World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
93
Citations
41015
World Ranking
10722
National Ranking
5513

James C. Stanley publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where James C. Stanley sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 445 publications — 48th percentile

48% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

James C. Stanley D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where James C. Stanley sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 93 D-Index — 47th percentile

47% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

James C. Stanley is affiliated with the University of Michigan-Ann Arbor in the United States. Their research primarily falls within the field of Medicine, with specific contributions in several subfields including Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Surgery, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Pharmacology, and Molecular Biology.

The scientist has contributed extensively to the study of renal and vascular pathologies and vascular anomalies and interventions. Their work also addresses abdominal vascular conditions and treatments, as well as topics related to the pharmaceutical industry and healthcare. Additional research interests cover connective tissue growth factor research, aortic aneurysm repair treatments, and pharmaceutical economics and policy.

James C. Stanley's frequent publication venues reflect a strong focus on vascular and cardiovascular research, including:

  • Journal of Vascular Surgery
  • Nature Communications
  • Annals of Vascular Surgery
  • Arteriosclerosis Thrombosis and Vascular Biology
  • Circulation Genomic and Precision Medicine

Their recent papers include:

  • Chromosome 1q21.2 and additional loci influence risk of spontaneous coronary artery dissection and myocardial infarction, 2020, Nature Communications
  • Genetic investigation of fibromuscular dysplasia identifies risk loci and shared genetics with common cardiovascular diseases, 2021, Nature Communications
  • A Novel Recurrent COL5A1 Genetic Variant Is Associated With a Dysplasia-Associated Arterial Disease Exhibiting Dissections and Fibromuscular Dysplasia, 2020, Arteriosclerosis Thrombosis and Vascular Biology
  • Surgical management of pediatric renin-mediated hypertension secondary to renal artery occlusive disease and abdominal aortic coarctation, 2020, Journal of Vascular Surgery
  • Fibromuscular Dysplasia and Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms Are Dimorphic Sex-Specific Diseases With Shared Complex Genetic Architecture, 2022, Circulation Genomic and Precision Medicine

James C. Stanley has collaborated frequently with several coauthors, including:

  • Dawn M. Coleman
  • Santhi K. Ganesh
  • Kristina L. Hunker
  • Min-Lee Yang
  • Jun Z. Li

Best Publications

  • ACC/AHA 2005 Practice Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Peripheral Arterial Disease (Lower Extremity, Renal, Mesenteric, and Abdominal Aortic)

    Alan T. Hirsch;Ziv J. Haskal;Norman R. Hertzer;Curtis W. Bakal

  • Suggested standards for reporting on arterial aneurysms

    K.Wayne Johnston;Robert B. Rutherford;M.David Tilson;Dhiraj M. Shah

  • ACC/AHA 2005 guidelines for the management of patients with peripheral arterial disease (Lower extremity, renal, mesenteric, and abdominal aortic): Executive summary a collaborative report from the American Association for Vascular Surgery/Society for Vas

    A. T. Hirsch;Z. J. Haskal;N. R. Hertzer;C. W. Bakal

  • 2011 ACCF/AHA Focused Update of the Guideline for the Management of Patients With Peripheral Artery Disease (Updating the 2005 Guideline) A Report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines

    Thom W. Rooke;Alan T. Hirsch;Sanjay Misra;Anton N. Sidawy

  • Breath-hold gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography of the abdominal aorta and its major branches.

    M R Prince;D L Narasimham;J C Stanley;T L Chenevert

  • ACC/AHA Guidelines for the Management of Patients with Peripheral Arterial Disease (Lower Extremity, Renal, Mesenteric, and Abdominal Aortic)

    Alan T. Hirsch;Ziv J. Haskal;Norman R. Hertzer;Curtis W. Bakal

  • Clinical importance and management of splanchnic artery aneurysms.

    James C. Stanley;Thomas W. Wakefield;Linda M. Graham;Walter M. Whitehouse

  • Recombinant gene expression in vivo within endothelial cells of the arterial wall

    Elizabeth G. Nabel;Gregory Plautz;Frederick M. Boyce;James C. Stanley

  • Nitric Oxide Reversibly Inhibits the Migration of Cultured Vascular Smooth Muscle Cells

    Rajabrata Sarkar;Eric G. Meinberg;James C. Stanley;R. David Gordon

  • Actuarial analysis of variables associated with rupture of small abdominal aortic aneurysms

    J. L. Cronenwett;T. F. Murphy;G. B. Zelenock;W. M. Whitehouse

  • Splanchnic Artery Aneurysms

    James C. Stanley;Norman W. Thompson;William J. Fry

  • Pathogenesis and clinical significance of splenic artery aneurysms.

    James C. Stanley;William J. Fry

  • Operative mortality rates for intact and ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms in Michigan: an eleven-year statewide experience

    Dolores J. Katz;James C. Stanley;Gerald B. Zelenock

  • Arterial Fibrodysplasia: Histopathologic Character and Current Etiologic Concepts

    James C. Stanley;Bruce L. Gewertz;Edward L. Bove;Vikrom Sottiurai

  • Renal artery aneurysms: a 35-year clinical experience with 252 aneurysms in 168 patients.

    Peter K. Henke;Jeffry D. Cardneau;Theodore H. Welling;Gilbert R. Upchurch

  • Fibromuscular Dysplasia: State of the Science and Critical Unanswered Questions A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association

    Jeffrey W. Olin;Heather L. Gornik;J. Michael Bacharach;Jose Biller

  • Surgical treatment of intact thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms in the United States: Hospital and surgeon volume-related outcomes

    John A Cowan;Justin B Dimick;Peter K Henke;Thomas S Huber

  • Evaluation of a cerebral oximeter as a monitor of cerebral ischemia during carotid endarterectomy.

    Satwant K. Samra;Eric A. Dy;Kathy Welch;Pema Dorje

  • Neutrophil depletion inhibits experimental abdominal aortic aneurysm formation.

    Jonathan L. Eliason;Kevin K. Hannawa;Gorav Ailawadi;Indranil Sinha

  • 2011 ACCF/AHA Focused update of the guideline for the management of patients with peripheral artery disease (updating the 2005 guideline): A Report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines - Developed in Collaboration with the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, Society of Interventional Radiology

    Thom W. Rooke;Alan T. Hirsch;Sanjay Misra;Anton N. Sidawy

Frequent Co-Authors

Thomas W. Wakefield
Thomas W. Wakefield University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Gilbert R. Upchurch
Gilbert R. Upchurch University of Florida
Peter K. Henke
Peter K. Henke University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Lazar J. Greenfield
Lazar J. Greenfield University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Justin B. Dimick
Justin B. Dimick University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
David M. Williams
David M. Williams Brown University
Santhi K. Ganesh
Santhi K. Ganesh University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Jeffrey W. Olin
Jeffrey W. Olin Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
Philip C. Andrews
Philip C. Andrews University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
David Bergqvist
David Bergqvist Uppsala University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Medicine in the USA opens the door to a variety of related online degrees and flexible career options. Besides a traditional medical degree, students can consider online programs that broaden their healthcare opportunities.

For those interested in pharmacy, many universities now offer online pharmd programs, allowing students to pursue an advanced pharmacy education while balancing work or other commitments. Similarly, a online bachelor's in health information management provides a pathway into the fast-growing field of health informatics and data management, without the need to attend on-campus classes.

Those looking for a quicker entry into the healthcare workforce might opt for certification routes. The medical coding certification cost is much lower than traditional degree programs, making it an appealing choice for career changers or those seeking affordable training.

Finally, students who wish to advance into clinical practice roles may consider the cheapest nurse practitioner programs available online. These programs are designed with flexibility and affordability in mind, providing another alternative for building a rewarding medical career.

Best Scientists Citing James C. Stanley

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles