World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 44 7049 6575 81 80 186 6147

Marisol Lila publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Marisol Lila between 1992 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Marisol Lila published across 34 years, from 1992 to 2025, averaging 7 papers a year. Output peaked at 20 publications in 2014. 34 of the 239 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1992 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 20. Peak 20 publications in 2014. 1992: 1 publication 1993: 0 publications 1994: 0 publications 1995: 1 publication 1996: 1 publication 1997: 0 publications 1998: 0 publications 1999: 0 publications 2000: 2 publications 2001: 0 publications 2002: 0 publications 2003: 2 publications 2004: 0 publications 2005: 2 publications 2006: 0 publications 2007: 6 publications 2008: 6 publications 2009: 5 publications 2010: 9 publications 2011: 5 publications 2012: 5 publications 2013: 19 publications 2014: 20 publications 2015: 7 publications 2016: 15 publications 2017: 17 publications 2018: 10 publications 2019: 13 publications 2020: 19 publications 2021: 17 publications 2022: 7 publications 2023: 16 publications 2024: 17 publications 2025: 17 publications
1992 2025

239 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Marisol Lila: publications per year, 1992 to 2025
Year Publications
1992 1
1993 0
1994 0
1995 1
1996 1
1997 0
1998 0
1999 0
2000 2
2001 0
2002 0
2003 2
2004 0
2005 2
2006 0
2007 6
2008 6
2009 5
2010 9
2011 5
2012 5
2013 19
2014 20
2015 7
2016 15
2017 17
2018 10
2019 13
2020 19
2021 17
2022 7
2023 16
2024 17
2025 17
Total 239
Download as CSV

Marisol Lila publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Marisol Lila sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 181–190 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 186 publications — 64th percentile

64% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397 186
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Marisol Lila D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Marisol Lila sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 44–45 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 44 D-Index — 41st percentile

41% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558 44
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Marisol Lila is affiliated with the University of Valencia in Spain and has a research profile focused primarily on social sciences and psychology, with a strong emphasis on health and clinical psychology subfields. Their scholarly output covers a broad range of topics related to interpersonal violence, trauma, and psychosocial development.

Their main areas of study include:

  • Social Sciences
  • Psychology

Within these fields, specific subfields of interest are:

  • Health
  • Clinical Psychology
  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Social Psychology
  • Gender Studies

Key research topics address issues such as:

  • Intimate Partner and Family Violence
  • Child Abuse and Trauma
  • Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies
  • Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
  • Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health
  • Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Suicide and Self-Harm Studies

Marisol Lila's recent publications include the following papers:

  • "Attitudes Toward Intimate Partner Violence Against Women in the European Union: A Systematic Review" (2020), published in European Psychologist
  • "Motivational Strategies in Interventions for Intimate Partner Violence Offenders: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials" (2020), published in Psychosocial Intervention
  • "Motivational Strategies, Working Alliance, and Protherapeutic Behaviors in Batterer Intervention Programs: A Randomized Controlled Trial" (2020), published in The European Journal of Psychology Applied to Legal Context
  • "Ensuring the comparability of cross-national survey data on intimate partner violence against women: a cross-sectional, population-based study in the European Union" (2020), published in BMJ Open
  • "Chronic high risk of intimate partner violence against women in disadvantaged neighborhoods: An eight-year space-time analysis" (2021), published in Preventive Medicine

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Marisol Lila include:

  • Enrique Gracia
  • Luis Moya-Albiol
  • Ángel Romero-Martínez
  • Manuel Martín-Fernández
  • Carolina Sarrate-Costa

The most common publication venues for their work are:

  • Psychosocial Intervention
  • The European Journal of Psychology Applied to Legal Context
  • Journal of Interpersonal Violence
  • PsycTESTS Dataset
  • Journal of Family Violence

In addition to journal articles, Marisol Lila has contributed to book publications, including a work titled Colección Psicología y Ley published by Sciendo in 2020.

Best Publications

  • Autoconcepto y ajuste psicosocial en la adolescencia

    María C. Fuentes;José Fernando García;Enrique Gracia;Marisol Lila

  • Public responses to intimate partner violence against women: the influence of perceived severity and personal responsibility.

    Enrique Gracia;Fernando García;Marisol Lila

  • Predicting success indicators of an intervention programme for convicted intimate-partner violence offenders: The Contexto Programme

    Marisol Lila;Amparo Oliver;Laura Galiana;Enrique Gracia

  • Psychological adjustment and victim-blaming among intimate partner violence offenders: The role of social support and stressful life events

    Marisol Lila;Enrique Gracia;Sergio Murgui

  • Police Involvement in Cases of Intimate Partner Violence Against Women The Influence of Perceived Severity and Personal Responsibility

    Enrique Gracia;Fernando García;Marisol Lila

  • Rechazo parental y ajuste psicológico y social de los hijos

    Enrique Gracia;Marisol Lila;Gonzalo Musitu

  • Perceived Paternal and Maternal Acceptance and Children's Outcomes in Colombia

    Marisol Lila;Fernando Garcia;Enrique Gracia

  • Asunción de responsabilidad en hombres maltratadores: influencia de la autoestima, la personalidad narcisista y la personalidad antisocial

    Marisol Lila;Enrique Gracia;Juan Herrero

  • Police Attitudes Toward Policing Partner Violence Against Women: Do They Correspond to Different Psychosocial Profiles?

    Enrique Gracia;Fernando García;Marisol Lila

  • Determinantes de la aceptación-rechazo parental

    Marisol Lila;Enrique Gracia

  • The Spatial Epidemiology of Intimate Partner Violence: Do Neighborhoods Matter?

    Enrique Gracia;Antonio López-Quílez;Miriam Marco;Silvia Lladosa

  • Individualized motivational plans in batterer intervention programs: A randomized clinical trial.

    Marisol Lila;Enrique Gracia;Alba Catalá-Miñana

  • PERCEIVED NEIGHBORHOOD VIOLENCE, PARENTING STYLES, AND DEVELOPMENTAL OUTCOMES AMONG SPANISH ADOLESCENTS

    Enrique Gracia;Maria C. Fuentes;Fernando Garcia;Marisol Lila

  • The Intimate Partner Violence Responsibility Attribution Scale (IPVRAS)

    Marisol Lila;Amparo Oliver;Alba Catalá-Miñana;Laura Galiana

  • Ambivalent sexism, empathy and law enforcement attitudes towards partner violence against women among male police officers

    Marisol Lila;Enrique Gracia;Fernando García

  • Adolescentes colombianos y españoles: diferencias, similitudes y relaciones entre la socialización familiar, la autoestima y los valores

    Marisol Lila;Gonzalo Musitu;Sofía Buelga

  • High testosterone levels and sensitivity to acute stress in perpetrators of domestic violence with low cognitive flexibility and impairments in their emotional decoding process: A preliminary study

    Ángel Romero-Martínez;Marisol Lila;Patricia Sariñana-González;Esperanza González-Bono

  • Explaining Method Effects Associated With Negatively Worded Items in Trait and State Global and Domain-Specific Self-Esteem Scales

    José M. Tomás;Amparo Oliver;Laura Galiana;Patricia Sancho

  • Perceived neighborhood social disorder and attitudes toward domestic violence against women among Latin-American immigrants

    Enrique Gracia;Juan Herrero;Marisol Lila;Asur Fuente

  • Measuring Acceptability of Intimate Partner Violence Against Women: Development and Validation of the A-IPVAW Scale

    Manuel Martín-Fernández;Enrique Gracia;Miriam Marco;Viviana Vargas

  • Autoconcepto y consumo de sustancias en la adolescencia

    María C. Fuentes;Fernando García;Enrique Gracia;Marisol Lila

Frequent Co-Authors

Enrique Gracia
Enrique Gracia University of Valencia
Enrique Gracia
Enrique Gracia University of Valencia
Christina M. Rodriguez
Christina M. Rodriguez University of Alabama at Birmingham
Juan Merlo
Juan Merlo Lund University
Isabel Castillo
Isabel Castillo University of Valencia
James R. Roney
James R. Roney University of California, Santa Barbara
Marta Rodríguez-Arias
Marta Rodríguez-Arias University of Valencia
Marcel A. G. van Aken
Marcel A. G. van Aken Utrecht University
Alicia Salvador
Alicia Salvador University of Valencia
Bridget Freisthler
Bridget Freisthler The Ohio State University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a psychology degree in the USA opens a variety of career options—especially in education and counseling. Online psychology and counseling programs offer flexibility for students, helping them balance studies and personal commitments.

Those interested in educational settings often consider becoming a school counselor in Pennsylvania, where specialized coursework and state certification are crucial. Requirements vary across states, making it essential to understand local guidelines.

For example, the Rhode Island school counselor education requirements focus on approved graduate programs and practical internship experiences. Meanwhile, the South Carolina school counselor education requirements emphasize a combination of a master’s degree, supervised fieldwork, and state assessments.

If your goal is becoming a school counselor in South Dakota, you’ll find a focus on mental health knowledge and a clear licensure process. Carefully review state-specific pathways to choose the right accredited online program and set yourself up for a successful psychology career.

Best Scientists Citing Marisol Lila

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles