World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
50
Citations
15848
World Ranking
5347
National Ranking
557

Netta Weinstein publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Netta Weinstein sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 157 publications — 53rd percentile

53% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Netta Weinstein D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Netta Weinstein sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 50 D-Index — 54th percentile

54% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Netta Weinstein is affiliated with the University of Reading in the United Kingdom. Their research spans multiple fields within psychology and social sciences, focusing primarily on behavioral health, motivation, social dynamics, and well-being.

The main fields of study for Weinstein include:

  • Psychology
  • Social Sciences

Their subfields of study further specify areas of expertise as:

  • Social Psychology
  • Clinical Psychology
  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Applied Psychology
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

Key research topics covered by Weinstein include:

  • Behavioral Health and Interventions
  • Motivation and Self-Concept in Sports
  • COVID-19 and Mental Health
  • Social and Intergroup Psychology
  • Communication in Education and Healthcare
  • Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
  • Attachment and Relationship Dynamics

Recent notable papers authored or co-authored by Weinstein include:

  • "A classification of motivation and behavior change techniques used in self-determination theory-based interventions in health contexts." (2020), published in Motivation Science
  • "Use caution when applying behavioural science to policy" (2020), published in Nature Human Behaviour
  • "How to foster perceived partner responsiveness: High-quality listening is key" (2021), published in Social and Personality Psychology Compass
  • "Effects of mental health stigma on loneliness, social isolation, and relationships in young people with depression symptoms" (2023), published in BMC Psychiatry
  • "Does Taking a Short Break from Social Media Have a Positive Effect on Well-being? Evidence from Three Preregistered Field Experiments" (2021), published in Journal of Technology in Behavioral Science

Weinstein collaborates frequently with several scholars, including:

  • Nicole Legate
  • Thuy-vy Thi Nguyen
  • Arlen C. Moller
  • Guy Itzchakov
  • Lisa Legault

Their publications appear repeatedly in several venues, highlighting their engagement with diverse academic communities:

  • Psychology Archives
  • Technology Mind and Behavior
  • Journal of Experimental Social Psychology
  • Arabixiv (OSF Preprints)
  • SSRN Electronic Journal

In addition to journal articles, Weinstein has contributed to book publications, including:

  • "Understanding perceptions of the Research Excellence Framework among UK researchers: The Real-Time REF Review" (2021), published by RAND Corporation eBooks
  • "Solitude" (2024), published by Cambridge University Press

Best Publications

  • When helping helps: autonomous motivation for prosocial behavior and its influence on well-being for the helper and recipient.

    Netta Weinstein;Richard M. Ryan

  • A multi-method examination of the effects of mindfulness on stress attribution, coping, and emotional well-being

    Netta Weinstein;Kirk W. Brown;Richard Michael Ryan

  • Can you connect with me now? How the presence of mobile communication technology influences face-to-face conversation quality:

    Andrew K. Przybylski;Netta Weinstein

  • Vitalizing effects of being outdoors and in nature

    Richard M. Ryan;Netta Weinstein;Jessey Bernstein;Kirk Warren Brown

  • A Large-Scale Test of the Goldilocks Hypothesis: Quantifying the Relations Between Digital-Screen Use and the Mental Well-Being of Adolescents

    Andrew K. Przybylski;Netta Weinstein

  • Can Nature Make Us More Caring? Effects of Immersion in Nature on Intrinsic Aspirations and Generosity:

    Netta Weinstein;Andrew K. Przybylski;Richard Michael Ryan

  • Is Coming out Always a “Good Thing”? Exploring the Relations of Autonomy Support, Outness, and Wellness for Lesbian, Gay, and Bisexual Individuals

    Nicole Legate;Richard M. Ryan;Netta Weinstein

  • A Classification of Motivation and Behavior Change Techniques Used in Self-Determination Theory-Based Interventions in Health Contexts

    Pedro J. Teixeira;Marta M. Marques;Marlene N. Silva;Jennifer Brunet

  • A self‐determination theory approach to understanding stress incursion and responses

    Netta Weinstein;Richard M. Ryan

  • Trait mindfulness modulates neuroendocrine and affective responses to social evaluative threat

    Kirk Warren Brown;Netta Weinstein;J. David Creswell

  • Internet Gaming Disorder: Investigating the Clinical Relevance of a New Phenomenon

    Andrew K. Przybylski;Netta Weinstein;Kou Murayama

  • The index of autonomous functioning: Development of a scale of human autonomy

    Netta Weinstein;Andrew K. Przybylski;Richard M. Ryan

  • The Ideal Self at Play The Appeal of Video Games That Let You Be All You Can Be

    Andrew K. Przybylski;Netta Weinstein;Kou Murayama;Martin F. Lynch

  • Undermining quality teaching and learning: A self-determination theory perspective on high-stakes testing

    Richard Michael Ryan;Netta Weinstein

  • Having to versus Wanting to Play: Background and Consequences of Harmonious versus Obsessive Engagement in Video Games

    Andrew K. Przybylski;Netta Weinstein;Richard Michael Ryan;C. Scott Rigby

  • Digital Screen Time Limits and Young Children's Psychological Well-Being: Evidence From a Population-Based Study.

    Andrew K. Przybylski;Netta Weinstein

  • Use caution when applying behavioural science to policy.

    Hans IJzerman;Neil A. Lewis;Andrew K. Przybylski;Netta Weinstein

  • Violent video game engagement is not associated with adolescents' aggressive behaviour: evidence from a registered report

    Andrew K. Przybylski;Netta Weinstein

  • Coming Out as Lesbian, Gay, or Bisexual: The Lasting Impact of Initial Disclosure Experiences

    William S. Ryan;Nicole Legate;Netta Weinstein

  • Motivational determinants of integrating positive and negative past identities.

    Netta Weinstein;Edward L. Deci;Richard M. Ryan

Frequent Co-Authors

Andrew K. Przybylski
Andrew K. Przybylski University of Oxford
Richard M. Ryan
Richard M. Ryan Australian Catholic University
Kou Murayama
Kou Murayama University of Reading
Silke Paulmann
Silke Paulmann University of Essex
Maarten Vansteenkiste
Maarten Vansteenkiste Ghent University
Edward L. Deci
Edward L. Deci University of Rochester
Andrew Balmford
Andrew Balmford University of Cambridge
Kirk Warren Brown
Kirk Warren Brown Carnegie Mellon University
Richard B. Bradbury
Richard B. Bradbury University of Cambridge
Mathew P. White
Mathew P. White University of Vienna

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in psychology opens doors to a variety of online education options and rewarding career paths. Many students choose online bachelor's or master's programs in psychology, counseling, or related fields for greater flexibility and access to specialized coursework.

One popular pathway is becoming a licensed mental health counselor. However, requirements can differ from city to city. For example, if you wish to pursue St. Louis mental health counselor certification requirements, you’ll need to gain a regionally accredited degree and complete supervised clinical experience. The St. Petersburg mental health counselor certification requirements also include passing a relevant national exam and state background checks.

Similar guidelines apply if your goal is to become a mental health counselor in Stockton or meet the Tampa mental health counselor certification requirements. These processes may include additional local coursework or state-specific clinical training. By understanding these regional differences and choosing the right online degree, you can confidently begin your journey in the field of psychology.

Best Scientists Citing Netta Weinstein

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles