World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 88 13341 12556 6785 6275 681 23183

Alan B. Lumsden publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Alan B. Lumsden between 1982 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Alan B. Lumsden published across 44 years, from 1982 to 2025, averaging 16.9 papers a year. Output peaked at 50 publications in 2006. 48 of the 743 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30 40 50
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1982 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 50. Peak 50 publications in 2006. 1982: 1 publication 1983: 0 publications 1984: 2 publications 1985: 7 publications 1986: 6 publications 1987: 0 publications 1988: 3 publications 1989: 3 publications 1990: 5 publications 1991: 1 publication 1992: 4 publications 1993: 10 publications 1994: 13 publications 1995: 21 publications 1996: 17 publications 1997: 22 publications 1998: 12 publications 1999: 6 publications 2000: 9 publications 2001: 17 publications 2002: 19 publications 2003: 40 publications 2004: 37 publications 2005: 44 publications 2006: 50 publications 2007: 25 publications 2008: 28 publications 2009: 23 publications 2010: 22 publications 2011: 48 publications 2012: 27 publications 2013: 15 publications 2014: 17 publications 2015: 11 publications 2016: 19 publications 2017: 15 publications 2018: 17 publications 2019: 14 publications 2020: 14 publications 2021: 15 publications 2022: 22 publications 2023: 14 publications 2024: 14 publications 2025: 34 publications
1982 2025

743 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Alan B. Lumsden: publications per year, 1982 to 2025
Year Publications
1982 1
1983 0
1984 2
1985 7
1986 6
1987 0
1988 3
1989 3
1990 5
1991 1
1992 4
1993 10
1994 13
1995 21
1996 17
1997 22
1998 12
1999 6
2000 9
2001 17
2002 19
2003 40
2004 37
2005 44
2006 50
2007 25
2008 28
2009 23
2010 22
2011 48
2012 27
2013 15
2014 17
2015 11
2016 19
2017 15
2018 17
2019 14
2020 14
2021 15
2022 22
2023 14
2024 14
2025 34
Total 743
Download as CSV

Alan B. Lumsden publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Alan B. Lumsden sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 681–700 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 681 publications — 79th percentile

79% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336 681
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Alan B. Lumsden D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Alan B. Lumsden sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 88–89 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 88 D-Index — 36th percentile

36% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970 88
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Alan B. Lumsden is affiliated with Houston Methodist in the United States and specializes in medicine with a focused research output in pulmonary and respiratory medicine, surgery, cardiology and cardiovascular medicine, neurology, and biomedical engineering.

Their work primarily addresses topics related to aortic aneurysm repair treatments, cerebrovascular and carotid artery diseases, aortic disease and treatment approaches, peripheral artery disease management, intracranial aneurysms including treatment and complications, cardiac anesthesia, surgical outcomes, and acute ischemic stroke management.

Recent publications by Alan B. Lumsden include the following:

  • Current utilization and future directions of robotic-assisted endovascular surgery, 2020, Expert Review of Medical Devices
  • Role of Teleproctoring in Challenging and Innovative Structural Interventions Amid the COVID-19 Pandemic and Beyond, 2020, JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions
  • Pivotal Clinical Study to Evaluate the Safety and Effectiveness of the MANTA Vascular Closure Device During Percutaneous EVAR and TEVAR Procedures, 2020, Journal of Endovascular Therapy
  • First in Man Pilot Feasibility Study in Extracranial Carotid Robotic-Assisted Endovascular Intervention, 2020, Neurosurgery
  • Parallel grafts and physician modified endografts for endovascular repair of the aortic arch, 2021, Annals of Cardiothoracic Surgery

Key frequent co-authors collaborating with Lumsden include:

  • Ponraj Chinnadurai
  • Márton Berczeli
  • Charudatta Bavare
  • Trisha Roy
  • Péter Legeza

Several venues have regularly featured Alan B. Lumsden's work, among them:

  • Journal of Vascular Surgery
  • Methodist DeBakey Cardiovascular Journal
  • Journal of Vascular Surgery Cases and Innovative Techniques
  • Journal of Endovascular Therapy
  • Annals of Vascular Surgery

Best Publications

  • The Society for Vascular Surgery: Clinical practice guidelines for the surgical placement and maintenance of arteriovenous hemodialysis access

    Anton N. Sidawy;Lawrence M. Spergel;Anatole Besarab;Michael Allon

  • Endotoxin levels measured by a chromogenic assay in portal, hepatic and peripheral venous blood in patients with cirrhosis

    Alan B. Lumsden;J. M. Henderson;M. H. Kutner

  • Fibromuscular Dysplasia: State of the Science and Critical Unanswered Questions A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association

    Jeffrey W. Olin;Heather L. Gornik;J. Michael Bacharach;Jose Biller

  • The Society for Vascular Surgery Practice Guidelines: management of the left subclavian artery with thoracic endovascular aortic repair.

    Jon S. Matsumura;W. Anthony Lee;R. Scott Mitchell;Mark A. Farber

  • Nonoperative management of visceral aneurysmsand pseudoaneurysms

    Tarek A. Salam;Alan B. Lumsden;Louis G. Martin;Robert B. Smith

  • The management of splenic artery aneurysms: experience with 23 cases.

    Samer G. Mattar;Alan B. Lumsden

  • Practice standards for transcranial Doppler (TCD) ultrasound. Part II. Clinical indications and expected outcomes.

    Andrei V Alexandrov;Michael A Sloan;Charles H Tegeler;David N Newell

  • Incidence and characteristics of patients with hand ischemia after a hemodialysis access procedure

    Amro H. Morsy;Mark Kulbaski;Changyi Chen;Halit Isiklar

  • Delayed rupture of aortic aneurysms following endovascular stent grafting.

    Alan B. Lumsden;Robert C. Allen;Elliot L. Chaikof;Michael Resnikoff;Michael Resnikoff

  • Effects of adipocyte-derived cytokines on endothelial functions: implication of vascular disease.

    Panagiotis Kougias;Hong Chai;Peter H. Lin;Qizhi Yao

  • Goblet and Clara cells of human distal airways: evidence for smoking induced changes in their numbers.

    Alan B. Lumsden;A. Mclean;D. Lamb

  • Hybrid approach to complex thoracic aortic aneurysms in high-risk patients: surgical challenges and clinical outcomes.

    Wei Zhou;Michael J. Reardon;Eric K. Peden;Peter H. Lin

  • Safety, feasibility, and early efficacy of subfascial endoscopic perforator surgery: A preliminary report from the North American registry☆☆☆

    Peter Gloviczki;John J. Bergan;Sunil S. Menawat;Robert W. Hobson

  • A prospective evaluation of surgically treated groin complications following percutaneous cardiac procedures

    Alan B. Lumsden;J. M. Miller;A. S. Kosinski;R. C. Allen

  • Central Venous Stenosis in the Hemodialysis Patient: Incidence and Efficacy of Endovascular Treatment:

    Alan B. Lumsden;M. J. Macdonald;H. Isiklar;L. G. Martin

  • Prophylactic balloon angioplasty fails to prolong the patency of expanded polytetrafluoroethylene arteriovenous grafts: Results of a prospective randomized study☆☆☆★★★

    Alan B. Lumsden;M.Julia MacDonald;Deepak Kikeri;George A. Cotsonis

  • Effects of angiotensin converting enzyme inhibition with cilazapril on intimal hyperplasia in injured arteries and vascular grafts in the baboon.

    Stephen R. Hanson;Jerry S. Powell;Thomas Dodson;Alan B. Lumsden

  • Small-caliber heparin-coated ePTFE grafts reduce platelet deposition and neointimal hyperplasia in a baboon model

    Peter H Lin;Peter H Lin;Changyi Chen;Changyi Chen;Ruth L Bush;Ruth L Bush;Qizhi Yao;Qizhi Yao

  • Surgical intervention for complications caused by femoral artery catheterization in pediatric patients

    Peter H. Lin;Thomas F. Dodson;Ruth L. Bush;Victor J. Weiss

  • Carotid artery aneurysm: Evolution of management over two decades

    Wei Zhou;Peter H. Lin;Ruth L. Bush;Eric K. Peden

Frequent Co-Authors

Changyi Chen
Changyi Chen Baylor College of Medicine
Qizhi Yao
Qizhi Yao Baylor College of Medicine
Christie M. Ballantyne
Christie M. Ballantyne Baylor College of Medicine
Michael J. Reardon
Michael J. Reardon Houston Methodist
Salim S. Virani
Salim S. Virani Baylor College of Medicine
Laurence A. Harker
Laurence A. Harker Emory University
Charles McCollum
Charles McCollum University of Manchester
Marcia K. O'Malley
Marcia K. O'Malley Rice University
Dennis F. Bandyk
Dennis F. Bandyk University of California, San Diego
Paolo Decuzzi
Paolo Decuzzi Italian Institute of Technology

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring the world of medicine in the USA goes far beyond becoming a doctor. Many students and professionals pursue alternative healthcare careers by enrolling in related online degree programs. These flexible options let you begin or advance your healthcare journey without relocating or interrupting your current commitments.

For those interested in healthcare administration, affordable medical billing and coding programs provide a fast, accessible entry point into the industry. If patient care is your passion, affordable online nursing programs and affordable np programs offer clear pathways to roles with direct patient impact, from registered nurses to highly skilled nurse practitioners.

For those aiming for leadership, research, or academic positions in nursing, online nursing doctoral programs open opportunities at the highest levels of the field. Each of these online options makes healthcare education more accessible and affordable, helping you shape a rewarding career path allied to medicine.

Best Scientists Citing Alan B. Lumsden

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles