World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
66
Citations
34561
World Ranking
2638
National Ranking
1516

John M. Darley publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John M. Darley sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 174 publications — 60th percentile

60% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

John M. Darley D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John M. Darley sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 66 D-Index — 77th percentile

77% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2013 - William James Fellow Award, Association for Psychological Science (APA)
  • 1990 - Fellow of John Simon Guggenheim Memorial Foundation

Overview

John M. Darley was affiliated with Princeton University in the United States. Their academic work focused primarily on medicine with a specialization in public health, environmental, and occupational health. The main topics covered in their research included health and medical research impacts.

Throughout their career, Darley contributed to the field with various publications, including recent papers such as "The Hiring Process in Academia" published in 2021 by Psychology Press eBooks. This venue was also the platform for their book publication, with a notable work titled "The Compleat Academic" released in 2021.

  • The Hiring Process in Academia, 2021, Psychology Press eBooks

  • The Compleat Academic, 2021

Darley frequently collaborated with other researchers, notably with Mark P. Zanna. Their publications were primarily disseminated through Psychology Press eBooks.

  • Mark P. Zanna

  • Psychology Press eBooks

During their career, Darley received several recognitions, including the William James Fellow Award from the Association for Psychological Science in 2013 and was named a Fellow of the John Simon Guggenheim Memorial Foundation in 1990.

Best Publications

  • An fMRI Investigation of Emotional Engagement in Moral Judgment

    Joshua D. Greene;R. Brian Sommerville;Leigh E. Nystrom;John M. Darley

  • Bystander intervention in emergencies: Diffusion of responsibility.

    John M. Darley;Bibb Latane

  • The neural bases of cognitive conflict and control in moral judgment.

    Joshua D. Greene;Leigh E. Nystrom;Andrew D. Engell;John M. Darley

  • "From Jerusalem to Jericho": A study of situational and dispositional variables in helping behavior.

    John M. Darley;C. Daniel Batson

  • Expectancy confirmation processes arising in the social interaction sequence.

    John M. Darley;Russell H. Fazio

  • Group inhibition of bystander intervention in emergencies.

    Bibb Latane;John M. Darley

  • Stereotype Threat Effects on Black and White Athletic Performance

    Jeff Stone;Christian I. Lynch;Mike Sjomeling;John M. Darley

  • A hypothesis-confirming bias in labeling effects.

    Unknown

  • Why do we punish? Deterrence and just deserts as motives for punishment.

    Kevin M. Carlsmith;John M. Darley;Paul H. Robinson

  • The Psychology of Compensatory and Retributive Justice

    John M. Darley;Thane S. Pittman

  • The psychology of meta-ethics: exploring objectivism.

    Geoffrey P. Goodwin;John M. Darley

  • Crowded minds: The implicit bystander effect.

    Stephen M. Garcia;Kim Weaver;Gordon B. Moskowitz;John M. Darley

  • Casuistry and social category bias.

    Michael I. Norton;Joseph A. Vandello;John M. Darley

  • Feedback as a means of decreasing residential energy consumption.

    Clive Seligman;John M. Darley

  • How Effective Are the Things People Say to Apologize? Effects of the Realization of the Apology Speech Act

    Steven J. Scher;John M. Darley

  • Incapacitation and just deserts as motives for punishment.

    John M. Darley;Kevin M. Carlsmith;Paul H. Robinson

  • Moral Rules: Their Content and Acquisition

    John M. Darley;Thomas R. Shultz

  • Psychological Aspects of Retributive Justice

    Kevin M. Carlsmith;John M. Darley

  • Victim or perpetrator?: Defensive attribution of responsibility and the need for order and justice.

    Alan L. Chaikin;John M. Darley

  • Behavioral approaches to residential energy conservation

    Clive Seligman;John M. Darley;Lawrence J. Becker

  • The Unresponsive Bystander: Why Doesn't He Help?

    Harvey A. Siegal;Bibb Latane;John Darley

Frequent Co-Authors

Paul H. Robinson
Paul H. Robinson University of Pennsylvania
Tom R. Tyler
Tom R. Tyler Yale University
Mark P. Zanna
Mark P. Zanna University of Waterloo
Bibb Latané
Bibb Latané Florida Atlantic University
Robert J. MacCoun
Robert J. MacCoun Stanford University
Jonathan D. Cohen
Jonathan D. Cohen Princeton University
Geoffrey P. Goodwin
Geoffrey P. Goodwin University of Pennsylvania
Michael I. Norton
Michael I. Norton Harvard University
Joshua D. Greene
Joshua D. Greene Harvard University
Joel Cooper
Joel Cooper Princeton University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Considering a degree in psychology? Many students also explore online programs in social work to broaden their career options. Both fields offer flexible, accredited degrees designed for busy schedules, including those seeking the fastest online social work master's programs in Boise or those looking for the fastest online social work degree programs in Tennessee.

Affordability is another key concern for prospective students. If cost is a factor, investigate options like the affordable online social work bachelor's programs in Pennsylvania or nationwide cheapest online bsw degrees in USA. These programs can pave the way to impactful careers in mental health, counseling, advocacy, and more, while allowing you to manage costs and commitments.

Online degrees in psychology or social work offer accessible routes to rewarding professions for those passionate about helping others. When choosing a program, consider factors like program length, cost, accreditation, and available specializations to find the best fit for your goals.

Best Scientists Citing John M. Darley

Recently Published Articles