World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Social Sciences and Humanities

D-Index
38
Citations
6163
World Ranking
5942
National Ranking
2833

David Copp publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David Copp sits on this spectrum.

44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44 publications 570+

This scientist: 121 publications — 25th percentile

25% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

David Copp D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David Copp sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 38 D-Index — 26th percentile

26% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

Overview

David Copp is a researcher affiliated with the University of California, Davis in the United States. Their work spans multiple fields, primarily focused on Arts and Humanities, Psychology, and Social Sciences. Within these disciplines, Copp's research particularly addresses Philosophy, Cognitive Neuroscience, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Education, and Developmental and Educational Psychology.

The main topics explored in Copp's scholarship include Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics; Free Will and Agency; War, Ethics, and Justification; Theology and Philosophy of Evil; Philosophical Ethics and Theory; Psychological and Educational Research Studies; and Education and Critical Thinking Development.

Copp has recently contributed to academic journals with papers such as:

  • Epistemic virtue in higher education: testing the mechanisms of intellectual character development, 2023, Current Psychology
  • The structure of adult thinking: A network approach to (meta)cognitive processing, 2024, Learning and Individual Differences
  • Offending by mentioning, 2023, Inquiry

Frequent collaborators in Copp's research include Gabe Avakian Orona, Richard Arum, Quoc-Viet Dang, Paul Bloomfield, and Duncan Pritchard. Their joint work has appeared repeatedly in venues such as Current Psychology, Learning and Individual Differences, and Inquiry.

Best Publications

  • The Oxford handbook of ethical theory

    David Copp

  • Morality, Normativity, and Society

    David Copp

  • Realist-Expressivism: A Neglected Option for Moral Realism

    David Copp

  • The Idea of a Legitimate State

    David Copp

  • DARWINIAN SKEPTICISM ABOUT MORAL REALISM

    David Copp

  • Defending the Principle of Alternate Possibilities: Blameworthiness and Moral Responsibility

    David Copp

  • Morality and Virtue: An Assessment of Some Recent Work in Virtue Ethics*

    David Copp;David Sobel

  • The Ring of Gyges: Overridingness and The Unity of Reason *

    David Copp

  • TOWARD A PLURALIST AND TELEOLOGICAL THEORY OF NORMATIVITY

    David Copp

  • The Collective Moral Autonomy Thesis

    David Copp

  • On the Agency of Certain Collective Entities: An Argument from “Normative Autonomy”

    David Copp

  • Morality in a Natural World: Selected Essays in Metaethics

    David Copp

  • Against direction of fit accounts of belief and desire

    David Sobel;David Copp

  • Belief, Reason, and Motivation: Michael Smith's "The Moral Problem"

    David Copp

  • Hobbes on artificial persons and collective actions

    David Copp

  • Morality, Reason and Truth. David Copp , David Zimmerman

    David Copp;David Zimmerman

  • Morality in a Natural World: Selected Essays in Metaethics

    Unknown

  • What Collectives Are: Agency, Individualism and Legal Theory

    David Copp

  • The Right to an Adequate Standard of Living: Justice, Autonomy, and the Basic Needs

    David Copp

  • Milk, Honey, and The Good Life on Moral Twin Earth

    David Copp

  • Quinn on double effect: the problem of closeness'

    John Martin Fischer;Mark Ravizza;David Copp

  • Morality, reason, and truth : new essays on the foundations of ethics

    David Copp;David Zimmerman

  • ‘Ought’ implies ‘can’ and the derivation of the Principle of Alternate Possibilities

    David Copp

Frequent Co-Authors

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing Social Sciences and Humanities in the USA can open doors to a wide range of online degrees and fulfilling careers. Online programs make these fields accessible for learners with diverse backgrounds and schedules. However, it is important to choose accredited and reputable paths for your education and future career. For example, if you are interested in counseling, consider cacrep accredited programs online to ensure your credentials meet professional standards.

Specializing in therapy is another rewarding direction. Many students explore marriage and family therapy degree online options that balance thorough training with flexible study. Psychology remains a popular field, and there are resources listing most affordable online schools for psychology to help manage tuition costs.

For those drawn to social work, consider the msw online pathways that may have more flexible admissions criteria. With a variety of online options now available, students can make choices that align with their interests, budget, and long-term goals in the social sciences and humanities.

Best Scientists Citing David Copp

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles