World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
40
Citations
10133
World Ranking
8088
National Ranking
4334

Daniel Linz publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Daniel Linz sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 94 publications — 16th percentile

16% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Daniel Linz D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Daniel Linz sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 40 D-Index — 30th percentile

30% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Daniel Linz is affiliated with the University of California, Santa Barbara in the United States. Their research spans several fields, predominantly focusing on psychology, medicine, and social sciences. Within these fields, their work addresses subfields such as clinical psychology, social psychology, public health, environmental and occupational health, gender studies, and cultural studies.

The main topics explored in Linz's research include grief, bereavement, and mental health; LGBTQ health, identity, and policy; patient dignity and privacy; sexuality, behavior, and technology; gender, feminism, and media; Asian culture and media studies; and palliative care and end-of-life issues.

Linz has contributed to multiple academic publications with notable papers such as:

  • "Methodological Issues in the Content Analysis of Pornography," 2025, University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform
  • "End-of-life topic avoidance among gender-diverse young adults: the importance of normalizing gender-affirming end-of-life conversations," 2023, Human Communication Research
  • "Overcoming Ungrievability: Transgender Expectations for Identity after Death," 2020, Sociological Inquiry

Their frequent co-authors include Stephenson Brooks Whitestone, with whom they have collaborated on multiple papers, as well as Howard Giles and Edward Donnerstein. Linz has published in various academic venues including Sociological Inquiry, University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform, and Human Communication Research.

The interdisciplinary nature of Linz's research centers on issues at the intersection of social identity, mental health, and communication. Their work on transgender identity and end-of-life topics contributes to social sciences and health communication, while their methodological work addresses challenges in analyzing sensitive content such as pornography. Studies related to patient dignity and privacy emphasize clinical and public health concerns, reflecting their engagement with healthcare communication.

Best Publications

  • The Influence of Media Violence on Youth

    Craig A. Anderson;Leonard Berkowitz;Edward I Donnerstein;L. Rowell Huesmann

  • Overrepresentation and Underrepresentation of African Americans and Latinos as Lawbreakers on Television News

    Travis L. Dixon;Daniel Linz

  • Using the confluence model of sexual aggression to predict men's conflict with women: A 10-year follow-up study.

    Neil M. Malamuth;Daniel Linz;Christopher L. Heavey;Gordon Barnes

  • Effects of long-term exposure to violent and sexually degrading depictions of women.

    Daniel G. Linz;Edward Donnerstein;Steven Penrod

  • Race and the Misrepresentation of Victimization on Local Television News

    Travis L. Dixon;Daniel Linz

  • The Question of Pornography: Research Findings and Policy Implications

    Edward I. Donnerstein;Daniel Linz;Steven Penrod

  • The inventory of beliefs about wife beating: the construction and initial validation of a measure of beliefs and attitudes

    Daniel G. Saunders;Ann B. Lynch;Marcia Grayson;Daniel Linz

  • The Effects of Multiple Exposures to Filmed Violence Against Women

    Daniel G. Linz;Edward Donnerstein;Steven Penrod

  • Predicting Men's Antisocial Behavior Against Women: The Interaction Model of Sexual Aggression

    Neil M. Malamuth;Christopher L. Heavey;Daniel Linz

  • Violence in Children's Television Programming: Assessing the Risks

    Barbara J. Wilson;Stacy L. Smith;W. James Potter;Dale Kunkel

  • Desensitization and resensitization to violence against women: Effects of exposure to sexually violent films on judgments of domestic violence victims.

    Charles R. Mullin;Daniel Linz

  • Sexual Priming, Gender Stereotyping, and Likelihood to Sexually Harass: Examining the Cognitive Effects of Playing a Sexually-Explicit Video Game

    Mike Z. Yao;Chad Mahood;Daniel G Linz

  • Physiological Desensitization and Judgments About Female Victims of Violence

    Daniel Linz;Edward I Donnerstein;Steven M. Adams

  • Mass Media Sexual Violence and Male Viewers Current Theory and Research

    Edward I. Donnerstein;Daniel G. Linz

  • The Confluence Model of Sexual Aggression: Combining Hostile Masculinity and Impersonal Sex

    Neil M. Malamuth;Christopher L. Heavey;Daniel Linz

  • The Context of Current Content Analysis of Gender Roles: An Introduction to a Special Issue

    Rena M. Rudy;Lucy Popova;Daniel G. Linz

  • Exposure to sexually explicit materials and attitudes toward rape: A comparison of study results

    Daniel Linz

  • Television News, Prejudicial Pretrial Publicity, and the Depiction of Race

    Travis L. Dixon;Daniel Linz

  • Sexuality and pornography.

    Gert Martin Hald;Christopher Seaman;Daniel Linz

  • The findings and recommendations of the Attorney General's Commission on Pornography: Do the psychological "facts" fit the political fury?

    Daniel Linz;Edward Donnerstein;Steven Penrod

Frequent Co-Authors

Steven D. Penrod
Steven D. Penrod John Jay College of Criminal Justice
Edward Donnerstein
Edward Donnerstein University of Arizona
Neil M. Malamuth
Neil M. Malamuth University of California, Los Angeles
W. James Potter
W. James Potter University of California, Santa Barbara
Howard Giles
Howard Giles University of California, Santa Barbara
Daniel G. Saunders
Daniel G. Saunders University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Kenneth C. Land
Kenneth C. Land Duke University
Miriam J. Metzger
Miriam J. Metzger University of California, Santa Barbara
Thomas A. Heberlein
Thomas A. Heberlein University of Wisconsin–Madison
Craig A. Anderson
Craig A. Anderson Iowa State University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in psychology opens up a wide range of online study options and career pathways. Many students choose to focus on becoming a mental health counselor—a role with high demand across the United States. However, the requirements for certification and licensure vary by location, making it essential to research local guidelines early in your academic journey.

For instance, if you're interested in practicing in Texas, explore the mental health counselor requirements in Houston and compare these with the mental health counselor requirements in Huntsville. Requirements may include graduate-level education, supervised clinical hours, and state-specific exams.

For those considering other regions, the mental health counselor requirements in Indianapolis and Irvine mental health counselor certification requirements offer further insights. Researching these pathways can help you select the right degree—such as a Master’s in Counseling, Clinical Psychology, or Social Work—for your goals. Many universities now offer flexible, accredited online programs designed to meet these varied state regulations.

Best Scientists Citing Daniel Linz

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles