World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Computer Science 45 7082 6877 173 171 287 11097

Piero Fraternali publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Piero Fraternali between 1989 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Piero Fraternali published across 37 years, from 1989 to 2025, averaging 8.7 papers a year. Output peaked at 21 publications in 2015. 15 of the 321 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1989 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 21. Peak 21 publications in 2015. 1989: 1 publication 1990: 0 publications 1991: 1 publication 1992: 2 publications 1993: 1 publication 1994: 4 publications 1995: 5 publications 1996: 4 publications 1997: 6 publications 1998: 4 publications 1999: 8 publications 2000: 6 publications 2001: 5 publications 2002: 7 publications 2003: 14 publications 2004: 5 publications 2005: 5 publications 2006: 7 publications 2007: 10 publications 2008: 6 publications 2009: 18 publications 2010: 15 publications 2011: 12 publications 2012: 11 publications 2013: 20 publications 2014: 20 publications 2015: 21 publications 2016: 14 publications 2017: 12 publications 2018: 8 publications 2019: 14 publications 2020: 5 publications 2021: 7 publications 2022: 19 publications 2023: 9 publications 2024: 6 publications 2025: 9 publications
1989 2025

321 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Piero Fraternali: publications per year, 1989 to 2025
Year Publications
1989 1
1990 0
1991 1
1992 2
1993 1
1994 4
1995 5
1996 4
1997 6
1998 4
1999 8
2000 6
2001 5
2002 7
2003 14
2004 5
2005 5
2006 7
2007 10
2008 6
2009 18
2010 15
2011 12
2012 11
2013 20
2014 20
2015 21
2016 14
2017 12
2018 8
2019 14
2020 5
2021 7
2022 19
2023 9
2024 6
2025 9
Total 321
Download as CSV

Piero Fraternali publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Piero Fraternali sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 97 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 32–41 to 991+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 609. Most scientists, 609, have 142–151 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 282–291 publications, is where this scientist sits. 32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32–41 publications 991+

This scientist: 287 publications — 71st percentile

71% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Computer Science scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 14,188 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
32–41 7
42–51 22
52–61 82
62–71 134
72–81 249
82–91 324
92–101 421
102–111 420
112–121 497
122–131 544
132–141 555
142–151 609
152–161 559
162–171 534
172–181 556
182–191 583
192–201 519
202–211 508
212–221 490
222–231 437
232–241 423
242–251 408
252–261 377
262–271 301
272–281 335
282–291 320 287
292–301 293
302–311 250
312–321 238
322–331 206
332–341 209
342–351 208
352–361 162
362–371 176
372–381 127
382–391 158
392–401 128
402–411 104
412–421 94
422–431 99
432–441 83
442–451 108
452–461 73
462–471 77
472–481 69
482–491 84
492–501 62
502–511 54
512–521 57
522–531 51
532–541 51
542–551 32
552–561 38
562–571 28
572–581 43
582–591 33
592–601 41
602–611 32
612–621 28
622–631 25
632–641 27
642–651 17
652–661 20
662–671 17
672–681 15
682–691 14
692–701 21
702–711 13
712–721 12
722–731 19
732–741 14
742–751 12
752–761 10
762–771 10
772–781 11
782–791 10
792–801 11
802–811 8
812–821 8
822–831 7
832–841 11
842–851 10
852–861 5
862–871 9
872–881 4
882–891 6
892–901 3
902–911 6
912–921 3
922–931 2
932–941 2
942–951 2
952–961 3
962–971 3
972–981 3
982–990 5
991+ 100
Download as CSV

Piero Fraternali D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Piero Fraternali sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 52 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 131+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 990. Most scientists, 990, have 36–37 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 44–45 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 45 D-Index — 51st percentile

51% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Computer Science scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 14,188 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 879
32–33 983
34–35 918
36–37 990
38–39 968
40–41 907
42–43 821
44–45 763 45
46–47 689
48–49 543
50–51 543
52–53 518
54–55 500
56–57 458
58–59 400
60–61 337
62–63 308
64–65 292
66–67 249
68–69 213
70–71 192
72–73 189
74–75 165
76–77 139
78–79 119
80–81 121
82–83 113
84–85 88
86–87 87
88–89 75
90–91 69
92–93 57
94–95 46
96–97 38
98–99 34
100–101 36
102–103 27
104–105 37
106–107 18
108–109 31
110–111 19
112–113 16
114–115 12
116–117 20
118–119 15
120–121 5
122–123 20
124–125 8
126–127 5
128–129 7
130 3
131+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Piero Fraternali is affiliated with the Polytechnic University of Milan in Italy. Their research spans multiple areas primarily within computer science and engineering, producing numerous publications focused on advanced computational methods and applications. The scientist's work includes contributions across several specialized subfields such as computer vision and pattern recognition, artificial intelligence, media technology, signal processing, and information systems.

Their research topics highlight a broad interest in advanced neural network applications, remote-sensing image classification, anomaly detection techniques, time series analysis and forecasting, cryospheric studies, adversarial robustness in machine learning, and water systems optimization. These thematic focuses demonstrate a blend of both theoretical development and applied sciences.

Recent publications by Piero Fraternali include:

  • "Long-term water conservation is fostered by smart meter-based feedback and digital user engagement" (2021) published in npj Clean Water
  • "Learning to Identify Illegal Landfills through Scene Classification in Aerial Images" (2021) published in Remote Sensing
  • "AerialWaste dataset for landfill discovery in aerial and satellite images" (2023) published in Scientific Data
  • "Taxonomy-Based Discovery and Annotation of Functional Areas in the City" (2021) published in Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media
  • "Comparing CAM Algorithms for the Identification of Salient Image Features in Iconography Artwork Analysis" (2021) published in Journal of Imaging

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Piero Fraternali include:

  • Nicolò Oreste Pinciroli Vago
  • Rocio Nahime Torres
  • Federico Milani
  • Niccoló Zangrando
  • Sergio Luis Herrera González

The scientist's work has been featured in a variety of publication venues. Prominent among these are:

  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Remote Sensing
  • Neural Computing and Applications
  • Journal of Imaging

Piero Fraternali's contributions reflect a sustained engagement with topics such as neural network techniques and remote sensing, supporting developments in both data-driven analysis and applied technological solutions within engineering and computer science domains.

Best Publications

  • Web Modeling Language (WebML): a modeling language for designing Web sites

    Stefano Ceri;Piero Fraternali;Aldo Bongio

  • Designing Data-Intensive Web Applications

    Stefano Ceri;Piero Fraternali;Aldo Bongio;Marco Brambilla

  • Tools and approaches for developing data-intensive Web applications: a survey

    Piero Fraternali

  • An Introduction to Information Retrieval

    Stefano Ceri;Alessandro Bozzon;Marco Brambilla;Emanuele Della Valle

  • XML-GL: a graphical language for querying and restructuring XML documents

    Stefano Ceri;Sara Comai;Ernesto Damiani;Piero Fraternali

  • Model-driven development of Web applications: the AutoWeb system

    Piero Fraternali;Paolo Paolini

  • On the Use of Higher-Order Model Transformations

    Massimo Tisi;Frédéric Jouault;Piero Fraternali;Stefano Ceri

  • Process modeling in Web applications

    Marco Brambilla;Stefano Ceri;Piero Fraternali;Ioana Manolescu

  • Designing Database Applications with Objects and Rules: The Idea Methodology

    Stefano Ceri;Piero Fraternali

  • Automatic generation of production rules for integrity maintenance

    Stefano Ceri;Piero Fraternali;Stefano Paraboschi;Letizia Tanca

  • Conceptual modeling of data-intensive Web applications

    S. Ceri;P. Fraternali;M. Matera

  • A Conceptual Model and a Tool Environment for Developing More Scalable, Dynamic, and Customizable Web Applications

    Piero Fraternali;Paolo Paolini

  • Conceptual modeling and code generation for rich internet applications

    Alessandro Bozzon;Sara Comai;Piero Fraternali;Giovanni Toffetti Carughi

  • Rich Internet Applications

    Piero Fraternali;Gustavo Rossi;Fernando Sánchez-Figueroa

  • Data-Driven, One-To-One Web Site Generation for Data-Intensive Applications

    Stefano Ceri;Piero Fraternali;Stefano Paraboschi

  • Interaction Flow Modeling Language: Model-Driven UI Engineering of Web and Mobile Apps with IFML

    Marco Brambilla;Piero Fraternali

  • Model-driven design and deployment of service-enabled web applications

    Ioana Manolescu;Marco Brambilla;Stefano Ceri;Sara Comai

  • A structured approach for the definition of the semantics of active databases

    Piero Fraternali;Letizia Tanca

  • Putting humans in the loop: Social computing for Water Resources Management

    P. Fraternali;A. Castelletti;R. Soncini-Sessa;C. Vaca Ruiz

  • Active Rule Management in Chimera

    Stefano Ceri;Piero Fraternali;Stefano Paraboschi;Letizia Tanca

  • XML-GL: A Graphical Language for Querying and Restructuring XML Documents.

    Stefano Ceri;Sara Comai;Piero Fraternali;Stefano Paraboschi

  • Addendum to "Automatic Generation of Production Rules for Integrity Maintenance".

    Stefano Ceri;Piero Fraternali;Stefano Paraboschi;Letizia Tanca

Frequent Co-Authors

Marco Brambilla
Marco Brambilla Polytechnic University of Milan
Stefano Ceri
Stefano Ceri Polytechnic University of Milan
Marco Tagliasacchi
Marco Tagliasacchi Google (Switzerland)
Stefano Paraboschi
Stefano Paraboschi University of Bergamo
Andrea Emilio Rizzoli
Andrea Emilio Rizzoli Dalle Molle Institute for Artificial Intelligence Research
Letizia Tanca
Letizia Tanca Polytechnic University of Milan
Andrea Castelletti
Andrea Castelletti Polytechnic University of Milan
Ioana Manolescu
Ioana Manolescu French Institute for Research in Computer Science and Automation - INRIA
Geert-Jan Houben
Geert-Jan Houben Delft University of Technology
Luciano Baresi
Luciano Baresi Polytechnic University of Milan

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online degrees can significantly broaden your career options after studying Computer Science in the USA. Programs such as an online ms data science equip students with advanced analytics skills, preparing them for roles in rapidly growing tech fields like artificial intelligence and big data.

For those interested in shifting to leadership and project management, enrolling in accelerated construction management degree programs online offers the flexibility to transition into industries beyond traditional computer science.

Business-minded students looking to enhance their management skills and employability may consider online mba programs affordable, allowing for career growth in tech startups, consulting, or executive roles.

Those wanting a streamlined educational path can also explore online masters that offer completion in as little as one year, ideal for upskilling without a long-term commitment. These related programs provide diverse pathways to enter, advance, or specialize within the fast-changing tech industry.

Best Scientists Citing Piero Fraternali

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles