World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Miguel Pérez-García

Miguel Pérez-García

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
45
Citations
9297
World Ranking
6640
National Ranking
76

Miguel Pérez-García publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Miguel Pérez-García sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 190 publications — 66th percentile

66% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Miguel Pérez-García D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Miguel Pérez-García sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 45 D-Index — 43rd percentile

43% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Miguel Pérez-García is affiliated with the University of Granada in Spain, focusing on research primarily within the fields of Medicine and Psychology. Their work spans multiple subfields including Clinical Psychology, Health, Psychiatry and Mental Health, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, and Social Psychology.

The scientist's research covers several main topics reflecting an interdisciplinary approach. These include:

  • Intimate Partner and Family Violence
  • Child Abuse and Trauma
  • Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
  • Traumatic Brain Injury Research
  • Resilience and Mental Health
  • Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
  • Cognitive Abilities and Testing

Some of their recent papers illustrate the scope and focus of their studies:

  • Structural Brain Alterations in Female Survivors of Intimate Partner Violence, 2020, Journal of Interpersonal Violence
  • Infant Formula Supplemented With Milk Fat Globule Membrane, Long-Chain Polyunsaturated Fatty Acids, and Synbiotics Is Associated With Neurocognitive Function and Brain Structure of Healthy Children Aged 6 Years: The COGNIS Study, 2022, Frontiers in Nutrition
  • The Effects of an Infant Formula Enriched with Milk Fat Globule Membrane, Long-Chain Polyunsaturated Fatty Acids and Synbiotics on Child Behavior up to 2.5 Years Old: The COGNIS Study, 2020, Nutrients
  • Cultural Bias in Intelligence Assessment Using a Culture-Free Test in Moroccan Children, 2021, Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology
  • Unemployment and general cognitive ability: A review and meta-analysis, 2021, Journal of Economic Psychology

Miguel Pérez-García has collaborated frequently with several coauthors, including:

  • Natalia Hidalgo-Ruzzante
  • Juan Verdejo-Román
  • Agar Marín-Morales
  • Julia C. Daugherty
  • Natalia Bueso-Izquierdo

The researcher's work has been published regularly in certain academic venues, with multiple publications in:

  • Neuroscience Applied
  • Journal of Interpersonal Violence
  • Nutrients
  • Journal of Psychiatric Research
  • European Neuropsychopharmacology

Best Publications

  • What are the specific vs. generalized effects of drugs of abuse on neuropsychological performance

    Maria Jose Fernandez-Serrano;Miguel Perez-Garcia;Antonio Javier Verdejo-Garcia

  • Executive dysfunction in substance dependent individuals during drug use and abstinence: an examination of the behavioral, cognitive and emotional correlates of addiction.

    Antonio Verdejo-García;Antoine Bechara;Emily C. Recknor;Miguel Pérez-García

  • Negative emotion-driven impulsivity predicts substance dependence problems.

    Antonio Verdejo-García;Antoine Bechara;Antoine Bechara;Emily C. Recknor;Miguel Pérez-García

  • Profile of executive deficits in cocaine and heroin polysubstance users: common and differential effects on separate executive components.

    Antonio Verdejo-García;Miguel Pérez-García

  • Cognitive impulsivity in cocaine and heroin polysubstance abusers.

    Antonio J. Verdejo-García;José C. Perales;Miguel Pérez-García

  • Neuropsychological consequences of alcohol and drug abuse on different components of executive functions

    María José Fernández-Serrano;Miguel Pérez-García;Jacqueline Schmidt Río-Valle;Antonio Verdejo-García

  • Differential effects of MDMA, cocaine, and cannabis use severity on distinctive components of the executive functions in polysubstance users: A multiple regression analysis

    Antonio J. Verdejo-Garcı́a;Francisca López-Torrecillas;Francisco Aguilar de Arcos;Miguel Pérez-Garcı́a

  • Clinical Implications and Methodological Challenges in the Study of the Neuropsychological Correlates of Cannabis, Stimulant, and Opioid Abuse

    Antonio Verdejo-García;Francisca López-Torrecillas;Carmen Orozco Giménez;Miguel Pérez-García

  • Selective alterations within executive functions in adolescents with excess weight.

    Antonio Verdejo-García;Manuel Pérez-Expósito;Jacqueline Schmidt-Río-Valle;Maria J. Fernández-Serrano

  • Neuropsychological functioning in methadone maintenance patients versus abstinent heroin abusers.

    Antonio Verdejo;Inmaculada Toribio;Carmen Orozco;Krista Lee Puente

  • Psychometric Properties of a Spanish Version of the UPPS–P Impulsive Behavior Scale: Reliability, Validity and Association With Trait and Cognitive Impulsivity

    Antonio Verdejo-García;Oscar Lozano;Maribel Moya;Miguel Angel Alcázar

  • Trait impulsivity and prefrontal gray matter reductions in cocaine dependent individuals

    Laura Moreno-Lopez;Andres Catena;Maria Jose Fernandez-Serrano;Elena Delgado-Rico

  • Disadvantageous decision-making as a predictor of drop-out among cocaine-dependent individuals in long-term residential treatment

    Laura Stevens;Patricia Betanzos-Espinosa;Cleo L. Crunelle;Esperanza Vergara-Moragues;Esperanza Vergara-Moragues

  • Emotion, Decision-Making and Substance Dependence: A Somatic-Marker Model of Addiction

    A. Verdejo-García;M. Pérez-García;A. Bechara

  • Nutrition and neurodevelopment in children: focus on NUTRIMENTHE project

    Tania Anjos;Signe Altmäe;Pauline Emmett;Henning Tiemeier

  • Neuropsychological profiling of impulsivity and compulsivity in cocaine dependent individuals

    María José Fernández-Serrano;José César Perales;Laura Moreno-López;Miguel Pérez-García

  • Experience of emotions in substance abusers exposed to images containing neutral, positive, and negative affective stimuli.

    Francisco Aguilar de Arcos;Antonio Verdejo-García;María Isabel Peralta-Ramírez;María Sánchez-Barrera

  • Strategic self-regulation, decision-making and emotion processing in poly-substance abusers in their first year of abstinence.

    Antonio Verdejo-García;Cristina Rivas-Pérez;Raquel Vilar-López;Miguel Pérez-García

  • The effects of daily stress and stressful life events on the clinical symptomatology of patients with lupus erythematosus.

    Maria I Peralta-Ramírez;Juan Jiménez-Alonso;Juan F Godoy-García;Miguel Pérez-García

  • Prenatal DHA Status and Neurological Outcome in Children at Age 5.5 Years Are Positively Associated

    M. Victoria Escolano-Margarit;Rosa Ramos;Jeannette Beyer;Gyoergyi Csabi

Frequent Co-Authors

Antonio Verdejo-García
Antonio Verdejo-García Monash University
Andrés Catena
Andrés Catena University of Granada
Emmanuel Stamatakis
Emmanuel Stamatakis University of Sydney
Berthold Koletzko
Berthold Koletzko Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München
José C. Perales
José C. Perales University of Granada
Antoine Bechara
Antoine Bechara University of Southern California
Gustavo A. Reyes del Paso
Gustavo A. Reyes del Paso University of Jaén
Eve M. Valera
Eve M. Valera Harvard University
Liane Young
Liane Young Boston College
Stephen D. Hart
Stephen D. Hart Simon Fraser University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Psychology in the USA opens doors to a variety of online degrees and dynamic career paths. Many students are now choosing flexible online counseling programs, which provide strong foundations in mental health and therapeutic techniques. These degrees can lead to careers in school counseling, mental health services, substance abuse counseling, and more.

Program popularity and rankings can differ by location. For example, the top-ranked counseling degree programs in Colorado are recognized for their student support and high licensure exam pass rates. In contrast, the most popular counseling degree programs in Florida often emphasize multicultural counseling and community practice.

If you’re considering options in other states, you might explore the best-ranked counseling degree programs in Georgia, which are known for their clinical training opportunities. Similarly, the best-ranked counseling degree programs in Massachusetts often offer innovative coursework and diverse practicum settings. Regardless of location, online degrees in psychology and counseling can provide a flexible pathway to a rewarding, impactful career.

Best Scientists Citing Miguel Pérez-García

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles