World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
38
Citations
5280
World Ranking
8926
National Ranking
900

Laura Mickes publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Laura Mickes sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 82 publications — 9th percentile

9% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Laura Mickes D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Laura Mickes sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 38 D-Index — 24th percentile

24% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Laura Mickes is affiliated with the University of Bristol in the United Kingdom. Their research spans multiple interconnected fields, primarily focusing on neuroscience, psychology, and computer science. Within these areas, their work has a particular emphasis on cognitive neuroscience, social psychology, artificial intelligence, computer vision and pattern recognition, and biophysics.

The core topics of their research include:

  • Memory Processes and Influences
  • Deception detection and forensic psychology
  • Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Face Recognition and Perception
  • Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning
  • Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
  • Cell Image Analysis Techniques

Their publication record includes recent papers such as:

  • "Regaining Consensus on the Reliability of Memory," 2020, published in Current Directions in Psychological Science
  • "The effect of lineup size on eyewitness identification," 2020, published in Journal of Experimental Psychology Applied
  • "Eyewitness memory is reliable, but the criminal justice system is not," 2022, published in Memory
  • "pyWitness 1.0: A python eyewitness identification analysis toolkit," 2023, published in Behavior Research Methods
  • "Doing right by the eyewitness evidence: a response to Berkowitz et al.," 2021, published in Memory

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Laura Mickes include:

  • John T. Wixted
  • Stewart Boogert
  • Chris R. Brewin
  • Bernice Andrews
  • Brent M. Wilson

The venues where Laura Mickes has most frequently published include:

  • Memory
  • Neuropsychologia
  • Cognitive Research Principles and Implications
  • Current Directions in Psychological Science
  • Journal of Experimental Psychology Applied

Best Publications

  • A Continuous Dual-Process Model of Remember/Know Judgments

    John T. Wixted;Laura Mickes

  • Receiver operating characteristic analysis of eyewitness memory: comparing the diagnostic accuracy of simultaneous versus sequential lineups.

    Laura Mickes;Heather D. Flowe;John T. Wixted

  • A signal-detection-based diagnostic-feature-detection model of eyewitness identification.

    John T. Wixted;Laura Mickes

  • A direct test of the unequal-variance signal detection model of recognition memory.

    Laura Mickes;John T. Wixted;Peter E. Wais

  • Initial eyewitness confidence reliably predicts eyewitness identification accuracy.

    John T. Wixted;Laura Mickes;Steven E. Clark;Scott D. Gronlund

  • Evaluating Eyewitness Identification Procedures Using Receiver Operating Characteristic Analysis

    Scott D. Gronlund;John T. Wixted;Laura Mickes

  • Remember/know judgments probe degrees of recollection

    Peter E. Wais;Laura Mickes;John T. Wixted

  • Estimating the reliability of eyewitness identifications from police lineups

    John T. Wixted;Laura Mickes;John C. Dunn;Steven E. Clark

  • The Field of Eyewitness Memory Should Abandon Probative Value and Embrace Receiver Operating Characteristic Analysis.

    John T. Wixted;Laura Mickes

  • Increased False-Memory Susceptibility After Mindfulness Meditation

    Brent M. Wilson;Laura Mickes;Stephanie Stolarz-Fantino;Matthew Evrard

  • Receiver operating characteristic analysis and confidence–accuracy characteristic analysis in investigations of system variables and estimator variables that affect eyewitness memory

    Laura Mickes

  • Recollection Is a Continuous Process Implications for Dual-Process Theories of Recognition Memory

    Laura Mickes;Peter E. Wais;John T. Wixted

  • Rethinking the Reliability of Eyewitness Memory.

    John T Wixted;Laura Mickes;Ronald P Fisher

  • Progressive impairment on neuropsychological tasks in a longitudinal study of preclinical Alzheimer's disease.

    Laura Mickes;John T. Wixted;Christine Fennema-Notestine;Douglas Galasko

  • Recollection can be weak and familiarity can be strong.

    Katherine M. Ingram;Laura Mickes;John T. Wixted

  • Measuring Recollection and Familiarity in the Medial Temporal Lobe

    John T. Wixted;Laura Mickes;Larry R. Squire

  • Strong memories are hard to scale.

    Laura Mickes;Vivian Hwe;Peter E. Wais;John T. Wixted

  • Who’s funny: Gender stereotypes, humor production, and memory bias

    Laura Mickes;Drew E. Walker;Julian L. Parris;Robert Mankoff

  • Models of lineup memory.

    John T Wixted;Edward Vul;Laura Mickes;Brent M Wilson

  • The role of estimator variables in eyewitness identification

    Carolyn Semmler;John Dunn;Laura Mickes;John T Wixted

Frequent Co-Authors

John T. Wixted
John T. Wixted University of California, San Diego
Jody Corey-Bloom
Jody Corey-Bloom University of California, San Diego
Christine R. Harris
Christine R. Harris University of California, San Diego
Ian A. Cook
Ian A. Cook University of California, Los Angeles
David P. Salmon
David P. Salmon University of California, San Diego
Mark W. Bondi
Mark W. Bondi University of California, San Diego
Bernice Andrews
Bernice Andrews Royal Holloway University of London
Ronald P. Fisher
Ronald P. Fisher Florida International University
Aaron S. Benjamin
Aaron S. Benjamin University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Jane S. Paulsen
Jane S. Paulsen University of Wisconsin–Madison

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in psychology can open doors to a variety of rewarding careers, including social work, counseling, and mental health advocacy. Many students consider related online degrees to gain flexibility in their studies and to qualify for advanced roles in their chosen fields.

One of the most popular pathways for psychology graduates is social work. The requirements to become a licensed social worker differ by state. For example, social worker degree requirements in Colorado include a specific accredited degree and supervised training, while the degree needed to be a social worker in Connecticut emphasizes state-specific coursework and field hours.

Aspiring professionals should thoroughly review the degree needed to be a social worker in Delaware, as requirements there also include passing a national exam. Similarly, social worker education requirements in Florida require adherence to detailed education and licensing standards.

Whether you pursue psychology or a related online degree, understanding state licensing policies can help you map a clear pathway to meaningful career opportunities.

Best Scientists Citing Laura Mickes

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles