D-Index & Metrics Best Publications

D-Index & Metrics D-index (Discipline H-index) only includes papers and citation values for an examined discipline in contrast to General H-index which accounts for publications across all disciplines.

Discipline name D-index D-index (Discipline H-index) only includes papers and citation values for an examined discipline in contrast to General H-index which accounts for publications across all disciplines. Citations Publications World Ranking National Ranking
Psychology D-index 54 Citations 15,003 148 World Ranking 3329 National Ranking 1922

Overview

What is he best known for?

The fields of study he is best known for:

  • Law
  • Social psychology
  • Statistics

Steven D. Penrod mainly investigates Social psychology, Eyewitness identification, Legal psychology, Identification and Witness. His Social psychology research is multidisciplinary, relying on both Pornography and Criminology. His research integrates issues of Contextual Associations, Applied psychology and Eyewitness memory in his study of Eyewitness identification.

Steven D. Penrod has included themes like Recall, Retention interval and Clinical psychology, Forensic psychology in his Legal psychology study. His Witness course of study focuses on Jury and Appeal and Scientific psychology. His study in Weapon focus is interdisciplinary in nature, drawing from both Developmental psychology and Reliability.

His most cited work include:

  • Eyewitness Identification Procedures: Recommendations for Lineups and Photospreads (593 citations)
  • Inside the jury (459 citations)
  • Meta-analysis of facial identification studies. (438 citations)

What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?

Steven D. Penrod mostly deals with Social psychology, Jury, Law, Eyewitness identification and Publicity. Specifically, his work in Social psychology is concerned with the study of Legal psychology. His Legal psychology study frequently draws parallels with other fields, such as Recall.

His Jury research integrates issues from Eyewitness testimony, Credibility, Deliberation and Forensic psychology. His research in Eyewitness identification intersects with topics in Cognitive psychology, Applied psychology and Supreme court. His Publicity study integrates concerns from other disciplines, such as Generalizability theory, Public opinion, News media and Public relations.

He most often published in these fields:

  • Social psychology (39.62%)
  • Jury (23.90%)
  • Law (23.27%)

What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2011-2021)?

  • Social psychology (39.62%)
  • Publicity (13.84%)
  • Jury (23.90%)

In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:

The scientist’s investigation covers issues in Social psychology, Publicity, Jury, Supreme court and Law. He combines Social psychology and Capital in his research. Steven D. Penrod works mostly in the field of Publicity, limiting it down to topics relating to Generalizability theory and, in certain cases, Social influence, as a part of the same area of interest.

His specific area of interest is Jury, where Steven D. Penrod studies Jury instructions. His studies in Supreme court integrate themes in fields like Procedural justice, Deliberation and Eyewitness identification. His Eyewitness identification study results in a more complete grasp of Identification.

Between 2011 and 2021, his most popular works were:

  • Effects of exposure time and cognitive operations on facial identification accuracy: a meta-analysis of two variables associated with initial memory strength (30 citations)
  • Eye-closure improves memory for a witnessed event under naturalistic conditions (29 citations)
  • Fair lineups are better than biased lineups and showups, but not because they increase underlying discriminability. (24 citations)

In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:

  • Law
  • Social psychology
  • Statistics

Steven D. Penrod focuses on Social psychology, Eyewitness identification, Jury, Law and Supreme court. He undertakes interdisciplinary study in the fields of Social psychology and Significant difference through his research. His Jury study combines topics in areas such as Social influence, Generalizability theory and Publicity.

His study in the field of Safeguard, Forensic psychology and Exoneration also crosses realms of National registry. His Supreme court research includes themes of Test, Verdict, Argument, Eyewitness testimony and Jury instructions.

This overview was generated by a machine learning system which analysed the scientist’s body of work. If you have any feedback, you can contact us here.

Best Publications

Inside the jury

Reid Hastie;Steven D. Penrod;Nancy Pennington.
(1983)

1604 Citations

Eyewitness Identification Procedures: Recommendations for Lineups and Photospreads

Gary L. Wells;Mark A. Small;Steven D. Penrod;Roy S. Malpass.
Law and Human Behavior (1998)

1328 Citations

Meta-analysis of facial identification studies.

Peter N. Shapiro;Steven Penrod.
Psychological Bulletin (1986)

844 Citations

CHOOSING, CONFIDENCE, AND ACCURACY : A META-ANALYSIS OF THE CONFIDENCE-ACCURACY RELATION IN EYEWITNESS IDENTIFICATION STUDIES

Siegfried Ludwig Sporer;Steven Penrod;Don Read;Brian Cutler.
Psychological Bulletin (1995)

821 Citations

A meta-analytic review of the effects of high stress on eyewitness memory.

Kenneth A. Deffenbacher;Brian H. Bornstein;Steven D. Penrod;E. Kiernan McGorty.
Law and Human Behavior (2004)

723 Citations

Eyewitness Evidence Improving Its Probative Value

Gary L. Wells;Amina Memon;Steven D. Penrod.
Psychological Science in the Public Interest (2006)

581 Citations

Mistaken Identification: The Eyewitness, Psychology and the Law

Brian L. Cutler;Steven D. Penrod.
(1995)

535 Citations

Effects of long-term exposure to violent and sexually degrading depictions of women.

Daniel G. Linz;Edward Donnerstein;Steven Penrod.
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology (1988)

507 Citations

Social Influence Model: A formal integration of research on majority and minority influence processes.

Sarah Tanford;Steven Penrod.
Psychological Bulletin (1984)

503 Citations

The Question of Pornography: Research Findings and Policy Implications

Edward I. Donnerstein;Daniel Linz;Steven Penrod.
(1987)

429 Citations

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Contact us

Best Scientists Citing Steven D. Penrod

Gary L. Wells

Gary L. Wells

Iowa State University

Publications: 64

Amina Memon

Amina Memon

Royal Holloway University of London

Publications: 47

Brian H. Bornstein

Brian H. Bornstein

Arizona State University

Publications: 40

Neil Brewer

Neil Brewer

Flinders University

Publications: 40

Elizabeth F. Loftus

Elizabeth F. Loftus

University of California, Irvine

Publications: 34

Siegfried L. Sporer

Siegfried L. Sporer

University of Giessen

Publications: 33

Christian A. Meissner

Christian A. Meissner

Iowa State University

Publications: 30

Saul M. Kassin

Saul M. Kassin

John Jay College of Criminal Justice

Publications: 28

Daniel Linz

Daniel Linz

University of California, Santa Barbara

Publications: 27

Brian L. Cutler

Brian L. Cutler

University of Ontario Institute of Technology

Publications: 25

Pär Anders Granhag

Pär Anders Granhag

University of Gothenburg

Publications: 25

Peter J. B. Hancock

Peter J. B. Hancock

University of Stirling

Publications: 23

John T. Wixted

John T. Wixted

University of California, San Diego

Publications: 22

Gail S. Goodman

Gail S. Goodman

University of California, Davis

Publications: 20

Ray Bull

Ray Bull

University of Leicester

Publications: 19

Colin Tredoux

Colin Tredoux

University of Cape Town

Publications: 19

Trending Scientists

Edmund S. Phelps

Edmund S. Phelps

Columbia University

Kian-Lee Tan

Kian-Lee Tan

National University of Singapore

Miguel Ángel Martínez

Miguel Ángel Martínez

University of Zaragoza

Ping Wu

Ping Wu

Nanjing Normal University

Xin Lu

Xin Lu

Chinese Academy of Sciences

Tom Hasell

Tom Hasell

University of Liverpool

Michael A. Russello

Michael A. Russello

University of British Columbia

Monika Schreiner

Monika Schreiner

Leibniz Association

Yongping Yang

Yongping Yang

National Institutes of Health

Marion L. Greaser

Marion L. Greaser

University of Wisconsin–Madison

James J. Sheridan

James J. Sheridan

Teagasc - The Irish Agriculture and Food Development Authority

T.G. Allan Green

T.G. Allan Green

University of Waikato

DelWayne R. Bohnenstiehl

DelWayne R. Bohnenstiehl

North Carolina State University

Jan Bauer

Jan Bauer

Medical University of Vienna

Aubyn C. Stahmer

Aubyn C. Stahmer

University of California, Davis

Leif Bertilsson

Leif Bertilsson

Karolinska University Hospital

Something went wrong. Please try again later.