World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
35
Citations
6101
World Ranking
11592
National Ranking
385

Paolo Paolini publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Paolo Paolini sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 208 publications — 49th percentile

49% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Paolo Paolini D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Paolo Paolini sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 35 D-Index — 20th percentile

20% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Paolo Paolini is affiliated with the Polytechnic University of Milan in Italy. Their research spans multiple fields including Computer Science and Business, Management and Accounting, with a focus on several subfields such as Artificial Intelligence, Management Information Systems, and Computer Science Applications.

Their main topics of study cover Business Process Modeling and Analysis, AI in Service Interactions, E-Learning and Knowledge Management, and Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation.

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Paolo Paolini include:

  • Donya Rooein
  • Devis Bianchini
  • Francesco Leotta
  • Massimo Mecella
  • Barbara Pernici

Paolo Paolini has published in notable venues, predominantly appearing in:

  • INTED proceedings
  • Software & Systems Modeling

Recent publications authored or co-authored by Paolo Paolini include:

  • "COMPETENCES AND SKILLS: TEACHING AND LEARNING AT SCHOOL," 2024, INTED proceedings
  • "TALKYTUTOR: AN INNOVATIVE APPROACH FOR CHATBOTS FOR EDUCATION," 2023, INTED proceedings
  • "aCHAT-WF: Generating conversational agents for teaching business process models," 2021, Software & Systems Modeling

Best Publications

  • HDM—a model-based approach to hypertext application design

    Franca Garzotto;Paolo Paolini;Daniel Schwabe

  • Hypermedia design, analysis, and evaluation issues

    Franca Garzotto;Luca Mainetti;Paolo Paolini

  • Model-driven development of Web applications: the AutoWeb system

    Piero Fraternali;Paolo Paolini

  • Extending UML for modeling Web applications

    L. Baresi;F. Garzotto;P. Paolini

  • A Conceptual Model and a Tool Environment for Developing More Scalable, Dynamic, and Customizable Web Applications

    Piero Fraternali;Paolo Paolini

  • Properties and update semantics of consistent views

    Georg Gottlob;Paolo Paolini;Roberto Zicari

  • From Web Sites to Web Applications: New Issues for Conceptual Modeling

    Luciano Baresi;Franca Garzotto;Paolo Paolini

  • HDM—a model for the design of hypertext applications

    Franca Garzotto;Paolo Paolini;Daniel Schwabe

  • SUE inspection: an effective method for systematic usability evaluation of hypermedia

    M. Matera;M.F. Costabile;F. Garzotto;P. Paolini

  • Goal-driven requirements analysis for hypermedia-intensive Web applications

    Davide Bolchini;Paolo Paolini

  • Modeling-by-Patterns of Web Applications

    Franca Garzotto;Paolo Paolini;Davide Bolchini;Sara Valenti

  • Collective digital storytelling at school as a whole-class interaction

    Nicoletta Di Blas;Paolo Paolini;Amalia Sabiescu

  • Binary Logical Associations in Data Modelling.

    Giampio Bracchi;Paolo Paolini;Giuseppe Pelagatti

  • Collective digital storytelling at school: a whole-class interaction

    Nicoletta Di Blas;Paolo Paolini;Amalia G. Sabiescu

  • Interactive storytelling for children

    Franca Garzotto;Paolo Paolini;Amalia Sabiescu

  • “Usable Accessibility” to the Web for blind Users

    Nicoletta Di Blas;Paolo Paolini;Marco Achille Speroni

  • Digital Storytelling as a Whole-Class Learning Activity: Lessons from a Three-Years Project

    Nicoletta Blas;Franca Garzotto;Paolo Paolini;Amalia Sabiescu

  • Information reuse in hypermedia applications

    Franca Garzotto;Luca Mainetti;Paolo Paolini

  • Interactive dialogue model: a design technique for multichannel applications

    D. Bolchini;P. Paolini

  • A survey on web modeling approaches for ubiquitous web applications

    Wieland Schwinger;Werner Retschitzegger;Andrea Schauerhuber;Gerti Kappel

  • Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Interaction Design and Children

    Paolo Paolini;Franca Garzotto

Frequent Co-Authors

Franca Garzotto
Franca Garzotto Polytechnic University of Milan
Luca Mainetti
Luca Mainetti University of Salento
Daniel Schwabe
Daniel Schwabe Pontifical Catholic University of Rio de Janeiro
Luciano Baresi
Luciano Baresi Polytechnic University of Milan
Maria Francesca Costabile
Maria Francesca Costabile University of Bari Aldo Moro
Piero Fraternali
Piero Fraternali Polytechnic University of Milan
Catherine C. Marshall
Catherine C. Marshall Texas A&M University
Barbara Pernici
Barbara Pernici Polytechnic University of Milan
Letizia Tanca
Letizia Tanca Polytechnic University of Milan
Wendy Hall
Wendy Hall University of Southampton

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online study options can open doors to various tech and science careers, especially if traditional routes present challenges. Many students begin their journey with an associate degree online, which offers a quick and affordable path into computer science or related fields.

If cost is a concern, you’ll find that there are cheap online degrees fast that let you save money while still earning a respected qualification. These options are ideal for those needing flexibility or balancing studies with work or family.

Worried about academic history? Don’t be. There are plenty of college that accepts low gpa applicants, giving more people the chance to start or enhance their education in computer science or related areas.

Interested in broader career opportunities? Graduates can branch out into various sectors—learn what can you do with an environmental science major for examples of roles beyond traditional tech jobs. The flexibility of online learning means you can tailor your education to suit your goals and ambitions.

Best Scientists Citing Paolo Paolini

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles