World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
38
Citations
7401
World Ranking
8788
National Ranking
589

Brian L. Cutler publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Brian L. Cutler sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 148 publications — 48th percentile

48% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Brian L. Cutler D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Brian L. Cutler sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 38 D-Index — 24th percentile

24% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Brian L. Cutler is affiliated with the University of Ontario Institute of Technology in Canada. Their research primarily focuses on topics related to forensic psychology, deception detection, and the intersection of psychology and law.

Their work spans several main fields of study including:

  • Psychology

Within psychology, their research covers notable subfields such as:

  • Social Psychology
  • Clinical Psychology
  • Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
  • Political Science and International Relations
  • Pharmacy

The primary topics of their work encompass:

  • Deception detection and forensic psychology
  • Psychopathy, forensic psychiatry, sexual offending
  • Policing practices and perceptions
  • Medical malpractice and liability issues
  • Law in society and culture
  • Face recognition and perception
  • Face recognition and analysis

Brian L. Cutler has contributed articles to multiple publication venues, including:

  • Psychology Crime and Law
  • Psychology Public Policy and Law
  • SSRN Electronic Journal
  • PsycTESTS Dataset
  • Legal and Criminological Psychology

Recent papers authored or coauthored by Brian L. Cutler are:

  • An Overview of Expert Psychological Testimony in False Confession Cases, 2020, SSRN Electronic Journal
  • Co-occurrences among interrogation tactics in actual criminal investigations, 2021, Psychology Crime and Law
  • COVID-19 and the courtroom: how social and cognitive psychological processes might affect trials during a pandemic, 2021, Psychology Crime and Law
  • Development of the Interview and Interrogation Assessment Instrument, 2022, Psychology Public Policy and Law
  • Interview and Interrogation Assessment Instrument, 2022, PsycTESTS Dataset

Frequent collaborators with Brian L. Cutler include:

  • Amy-May Leach
  • Jeffrey S. Neuschatz
  • Jeffrey S. Kaplan
  • Lyndsay R. Woolridge
  • Baylee D. Jenkins

Best Publications

  • CHOOSING, CONFIDENCE, AND ACCURACY : A META-ANALYSIS OF THE CONFIDENCE-ACCURACY RELATION IN EYEWITNESS IDENTIFICATION STUDIES

    Siegfried Ludwig Sporer;Steven Penrod;Don Read;Brian Cutler

  • Mistaken Identification: The Eyewitness, Psychology and the Law

    Brian L. Cutler;Steven D. Penrod

  • Witness confidence and witness accuracy: Assessing their forensic relation.

    Steven Penrod;Brian Cutler

  • The reliability of eyewitness identification: The role of system and estimator variables.

    Brian L. Cutler;Steven D. Penrod;Todd K. Martens

  • Juror Decision Making in Eyewitness Identification Cases

    Brian L. Cutler;Steven D. Penrod;Thomas E. Stuve

  • Juror Sensitivity to Eyewitness Identification Evidence

    Brian L. Cutler;Steven D. Penrod;Hedy Red Dexter

  • Getting along and getting ahead: Empirical support for a theory of protective and acquisitive self-presentation.

    Raymond N. Wolfe;Richard D. Lennox;Brian L. Cutler

  • Improving the reliability of eyewitness identification: Lineup construction and presentation.

    Brian L. Cutler;Steven D. Penrod

  • Double-blind photoarray administration as a safeguard against investigator bias.

    Mark R. Phillips;Bradley D. McAuliff;Margaret Bull Kovera;Brian L. Cutler

  • A meta-analysis of the association between authoritarianism and jurors' perceptions of defendant culpability.

    Douglas J. Narby;Brian L. Cutler;Gary Moran

  • Improving the reliability of eyewitness identification: Putting context into context.

    Brian L. Cutler;Steven D. Penrod;Todd K. Martens

  • Reliability and validity of the original and revised Legal Attitudes Questionnaire.

    David A Kravitz;Brian L. Cutler;Petra Brock

  • Effects of inconsistencies in eyewitness testimony on mock-juror decision-making

    Garrett L. Berman;Brian L. Cutler

  • The eyewitness, the expert psychologist, and the jury

    Brian L. Cutler;Steven D. Penrod;Hedy R. Dexter

  • The Prejudicial Impact of Pretrial Publicity1

    Gary Moran;Brian L. Cutler

  • Effects of inconsistent eyewitness statements on mock-jurors' evaluations of the eyewitness, perceptions of defendant culpability and verdicts

    Garrett L. Berman;Douglas J. Narby;Brian L. Cutler

  • Expert testimony and jury decision making: An empirical analysis

    Brian L. Cutler;Hedy R. Dexter;Steven D. Penrod

  • The external validity of eyewitness identification research: Generalizing across subject populations

    Thomas E. O'Rourke;Steven D. Penrod;Brian L. Cutler;Thomas E. Stuve

  • Performance feedback improves the resolution of confidence judgments

    Glen L Sharp;Brian L Cutler;Steven D Penrod

  • A Test of Voir Dire as a Remedy for the Prejudicial Effects of Pretrial Publicity1

    Hedy Red Dexter;Brian L. Cutler;Gary Moran

Frequent Co-Authors

Steven D. Penrod
Steven D. Penrod John Jay College of Criminal Justice
Richard A. Leo
Richard A. Leo University of San Francisco
Gary L. Wells
Gary L. Wells Iowa State University
Siegfried L. Sporer
Siegfried L. Sporer University of Giessen
R. Michael Bagby
R. Michael Bagby University of Toronto
Ronald P. Fisher
Ronald P. Fisher Florida International University
Ethel Quayle
Ethel Quayle University of Edinburgh
Sabarish V. Babu
Sabarish V. Babu Clemson University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you are interested in studying psychology, there are several related online degrees and career pathways to explore. One popular route is pursuing a career as a school counselor, which combines psychological knowledge with educational support services.

Each state has its own guidelines and requirements to be a school counselor in Alabama, requirements to be a school counselor in Alabama are a great example of this. Typically, these include earning a relevant master’s degree, completing internships, and passing state-specific certification exams.

In other states, such as Alaska, Alaska school counselor certification requirements also include specialized coursework and practical experience. The Arizona school counselor education requirements detail required graduate programs and supervised hours, while how to become a school counselor in Arkansas focuses on state licensure steps.

With the flexibility of online degrees, you can gain the qualifications necessary for such roles while balancing work and personal commitments. Research your state’s specific requirements to ensure your educational pathway aligns with your career goals in school counseling or related psychology fields.

Best Scientists Citing Brian L. Cutler

Trending Scientists