World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Peter Gloviczki

Peter Gloviczki

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
112
Citations
44161
World Ranking
5154
National Ranking
2787

Peter Gloviczki publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peter Gloviczki sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 768 publications — 85th percentile

85% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Peter Gloviczki D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peter Gloviczki sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 112 D-Index — 75th percentile

75% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Peter Gloviczki is affiliated with the Mayo Clinic in the United States and has contributed extensively to the field of medicine, particularly focusing on vascular and cardiovascular disorders. Their research spans several interconnected disciplines, with primary fields of study including pulmonary and respiratory medicine, surgery, internal medicine, cardiology and cardiovascular medicine, and emergency medical services.

The main research topics covered by Peter Gloviczki revolve around venous thromboembolism diagnosis and management, peripheral artery disease management, diagnosis and treatment of venous diseases, aortic aneurysm repair treatments, cerebrovascular and carotid artery diseases, cardiac anesthesia and surgical outcomes, as well as vascular procedures and complications.

Peter Gloviczki has a significant number of publications in key academic journals. Frequent publication venues include:

  • Journal of Vascular Surgery (59 publications)
  • Journal of Vascular Surgery Venous and Lymphatic Disorders (31 publications)
  • Journal of Vascular Surgery Cases and Innovative Techniques (12 publications)
  • International Angiology (8 publications)
  • Annals of Vascular Surgery (6 publications)

Collaborations have been an essential aspect of their professional work, with frequent co-authors including:

  • Peter F. Lawrence (53 collaborations)
  • Kosmas I. Paraskevas (28 collaborations)
  • Young Erben (21 collaborations)
  • Armando Mansilha (20 collaborations)
  • Bruce A. Perler (20 collaborations)

In terms of scholarly papers, some of the recent publications authored by Peter Gloviczki include:

  • The 2023 Society for Vascular Surgery, American Venous Forum, and American Vein and Lymphatic Society clinical practice guidelines for the management of varicose veins of the lower extremities. Part II, 2023, Journal of Vascular Surgery Venous and Lymphatic Disorders
  • The 2022 Society for Vascular Surgery, American Venous Forum, and American Vein and Lymphatic Society clinical practice guidelines for the management of varicose veins of the lower extremities. Part I. Duplex Scanning and Treatment of Superficial Truncal Reflux, 2022, Journal of Vascular Surgery Venous and Lymphatic Disorders

Other influential papers in vascular surgery and venous diseases, although not authored by Gloviczki but with high citation counts relevant to their field, include:

  • The 2020 update of the CEAP classification system and reporting standards by Fedor Lurie, 2020, Journal of Vascular Surgery Venous and Lymphatic Disorders
  • Editor's Choice - European Society for Vascular Surgery (ESVS) 2021 Clinical Practice Guidelines on the Management of Venous Thrombosis by Stavros K. Kakkos, 2020, European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery
  • The 2020 appropriate use criteria for chronic lower extremity venous disease of the American Venous Forum, the Society for Vascular Surgery, the American Vein and Lymphatic Society, and the Society of Interventional Radiology by Elna M. Masuda, 2020, Journal of Vascular Surgery Venous and Lymphatic Disorders

Best Publications

  • Revision of the CEAP classification for chronic venous disorders: Consensus statement

    Bo Eklöf;Robert B. Rutherford;John J. Bergan;Patrick H. Carpentier

  • The care of patients with varicose veins and associated chronic venous diseases: Clinical practice guidelines of the Society for Vascular Surgery and the American Venous Forum

    Peter Gloviczki;Anthony J. Comerota;Michael C. Dalsing;Bo G. Eklof

  • Management of venous leg ulcers: clinical practice guidelines of the Society for Vascular Surgery ® and the American Venous Forum.

    Thomas F. O'Donnell;Marc A. Passman;William A. Marston;William J. Ennis

  • Klippel-Trénaunay syndrome: spectrum and management.

    Anila G. Jacob;David J. Driscoll;William J. Shaughnessy;Anthony W. Stanson

  • Contemporary management of acute mesenteric ischemia: Factors associated with survival.

    Woosup M. Park;Peter Gloviczki;Kenneth J. Cherry;John W. Hallett

  • The 2020 update of the CEAP classification system and reporting standards

    Fedor Lurie;Marc Passman;Mark Meisner;Michael Dalsing

  • Nomenclature of the veins of the lower limbs: an international interdisciplinary consensus statement.

    Alberto Caggiati;John J Bergan;Peter Gloviczki;Gorges Jantet

  • Mesenteric venous thrombosis: Still a lethal disease in the 1990s

    Robert Y. Rhee;Peter Gloviczki;Celio T. Mendonca;Tanya M. Petterson

  • Infected aortic aneurysms: aggressive presentation, complicated early outcome, but durable results.

    Gustavo S. Oderich;Jean M. Panneton;Jean M. Panneton;Thomas C. Bower;Thomas C. Bower;Kenneth J. Cherry;Kenneth J. Cherry

  • Splenic Artery Aneurysms: Two Decades Experience at Mayo Clinic

    Maher A. Abbas;William M. Stone;Richard J. Fowl;Peter Gloviczki

  • Graft-related complications after abdominal aortic aneurysm repair: Reassurance from a 36-year population-based experience

    John W. Hallett;Donna M. Marshall;Tanya M. Petterson;Darryl T. Gray

  • Updated terminology of chronic venous disorders: the VEIN-TERM transatlantic interdisciplinary consensus document.

    Bo Eklof;Michel Perrin;Konstantinos T. Delis;Robert B. Rutherford

  • Endovenous laser therapy and radiofrequency ablation of the great saphenous vein: analysis of early efficacy and complications.

    Alessandra Puggioni;Manju Kalra;Michele Carmo;Geza Mozes

  • Early thrombus removal strategies for acute deep venous thrombosis: Clinical Practice Guidelines of the Society for Vascular Surgery and the American Venous Forum

    Mark H. Meissner;Peter Gloviczki;Anthony J. Comerota;Michael C. Dalsing

  • Editor's Choice - Management of the Diseases of Mesenteric Arteries and Veins: Clinical Practice Guidelines of the European Society of Vascular Surgery (ESVS).

    Martin Björck;M Koelemay;S Acosta

  • The hemodynamics and diagnosis of venous disease.

    Mark H. Meissner;Gregory Moneta;Kevin Burnand;Peter Gloviczki

  • The spectrum, management and clinical outcome of Ehlers-Danlos syndrome type IV: a 30-year experience.

    Gustavo S. Oderich;Jean M. Panneton;Thomas C. Bower;Noralane M. Lindor

  • Editor's Choice - European Society for Vascular Surgery (ESVS) 2021 Clinical Practice Guidelines on the Management of Venous Thrombosis.

    Stavros K. Kakkos;Manjit Gohel;Niels Baekgaard;Rupert Bauersachs

  • Clinical features and management of splenic artery pseudoaneurysm: case series and cumulative review of literature

    Deron J Tessier;William M Stone;Richard J Fowl;Maher A Abbas

  • Hepatic artery aneurysm: factors that predict complications.

    Maher A Abbas;Richard J Fowl;William M Stone;Jean M Panneton

Frequent Co-Authors

Thomas C. Bower
Thomas C. Bower Mayo Clinic
Mark D. Fleming
Mark D. Fleming Boston Children's Hospital
Stephen S. Cha
Stephen S. Cha Mayo Clinic
Timothy O'Brien
Timothy O'Brien University of Minnesota

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Medicine in the USA opens doors to a wide range of rewarding careers—not just as a practicing physician. Many students also explore related fields available through flexible, affordable online programs that can complement or offer alternatives to traditional medical degrees.

For registered nurses interested in leadership or advanced practice, the cheapest BSN to DNP programs provide a pathway to the highest level of clinical nursing education. Pharmacy professionals can continue their studies through pharmacy school online, letting them advance without interrupting their careers.

Beyond clinical roles, the healthcare industry offers crucial administrative positions. Earning a health information management degree online is ideal for those interested in healthcare data, records, and compliance. Likewise, individuals seeking entry-level opportunities may look into how much is medical billing and coding school to begin a career in medical billing and coding, an essential support role in healthcare organizations.

Each of these online pathways offers flexibility and affordability, making them attractive options for those pursuing a future in healthcare.

Best Scientists Citing Peter Gloviczki

Trending Scientists