World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
75
Citations
22750
World Ranking
19073
National Ranking
9507

John J. Bergan publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John J. Bergan sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 437 publications — 46th percentile

46% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

John J. Bergan D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John J. Bergan sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 75 D-Index — 6th percentile

6% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

John J. Bergan was a researcher affiliated with the University of California, San Diego in the United States. Their work was primarily situated within the field of Medicine, with particular focus on Surgery and Internal Medicine as subfields of study.

Their research contributions addressed several key medical topics, including:

  • Diagnosis and Treatment of Venous Diseases
  • Venous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management
  • Peripheral Artery Disease Management

A notable publication from Bergan was titled Management of chronic venous disorders of the lower limbs. Guidelines According to Scientific Evidence. Part II., published in 2020 in the venue PubMed. This work included contributions from Andrew Nicolaides and was cited 366 times.

Bergan collaborated frequently with several researchers across their work. These co-authors included:

  • Andrew Nicolaides
  • Claudio Allegra
  • Andrew W. Bradbury
  • Marc Cairols
  • P. Carpentier

Their publications appeared predominantly in PubMed, a venue representing the primary outlet for their scientific papers.

Best Publications

  • Revision of the CEAP classification for chronic venous disorders: Consensus statement

    Bo Eklöf;Robert B. Rutherford;John J. Bergan;Patrick H. Carpentier

  • Six-year prospective multicenter randomized comparison of autologous saphenous vein and expanded polytetrafluoroethylene grafts in infrainguinal arterial reconstructions.

    Frank J. Veith;Sushil K. Gupta;Enrico Ascer;Sheila White-Flores

  • Chronic venous disease.

    John J Bergan;Geert W Schmid-Schönbein;Philip D Coleridge Smith;Andrew N Nicolaides

  • Carotid Endarterectomy and Prevention of Cerebral Ischemia in Symptomatic Carotid Stenosis

    M R Mayberg;S E Wilson;F Yatsu;D G Weiss

  • Nomenclature of the veins of the lower limbs: an international interdisciplinary consensus statement.

    Alberto Caggiati;John J Bergan;Peter Gloviczki;Gorges Jantet

  • Chronic Venous Disease in an Ethnically Diverse Population The San Diego Population Study

    Michael H. Criqui;Maritess Jamosmos;Arnost Fronek;Julie O. Denenberg

  • Classification and grading of chronic venous disease in the lower limbs. A consensus statement

    Hugh G. Beebe;John J. Bergan;David Bergqvist;Bo Eklof

  • Mid-term results of endoscopic perforator vein interruption for chronic venous insufficiency: Lessons learned from the North American Subfascial Endoscopic Perforator Surgery registry

    Peter Gloviczki;John J. Bergan;Jeffrey M. Rhodes;Linda G. Canton

  • Quality of life in patients with chronic venous disease: San Diego population study

    Robert M. Kaplan;Michael H. Criqui;Julie O. Denenberg;John Bergan

  • Endovascular Stent-Graft Treatment of Traumatic Arterial Lesions

    Juan C. Parodi;Claudio Schönholz;Luis M. Ferreira;John Bergan

  • Nomenclature of the veins of the lower limb : Extensions, refinements, and clinical application

    Alberto Caggiati;John J. Bergan;Peter Gloviczki;Bo Eklof

  • Classification and grading of chronic venous disease in the lower limbs : a consensus statement

    H. G. Beebe;J. J. Bergan;D. Bergqvist;B. Eklof

  • Summary of cases of adventitial cystic disease of the popliteal artery

    D. Flanigan;Steven Burnham;James Goodreau;John Bergan

  • Randomization of autogenous vein and polytetrafluorethylene grafts in femoral-distal reconstruction.

    John J. Bergan;John J. Bergan;John J. Bergan;Frank J. Veith;Frank J. Veith;Frank J. Veith;Victor M. Bernhard;Victor M. Bernhard;Victor M. Bernhard;James S.T. Yao;James S.T. Yao;James S.T. Yao

  • Monocyte infiltration into venous valves

    Takashi Ono;John J. Bergan;Geert W. Schmid-Schönbein;Shinya Takase

  • Femoral Venous Reflux Abolished by Greater Saphenous Vein Stripping

    Jon C. Walsh;John J. Bergan;Sue Beeman;Thomas P. Comer

  • Mesenteric venous thrombosis

    Timothy R.S. Harward;David Green;John J. Bergan;Robert J. Rizzo

  • Primary chronic venous disorders.

    Mark H. Meissner;Peter Gloviczki;John Bergan;Robert L. Kistner

  • Defining the role of extended saphenofemoral junction ligation: a prospective comparative study.

    James G. Chandler;Olivier Pichot;Carmine Sessa;Sanja Schuller-Petrović

  • Classification and grading of chronic venous disease in the lower limbs--a consensus statement. Organized by Straub Foundation with the cooperation of the American Venous Forum at the 6th annual meeting, February 22-25, 1994, Maui, Hawaii

    H G Beebe;J J Bergan;D Bergqvist;B Eklof

Frequent Co-Authors

Geert W. Schmid-Schönbein
Geert W. Schmid-Schönbein University of California, San Diego
Mitchel P. Goldman
Mitchel P. Goldman University of California, San Diego
Peter Gloviczki
Peter Gloviczki Mayo Clinic
Gregory L. Moneta
Gregory L. Moneta Oregon Health & Science University
John M. Porter
John M. Porter Oregon Health & Science University
Lazar J. Greenfield
Lazar J. Greenfield University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Andrew N. Nicolaides
Andrew N. Nicolaides Imperial College London
Thomas F. O'Donnell
Thomas F. O'Donnell Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
David Bergqvist
David Bergqvist Uppsala University
Michael H. Criqui
Michael H. Criqui University of California, San Diego

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a career in medicine doesn't always require taking the traditional MD path. Many students today are looking for flexible and affordable options to enter healthcare by studying online. If you’re already a registered nurse seeking to advance your qualifications, you may be interested in the cheapest accredited online rn to bsn programs that can help you earn a BSN without breaking the bank.

For those without a nursing background, there are dedicated direct entry nurse practitioner programs for non-nurses online which offer a fast track into advanced nursing practice. Additionally, students searching for flexible entry points can explore online bsn programs for non nurses that focus on accessibility and convenience.

If you’re interested in the administrative side of healthcare, consider programs in medical billing and coding. Many schools provide these courses entirely online, and you can learn more about financial aid for medical billing and coding online classes to help offset costs. Whichever path you choose, online healthcare degrees provide a range of opportunities for diverse career aspirations.

Best Scientists Citing John J. Bergan

Recently Published Articles