World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
47
Citations
6781
World Ranking
5901
National Ranking
2140

Jesse O. Bash publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jesse O. Bash sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 123 publications — 26th percentile

26% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

Jesse O. Bash D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jesse O. Bash sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 47 D-Index — 42nd percentile

42% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Overview

Jesse O. Bash is affiliated with the Environmental Protection Agency in the United States. Their research spans key areas within Environmental Science and Earth and Planetary Sciences, with a focus on Atmospheric Science, Global and Planetary Change, Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis, Environmental Engineering, and Environmental Chemistry.

The main topics covered in their work include:

  • Atmospheric chemistry and aerosols
  • Air Quality and Health Impacts
  • Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics
  • Atmospheric Ozone and Climate
  • Atmospheric aerosols and clouds
  • Vehicle emissions and performance
  • Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances research

Jesse O. Bash has contributed to several scientific publications, with frequent appearances in the following venues:

  • Atmospheric chemistry and physics
  • Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres
  • Geoscientific model development
  • The Science of The Total Environment
  • Environmental Science & Technology

Frequent collaborators in their research include Christian Hogrefe, Donna Schwede, Kristen M. Foley, Robert C. Gilliam, and Benjamin N. Murphy, each with numerous coauthored works.

Among recent publications by Jesse O. Bash are:

  • The Community Multiscale Air Quality (CMAQ) model versions 5.3 and 5.3.1: system updates and evaluation, 2021, Geoscientific model development
  • Characterizing the Air Emissions, Transport, and Deposition of Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances from a Fluoropolymer Manufacturing Facility, 2021, Environmental Science & Technology
  • The Chesapeake Bay program modeling system: Overview and recommendations for future development, 2021, Ecological Modelling
  • 2002-2017 anthropogenic emissions data for air quality modeling over the United States, 2023, Data in Brief
  • Long-term regional trends of nitrogen and sulfur deposition in the United States from 2002 to 2017, 2022, Atmospheric chemistry and physics

Best Publications

  • Incremental testing of the Community Multiscale Air Quality (CMAQ) modeling system version 4.7

    K. M. Foley;S. J. Roselle;K. W. Appel;P. V. Bhave

  • Towards a climate-dependent paradigm of ammonia emission and deposition

    Mark A. Sutton;Stefan Reis;Stuart N. Riddick;Ulrike Dragosits

  • Ammonia Emissions in the United States, European Union, and China Derived by High-Resolution Inversion of Ammonium Wet Deposition Data: Interpretation with a New Agricultural Emissions Inventory (MASAGE_NH3)

    F. Paulot;Daniel James Jacob;R. W. Pinder;J. O. Bash

  • The Community Multiscale Air Quality (CMAQ) model versions 5.3 and 5.3.1: system updates and evaluation.

    K. Wyat Appel;Jesse O. Bash;Kathleen M. Fahey;Kristen M. Foley

  • Description and evaluation of the Community Multiscale Air Quality (CMAQ) modeling system version 5.1.

    K. Wyat Appel;Sergey L. Napelenok;Kristen M. Foley;Havala O. T. Pye

  • Modeling the Current and Future Roles of Particulate Organic Nitrates in the Southeastern United States

    Havala O. T. Pye;Deborah J. Luecken;Lu Xu;Christopher M. Boyd

  • Evaluation of a regional air-quality model with bidirectional NH 3 exchange coupled to an agroecosystem model

    J. O. Bash;E. J. Cooter;R. L. Dennis;J. T. Walker

  • Constraining U.S. ammonia emissions using TES remote sensing observations and the GEOS‐Chem adjoint model

    L. Zhu;D. K. Henze;K. E. Cady-Pereira;M. W. Shephard

  • TES ammonia retrieval strategy and global observations of the spatial and seasonal variability of ammonia

    M.W Shephard;K.E Cady-Pereira;M. Luo;D.K Henze

  • Advances in understanding, models and parameterizations of biosphere-atmosphere ammonia exchange

    Christophe Flechard;Raia Silvia Massad;Benjamin Loubet;Erwan Personne

  • A multi-resolution assessment of the Community Multiscale Air Quality (CMAQ) model v4.7 wet deposition estimates for 2002–2006

    K. W. Appel;K. M. Foley;J. O. Bash;R. W. Pinder

  • Characterizing the Air Emissions, Transport, and Deposition of Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances from a Fluoropolymer Manufacturing Facility.

    Emma L D'Ambro;Emma L D'Ambro;Havala O T Pye;Jesse O Bash;James Bowyer

  • Evaluation of improved land use and canopy representation in BEIS v3.61 with biogenic VOC measurements in California

    Jesse O. Bash;Kirk R. Baker;Melinda R. Beaver

  • Linking agricultural crop management and air quality models for regional to national-scale nitrogen assessments

    E. J. Cooter;J. O. Bash;V. Benson;L. Ran

  • Development and evaluation of an ammonia bidirectional flux parameterization for air quality models

    Jonathan E. Pleim;Jesse O. Bash;John T. Walker;Ellen J. Cooter

  • 2002–2017 anthropogenic emissions data for air quality modeling over the United States

    Unknown

  • Long-term trends in total inorganic nitrogen and sulfur deposition in the U.S. from 1990 to 2010.

    Yuqiang Zhang;Rohit Mathur;Jesse O. Bash;Christian Hogrefe

  • Global evaluation of ammonia bidirectional exchange and livestock diurnal variation schemes

    L. Zhu;D. Henze;J. Bash;G.-R. Jeong;G.-R. Jeong

  • Estimation of NH3 bi-directional flux from managed agricultural soils

    Ellen J. Cooter;Jesse O. Bash;John T. Walker;M.R. Jones

  • Estimation of in-canopy ammonia sources and sinks in a fertilized Zea mays field.

    Jesse O. Bash;John T. Walker;Gabriel G. Katul;Matthew R. Jones

  • Sources and Impacts of Atmospheric NH3: Current Understanding and Frontiers for Modeling, Measurements, and Remote Sensing in North America

    Liye Zhu;Liye Zhu;Daven K. Henze;Jesse O. Bash;Karen E. Cady-Pereira

  • Overview and Evaluation of the Community Multiscale Air Quality (CMAQ) Modeling System Version 5.2

    K. Wyat Appel;Sergey Napelenok;Christian Hogrefe;George Pouliot

Frequent Co-Authors

Daven K. Henze
Daven K. Henze University of Colorado Boulder
Robert W. Pinder
Robert W. Pinder Environmental Protection Agency
John T. Walker
John T. Walker Environmental Protection Agency
Karen Cady-Pereira
Karen Cady-Pereira Atmospheric and Environmental Research
Mark W. Shephard
Mark W. Shephard Environment and Climate Change Canada
Athanasios Nenes
Athanasios Nenes École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne
Havala O. T. Pye
Havala O. T. Pye Environmental Protection Agency
Rohit Mathur
Rohit Mathur Environmental Protection Agency
Christian Hogrefe
Christian Hogrefe Environmental Protection Agency
Jonathan E. Pleim
Jonathan E. Pleim Environmental Protection Agency

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in Environmental Sciences in the USA opens the door to diverse career opportunities. For those interested in the Earth’s physical processes, online geology degrees offer specialized knowledge in geoscience, helping students tackle issues such as climate change and natural resource management.

Technology-driven roles are also on the rise. Programs focusing on spatial data analysis, like the best GIS programs, equip students with Geographic Information Systems expertise essential for environmental planning and sustainable development.

For those interested in environmental policy and administration, fast-track options like 1 year MPA programs provide advanced training in public administration, preparing graduates to influence policy-making and manage environmental programs efficiently.

Lastly, understanding human behavior and social dynamics is crucial in addressing environmental challenges. Online sociology bachelor programs help bridge this gap by offering insights into societal impacts and promoting community-based solutions.

Best Scientists Citing Jesse O. Bash

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles