World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Mathematics 38 2389 2121 1002 838 148 4791
Engineering and Technology 40 7432 7171 2029 1883 183 5424

John N. Shadid publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by John N. Shadid between 1964 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. John N. Shadid published across 62 years, from 1964 to 2025, averaging 3.4 papers a year. Output peaked at 14 publications in 2017. 5 of the 211 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1964 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 14. Peak 14 publications in 2017. 1964: 2 publications 1965: 0 publications 1966: 0 publications 1967: 0 publications 1968: 0 publications 1969: 0 publications 1970: 0 publications 1971: 0 publications 1972: 0 publications 1973: 1 publication 1974: 0 publications 1975: 0 publications 1976: 0 publications 1977: 0 publications 1978: 0 publications 1979: 0 publications 1980: 0 publications 1981: 0 publications 1982: 0 publications 1983: 0 publications 1984: 0 publications 1985: 0 publications 1986: 0 publications 1987: 0 publications 1988: 0 publications 1989: 1 publication 1990: 1 publication 1991: 1 publication 1992: 3 publications 1993: 1 publication 1994: 3 publications 1995: 2 publications 1996: 2 publications 1997: 8 publications 1998: 1 publication 1999: 4 publications 2000: 2 publications 2001: 4 publications 2002: 3 publications 2003: 3 publications 2004: 11 publications 2005: 11 publications 2006: 8 publications 2007: 10 publications 2008: 13 publications 2009: 8 publications 2010: 9 publications 2011: 1 publication 2012: 3 publications 2013: 5 publications 2014: 3 publications 2015: 7 publications 2016: 6 publications 2017: 14 publications 2018: 4 publications 2019: 8 publications 2020: 14 publications 2021: 10 publications 2022: 10 publications 2023: 9 publications 2024: 3 publications 2025: 2 publications
1964 2025

211 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
John N. Shadid: publications per year, 1964 to 2025
Year Publications
1964 2
1965 0
1966 0
1967 0
1968 0
1969 0
1970 0
1971 0
1972 0
1973 1
1974 0
1975 0
1976 0
1977 0
1978 0
1979 0
1980 0
1981 0
1982 0
1983 0
1984 0
1985 0
1986 0
1987 0
1988 0
1989 1
1990 1
1991 1
1992 3
1993 1
1994 3
1995 2
1996 2
1997 8
1998 1
1999 4
2000 2
2001 4
2002 3
2003 3
2004 11
2005 11
2006 8
2007 10
2008 13
2009 8
2010 9
2011 1
2012 3
2013 5
2014 3
2015 7
2016 6
2017 14
2018 4
2019 8
2020 14
2021 10
2022 10
2023 9
2024 3
2025 2
Total 211
Download as CSV

John N. Shadid publication distribution in Mathematics in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Mathematics in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John N. Shadid sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
25 50 75 100
Bar chart with 100 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 42–46 to 537+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 112. Most scientists, 112, have 142–146 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 537 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 147–151 publications, is where this scientist sits. 42–46 publications: 3 scientists 47–51 publications: 5 scientists 52–56 publications: 7 scientists 57–61 publications: 20 scientists 62–66 publications: 14 scientists 67–71 publications: 25 scientists 72–76 publications: 19 scientists 77–81 publications: 35 scientists 82–86 publications: 50 scientists 87–91 publications: 60 scientists 92–96 publications: 86 scientists 97–101 publications: 84 scientists 102–106 publications: 83 scientists 107–111 publications: 90 scientists 112–116 publications: 99 scientists 117–121 publications: 90 scientists 122–126 publications: 91 scientists 127–131 publications: 109 scientists 132–136 publications: 110 scientists 137–141 publications: 98 scientists 142–146 publications: 112 scientists 147–151 publications: 102 scientists 152–156 publications: 88 scientists 157–161 publications: 106 scientists 162–166 publications: 83 scientists 167–171 publications: 102 scientists 172–176 publications: 77 scientists 177–181 publications: 81 scientists 182–186 publications: 78 scientists 187–191 publications: 71 scientists 192–196 publications: 92 scientists 197–201 publications: 64 scientists 202–206 publications: 69 scientists 207–211 publications: 64 scientists 212–216 publications: 62 scientists 217–221 publications: 58 scientists 222–226 publications: 53 scientists 227–231 publications: 50 scientists 232–236 publications: 46 scientists 237–241 publications: 46 scientists 242–246 publications: 46 scientists 247–251 publications: 43 scientists 252–256 publications: 29 scientists 257–261 publications: 45 scientists 262–266 publications: 30 scientists 267–271 publications: 33 scientists 272–276 publications: 34 scientists 277–281 publications: 30 scientists 282–286 publications: 31 scientists 287–291 publications: 21 scientists 292–296 publications: 34 scientists 297–301 publications: 26 scientists 302–306 publications: 10 scientists 307–311 publications: 17 scientists 312–316 publications: 23 scientists 317–321 publications: 13 scientists 322–326 publications: 16 scientists 327–331 publications: 26 scientists 332–336 publications: 13 scientists 337–341 publications: 13 scientists 342–346 publications: 16 scientists 347–351 publications: 17 scientists 352–356 publications: 12 scientists 357–361 publications: 18 scientists 362–366 publications: 18 scientists 367–371 publications: 9 scientists 372–376 publications: 11 scientists 377–381 publications: 8 scientists 382–386 publications: 8 scientists 387–391 publications: 9 scientists 392–396 publications: 9 scientists 397–401 publications: 8 scientists 402–406 publications: 11 scientists 407–411 publications: 6 scientists 412–416 publications: 6 scientists 417–421 publications: 9 scientists 422–426 publications: 8 scientists 427–431 publications: 5 scientists 432–436 publications: 8 scientists 437–441 publications: 8 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 4 scientists 452–456 publications: 4 scientists 457–461 publications: 2 scientists 462–466 publications: 2 scientists 467–471 publications: 4 scientists 472–476 publications: 3 scientists 477–481 publications: 3 scientists 482–486 publications: 6 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 5 scientists 497–501 publications: 5 scientists 502–506 publications: 1 scientist 507–511 publications: 6 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 1 scientist 522–526 publications: 3 scientists 527–531 publications: 1 scientist 532–536 publications: 4 scientists 537+ publications: 100 scientists
42–46 publications 537+

