World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Elizabeth A. Stone

Elizabeth A. Stone

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
62
Citations
11417
World Ranking
2659
National Ranking
1065

Elizabeth A. Stone publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Elizabeth A. Stone sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 144 publications — 38th percentile

38% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

Elizabeth A. Stone D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Elizabeth A. Stone sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 62 D-Index — 74th percentile

74% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Overview

Elizabeth A. Stone is affiliated with the University of Iowa in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on areas within Environmental Science and Earth and Planetary Sciences, supporting a multidisciplinary approach to understanding atmospheric and environmental processes.

The scientist's work encompasses various subfields, including Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis, Atmospheric Science, Global and Planetary Change, Environmental Engineering, and Materials Chemistry.

The main topics covered in their research include:

  • Atmospheric chemistry and aerosols
  • Air Quality and Health Impacts
  • Air Quality Monitoring and Forecasting
  • Atmospheric aerosols and clouds
  • Indoor Air Quality and Microbial Exposure
  • Allergic Rhinitis and Sensitization
  • Odor and Emission Control Technologies

Stone's frequent publication venues are:

  • ACS Earth and Space Chemistry
  • Atmospheric Environment
  • Environmental Science & Technology
  • Environmental Science Atmospheres
  • The Cambridge Structural Database

Frequent coauthors include:

  • Kimberly A. Prather
  • R. J. Yokelson
  • Arnico K. Panday
  • Thilina Jayarathne
  • P. F. DeCarlo

Some notable recent papers authored by Stone are:

  • Characterization of Atmospheric Pollen Fragments during Springtime Thunderstorms, 2020, Environmental Science & Technology Letters
  • Organic Enrichment, Physical Phase State, and Surface Tension Depression of Nascent Core-Shell Sea Spray Aerosols during Two Phytoplankton Blooms, 2020, ACS Earth and Space Chemistry
  • Ambient air quality in the Kathmandu Valley, Nepal, during the pre-monsoon: concentrations and sources of particulate matter and trace gases, 2020, Atmospheric chemistry and physics
  • PM2.5 chemistry, organosulfates, and secondary organic aerosol during the 2017 Lake Michigan Ozone Study, 2020, Atmospheric Environment
  • Overview of the Lake Michigan Ozone Study 2017, 2021, Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society

Best Publications

  • Atmospheric brown clouds: Hemispherical and regional variations in long-range transport, absorption, and radiative forcing

    V. Ramanathan;F. Li;M. V. Ramana;P. S. Praveen

  • Mexico City aerosol analysis during MILAGRO using high resolution aerosol mass spectrometry at the urban supersite (T0) – Part 1: Fine particle composition and organic source apportionment

    Allison Aiken;Allison Aiken;D. Salcedo;Michael J. Cubison;J. Huffman

  • Apportionment of primary and secondary organic aerosols in southern California during the 2005 study of organic aerosols in riverside (SOAR-1).

    Kenneth S. Docherty;Elizabeth A. Stone;Ingrid M. Ulbrich;Peter F. DeCarlo

  • Examining the effects of anthropogenic emissions on isoprene-derived secondary organic aerosol formation during the 2013 Southern Oxidant and Aerosol Study (SOAS) at the Look Rock, Tennessee ground site

    S. H. Budisulistiorini;S. H. Budisulistiorini;X. Li;S. T. Bairai;S. T. Bairai;J. Renfro

  • Biomass burning dominates brown carbon absorption in the rural southeastern United States

    R. A. Washenfelder;R. A. Washenfelder;A. R. Attwood;A. R. Attwood;C. A. Brock;H. Guo

  • Chemical characterization and source apportionment of fine and coarse particulate matter in Lahore, Pakistan

    Elizabeth Stone;James Schauer;Tauseef A. Quraishi;Abid Mahmood

  • Field measurements of trace gases and aerosols emitted by peat fires in Central Kalimantan, Indonesia, during the 2015 El Niño

    Chelsea E. Stockwell;Chelsea E. Stockwell;Thilina Jayarathne;Mark A. Cochrane;Kevin C. Ryan

  • Source apportionment of fine organic aerosol in Mexico City during the MILAGRO experiment 2006

    E. A. Stone;D. C. Snyder;R. J. Sheesley;A. P. Sullivan

  • Evidence for an unrecognized secondary anthropogenic source of organosulfates and sulfonates: gas-phase oxidation of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in the presence of sulfate aerosol.

    Matthieu Riva;Sophie Tomaz;Sophie Tomaz;Tianqu Cui;Ying Hsuan Lin

  • Analysis of Organic Anionic Surfactants in Fine and Coarse Fractions of Freshly Emitted Sea Spray Aerosol

    Richard E. Cochran;Olga Laskina;Thilina Jayarathne;Alexander Laskin

  • Parameterization of Single Scattering Albedo (SSA) and Absorption Angstrom Exponent (AAE) with EC/OC for Aerosol Emissions from Biomass Burning

    Rudra P. Pokhrel;Nick L. Wagner;Justin M. Langridge;Daniel A. Lack

  • Sea spray aerosol chemical composition: elemental and molecular mimics for laboratory studies of heterogeneous and multiphase reactions

    Timothy H. Bertram;Richard E. Cochran;Vicki H. Grassian;Elizabeth A. Stone

  • Water-Soluble Brown Carbon in Atmospheric Aerosols from Godavari (Nepal), a Regional Representative of South Asia

    Guangming Wu;Kirpa Ram;Kirpa Ram;Pingqing Fu;Wan Wang

  • Toxic metals in the atmosphere in Lahore, Pakistan.

    Erika von Schneidemesser;Elizabeth A. Stone;Tauseef A. Quraishi;Martin M. Shafer

  • Molecular Diversity of Sea Spray Aerosol Particles: Impact of Ocean Biology on Particle Composition and Hygroscopicity

    Richard E. Cochran;Olga Laskina;Jonathan V. Trueblood;Armando D. Estillore

  • Characterization of organosulfates in atmospheric aerosols at Four Asian locations

    Elizabeth A. Stone;Elizabeth A. Stone;Liming Yang;Liya E. Yu;Maheswar Rupakheti

  • A Dynamic Link between Ice Nucleating Particles Released in Nascent Sea Spray Aerosol and Oceanic Biological Activity during Two Mesocosm Experiments

    Christina S. McCluskey;Thomas C. J. Hill;Francesca Malfatti;Camille M. Sultana

  • Nepal Ambient Monitoring and Source Testing Experiment (NAMaSTE): emissions of particulate matter from wood- and dung-fueled cooking fires, garbage and crop residue burning, brick kilns, and other sources

    Thilina Jayarathne;Chelsea E. Stockwell;Prakash V. Bhave;Puppala S. Praveen

  • Nepal Ambient Monitoring and Source Testing Experiment (NAMaSTE): Emissions of trace gases and light-absorbing carbon from wood and dung cooking fires, garbage and crop residue burning, brick kilns, and other sources

    Chelsea E. Stockwell;Chelsea E. Stockwell;Ted J. Christian;J. Douglas Goetz;Thilina Jayarathne

  • The impact of residential combustion emissions on atmospheric aerosol, human health and climate

    E. W. Butt;A. Rap;A. Schmidt;C. E. Scott

Frequent Co-Authors

James J. Schauer
James J. Schauer University of Wisconsin–Madison
Robert J. Yokelson
Robert J. Yokelson University of Montana
Vicki H. Grassian
Vicki H. Grassian University of California, San Diego
Peter F. DeCarlo
Peter F. DeCarlo Johns Hopkins University
Timothy H. Bertram
Timothy H. Bertram University of Wisconsin–Madison
Jose L. Jimenez
Jose L. Jimenez University of Colorado Boulder
Charles O. Stanier
Charles O. Stanier University of Iowa
Kimberly A. Prather
Kimberly A. Prather University of California, San Diego
Donald R. Blake
Donald R. Blake University of California, Irvine
Rodney J. Weber
Rodney J. Weber Georgia Institute of Technology

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those interested in expanding their expertise beyond Environmental Sciences, various online degree options provide flexible pathways to advanced careers. Programs such as the dsw online programs offer opportunities to integrate social work principles with environmental justice, emphasizing community-based solutions.

If you’re exploring broader educational foundations, many students find success with the most affordable online general studies degree programs. These degrees allow learners to tailor their curriculum, often incorporating environmental policy, sustainability, and ecological subjects.

For those seeking degrees with manageable workloads, knowing what's the easiest bachelor's degree to get can help in selecting programs that balance academic rigor with personal demands, making it easier to complete studies while gaining relevant knowledge.

Specialized fields like Earth sciences are also accessible through top-tier geology degree online programs. These pathways equip students with critical skills to analyze geological processes, a key component of environmental investigations.

Best Scientists Citing Elizabeth A. Stone

Trending Scientists