World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
41
Citations
9731
World Ranking
8671
National Ranking
23

Daniel Schwabe publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Daniel Schwabe sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 204 publications — 48th percentile

48% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Daniel Schwabe D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Daniel Schwabe sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 41 D-Index — 40th percentile

40% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Daniel Schwabe is affiliated with the Pontifical Catholic University of Rio de Janeiro in Brazil. Their research primarily spans the field of computer science, with a focus on several subfields and topics.

The main fields of study include:

  • Computer Science

Key subfields of study in their work are:

  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Management Science and Operations Research
  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Information Systems
  • Communication

Daniel Schwabe's research topics cover:

  • Semantic Web and Ontologies
  • Data Quality and Management
  • Natural Language Processing Techniques
  • Advanced Graph Neural Networks
  • Wikis in Education and Collaboration
  • Advanced Database Systems and Queries
  • Service-Oriented Architecture and Web Services

Their publications show activity in multiple venues, with the most frequent including:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
  • Lecture Notes in Computer Science
  • Law in Context
  • Journal of Web Semantics

Some recent papers authored or coauthored by Daniel Schwabe are:

  • Commonsense Knowledge in Wikidata, 2020, arXiv (Cornell University)
  • KGTK: A Toolkit for Large Knowledge Graph Manipulation and Analysis, 2020, Lecture Notes in Computer Science
  • More than the Name of the Rose, 2023, The American Historical Review
  • Knowledge Graphs: Trust, Privacy, and Transparency from a Legal Governance Approach, 2020, Law in Context
  • Tun-OCM: A model-driven approach to support database tuning decision making, 2021, Decision Support Systems

The scientist has several frequent collaborators in their research, including:

  • Filip Ilievski
  • Pedro Szekely
  • Sérgio Lifschitz
  • Daniel Garijo
  • Edward Hermann Hæusler

Best Publications

  • HDM—a model-based approach to hypertext application design

    Franca Garzotto;Paolo Paolini;Daniel Schwabe

  • The Semantic Web - ISWC 2006

    Isabel Cruz;Stefan Decker;Dean Allemang;Chris Preist

  • An object oriented approach to Web-based applications design

    Daniel Schwabe;Gustavo Rossi

  • The object-oriented hypermedia design model

    Daniel Schwabe;Gustavo Rossi

  • Systematic hypermedia application design with OOHDM

    Daniel Schwabe;Gustavo Rossi;Simone D. J. Barbosa

  • A hybrid approach for searching in the semantic web

    Cristiano Rocha;Daniel Schwabe;Marcus Poggi Aragao

  • Designing personalized web applications

    Gustavo Rossi;Daniel Schwabe;Robson Guimarães

  • Fusion - visually exploring and eliciting relationships in linked data

    Samur Araujo;Geert-Jan Houben;Daniel Schwabe;Jan Hidders

  • Developing Hypermedia Applications using OOHDM

    Daniel Schwabe

  • Design reuse in hypermedia applications development

    Gustavo Rossi;Daniel Schwabe;Alejandra Garrido

  • Web Application Models Are More Than Conceptual Models

    Gustavo Rossi;Gustavo Rossi;Daniel Schwabe;Fernando Lyardet

  • HDM—a model for the design of hypertext applications

    Franca Garzotto;Paolo Paolini;Daniel Schwabe

  • Web engineering

    Yogesh Deshpande;San Murugesan;Athula Ginige;Steve Hansen

  • Engineering Web applications for reuse

    D. Schwabe;L. Esmeraldo;G. Rossi;F. Lyardet

  • Systematic hypermedia design with oohdm

    Daniel Schwabe;Gustavo Rossi;Simone Diniz Junqueira Barbosa

  • OOHDM-Web: an environment for implementation of hypermedia applications in the WWW

    Daniel Schwabe;Rita de Almeida Pontes;Isbela Moura

  • Modeling Interactions and Navigation in Web Applications

    Natacha Güell;Daniel Schwabe;Patricia Vilain

  • Improving Web information systems with navigational patterns

    Gustavo Rossi;Daniel Schwabe;Fernando Lyardet

  • A diagrammatic tool for representing user interaction in UML

    Patrícia Vilain;Daniel Schwabe;Clarisse Sieckenius de Souza

  • Designing the Interface of Rich Internet Applications

    M. Urbieta;G. Rossi;J. Ginzburg;D. Schwabe

Frequent Co-Authors

Gustavo Rossi
Gustavo Rossi National University of La Plata
Paolo Paolini
Paolo Paolini Polytechnic University of Milan
Franca Garzotto
Franca Garzotto Polytechnic University of Milan
Geert-Jan Houben
Geert-Jan Houben Delft University of Technology
Oscar Pastor
Oscar Pastor Universitat Politècnica de València
Carlos José Pereira de Lucena
Carlos José Pereira de Lucena Pontifical Catholic University of Rio de Janeiro
Stefan Decker
Stefan Decker RWTH Aachen University
Isabel F. Cruz
Isabel F. Cruz University of Illinois at Chicago
Peter Mika
Peter Mika Yahoo (United Kingdom)
Virgilio Almeida
Virgilio Almeida Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Computer Science opens doors to diverse and rewarding career paths. As technology continues to evolve, computer science remains one of the top 10 best majors for the future, offering strong job prospects and competitive salaries.

For those looking to upskill, many professionals consider advancing their education through flexible, accessible options. There are a variety of masters degrees available online, some of which are designed for working adults seeking to specialize in areas such as artificial intelligence, cybersecurity, or data analytics.

If you're interested in leadership, research, or academia, you might want to explore the affordable doctoral programs now offered online. These can open pathways to advanced research and university faculty positions.

Educators and administrators looking for rapid advancement may consider seeking the cheapest edd and fastest pathways to an EdD, potentially qualifying for higher-level roles in educational technology or academic leadership.

Best Scientists Citing Daniel Schwabe

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles