World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Charles O. Stanier

Charles O. Stanier

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
44
Citations
8043
World Ranking
6705
National Ranking
2393

Charles O. Stanier publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Charles O. Stanier sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 118 publications — 23rd percentile

23% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

Charles O. Stanier D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Charles O. Stanier sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 44 D-Index — 32nd percentile

32% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Overview

Charles O. Stanier is affiliated with the University of Iowa in the United States and has contributed extensively to the fields of Environmental Science and Earth and Planetary Sciences. Their research portfolio includes 25 publications in Environmental Science and 22 in Earth and Planetary Sciences, with a strong focus on atmospheric phenomena.

The main topics of Stanier's work include:

  • Atmospheric chemistry and aerosols
  • Air Quality and Health Impacts
  • Atmospheric Ozone and Climate
  • Vehicle emissions and performance
  • Atmospheric aerosols and clouds
  • Air Quality Monitoring and Forecasting
  • Odor and Emission Control Technologies

Stanier's research spans various subfields, such as:

  • Atmospheric Science
  • Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis
  • Global and Planetary Change
  • Environmental Engineering
  • Automotive Engineering

Frequent publication venues include:

  • Atmospheric Environment (4 publications)
  • Elementa Science of the Anthropocene (2 publications)
  • Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres (2 publications)
  • Environmental Science & Technology (2 publications)
  • ACS ES&T Air (2 publications)

Selected recent papers authored or coauthored by Stanier are:

  • "Overview of the Lake Michigan Ozone Study 2017", 2021, Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society
  • "Multi-model intercomparisons of air quality simulations for the KORUS-AQ campaign", 2021, Elementa Science of the Anthropocene
  • "Sensitivity of Meteorological Skill to Selection of WRF-Chem Physical Parameterizations and Impact on Ozone Prediction During the Lake Michigan Ozone Study (LMOS)", 2020, Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres
  • "PM2.5 chemistry, organosulfates, and secondary organic aerosol during the 2017 Lake Michigan Ozone Study", 2020, Atmospheric Environment
  • "A multiphase CMAQ version 5.0 adjoint", 2020, Geoscientific Model Development

Stanier has collaborated frequently with several researchers, including:

  • Gregory R. Carmichael
  • R. B. Pierce
  • M. Christiansen
  • Elizabeth A. Stone
  • Angela F. Dickens

Best Publications

  • Coupled partitioning, dilution, and chemical aging of semivolatile organics.

    N M Donahue;A L Robinson;C O Stanier;S N Pandis

  • Nucleation events during the Pittsburgh Air Quality study: Description and relation to key meteorological, gas phase, and aerosol parameters

    Charles O. Stanier;Andrey Y. Khlystov;Spyros N. Pandis

  • Ambient aerosol size distributions and number concentrations measured during the Pittsburgh Air Quality Study (PAQS)

    Charles O Stanier;Andrey Y Khlystov;Spyros N Pandis

  • An algorithm for combining electrical mobility and aerodynamic size distributions data when measuring ambient aerosol

    A Khlystov;C Stanier;SN Pandis

  • Photosynthetic Control of Atmospheric Carbonyl Sulfide During the Growing Season

    J. E. Campbell;G. R. Carmichael;T. Chai;M. Mena-Carrasco;M. Mena-Carrasco

  • Insights into the chemistry of new particle formation and growth events in Pittsburgh based on aerosol mass spectrometry.

    Q. I. Zhang;Charles O. Stanier;Manjula R. Canagaratna;John T. Jayne

  • Health impacts and economic losses assessment of the 2013 severe haze event in Beijing area

    Meng Gao;Sarath K. Guttikunda;Gregory R. Carmichael;Yuesi Wang

  • Ozonolysis of α‐pinene at atmospherically relevant concentrations: Temperature dependence of aerosol mass fractions (yields)

    Ravi K. Pathak;Charles O. Stanier;Neil M. Donahue;Spyros N. Pandis;Spyros N. Pandis

  • CO 2 , CO, and CH 4 measurements from tall towers in the NOAA Earth System Research Laboratory's Global Greenhouse Gas Reference Network: instrumentation, uncertainty analysis, and recommendations for future high-accuracy greenhouse gas monitoring efforts

    A. E. Andrews;J. D. Kofler;J. D. Kofler;M. E. Trudeau;M. E. Trudeau;M. E. Trudeau;J. C. Williams

  • Atmospheric volatile organic compound measurements during the Pittsburgh Air Quality Study: Results, interpretation, and quantification of primary and secondary contributions

    Dylan B. Millet;Dylan B. Millet;Neil M. Donahue;Spyros N. Pandis;Andrea Polidori

  • Ozonolysis of α-pinene: parameterization of secondary organic aerosol mass fraction

    R. K. Pathak;A. A. Presto;T. E. Lane;C. O. Stanier

  • Modeling semivolatile organic aerosol mass emissions from combustion systems.

    Manish K. Shrivastava;Eric M. Lipsky;Charles O. Stanier;Allen L. Robinson

  • Advanced Factor Analysis on Pittsburgh Particle Size-Distribution Data Special Issue ofAerosol Science and Technologyon Findings from the Fine Particulate Matter Supersites Program

    Liming Zhou;Eugene Kim;Philip K. Hopke;Charles O. Stanier

  • Uncontrolled combustion of shredded tires in a landfill – Part 1: Characterization of gaseous and particulate emissions

    Jared Downard;Ashish Singh;Robert Bullard;Thilina Jayarathne

  • Cyclic siloxanes in air, including identification of high levels in Chicago and distinct diurnal variation.

    Rachel A. Yucuis;Charles O. Stanier;Keri C. Hornbuckle

  • Measurements of the volatility of aerosols from α-pinene ozonolysis

    Charles O. Stanier;Ravi K. Pathak;Spyros N. Pandis

  • Multi-model intercomparisons of air quality simulations for the KORUS-AQ campaign

    Rokjin J. Park;Yujin J. Oak;Louisa K. Emmons;Cheol Hee Kim

  • Water content of ambient aerosol during the Pittsburgh Air Quality Study

    Andrey Khlystov;Charles O. Stanier;Satoshi Takahama;Spyros N. Pandis

  • Mass balance closure and the federal reference method for PM2.5 in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania

    Sarah L Rees;Allen L Robinson;Andrey Khlystov;Charles O Stanier

  • Critical factors determining the variation in SOA yields from terpene ozonolysis: a combined experimental and computational study.

    Neil M. Donahue;Kara E. Huff Hartz;Bao Chuong;Albert A. Presto

  • Parameterization of secondary organic aerosol mass fractions from smog chamber data

    Charles O. Stanier;Neil Donahue;Spyros N. Pandis;Spyros N. Pandis

Frequent Co-Authors

Spyros N. Pandis
Spyros N. Pandis University of Patras
Gregory R. Carmichael
Gregory R. Carmichael University of Iowa
Andrey Khlystov
Andrey Khlystov Desert Research Institute
Athanasios Nenes
Athanasios Nenes École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne
Dylan B. Millet
Dylan B. Millet University of Minnesota
Daven K. Henze
Daven K. Henze University of Colorado Boulder
Jesse O. Bash
Jesse O. Bash Environmental Protection Agency
Elizabeth A. Stone
Elizabeth A. Stone University of Iowa
Neil M. Donahue
Neil M. Donahue Carnegie Mellon University
Timothy H. Bertram
Timothy H. Bertram University of Wisconsin–Madison

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students interested in Environmental Sciences, exploring related online degrees can broaden career opportunities. Programs like an online general studies bachelor degree cheap offer a cost-effective way to gain interdisciplinary knowledge that complements environmental expertise. These degrees provide flexibility and affordability, ideal for those balancing work and study.

Students who want a manageable workload might consider the easy bachelor degrees category. While "easy" is subjective, these programs generally have less technical or rigorous coursework, making them suitable for students seeking a smoother introduction to scientific fields.

Focusing more specifically on earth sciences, an geoscience online degree offers specialized study in geology and environmental processes. This degree’s relevance to resource management and environmental protection makes it an attractive option for those looking to dive deeper into the physical aspects of environmental science.

For advanced professionals, pursuing top gis masters programs can enhance skills in spatial analysis and mapping technologies crucial for environmental planning and conservation efforts. GIS expertise is increasingly in demand across public and private sectors focused on sustainability and natural resource management.

Best Scientists Citing Charles O. Stanier

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles