World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
98
Citations
49415
World Ranking
670
National Ranking
30

Mark P. Zanna publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark P. Zanna sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 257 publications — 82nd percentile

82% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Mark P. Zanna D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark P. Zanna sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 98 D-Index — 94th percentile

94% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2011 - Izaak Walton Killam Memorial Prize, Canada Council
  • 1999 - Fellow of the Royal Society of Canada Academy of Social Sciences
  • 1997 - Donald T. Campbell Award, Society for Personality and Social Psychology
  • 1993 - CPA Donald O. Hebb Award for Distinguished Contributions to Psychology as a Science, Canadian Psychological Association (CPA)
  • 1979 - Fellow of the American Psychological Association (APA)

Overview

Mark P. Zanna was affiliated with the University of Waterloo in Canada, where they contributed to the field of psychology through research and publications. Their work primarily spanned the areas of psychology with specific focus on developmental and educational psychology, social psychology, education, as well as public health, environmental and occupational health.

The scientist's research covered key topics such as science education and perceptions, animal and plant science education, science education and pedagogy, and health and medical research impacts. These topics were reflected throughout their scholarly output.

Mark P. Zanna co-authored several papers with frequent collaborators including John M. Darley, Emily Cyr, Kathryn M. Kroeper, Hilary B. Bergsieker, and Tara C. Dennehy. This collaboration expanded their work's scope across different subfields of psychology and education.

Some of their recent papers included:

  • "Girls are good at STEM: Opening minds and providing evidence reduces boys' stereotyping of girls' STEM ability" (2023) published in Child Development
  • "The Hiring Process in Academia" (2021) published by Psychology Press eBooks

The scientist also contributed to book publications, notably with Psychology Press eBooks where they published a book titled "The Compleat Academic" in 2021, which has been cited within the academic community.

Frequent publication venues for their work were:

  • Child Development
  • Psychology Press eBooks

Mark P. Zanna received several awards recognizing their contributions to psychology and academia. These included the Izaak Walton Killam Memorial Prize from the Canada Council in 2011, fellowship in the Royal Society of Canada's Academy of Social Sciences in 1999, the Donald T. Campbell Award from the Society for Personality and Social Psychology in 1997, the CPA Donald O. Hebb Award from the Canadian Psychological Association in 1993, and fellowship in the American Psychological Association in 1979.

Best Publications

  • Trust in close relationships.

    John K. Rempel;John G. Holmes;Mark P. Zanna

  • Establishing a causal chain: why experiments are often more effective than mediational analyses in examining psychological processes.

    Steven J. Spencer;Mark P. Zanna;Geoffrey T. Fong

  • Direct Experience And Attitude-Behavior Consistency

    Russell H. Fazio;Mark P. Zanna

  • Attitudes and Attitude Change

    James M. Olson;Mark P. Zanna

  • Attitudes: A new look at an old concept.

    Mark P. Zanna;John K. Rempel

  • The Nonverbal Mediation of Self-Fulfilling Prophecies in Interracial Interaction.

    Carl O Word;Mark P Zanna;Joel Cooper

  • Let's not be indifferent about (attitudinal) ambivalence.

    Megan M. Thompson;Mark P. Zanna;Dale W. Griffin

  • Attitudinal qualities relating to the strength of the attitude-behavior relationship☆

    Russell H. Fazio;Mark P. Zanna

  • The Handbook of Attitudes

    Dolores Albarracin;Blair T. Johnson;Mark P. Zanna

  • Assessing the structure of prejudicial attitudes: the case of attitudes towards homosexuals

    Geoffrey Haddock;Mark P. Zanna;Victoria M. Esses

  • Dissonance and the pill: an attribution approach to studying the arousal properties of dissonance.

    Mark P. Zanna;Joel Cooper

  • Secure and defensive high self-esteem.

    Christian H. Jordan;Steven J. Spencer;Mark P. Zanna;Etsuko Hoshino-Browne

  • Compensatory conviction in the face of personal uncertainty: going to extremes and being oneself.

    Ian McGregor;Mark P. Zanna;John G. Holmes;Steven J. Spencer

  • On the predictive validity of attitudes: The roles of direct experience and confidence1

    Russell H. Fazio;Mark P. Zanna

  • Values, stereotypes, and emotions as determinants of intergroup attitudes

    Victoria M. Esses;Geoffrey Haddock;Mark P. Zanna

  • Two brief interventions to mitigate a “chilly climate” transform women’s experience, relationships, and achievement in engineering.

    Gregory M. Walton;Christine Logel;Jennifer M. Peach;Steven J. Spencer

  • Inequality, discrimination, and the power of the status quo: Direct evidence for a motivation to see the way things are as the way they should be.

    Aaron C. Kay;Danielle Gaucher;Jennifer M. Peach;Kristin Laurin

  • Thinking and caring about cognitive inconsistency: When and for whom does attitudinal ambivalence feel uncomfortable?

    Ian R. Newby-Clark;Ian McGregor;Mark P. Zanna

  • Dissonance and Self-perception: An integrative View of Each Theory's Proper Domain of Application

    Russell H Fazio;Mark P Zanna;Joel Cooper

  • Subliminal priming and persuasion: Striking while the iron is hot

    Erin J Strahan;Steven J Spencer;Mark P Zanna

  • Advances in experimental social psychology

    Leonard Berkowitz;Mark P. Zanna;James M. Olson

Frequent Co-Authors

James M. Olson
James M. Olson University of Western Ontario
Geoffrey T. Fong
Geoffrey T. Fong University of Waterloo
Steven J. Spencer
Steven J. Spencer The Ohio State University
Geoffrey Haddock
Geoffrey Haddock Cardiff University
Blair T. Johnson
Blair T. Johnson University of Connecticut
Russell H. Fazio
Russell H. Fazio The Ohio State University
Dolores Albarracín
Dolores Albarracín University of Pennsylvania
Ron Borland
Ron Borland University of Melbourne
Joel Cooper
Joel Cooper Princeton University
John M. Darley
John M. Darley Princeton University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a degree in psychology opens several diverse online education options and rewarding career pathways across the United States. Many students choose online bachelor's or master's programs in psychology, counseling, or mental health, which offer flexibility and accessibility for busy schedules.

A major consideration for those pursuing a psychology career is meeting state-specific licensure requirements, which can vary significantly depending on where you want to practice. For instance, to understand the Albuquerque licensed therapist requirements, you'll need to be aware of New Mexico's unique educational standards and clinical experience mandates.

Requirements in other states may differ. If you’re interested in California, you should review the Anaheim licensed therapist requirements. In Alaska, aspiring professionals should consult the Anchorage licensed therapist education requirements. For those considering Texas, there are clear steps on how to become a licensed therapist in Arlington.

Before enrolling in an online psychology program, carefully research your state’s requirements. This will help ensure that your education aligns with your licensure goals and sets you on the right career path in psychology or counseling.

Best Scientists Citing Mark P. Zanna

Recently Published Articles