This scientist: 148 publications — 37th percentile

37% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 537 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Mathematics scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,584 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
42–46 3
47–51 5
52–56 7
57–61 20
62–66 14
67–71 25
72–76 19
77–81 35
82–86 50
87–91 60
92–96 86
97–101 84
102–106 83
107–111 90
112–116 99
117–121 90
122–126 91
127–131 109
132–136 110
137–141 98
142–146 112
147–151 102 148
152–156 88
157–161 106
162–166 83
167–171 102
172–176 77
177–181 81
182–186 78
187–191 71
192–196 92
197–201 64
202–206 69
207–211 64
212–216 62
217–221 58
222–226 53
227–231 50
232–236 46
237–241 46
242–246 46
247–251 43
252–256 29
257–261 45
262–266 30
267–271 33
272–276 34
277–281 30
282–286 31
287–291 21
292–296 34
297–301 26
302–306 10
307–311 17
312–316 23
317–321 13
322–326 16
327–331 26
332–336 13
337–341 13
342–346 16
347–351 17
352–356 12
357–361 18
362–366 18
367–371 9
372–376 11
377–381 8
382–386 8
387–391 9
392–396 9
397–401 8
402–406 11
407–411 6
412–416 6
417–421 9
422–426 8
427–431 5
432–436 8
437–441 8
442–446 4
447–451 4
452–456 4
457–461 2
462–466 2
467–471 4
472–476 3
477–481 3
482–486 6
487–491 3
492–496 5
497–501 5
502–506 1
507–511 6
512–516 4
517–521 1
522–526 3
527–531 1
532–536 4
537+ 100
Download as CSV

John N. Shadid D-index placement in Mathematics in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Mathematics scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John N. Shadid sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 57 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 86+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 174. Most scientists, 174, have 30 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 86 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 38 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 174 scientists 31 D-Index: 151 scientists 32 D-Index: 174 scientists 33 D-Index: 117 scientists 34 D-Index: 136 scientists 35 D-Index: 127 scientists 36 D-Index: 145 scientists 37 D-Index: 153 scientists 38 D-Index: 150 scientists 39 D-Index: 150 scientists 40 D-Index: 138 scientists 41 D-Index: 136 scientists 42 D-Index: 93 scientists 43 D-Index: 108 scientists 44 D-Index: 115 scientists 45 D-Index: 112 scientists 46 D-Index: 103 scientists 47 D-Index: 75 scientists 48 D-Index: 59 scientists 49 D-Index: 67 scientists 50 D-Index: 60 scientists 51 D-Index: 57 scientists 52 D-Index: 59 scientists 53 D-Index: 62 scientists 54 D-Index: 60 scientists 55 D-Index: 50 scientists 56 D-Index: 42 scientists 57 D-Index: 54 scientists 58 D-Index: 50 scientists 59 D-Index: 42 scientists 60 D-Index: 41 scientists 61 D-Index: 35 scientists 62 D-Index: 40 scientists 63 D-Index: 21 scientists 64 D-Index: 31 scientists 65 D-Index: 27 scientists 66 D-Index: 29 scientists 67 D-Index: 19 scientists 68 D-Index: 25 scientists 69 D-Index: 17 scientists 70 D-Index: 18 scientists 71 D-Index: 12 scientists 72 D-Index: 14 scientists 73 D-Index: 13 scientists 74 D-Index: 18 scientists 75 D-Index: 9 scientists 76 D-Index: 11 scientists 77 D-Index: 10 scientists 78 D-Index: 9 scientists 79 D-Index: 16 scientists 80 D-Index: 12 scientists 81 D-Index: 10 scientists 82 D-Index: 5 scientists 83 D-Index: 5 scientists 84 D-Index: 13 scientists 85 D-Index: 6 scientists 86+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 86+

This scientist: 38 D-Index — 37th percentile

37% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 86 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Mathematics scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,584 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 174
31 151
32 174
33 117
34 136
35 127
36 145
37 153
38 150 38
39 150
40 138
41 136
42 93
43 108
44 115
45 112
46 103
47 75
48 59
49 67
50 60
51 57
52 59
53 62
54 60
55 50
56 42
57 54
58 50
59 42
60 41
61 35
62 40
63 21
64 31
65 27
66 29
67 19
68 25
69 17
70 18
71 12
72 14
73 13
74 18
75 9
76 11
77 10
78 9
79 16
80 12
81 10
82 5
83 5
84 13
85 6
86+ 99
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2019 - THE THOMAS J.R. HUGHES MEDAL For outstanding and sustained contributions to large-scale parallel multiphysics CFD solution methods, HPC computing algorithms/software and numerical methods for coupled nonlinear PDEs.
  • 2018 - SIAM Fellow For contributions to solution methods for multiphysics systems, scalable parallel numerical algorithms, and numerical methods for strongly coupled nonlinear partial differential equations.

Overview

John N. Shadid is affiliated with Sandia National Laboratories in the United States. Their research output primarily focuses on engineering with a strong emphasis on computational mechanics. Their work spans several subfields, including computational theory and mathematics, numerical analysis, electrical and electronic engineering, and nuclear and high energy physics.

The main topics addressed in their publications cover advanced numerical methods in computational mathematics, computational fluid dynamics and aerodynamics, numerical methods for differential equations, electromagnetic simulation and numerical methods, advanced mathematical modeling in engineering, matrix theory and algorithms, and magnetic confinement fusion research.

Frequent co-authors in their research include Tan Bui-Thanh, Roger P. Pawlowski, Sidafa Conde, Ignacio Tomaš, and Michael Crockatt.

John N. Shadid has published regularly in venues such as:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Journal of Computational Physics
  • Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering
  • SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing
  • Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics

Selected recent papers include:

  • A multilevel approach for trace system in HDG discretizations, 2020, Journal of Computational Physics
  • Embedded pairs for optimal explicit strong stability preserving Runge-Kutta methods, 2022, Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics
  • Matrix-free subcell residual distribution for Bernstein finite elements: Monolithic limiting, 2020, Computers & Fluids
  • A linearity preserving nodal variation limiting algorithm for continuous Galerkin discretization of ideal MHD equations, 2020, Journal of Computational Physics
  • An adaptive scalable fully implicit algorithm based on stabilized finite element for reduced visco-resistive MHD, 2022, Journal of Computational Physics

Their research has garnered recognition in the form of distinguished awards, such as the Thomas J.R. Hughes Medal in 2019, awarded for contributions to large-scale parallel multiphysics CFD solution methods, HPC computing algorithms/software, and numerical methods for coupled nonlinear partial differential equations. Additionally, they were named a SIAM Fellow in 2018 for their work on solution methods for multiphysics systems, scalable parallel numerical algorithms, and numerical methods addressing strongly coupled nonlinear partial differential equations.

Best Publications

  • Multiphysics simulations: Challenges and opportunities

    David E Keyes;Lois C Mcinnes;Carol Woodward;William Gropp

  • Block Preconditioners Based on Approximate Commutators

    Howard Elman;Victoria E. Howle;John Shadid;Robert Shuttleworth

  • Reduced-order modeling of time-dependent PDEs with multiple parameters in the boundary data

    Max D. Gunzburger;Janet S. Peterson;John N. Shadid

  • A taxonomy and comparison of parallel block multi-level preconditioners for the incompressible Navier-Stokes equations

    Howard Elman;V.E. Howle;John Shadid;Robert Shuttleworth

  • Three‐dimensional wideband electromagnetic modeling on massively parallel computers

    David L. Alumbaugh;Gregory A. Newman;Lydie Prevost;John N. Shadid

  • Stability of the SUPG finite element method for transient advection-diffusion problems

    Pavel B. Bochev;Max D. Gunzburger;John N. Shadid

  • Reaction Diffusion Modeling of Calcium Dynamics with Realistic ER Geometry

    Shawn Means;Alexander J. Smith;Jason Shepherd;John Shadid

  • Interplay of ryanodine receptor distribution and calcium dynamics

    Leighton T. Izu;Shawn A. Means;John N. Shadid;Ye Chen-Izu

  • A Taxonomy of Consistently Stabilized Finite Element Methods for the Stokes Problem

    Teri Barth;Pavel Bochev;Max Gunzburger;John Shadid

  • Towards a scalable fully-implicit fully-coupled resistive MHD formulation with stabilized FE methods

    J. N. Shadid;R. P. Pawlowski;J. W. Banks;L. Chacón

  • Studies on the accuracy of time-integration methods for the radiation-diffusion equations

    David L. Ropp;John N. Shadid;Curtis C. Ober

  • Stabilized shock hydrodynamics: I. A Lagrangian method

    G. Scovazzi;M. A. Christon;Thomas J Hughes;J. N. Shadid

  • An Inexact Newton Method for Fully Coupled Solution of the Navier-Stokes Equations with Heat and Mass Transport

    John N. Shadid;Ray S. Tuminaro;Homer F. Walker

  • Bifurcation and stability analysis of laminar isothermal counterflowing jets

    R. P. Pawlowski;A. G. Salinger;J. N. Shadid;T. J. Mountziaris

  • Globalization Techniques for Newton-Krylov Methods and Applications to the Fully Coupled Solution of the Navier-Stokes Equations

    Roger P. Pawlowski;John N. Shadid;Joseph P. Simonis;Homer F. Walker

  • Scalable implicit incompressible resistive MHD with stabilized FE and fully-coupled Newton–Krylov-AMG

    John N. Shadid;John N. Shadid;Roger P. Pawlowski;Eric C Cyr;Raymond S. Tuminaro

  • Fundamental models of the metalorganic vapor-phase epitaxy of gallium nitride and their use in reactor design

    R.P Pawlowski;R.P Pawlowski;C Theodoropoulos;A.G Salinger;T.J Mountziaris

  • A parallel block multi-level preconditioner for the 3D incompressible Navier--Stokes equations

    Howard C. Elman;Victoria E. Howle;John N. Shadid;Ray S. Tuminaro

  • Least Squares Preconditioners for Stabilized Discretizations of the Navier-Stokes Equations

    Howard Elman;Victoria E. Howle;John Shadid;David Silvester

  • A New Approximate Block Factorization Preconditioner for Two-Dimensional Incompressible (Reduced) Resistive MHD

    Eric C. Cyr;John N Shadid;Raymond S. Tuminaro;Roger P. Pawlowski

Frequent Co-Authors

Raymond S. Tuminaro
Raymond S. Tuminaro Sandia National Laboratories
Andrew G. Salinger
Andrew G. Salinger Sandia National Laboratories
Howard C. Elman
Howard C. Elman University of Maryland, College Park
Max D. Gunzburger
Max D. Gunzburger Florida State University
Richard B. Lehoucq
Richard B. Lehoucq Sandia National Laboratories
Pavel B. Bochev
Pavel B. Bochev Sandia National Laboratories
William D. Henshaw
William D. Henshaw Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute
Lorenz T. Biegler
Lorenz T. Biegler Carnegie Mellon University
Haim Waisman
Haim Waisman Columbia University
Guglielmo Scovazzi
Guglielmo Scovazzi Duke University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those studying Mathematics in the USA, expanding your qualifications with related online degrees can open up diverse career pathways. Many students explore business-related options, such as pursuing the fastest online MBA programs to quickly gain management skills alongside analytical expertise. These accelerated paths often balance rigorous coursework with flexible schedules, ideal for working professionals.

Alternatively, marketing is another thriving field where a strong quantitative background is an asset. The masters in marketing online degrees offer affordable options that deliver strong return on investment through well-paying careers. Integrating mathematical skills with marketing analytics can set graduates apart in this competitive industry.

One-year master’s programs are particularly appealing for those wanting to upskill rapidly. Programs listed under year long MBA programs provide intensive study combined with practical applications, fitting well with the career goals of mathematically trained professionals seeking leadership roles.

Many students also consider the flexibility of credit transfers to reduce study time and costs. Resources detailing the mba transfer credits policies help identify programs that recognize prior learning, streamlining the path to degree completion.

Best Scientists Citing John N. Shadid

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles