World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Elizabeth J. Marsh

Elizabeth J. Marsh

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
45
Citations
12134
World Ranking
6572
National Ranking
3567

Elizabeth J. Marsh publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Elizabeth J. Marsh sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 123 publications — 34th percentile

34% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Elizabeth J. Marsh D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Elizabeth J. Marsh sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 45 D-Index — 43rd percentile

43% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Elizabeth J. Marsh is affiliated with Duke University in the United States. Their research primarily spans the fields of psychology and neuroscience, with a total of 27 publications in psychology and 16 in neuroscience. Within these fields, Marsh has contributed to subfields including cognitive neuroscience, developmental and educational psychology, artificial intelligence, sociology and political science, and social psychology.

Their work covers several key topics related to human cognition and behavior. These include:

  • Memory Processes and Influences
  • Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
  • Identity, Memory, and Therapy
  • Misinformation and Its Impacts
  • Educational Strategies and Epistemologies
  • Child and Animal Learning Development
  • Topic Modeling

Marsh has published frequently in various academic journals. The most frequent publication venues are:

  • Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition
  • Applied Cognitive Psychology
  • Psychonomic Bulletin & Review
  • Journal of Experimental Psychology General
  • Memory & Cognition

Their recent papers demonstrate a focus on memory, cognitive biases, and psychological processes involved in understanding and representing information. Recent publications include:

  • "Externalizing autobiographical memories in the digital age," 2021, Trends in Cognitive Sciences
  • "Structure-seeking as a psychological antecedent of beliefs about morality," 2020, Journal of Experimental Psychology General
  • "Truncating bar graphs persistently misleads viewers," 2021, Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition
  • "A comparison of memories of fiction and autobiographical memories," 2021, Journal of Experimental Psychology General
  • "Understanding why searching the internet inflates confidence in explanatory ability," 2023, Applied Cognitive Psychology

Marsh's collaborative work involves frequent coauthors including Matthew L. Stanley, Brenda W. Yang, Peter S. Whitehead, Alexandria R. Stone, and Morgan Taylor. These collaborations underline a research network focused on cognitive psychology and related areas.

Best Publications

  • Improving Students’ Learning With Effective Learning Techniques: Promising Directions From Cognitive and Educational Psychology

    John Dunlosky;Katherine A. Rawson;Elizabeth J. Marsh;Mitchell J. Nathan

  • Knowledge does not protect against illusory truth.

    Lisa K. Fazio;Nadia M. Brashier;B. Keith Payne;Elizabeth J. Marsh

  • The positive and negative consequences of multiple-choice testing.

    Henry L. Roediger;Elizabeth J. Marsh

  • Learning facts from fiction.

    Elizabeth J Marsh;Michelle L Meade;Henry L Roediger

  • Biased retellings of events yield biased memories.

    Barbara Tversky;Elizabeth J. Marsh

  • Retelling Is Not the Same as Recalling Implications for Memory

    Elizabeth J. Marsh

  • Learning errors from fiction: difficulties in reducing reliance on fictional stories.

    Elizabeth J. Marsh;Lisa K. Fazio

  • The memorial consequences of multiple-choice testing

    Elizabeth J. Marsh;Henry L. Roediger;Robert A. Bjork;Elizabeth L. Bjork

  • Explanation Feedback Is Better Than Correct Answer Feedback for Promoting Transfer of Learning

    Andrew C. Butler;Namrata Godbole;Elizabeth J. Marsh

  • Understanding How Prior Knowledge Influences Memory in Older Adults.

    Sharda Umanath;Elizabeth J. Marsh

  • Telling a Story or Telling it Straight: The Effects of Entertaining Versus Accurate Retellings on Memory

    Nicole M. Dudukovic;Elizabeth J. Marsh;Barbara Tversky

  • Spinning the Stories of our Lives

    Elizabeth J. Marsh;Barbara Tversky

  • Surprising feedback improves later memory

    Lisa K. Fazio;Elizabeth J. Marsh

  • Integrating Cognitive Science and Technology Improves Learning in a STEM Classroom

    Andrew C. Butler;Elizabeth J. Marsh;J. P. Slavinsky;Richard G. Baraniuk

  • The Digital Expansion of the Mind: Implications of Internet Usage for Memory and Cognition

    Elizabeth J. Marsh;Suparna Rajaram

  • Neural correlates of retrieval-based memory enhancement: an fMRI study of the testing effect.

    Erik A. Wing;Elizabeth J. Marsh;Roberto Cabeza

  • Creating Illusions of Knowledge: Learning Errors that Contradict Prior Knowledge.

    Lisa K. Fazio;Sarah J. Barber;Suparna Rajaram;Peter A. Ornstein

  • The Cognitive, Emotional, and Social Impacts of the September 11 Attacks: Group Differences in Memory for the Reception Context and the Determinants of Flashbulb Memory

    Olivier Luminet;Antonietta Curci;Elizabeth J Marsh;Ineke Wessel

  • The hypercorrection effect persists over a week, but high-confidence errors return

    Andrew C. Butler;Lisa K. Fazio;Elizabeth J. Marsh

  • An initial accuracy focus prevents illusory truth

    Nadia M. Brashier;Emmaline Drew Eliseev;Elizabeth J. Marsh

  • Benefits of testing memory: Best practices and boundary conditions.

    Henry L. Roediger Iii;Pooja K. Agarwal;Sean H. K. Kang;Elizabeth J. Marsh

Frequent Co-Authors

Henry L. Roediger
Henry L. Roediger Washington University in St. Louis
Andrew C. Butler
Andrew C. Butler Washington University in St. Louis
Roberto Cabeza
Roberto Cabeza Duke University
Mark A. McDaniel
Mark A. McDaniel Washington University in St. Louis
Suparna Rajaram
Suparna Rajaram Stony Brook University
Alan Brown
Alan Brown Harvard University
Barbara Tversky
Barbara Tversky Columbia University
Robert A. Bjork
Robert A. Bjork University of California, Los Angeles
Elizabeth Ligon Bjork
Elizabeth Ligon Bjork University of California, Los Angeles
David A. Balota
David A. Balota Washington University in St. Louis

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a career in Psychology opens doors to various online degrees and specialization options, particularly in mental health and counseling. Many students pursue degrees that prepare them for roles as substance abuse counselors, an area with growing demand across the U.S.

Education requirements and pathways can differ greatly depending on your location. For example, the Newark substance abuse counselors education requirements emphasize a combination of accredited education and practical training. In contrast, if you're considering the East Coast, it’s helpful to review the Norfolk substance abuse counselors education requirements, which highlight state-specific standards and certifications.

The pathway to becoming a counselor also depends on meeting licensure and credentialing guidelines, such as the North Las Vegas substance abuse counselor certification requirements. Similarly, in California, understanding the Oakland substance abuse counselors education requirements is crucial for anyone planning to practice in the Bay Area.

Online psychology degrees can provide the foundational skills you need to start your counseling career, while local requirements guide your next steps toward practice and certification.

Best Scientists Citing Elizabeth J. Marsh

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles