World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Award Badge
Computer Science
Netherlands
2025

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
55
Citations
11435
World Ranking
4340
National Ranking
59

Geert-Jan Houben publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Geert-Jan Houben sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 301 publications — 74th percentile

74% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Geert-Jan Houben D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Geert-Jan Houben sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 55 D-Index — 71st percentile

71% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2025 - Research.com Computer Science in Netherlands Leader Award
  • 2022 - Research.com Computer Science in Netherlands Leader Award

Overview

Geert-Jan Houben is affiliated with Delft University of Technology in the Netherlands. Their research spans several fields within computer science and social sciences, with a primary focus on areas related to artificial intelligence, computer science applications, and safety research.

The scientist's published work covers a range of topics. Key research themes include:

  • Mobile Crowdsensing and Crowdsourcing
  • Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
  • Adversarial Robustness in Machine Learning
  • Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
  • Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data
  • Personal Information Management and User Behavior
  • Transportation and Mobility Innovations

Among the recent papers authored or co-authored by Geert-Jan Houben are:

  • "Meaningful human control: actionable properties for AI system development" (2022), published in AI and Ethics
  • "Managing bias and unfairness in data for decision support: a survey of machine learning and data engineering approaches to identify and mitigate bias and unfairness within data management and analytics systems" (2021), published in The VLDB Journal
  • "VirtualCrowd: A Simulation Platform for Microtask Crowdsourcing Campaigns" (2020), published in Companion Proceedings of the Web Conference 2020
  • "Analyzing Workers Performance in Online Mapping Tasks Across Web, Mobile, and Virtual Reality Platforms" (2020), published in Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Human Computation and Crowdsourcing

The frequent co-authors collaborating with Geert-Jan Houben include:

  • Sihang Qiu
  • Alessandro Bozzon
  • Luciano Cavalcante Siebert
  • Maria Luce Lupetti
  • Evgeni Aizenberg

The scientist publishes across various venues, reflecting a multidisciplinary approach, including:

  • AI and Ethics
  • The VLDB Journal
  • Companion Proceedings of the Web Conference 2020
  • Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Human Computation and Crowdsourcing

Geert-Jan Houben's intersection of research fields and topics indicates a focus on the interplay between technology, ethics, and user-centric applications in modern computing, particularly in relation to AI systems and data-driven decision support.

Best Publications

  • A knowledge-based SWOT-analysis system as an instrument for strategic planning in small and medium sized enterprises

    G. Houben;K. Lenie;K. Vanhoof

  • AHAM: a Dexter-based reference model for adaptive hypermedia

    Paul De Bra;Geert-Jan Houben;Hongjing Wu

  • Supporting Self-Regulated Learning in Online Learning Environments and MOOCs: A Systematic Review

    Jacqueline Wong;Martine Baars;Dan Davis;Tim van der Zee

  • Analyzing user modeling on twitter for personalized news recommendations

    Fabian Abel;Qi Gao;Geert-Jan Houben;Ke Tao

  • Adaptive hypermedia: from systems to framework

    Paul De Bra;Peter Brusilovsky;Geert-Jan Houben

  • Semantic enrichment of twitter posts for user profile construction on the social web

    Fabian Abel;Qi Gao;Geert-Jan Houben;Ke Tao

  • Fusion - visually exploring and eliciting relationships in linked data

    Samur Araujo;Geert-Jan Houben;Daniel Schwabe;Jan Hidders

  • A comparative study of users' microblogging behavior on sina weibo and twitter

    Qi Gao;Fabian Abel;Geert-Jan Houben;Yong Yu

  • Cross-system user modeling and personalization on the Social Web

    Fabian Abel;Eelco Herder;Geert-Jan Houben;Nicola Henze

  • Twitcident: fighting fire with information from social web streams

    Fabian Abel;Claudia Hauff;Geert-Jan Houben;Richard Stronkman

  • Interoperability in Personalized Adaptive Learning

    Lora Aroyo;Peter Dolog;Geert-Jan Houben;Milos Kravcik

  • Information retrieval in distributed hypertexts

    Paul De Bra;Geert-Jan Houben;Yoram Kornatzky;Reinier Post

  • User Modeling, Adaptation, and Personalization

    Geert-Jan Houben;Gord McCalla;Fabio Pianesi;Massimo Zancanaro

  • Semantics + filtering + search = twitcident. exploring information in social web streams

    Fabian Abel;Claudia Hauff;Geert-Jan Houben;Richard Stronkman

  • Activating Learning at Scale : A Review of Innovations in Online Learning Strategies

    Dan Davis;Guanliang Chen;Claudia Hauff;Geert Jan Houben

  • Engineering semantic web information systems in Hera

    Richard Vdovjak;Flavius Frasincar;Geert-Jan Houben;Peter Barna

  • Follow the successful crowd: raising MOOC completion rates through social comparison at scale

    Dan Davis;Ioana Jivet;René F. Kizilcec;Guanliang Chen

  • Analyzing temporal dynamics in Twitter profiles for personalized recommendations in the social web

    Fabian Abel;Qi Gao;Geert-Jan Houben;Ke Tao

  • Index structures and algorithms for querying distributed RDF repositories

    Heiner Stuckenschmidt;Richard Vdovjak;Geert-Jan Houben;Jeen Broekstra

  • Leveraging the semantics of tweets for adaptive faceted search on twitter

    Fabian Abel;Ilknur Celik;Geert-Jan Houben;Patrick Siehndel

Frequent Co-Authors

Flavius Frasincar
Flavius Frasincar Erasmus University Rotterdam
Lora Aroyo
Lora Aroyo Google (United States)
Paul De Bra
Paul De Bra Eindhoven University of Technology
Peter Dolog
Peter Dolog Aalborg University
Jan Paredaens
Jan Paredaens University of Antwerp
Daniel Schwabe
Daniel Schwabe Pontifical Catholic University of Rio de Janeiro
Antonio Vallecillo
Antonio Vallecillo University of Malaga
Frank Dignum
Frank Dignum Umeå University
Piero Fraternali
Piero Fraternali Polytechnic University of Milan
Luciano Baresi
Luciano Baresi Polytechnic University of Milan

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring related online degrees is a smart way to expand your career options in Computer Science. Many students consider pursuing an MBA to develop leadership skills and business acumen. If affordability is a concern, you may want to review the cheapest mba programs online, which let you earn a valuable credential without incurring heavy debt.

For those looking to accelerate their education, a 1 year masters program can provide advanced knowledge and credentials in a fraction of the usual time. Alternatively, several short degrees that pay well can help you quickly enter the workforce in high-demand tech roles.

If you’re seeking specialized expertise, the best online masters in artificial intelligence offer in-depth training in one of today’s hottest fields. These flexible online programs give you the freedom to study at your own pace while opening doors to lucrative career opportunities.

Best Scientists Citing Geert-Jan Houben

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles