World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
37
Citations
7713
World Ranking
9091
National Ranking
913

Geoffrey Haddock publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Geoffrey Haddock sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 107 publications — 25th percentile

25% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Geoffrey Haddock D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Geoffrey Haddock sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 37 D-Index — 21st percentile

21% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Geoffrey Haddock is affiliated with Cardiff University in the United Kingdom and has contributed substantially to the fields of psychology and social sciences. Their work spans numerous subfields including social psychology, sociology and political science, cognitive neuroscience, applied psychology, and clinical psychology.

The core topics addressed in Haddock's research involve social and intergroup psychology, cultural differences and values, psychology of moral and emotional judgment, behavioral health and interventions, neural and behavioral psychology studies, motivation and self-concept in sports, as well as evolutionary psychology and human behavior.

Some of the key recent papers authored or co-authored by Haddock include:

  • The importance of (shared) human values for containing the COVID-19 pandemic, 2020, British Journal of Social Psychology
  • Sense or sensibility? The neuro-functional basis of the structural matching effect in persuasion, 2020, Cognitive Affective & Behavioral Neuroscience
  • The limitations of polling data in understanding public support for COVID-19 lockdown policies, 2021, Royal Society Open Science
  • The Salience of Children Increases Adult Prosocial Values, 2021, Social Psychological and Personality Science
  • The Progressive Values Scale: Assessing the Ideological Schism on the Left, 2022, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin

Frequently collaborating co-authors include Gregory R. Maio, Colin Foad, Lukas J. Wolf, Travis Proulx, and Antonio Aquino. This demonstrates a regular partnership with researchers who have contributed significantly across multiple projects.

Haddock's publications often appear in journals such as:

  • Royal Society Open Science
  • Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin
  • Social Psychological and Personality Science
  • Higher Education Quarterly
  • Journal of Personality

In addition to journal articles, Geoffrey Haddock has contributed to book publications, including a title published by RAND Corporation eBooks in 2021 titled "Understanding perceptions of the Research Excellence Framework among UK researchers: The Real-Time REF Review."

Their research outputs amount to a significant volume of work with 36 publications classified under psychology and 19 under social sciences, reflecting a diverse and interdisciplinary academic portfolio.

Best Publications

  • The Psychology of Attitudes and Attitude Change

    Gregory Richard Maio;Geoffrey Haddock

  • Assessing the structure of prejudicial attitudes: the case of attitudes towards homosexuals

    Geoffrey Haddock;Mark P. Zanna;Victoria M. Esses

  • Values, stereotypes, and emotions as determinants of intergroup attitudes

    Victoria M. Esses;Geoffrey Haddock;Mark P. Zanna

  • Broad versus narrow personality measures and the prediction of behaviour across cultures

    Sampo V. Paunonen;Geoffrey Haddock;Friedrich Forsterling;Mirja Keinonen

  • Should Persuasion Be Affective or Cognitive? The Moderating Effects of Need for Affect and Need for Cognition

    Geoffrey Haddock;Gregory Richard Maio;Karin Arnold;Thomas Huskinson

  • Forming Judgments of Attitude Certainty, Intensity, and Importance: The Role of Subjective Experiences

    Geoffrey Haddock;Alexander J. Rothman;Rolf Reber;Norbert Schwarz

  • Individual differences in attitude structure: Variance in the chronic reliance on affective and cognitive information

    Thomas L.H Huskinson;Geoffrey Haddock

  • Preferring housewives' to feminists'. Categorization and the favorability of attitudes toward women

    Geoffrey Haddock;Mark P. Zanna

  • The mediating role of coping strategies on the relationship between achievement motivation and affect in sport

    Nikos Ntoumanis;Stuart J.H. Biddle;Geoffrey Haddock

  • The importance of (shared) human values for containing the COVID-19 pandemic.

    Lukas J. Wolf;Geoffrey Haddock;Antony S. R. Manstead;Gregory R. Maio

  • Contemporary perspectives on the psychology of attitudes

    Geoffrey Haddock;Gregory Richard Maio

  • Authoritarianism, values, and the favorability and structure of antigay attitudes.

    Geoffrey Haddock;Mark P. Zanna

  • Look Black in Anger: The role of implicit prejudice in the categorization and perceived emotional intensity of racially ambiguous faces

    Paul B. Hutchings;Geoffrey Haddock

  • On the use of open-ended measures to assess attitudinal components

    Geoffrey Haddock;Mark P. Zanna

  • The (limited) role of trait-laden stereotypes in predicting attitudes toward Native peoples

    Geoffrey Haddock;Mark P. Zanna;Victoria M. Esses

  • The role of mood in the expression of intergroup stereotypes

    V. M. Esses;Geoffrey Haddock;M. P. Zanna

  • Cognition, Affect, and the Prediction of Social Attitudes

    Geoffrey Haddock;Mark P. Zanna

  • Impact of Negative Advertising on Evaluations of Political Candidates: The 1993 Canadian Federal Election

    Geoffrey Haddock;Mark P. Zanna

  • Perfectionism in weight-concerned and -unconcerned women: an experimental approach

    Patricia Pliner;Geoffrey Haddock

  • Anti-fat prejudice among children: The mere proximity effect in 5-10 year olds

    Helen Louise Penny;Geoffrey Haddock

  • Stigma and sexual orientation: Understanding prejudice against lesbians, gay men, and bisexuals

    GG Haddock;MP Zanna

Frequent Co-Authors

Gregory R. Maio
Gregory R. Maio University of Bath
Mark P. Zanna
Mark P. Zanna University of Waterloo
Katy Tapper
Katy Tapper City, University of London
Alexander J. Rothman
Alexander J. Rothman University of Minnesota
Victoria M. Esses
Victoria M. Esses University of Western Ontario
Norbert Schwarz
Norbert Schwarz University of Southern California
Jochen E. Gebauer
Jochen E. Gebauer University of Mannheim
C. Neil Macrae
C. Neil Macrae University of Aberdeen
Netta Weinstein
Netta Weinstein University of Reading

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in Psychology opens doors to a range of related online degrees and fascinating career pathways. Popular options include clinical psychology, counseling, and specialized fields like Speech-Language Pathology (SLP). SLP professionals are in high demand, supporting individuals with communication disorders across healthcare and educational settings.

If you’re interested in becoming a speech-language pathologist, it’s important to know that requirements can vary by state. For example, Alabama speech pathologist certification requirements include a master's degree and post-graduate supervised experience. Similarly, Alaska speech pathologist certification requirements focus on accredited education and national exam completion.

In other states, steps like supervised clinical hours, licensure exams, and ongoing professional development are also common. To understand more, look into the Arizona slp certification requirements and Arkansas speech pathologist certification requirements.

Exploring related degrees and understanding each state’s requirements can help you plan your education and career path in psychology or speech-language pathology.

Best Scientists Citing Geoffrey Haddock

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles