World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
80
Citations
21240
World Ranking
17208
National Ranking
8622

Lazar J. Greenfield publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Lazar J. Greenfield sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 403 publications — 39th percentile

39% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Lazar J. Greenfield D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Lazar J. Greenfield sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 80 D-Index — 16th percentile

16% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Lazar J. Greenfield is affiliated with the University of Michigan-Ann Arbor in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on Neuroscience and Medicine, with a substantial emphasis on Cognitive Neuroscience as a key subfield. The scientist's work covers a range of topics related to neural function and brain connectivity.

The main topics addressed in their research include:

  • Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • Neural dynamics and brain function
  • EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
  • Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Neuropeptides and Animal Physiology
  • Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling
  • Long-Term Effects of COVID-19

Greenfield has contributed to several publication venues, frequently publishing in:

  • Neurology
  • Annals of Neurology
  • Experimental Neurology
  • Multiple Sclerosis and Related Disorders
  • Scientific Reports

Some of the recent papers authored or co-authored by Greenfield include:

  • "Vulnerability of cholecystokinin-expressing GABAergic interneurons in the unilateral intrahippocampal kainate mouse model of temporal lobe epilepsy" (2021, Experimental Neurology)
  • "Mild COVID-19 infection despite chronic B cell depletion in a patient with aquaporin-4-positive neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder." (2020, Multiple Sclerosis and Related Disorders)
  • "Network analysis of preictal iEEG reveals changes in network structure preceding seizure onset" (2022, Scientific Reports)
  • "Subjective Memory Complaints and Memory Dysfunction in Epilepsy (4486)" (2021, Neurology)
  • "Network Analysis of Preictal iEEG Reveals Changes in Network Structure Preceding Seizure Onset" (2022, Research Square)

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Greenfield include:

  • Stefan Sumsky
  • Young-Jin Kang
  • Ethan M. Clement
  • In-Hyun Park
  • Bret N. Smith

Best Publications

  • Relationship of the proinflammatory cytokines to myocardial ischemia and dysfunction after uncomplicated coronary revascularization

    Hani A. Hennein;Hailu Ebba;Jorge L. Rodriguez;Scot H. Merrick

  • Burnout among American surgeons

    Darrell A. Campbell;Seema S. Sonnad;Frederic E. Eckhauser;Kyle K. Campbell

  • Renal artery aneurysms: a 35-year clinical experience with 252 aneurysms in 168 patients.

    Peter K. Henke;Jeffry D. Cardneau;Theodore H. Welling;Gilbert R. Upchurch

  • Vascular prosthetic infections: collected experience and results of treatment.

    Liekweg Wg;Greenfield Lj

  • Natural history and management of iliac aneurysms

    James W. Richardson;Lazar J. Greenfield

  • American Surgical Association Blue Ribbon Committee Report on Surgical Education: 2004.

    Haile T. Debas;Barbara L. Bass;Murray F. Brennan;Timothy C. Flynn

  • Classification and grading of chronic venous disease in the lower limbs. A consensus statement

    Hugh G. Beebe;John J. Bergan;David Bergqvist;Bo Eklof

  • Length of stay has minimal impact on the cost of hospital admission.

    Paul A Taheri;David A Butz;Lazar J Greenfield

  • Twelve-year clinical experience with the Greenfield vena caval filter.

    L J Greenfield;B A Michna

  • Classification and grading of chronic venous disease in the lower limbs : a consensus statement

    H. G. Beebe;J. J. Bergan;D. Bergqvist;B. Eklof

  • Inhibition of surgically induced ischemia/reperfusion injury by oxygen free radical scavengers.

    James R. Stewart;William H. Blackwell;Stephen L. Crute;Victor Loughlin

  • Diagnosis and endovascular treatment of iliocaval compression syndrome.

    Darren R. Hurst;Andrew R. Forauer;Jess R. Bloom;Lazar J. Greenfield

  • Posttrauma thromboembolism prophylaxis.

    Lazar J. Greenfield;Mary C. Proctor;Jorge L. Rodriguez;Fred A. Luchette

  • Fetal response to injury in the rabbit

    Thomas M. Krummel;Jeffrey M. Nelson;Robert F. Diegelmann;William J. Lindblad

  • Clinical characteristics and surgical management of vascular complications in patients undergoing cardiac catheterization : interventional versus diagnostic procedures

    Louis M. Messina;Thomas W. Wakefield;Gerald B. Zelenock

  • Early Placement of Prophylactic Vena Caval Filters in Injured Patients at High Risk for Pulmonary Embolism

    Jorge L. Rodriguez;Juliet M. Lopez;Mary C. Proctor;Janna L. Conley

  • Twenty-year clinical experience with the Greenfield filter

    L. J. Greenfield;M. C. Proctor

  • Venous Thrombosis–Associated Inflammation and Attenuation With Neutralizing Antibodies to Cytokines and Adhesion Molecules

    Thomas W. Wakefield;Robert M. Strieter;Carol A. Wilke;Amy M. Kadell

  • Surgeon age and operative mortality in the United States.

    Jennifer F. Waljee;Lazar J. Greenfield;Justin B. Dimick;John D. Birkmeyer

  • EFFECT OF POSITIVE PRESSURE VENTILATION ON SURFACE TENSION PROPERTIES OF LUNG EXTRACTS.

    Lazar J. Greenfield;Paul A. Ebert;Donald W. Benson

Frequent Co-Authors

Thomas W. Wakefield
Thomas W. Wakefield University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
James C. Stanley
James C. Stanley University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Peter K. Henke
Peter K. Henke University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Harvey J. Sugerman
Harvey J. Sugerman Virginia Commonwealth University
Gilbert R. Upchurch
Gilbert R. Upchurch University of Florida
Robert M. Strieter
Robert M. Strieter University of Virginia
Marie D. Burdick
Marie D. Burdick University of Virginia
John J. Bergan
John J. Bergan University of California, San Diego
David Bergqvist
David Bergqvist Uppsala University
Mitchel P. Goldman
Mitchel P. Goldman University of California, San Diego

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re exploring a career in medicine but prefer flexible study options, there are several accredited online degrees that can help you start or advance in healthcare. Online programs can make education more accessible and affordable, especially for working adults or career changers.

For registered nurses looking to earn a bachelor’s degree, consider the cheapest accredited online rn to bsn programs to gain higher qualifications without breaking the bank. If you don’t have a nursing background but aspire to become a nurse at the master’s level, direct entry msn online options provide an accelerated pathway.

For those just getting started, online adn programs for non nurses offer a practical entry point to the nursing field, with flexible admissions requirements. And if you’re interested in administrative roles, exploring accredited medical billing and coding schools online with financial aid can open doors to vital healthcare support careers.

Each of these pathways allows you to start or advance a rewarding healthcare career with the convenience of online education.

Best Scientists Citing Lazar J. Greenfield

Trending Scientists