World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
37
Citations
9209
World Ranking
9048
National Ranking
4798

Daniel G. Saunders publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Daniel G. Saunders sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 83 publications — 10th percentile

10% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Daniel G. Saunders D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Daniel G. Saunders sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 37 D-Index — 21st percentile

21% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Daniel G. Saunders is a researcher affiliated with the University of Michigan-Ann Arbor in the United States. Their work spans multiple fields of study, including Psychology, Social Sciences, and Medicine. More specifically, their research engages deeply with subfields such as Clinical Psychology, Health, Sociology and Political Science, Emergency Medicine, and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health.

The main topics addressed in Saunders' research focus on Intimate Partner and Family Violence, Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health, Sex Work and Related Issues, Child Abuse and Trauma, Migration, Health and Trauma, Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation, as well as Suicide and Self-Harm Studies.

Recent publications by Saunders include:

  • "Patriarchy's Link to Intimate Partner Violence: Applications to Survivors' Asylum Claims" (2022, Violence Against Women)
  • "Childhood family violence and officer responses to officer-involved domestic violence: Effects of cumulative and resolved trauma" (2020, International Journal of Police Science & Management)
  • "0053 An analysis of drug overdose deaths by intent in Ohio from 2016-2018" (2021, Abstracts)

Saunders frequently publishes in venues including Violence Against Women, International Journal of Police Science & Management, and Abstracts.

Their collaborative work often involves coauthors such as Tina Jiwatram-Negrón, Natalie Nanasi, Iris Cardenas, Stephanie Grace Prost, and Karen Oehme.

Best Publications

  • Leaving An Abusive Partner: An Empirical Review of Predictors, the Process of Leaving, and Psychological Well-Being

    Deborah K. Anderson;Daniel G. Saunders

  • A TYPOLOGY OF MEN WHO BATTER: Three Types Derived From Cluster Analysis

    Daniel G. Saunders

  • The impact of different forms of psychological abuse on battered women

    Leslie A. Sackett;Daniel G. Saunders

  • When Battered Women Use Violence: Husband*Abuse or Self'Defense?

    Daniel G. Saunders

  • Prevalence of domestic violence in community practice and rate of physician inquiry

    L K Hamberger;D G Saunders;M Hovey

  • Feminist-cognitive-behavioral and process-psychodynamic treatments for men who batter: interaction of abuser traits and treatment models

    Daniel G. Saunders

  • Wife abuse, husband abuse, or mutual combat?: A feminist perspective on the empirical findings.

    Daniel G. Saunders

  • Assessing the Risk of Severe Domestic Violence The Importance of Survivors' Predictions

    Arlene N. Weisz;Richard M. Tolman;Daniel G. Saunders

  • Posttraumatic stress symptom profiles of battered women: a comparison of survivors in two settings.

    Daniel G. Saunders

  • The inventory of beliefs about wife beating: the construction and initial validation of a measure of beliefs and attitudes

    Daniel G. Saunders;Ann B. Lynch;Marcia Grayson;Daniel Linz

  • Adolescent Dating Violence Victimization and Psychological Well-Being

    Michelle Renee Callahan;Richard M. Tolman;Daniel G. Saunders

  • Are Physical Assaults by Wives and Girlfriends a Major Social Problem? A Review of the Literature

    Daniel G. Saunders

  • Procedures for Adjusting Self-Reports of Violence for Social Desirability Bias

    Daniel G. Saunders

  • Group interventions for men who batter: A summary of program descriptions and research

    Daniel G. Saunders

  • Attitudes About Woman Abuse Among Police Officers, Victims, and Victim Advocates

    Daniel G. Saunders;Patricia B. Size

  • Child Custody Decisions in Families Experiencing Woman Abuse

    Daniel G. Saunders

  • Cognitive-behavioral treatment of men who batter: The short-term effects of group therapy

    Daniel G. Saunders;Darald Hanusa

  • The meanings and motives for women's use of violence in Canadian college dating relationships: Results from a national survey

    Walter S. DeKeseredy;Daniel G. Saunders;Martin D. Schwartz;Shahid Alvi

  • When Will Adolescents Tell Someone About Dating Violence Victimization

    Beverly M. Black;Richard M. Tolman;Michelle Callahan;Daniel G. Saunders

  • The Tendency to Arrest Victims of Domestic Violence A Preliminary Analysis of Officer Characteristics

    Daniel G. Saunders

Frequent Co-Authors

Richard M. Tolman
Richard M. Tolman University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Daniel Linz
Daniel Linz University of California, Santa Barbara
Kathleen Coulborn Faller
Kathleen Coulborn Faller University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Amy L. Ai
Amy L. Ai Florida State University
Cris M. Sullivan
Cris M. Sullivan Michigan State University
L. Kevin Hamberger
L. Kevin Hamberger Medical College of Wisconsin
Deborah Bybee
Deborah Bybee Michigan State University
Amy Holtzworth-Munroe
Amy Holtzworth-Munroe Indiana University
James E. Aikens
James E. Aikens University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Henry A. Buchtel
Henry A. Buchtel University of Michigan–Ann Arbor

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Psychology in the USA opens diverse professional pathways, including careers in social work, counseling, research, and human services. Many students choose to pursue online degrees to gain flexibility and access accredited programs. Online education allows you to balance studies with work or family commitments while still preparing for licensing and certification requirements.

If you are considering a career in social work, it's crucial to be aware of the state-specific requirements for licensure. For instance, those interested in practicing in New Hampshire should review the New Hampshire social work license requirements. Similarly, if you plan to work in New Jersey, you can learn more about becoming a social worker in New Jersey.

Other states like New Mexico also have their own New Mexico social work license requirements to ensure high standards for professionals. If your ambitions lead you to New York, be sure to check the requirements to be a social worker in New York. Researching state guidelines is essential, whether you’re pursuing traditional or online pathways, to help tailor your education to meet your career goals.

Best Scientists Citing Daniel G. Saunders

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles