World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 59 3708 3418 2082 1875 151 12597

Cris M. Sullivan publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Cris M. Sullivan between 1991 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Cris M. Sullivan published across 35 years, from 1991 to 2025, averaging 4.5 papers a year. Output peaked at 11 publications in 2013. 3 of the 159 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6 8 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1991 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 11. Peak 11 publications in 2013. 1991: 3 publications 1992: 3 publications 1993: 0 publications 1994: 2 publications 1995: 3 publications 1996: 1 publication 1997: 0 publications 1998: 4 publications 1999: 2 publications 2000: 3 publications 2001: 7 publications 2002: 4 publications 2003: 10 publications 2004: 3 publications 2005: 2 publications 2006: 6 publications 2007: 1 publication 2008: 8 publications 2009: 7 publications 2010: 3 publications 2011: 8 publications 2012: 9 publications 2013: 11 publications 2014: 8 publications 2015: 1 publication 2016: 6 publications 2017: 8 publications 2018: 8 publications 2019: 7 publications 2020: 5 publications 2021: 7 publications 2022: 4 publications 2023: 2 publications 2024: 1 publication 2025: 2 publications
1991 2025

159 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Cris M. Sullivan: publications per year, 1991 to 2025
Year Publications
1991 3
1992 3
1993 0
1994 2
1995 3
1996 1
1997 0
1998 4
1999 2
2000 3
2001 7
2002 4
2003 10
2004 3
2005 2
2006 6
2007 1
2008 8
2009 7
2010 3
2011 8
2012 9
2013 11
2014 8
2015 1
2016 6
2017 8
2018 8
2019 7
2020 5
2021 7
2022 4
2023 2
2024 1
2025 2
Total 159
Download as CSV

Cris M. Sullivan publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Cris M. Sullivan sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 151–160 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 151 publications — 50th percentile

50% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576 151
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Cris M. Sullivan D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Cris M. Sullivan sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 58–59 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 59 D-Index — 68th percentile

68% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325 59
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Cris M. Sullivan is affiliated with Michigan State University in the United States and has contributed extensively to the fields of social sciences and health professions. Their research encompasses various subfields including health, general health professions, clinical psychology, demography, and sociology and political science.

The main topics covered in Sullivan's research focus on intimate partner and family violence, homelessness and social issues, elder abuse and neglect, health disparities and outcomes, child abuse and trauma, grief, bereavement, and mental health, as well as housing, finance, and neoliberalism.

They have published work in several academic venues, with frequent contributions to:

  • Journal of Family Violence
  • Journal of Community Psychology
  • Journal of Interpersonal Violence
  • PsycTESTS Dataset
  • Journal of Social Distress and the Homeless

Notable recent papers authored or coauthored by Sullivan include:

  • Impact of the Domestic Violence Housing First Model on Survivors' Safety and Housing Stability: 12-Month Findings, 2022, Journal of Interpersonal Violence
  • Impact of the Domestic Violence Housing First Model on Survivors' Safety and Housing Stability: Six Month Findings, 2022, Journal of Family Violence

Other significant collaborative papers related to broader social issues include:

  • The Use of Children as a Tactic of Intimate Partner Violence and its Relationship to Survivors' Mental Health, 2021, Journal of Family Violence
  • The impact of COVID-19 on the safety, housing stability, and mental health of unstably housed domestic violence survivors, 2021, Journal of Community Psychology
  • Development and validation of the housing instability scale, 2022, Journal of Social Distress and the Homeless

Throughout their career, Sullivan has worked alongside several frequent coauthors, including Danielle Chiaramonte, Gabriela López-Zerón, Mackenzie Sprecher, Adam Farero, and Oyesola Oluwafunmilayo Ayeni.

The breadth of their publications and collaborations reflects a sustained focus on addressing complex social issues related to violence, housing stability, and mental health within vulnerable populations across diverse academic disciplines.

Best Publications

  • Reducing violence using community-based advocacy for women with abusive partners.

    Cris M. Sullivan;Deborah I. Bybee

  • Development of the Scale of Economic Abuse

    Adrienne E. Adams;Cris M. Sullivan;Deborah Bybee;Megan R. Greeson

  • When Ending the Relationship Does Not End the Violence Women's Experiences of Violence by Former Partners

    Ruth E. Fleury;Cris M. Sullivan;Deborah I. Bybee

  • WOMEN WHO USE DOMESTIC VIOLENCE SHELTERS Changes in Depression Over Time

    Rebecca Campbell;Cris M. Sullivan;William S. Davidson

  • Main, mediating, and moderating effects of social support on the well-being of survivors of intimate partner violence across 2 years.

    Marisa L. Beeble;Deborah Bybee;Cris M. Sullivan;Adrienne E. Adams

  • The Process Through Which an Advocacy Intervention Resulted in Positive Change for Battered Women Over Time

    Deborah I. Bybee;Cris M. Sullivan

  • The Impact of Family and Friends’ Reactions on the Well-Being of Women With Abusive Partners

    Jessica R. Goodkind;Tameka L. Gillum;Deborah I. Bybee;Cris M. Sullivan

  • Predicting Re-Victimization of Battered Women 3 Years After Exiting a Shelter Program

    Deborah Bybee;Cris M. Sullivan

  • Health effects of experiences of sexual violence for women with abusive partners

    Kimberly K. Eby;Jacquelyn C. Campbell;Cris M. Sullivan;William S. Davidson

  • The Importance of Spirituality in the Lives of Domestic Violence Survivors

    Tameka L. Gillum;Cris M. Sullivan;Deborah I. Bybee

  • Culturally adapting an evidence-based parenting intervention for Latino immigrants: the need to integrate fidelity and cultural relevance.

    Jose Ruben Parra Cardona;Melanie Domenech-Rodriguez;Marion Forgatch;Cris M. Sullivan

  • The Role of Social Support in the Lives of Women Exiting Domestic Violence Shelters An Experimental Study

    Cheribeth Tan;Joanne Basta;Cris M. Sullivan;William S. Davidson

  • An advocacy intervention program for women with abusive partners: Initial evaluation

    Cris M. Sullivan;Cheribeth Tan;Joanna Basta;Maureen Rumptz

  • Battered Women’s Multitude of Needs Evidence Supporting the Need for Comprehensive Advocacy

    Nicole E. Allen;Deborah I. Bybee;Cris M. Sullivan

  • Beyond bruises and broken bones: the joint effects of stress and injuries on battered women's health.

    Cheryl A. Sutherland;Deborah I. Bybee;Cris M. Sullivan

  • The long-term effects of battering on women's health.

    C Sutherland;D Bybee;C Sullivan

  • The Impact of Intimate Partner Violence on Low-Income Women’s Economic Well-Being The Mediating Role of Job Stability

    Adrienne E. Adams;Richard M. Tolman;Deborah Bybee;Cris M. Sullivan

  • An advocacy intervention program for women with abusive partners: six-month follow-up

    Cris M. Sullivan;Rebecca Campbell;Holly Angelique;Kimberly K. Eby

  • Sexual Relationship Power, Intimate Partner Violence, and Condom Use Among Minority Urban Girls

    Anne M. Teitelman;Sarah J. Ratcliffe;Mercedes M. Morales-Aleman;Cris M. Sullivan

  • A Contextual Analysis of Battered Women’s Safety Planning:

    Jessica R. Goodkind;Cris M. Sullivan;Deborah I. Bybee

Frequent Co-Authors

Deborah Bybee
Deborah Bybee Michigan State University
William S. Davidson
William S. Davidson Michigan State University
Joanne Belknap
Joanne Belknap University of Colorado Boulder
Lisa A. Goodman
Lisa A. Goodman Boston College
Rebecca Campbell
Rebecca Campbell Michigan State University
Guillermo Bernal
Guillermo Bernal University of Puerto Rico
Richard M. Tolman
Richard M. Tolman University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Judith McFarlane
Judith McFarlane Texas Woman's University
Daniel G. Saunders
Daniel G. Saunders University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Mary Ann Dutton
Mary Ann Dutton Georgetown University Medical Center

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

When considering a career in psychology, exploring related online degrees and career pathways can greatly expand your professional options. Many students looking to become counselors or mental health professionals start by researching specialized programs that offer strong job prospects and a solid return on investment.

Accredited counseling degrees are highly sought after, with certain regions standing out for their value and opportunities. For example, you can check the most valuable counseling degree programs ranking in Florida to find top choices in that state. Similarly, urban centers offer unique benefits; see the best value counseling degrees in Los Angeles for programs in this major city.

Beyond the coasts, the most valuable counseling programs in Missouri and the most valuable counseling degree programs ranking in Pennsylvania highlight additional regions with affordable tuition and high graduate employment rates.

By exploring these regional rankings, you can better identify online psychology and counseling degrees that match your career goals. The right program can lead to rewarding roles in clinical counseling, school psychology, or social work, helping you make a meaningful impact in your community.

Best Scientists Citing Cris M. Sullivan

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles