Vojtěch Kubelka;Brett K. Sandercock;Tamás Székely;Tamás Székely;Robert P. Freckleton

  • Age-Specific Survival and Probable Causes of Mortality in Female Lesser Prairie-Chickens

    Christian A. Hagen;James C. Pitman;Brett K. Sandercock;Robert J. Robel

  • Spatial Variation in Lesser Prairie-Chicken Demography: A Sensitivity Analysis of Population Dynamics and Management Alternatives

    Christian A. Hagen;Brett K. Sandercock;James C. Pitman;Robert J. Robel

  • Effects of wind energy development on survival of female greater prairie-chickens

    Virginia L. Winder;Lance B. McNew;Andrew J. Gregory;Lyla M. Hunt

  • Recruitment and establishment of the gut microbiome in arctic shorebirds.

    Kirsten Grond;Richard B Lanctot;Ari Jumpponen;Brett K Sandercock

  • Composition and Drivers of Gut Microbial Communities in Arctic-Breeding Shorebirds

    Kirsten Grond;Kirsten Grond;Jorge W. Santo Domingo;Richard B. Lanctot;Ari Jumpponen

  • Mortality within the annual cycle: seasonal survival patterns in Afro-Siberian Red Knots Calidris canutus canutus

    Jutta Leyrer;Jutta Leyrer;Tamar Lok;Maarten Brugge;Bernard Spaans

  • Demography of greater prairie‐chickens: Regional variation in vital rates, sensitivity values, and population dynamics

    Lance B. McNew;Andrew J. Gregory;Samantha M. Wisely;Brett K. Sandercock

  • Demographic consequences of age-structure in extreme environments: population models for arctic and alpine ptarmigan

    Brett K. Sandercock;Kathy Martin;Susan J. Hannon

  • Supporting Information for 'Unexpected diversity in socially synchronized rhythms of shorebirds'

    Martin Bulla;Mihai Valcu;Adriaan M. Dokter;Alexei G. Dondua

Frequent Co-Authors

Richard B. Lanctot
Richard B. Lanctot United States Fish and Wildlife Service
David B. Lank
David B. Lank Simon Fraser University
Samantha M. Wisely
Samantha M. Wisely University of Florida
Christian A. Hagen
Christian A. Hagen Oregon State University
Bart Kempenaers
Bart Kempenaers Max Planck Institute for Ornithology
Erica Nol
Erica Nol Trent University
Keith A. Hobson
Keith A. Hobson University of Western Ontario
Susan M. Haig
Susan M. Haig Oregon State University
David H. Ward
David H. Ward United States Geological Survey
Reed Bowman
Reed Bowman Archbold Biological Station

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Ecology and Evolution can open doors to a range of interdisciplinary careers. Many fields, such as environmental planning, data analysis, and science communication, intersect with ecology and benefit from diverse skill sets. Today, students can broaden their expertise through flexible online learning options that cater to a variety of interests and career goals.

For those interested in environmental design, the best online architecture degree programs provide valuable insight into sustainable construction and landscape planning. Analytical minds may find online math degree programs especially useful for data modeling and research in ecological studies.

If you want to present scientific findings visually, online graphic design courses can help develop communication and visualization skills, which are essential when sharing complex research with wider audiences. Additionally, for flexible, customizable studies, the most affordable online interdisciplinary studies programs allow students to create degree paths that integrate ecology, evolution, and related fields.

By combining skills from these areas, graduates can pursue a range of innovative careers that make an impact on the natural world.

Best Scientists Citing Brett K. Sandercock

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles