World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
58
Citations
16418
World Ranking
3827
National Ranking
2146

Overview

Steven D. Penrod is affiliated with John Jay College of Criminal Justice in the United States. Their academic work focuses on several intersecting fields including Psychology, Social Sciences, and Neuroscience. Within these areas, they have contributed specifically to Cognitive Neuroscience, Law, Social Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, and Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.

The main topics addressed in their research include:

  • Jury Decision Making Processes
  • Memory Processes and Influences
  • Deception Detection and Forensic Psychology
  • Face Recognition and Perception
  • Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior
  • Law in Society and Culture

Their recent peer-reviewed publications highlight diverse lines of inquiry. These include:

  • How to measure lineup fairness: concurrent and predictive validity of lineup-fairness measures, 2024, Psychology Crime and Law
  • Three-level meta-analysis of the other-race bias in facial identification, 2022, Applied Cognitive Psychology
  • Improving juror sensitivity to specific eyewitness factors: judicial instructions fail the test, 2020, Psychiatry Psychology and Law
  • Validity of mock-witness measures for assessing lineup fairness, 2021, Psychology Crime and Law
  • Eyewitnesses in the courtroom: a jury-level experimental examination of the impact of the Henderson instructions, 2020, Journal of Experimental Criminology

These publications appear across various venues, with multiple papers published in Psychology Crime and Law as well as contributions to Applied Cognitive Psychology, Psychiatry Psychology and Law, Journal of Experimental Criminology, and THE KOREAN JOURNAL OF FORENSIC PSYCHOLOGY.

Steven D. Penrod collaborates regularly with several co-authors, including:

  • Jungwon Lee
  • Angela M. Jones
  • Amanda N. Bergold
  • Jamal K. Mansour
  • Marlee Kind Dillon

Best Publications

  • Inside the jury

    Reid Hastie;Steven D. Penrod;Nancy Pennington

  • Eyewitness Identification Procedures: Recommendations for Lineups and Photospreads

    Gary L. Wells;Mark A. Small;Steven D. Penrod;Roy S. Malpass

  • Meta-analysis of facial identification studies.

    Peter N. Shapiro;Steven Penrod

  • CHOOSING, CONFIDENCE, AND ACCURACY : A META-ANALYSIS OF THE CONFIDENCE-ACCURACY RELATION IN EYEWITNESS IDENTIFICATION STUDIES

    Siegfried Ludwig Sporer;Steven Penrod;Don Read;Brian Cutler

  • A meta-analytic review of the effects of high stress on eyewitness memory.

    Kenneth A. Deffenbacher;Brian H. Bornstein;Steven D. Penrod;E. Kiernan McGorty

  • Eyewitness Evidence Improving Its Probative Value

    Gary L. Wells;Amina Memon;Steven D. Penrod

  • Mistaken Identification: The Eyewitness, Psychology and the Law

    Brian L. Cutler;Steven D. Penrod

  • Social Influence Model: A formal integration of research on majority and minority influence processes.

    Sarah Tanford;Steven Penrod

  • Effects of long-term exposure to violent and sexually degrading depictions of women.

    Daniel G. Linz;Edward Donnerstein;Steven Penrod

  • The Question of Pornography: Research Findings and Policy Implications

    Edward I. Donnerstein;Daniel Linz;Steven Penrod

  • Witness confidence and witness accuracy: Assessing their forensic relation.

    Steven Penrod;Brian Cutler

  • The reliability of eyewitness identification: The role of system and estimator variables.

    Brian L. Cutler;Steven D. Penrod;Todd K. Martens

  • The Effects of Multiple Exposures to Filmed Violence Against Women

    Daniel G. Linz;Edward Donnerstein;Steven Penrod

  • Juror Decision Making in Eyewitness Identification Cases

    Brian L. Cutler;Steven D. Penrod;Thomas E. Stuve

  • Juror Sensitivity to Eyewitness Identification Evidence

    Brian L. Cutler;Steven D. Penrod;Hedy Red Dexter

  • Reinstatement of context in a field experiment on eyewitness identification.

    Carol Krafka;Steven Penrod

  • Mugshot Exposure Effects: Retroactive Interference, Mugshot Commitment, Source Confusion, and Unconscious Transference

    Kenneth A. Deffenbacher;Brian H. Bornstein;Steven D. Penrod

  • Improving the reliability of eyewitness identification: Lineup construction and presentation.

    Brian L. Cutler;Steven D. Penrod

  • THE EFFECTS OF DAUBERT ON THE ADMISSIBILITY OF EXPERT TESTIMONY IN STATE AND FEDERAL CRIMINAL CASES

    Jennifer L. Groscup;Steven D. Penrod;Christina A. Studebaker;Matthew T. Huss

  • Improving the reliability of eyewitness identification: Putting context into context.

    Brian L. Cutler;Steven D. Penrod;Todd K. Martens

  • Inside the Jury.

    V. Lee Hamilton;Reid Hastie;Steven D. Penrod;Nancy Pennington

Frequent Co-Authors

Brian L. Cutler
Brian L. Cutler University of Ontario Institute of Technology
Reid Hastie
Reid Hastie University of Chicago
Daniel Linz
Daniel Linz University of California, Santa Barbara
Brian H. Bornstein
Brian H. Bornstein Arizona State University
Gary L. Wells
Gary L. Wells Iowa State University
Edward Donnerstein
Edward Donnerstein University of Arizona
Eugene Borgida
Eugene Borgida University of Minnesota
Barry Rosenfeld
Barry Rosenfeld Fordham University
Siegfried L. Sporer
Siegfried L. Sporer University of Giessen
Elizabeth F. Loftus
Elizabeth F. Loftus University of California, Irvine

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a psychology degree online opens up a diverse range of career pathways. Graduates can pursue roles in clinical psychology, counseling, research, education, or organizational development. A key issue in selecting an online psychology program is finding one that balances flexibility with strong academic credentials and networking opportunities.

Geography can play a role in program availability and reputation. The top psychology degrees in Virginia often offer robust online options with respected faculty. If you’re in a specific city, consider programs tailored to regional needs, like the top psychology programs in Virginia Beach or the best psychology program rankings in Waco for Texas learners.

For those seeking a metropolitan experience, the best psychology program rankings in Washington, D.C. highlight programs that prepare students for federal or policy-related careers. Ultimately, researching rankings, accreditation, and each program’s career support can help you choose the best online path for psychology success.

Best Scientists Citing Steven D. Penrod

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles