World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
33
Citations
7316
World Ranking
10380
National Ranking
5447

Shana K. Carpenter publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Shana K. Carpenter sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 73 publications — 5th percentile

5% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Shana K. Carpenter D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Shana K. Carpenter sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 33 D-Index — 10th percentile

10% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Shana K. Carpenter is affiliated with Oregon State University in the United States. Their research primarily spans the field of psychology, with a focus on developmental and educational psychology, experimental and cognitive psychology, education, artificial intelligence, and cognitive neuroscience.

The main topics covered in Carpenter's work include:

  • Visual and Cognitive Learning Processes
  • Memory Processes and Influences
  • Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning
  • Educational Strategies and Epistemologies
  • Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
  • Evaluation of Teaching Practices
  • Innovations in Medical Education

Notable recent papers authored by Carpenter include:

  • "On students' (mis)judgments of learning and teaching effectiveness." (2020), published in Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition
  • "The science of effective learning with spacing and retrieval practice" (2022), published in Nature Reviews Psychology
  • "Students' Use of Retrieval in Self-Regulated Learning: Implications for Monitoring and Regulating Effortful Learning Experiences" (2020), published in Educational Psychology Review

Other frequently cited papers relevant to this profile include:

  • "Synthesizing Cognitive Load and Self-regulation Theory: a Theoretical Framework and Research Agenda" (2020), Educational Psychology Review
  • "The rich-get-richer effect: Prior knowledge predicts new learning of domain-relevant information." (2021), Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition

Carpenter's work is often published in the following venues:

  • Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition
  • Educational Psychology Review
  • Learning and Instruction
  • Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology
  • Psychonomic Bulletin & Review

Collaborations are a part of Carpenter's research approach, with frequent co-authors including Daniel Corral, Amber E. Witherby, Sarah K. Tauber, Steven C. Pan, and Tino Endres. These collaborations have appeared across multiple publications, contributing to shared research agendas.

Best Publications

  • Cue strength as a moderator of the testing effect: the benefits of elaborative retrieval.

    Shana K. Carpenter

  • Using Spacing to Enhance Diverse Forms of Learning: Review of Recent Research and Implications for Instruction

    Shana K. Carpenter;Nicholas J. Cepeda;Doug Rohrer;Sean H. K. Kang

  • Impoverished cue support enhances subsequent retention: Support for the elaborative retrieval explanation of the testing effect

    Shana K. Carpenter;Edward L. Delosh

  • Enhancing learning and retarding forgetting: Choices and consequences

    Harold Pashler;Doug Rohrer;Nicholas J. Cepeda;Nicholas J. Cepeda;Shana K. Carpenter

  • The effects of tests on learning and forgetting

    Shana K. Carpenter;Harold Pashler;John T. Wixted;Edward Vul

  • Application of the Testing and Spacing Effects to Name Learning

    Shana K. Carpenter;Edward L. DeLosh

  • Semantic information activated during retrieval contributes to later retention: Support for the mediator effectiveness hypothesis of the testing effect.

    Shana K. Carpenter

  • Testing Enhances the Transfer of Learning

    Shana K. Carpenter

  • Using tests to enhance 8th grade students' retention of U.S. history facts

    Shana K. Carpenter;Shana K. Carpenter;Harold Pashler;Nicholas J. Cepeda;Nicholas J. Cepeda

  • Testing beyond words: using tests to enhance visuospatial map learning.

    Shana K. Carpenter;Harold Pashler

  • What types of learning are enhanced by a cued recall test

    Shana K. Carpenter;Harold Pashler;Edward Vul

  • Are pictures good for learning new vocabulary in a foreign language? Only if you think they are not.

    Shana K. Carpenter;Kellie M. Olson

  • The Wickelgren Power Law and the Ebbinghaus Savings Function

    John T. Wixted;Shana K. Carpenter

  • Appearances can be deceiving: instructor fluency increases perceptions of learning without increasing actual learning.

    Shana K. Carpenter;Miko M. Wilford;Nate Kornell;Kellie M. Mullaney;Kellie M. Mullaney

  • On Students’ (Mis)judgments of Learning and Teaching Effectiveness

    Shana K. Carpenter;Amber E. Witherby;Sarah K. Tauber

  • Synthesizing Cognitive Load and Self-regulation Theory: a Theoretical Framework and Research Agenda

    Anique B. H. de Bruin;Julian Roelle;Shana K. Carpenter;Martine Baars

  • Study strategies and beliefs about learning as a function of academic achievement and achievement goals

    Jason Geller;Alexander R Toftness;Patrick I Armstrong;Shana K Carpenter

  • The science of effective learning with spacing and retrieval practice

    Unknown

  • The effects of interleaving versus blocking on foreign language pronunciation learning.

    Shana K. Carpenter;Frank E. Mueller

  • A Classroom Study on the Relationship Between Student Achievement and Retrieval-Enhanced Learning

    Shana K. Carpenter;Terry J. S. Lund;Clark R. Coffman;Patrick I. Armstrong

  • Tests enhance retention and transfer of spatial learning

    Shana K. Carpenter;Jonathan W. Kelly

Frequent Co-Authors

Harold Pashler
Harold Pashler University of California, San Diego
Edward Vul
Edward Vul University of California, San Diego
Nate Kornell
Nate Kornell Williams College
Doug Rohrer
Doug Rohrer University of South Florida
Laura Mickes
Laura Mickes University of Bristol
John T. Wixted
John T. Wixted University of California, San Diego
Robert D. Reason
Robert D. Reason Iowa State University
Lyle E. Bourne
Lyle E. Bourne University of Colorado Boulder
Douglas A. Gentile
Douglas A. Gentile Iowa State University
Alexander Renkl
Alexander Renkl University of Freiburg

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying psychology in the USA opens up many rewarding career options, especially in fields focused on behavioral analysis and mental health support. One increasingly popular pathway is becoming a Board Certified Behavior Analyst (BCBA), a credential that allows professionals to make significant positive impacts in educational, healthcare, and community settings.

Online psychology degrees are now widely available, making it easier for working adults or those with other commitments to study at their own pace. These programs often provide specialized tracks for those interested in applied behavior analysis, preparing graduates for certification. Each state may have specific requirements; for instance, becoming a bcba in Nashville, becoming a bcba in New Orleans, how to become a bcba in New York City, and becoming a bcba in Newark each have guidelines tailored to local licensure, educational prerequisites, and supervision hours.

Researching state-specific pathways and accredited online psychology or behavior analysis programs can help you plan your academic and professional journey. With the right preparation, a psychology degree can be your gateway to meaningful roles in behavior analysis and broader mental health fields.

Best Scientists Citing Shana K. Carpenter

Trending Scientists