World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Andrew K. Przybylski

Andrew K. Przybylski

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Social Sciences and Humanities 46 3480 3206 586 537 128 28965

Andrew K. Przybylski publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Andrew K. Przybylski between 2006 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Andrew K. Przybylski published across 20 years, from 2006 to 2025, averaging 8.5 papers a year. Output peaked at 24 publications in 2019. 23 of the 170 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2006 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 24. Peak 24 publications in 2019. 2006: 1 publication 2007: 1 publication 2008: 0 publications 2009: 4 publications 2010: 1 publication 2011: 0 publications 2012: 4 publications 2013: 6 publications 2014: 7 publications 2015: 6 publications 2016: 16 publications 2017: 16 publications 2018: 11 publications 2019: 24 publications 2020: 13 publications 2021: 19 publications 2022: 10 publications 2023: 8 publications 2024: 8 publications 2025: 15 publications
2006 2025

170 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Andrew K. Przybylski: publications per year, 2006 to 2025
Year Publications
2006 1
2007 1
2008 0
2009 4
2010 1
2011 0
2012 4
2013 6
2014 7
2015 6
2016 16
2017 16
2018 11
2019 24
2020 13
2021 19
2022 10
2023 8
2024 8
2025 15
Total 170
Download as CSV

Andrew K. Przybylski publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Andrew K. Przybylski sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 54 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 44–53 to 570+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 474. Most scientists, 474, have 114–123 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 124–133 publications, is where this scientist sits. 44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44–53 publications 570+

This scientist: 128 publications — 29th percentile

29% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
44–53 28
54–63 61
64–73 161
74–83 225
84–93 301
94–103 390
104–113 406
114–123 474
124–133 453 128
134–143 434
144–153 407
154–163 411
164–173 391
174–183 313
184–193 319
194–203 304
204–213 285
214–223 246
224–233 213
234–243 170
244–253 167
254–263 162
264–273 138
274–283 138
284–293 113
294–303 106
304–313 95
314–323 101
324–333 81
334–343 69
344–353 56
354–363 36
364–373 42
374–383 41
384–393 44
394–403 27
404–413 30
414–423 20
424–433 29
434–443 29
444–453 25
454–463 19
464–473 21
474–483 11
484–493 17
494–503 7
504–513 6
514–523 12
524–533 10
534–543 7
544–553 6
554–563 12
564–569 8
570+ 100
Download as CSV

Andrew K. Przybylski D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Andrew K. Przybylski sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 71 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 100+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 313. Most scientists, 313, have 42 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 46 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 46 D-Index — 55th percentile

55% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 177
31 210
32 222
33 188
34 181
35 243
36 261
37 272
38 278
39 300
40 297
41 308
42 313
43 300
44 269
45 260
46 228 46
47 251
48 203
49 186
50 187
51 166
52 138
53 141
54 131
55 137
56 109
57 129
58 95
59 105
60 106
61 86
62 94
63 77
64 79
65 59
66 68
67 51
68 49
69 40
70 43
71 40
72 50
73 46
74 43
75 45
76 45
77 30
78 25
79 31
80 29
81 18
82 21
83 26
84 15
85 15
86 19
87 19
88 12
89 7
90 19
91 20
92 13
93 9
94 13
95 8
96 7
97 6
98 6
99 6
100+ 97
Download as CSV

Overview

Andrew K. Przybylski is affiliated with the University of Oxford in the United Kingdom. Their research primarily spans the fields of psychology and social sciences, with significant contributions to subfields such as sociology and political science, applied psychology, experimental and cognitive psychology, clinical psychology, and education.

The scientist's work addresses several main topics, including the impact of technology on adolescents, COVID-19 and mental health, child development in relation to digital technology, media influence and health, digital mental health interventions, psychological and temporal perspectives research, and mind wandering and attention.

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Andrew K. Przybylski include Matti Vuorre, Netta Weinstein, Amy Orben, Niklas Johannes, and Thuy-vy Thi Nguyen.

They have published extensively in a range of academic venues. Notable among these are Technology Mind and Behavior, Royal Society Open Science, Nature Human Behaviour, Clinical Psychological Science, and Arabixiv (OSF Preprints).

Selected recent papers by Andrew K. Przybylski include the following:

  • "Multidisciplinary research priorities for the COVID-19 pandemic: a call for action for mental health science" (2020, The Lancet Psychiatry)
  • "Windows of developmental sensitivity to social media" (2022, Nature Communications)
  • "Video game play is positively correlated with well-being" (2021, Royal Society Open Science)
  • "Use caution when applying behavioural science to policy" (2020, Nature Human Behaviour)
  • "There Is No Evidence That Associations Between Adolescents' Digital Technology Engagement and Mental Health Problems Have Increased" (2021, Clinical Psychological Science)

Best Publications

  • Multidisciplinary research priorities for the COVID-19 pandemic: a call for action for mental health science.

    Emily A. Holmes;Emily A. Holmes;Rory C O'Connor;V. Hugh Perry;Irene Tracey

  • The motivational pull of video games: A self-determination theory approach

    Richard M. Ryan;C. Scott Rigby;Andrew K. Przybylski

  • Motivational, emotional, and behavioral correlates of fear of missing out

    Andrew K. Przybylski;Kou Murayama;Cody R. DeHaan;Valerie Gladwell

  • A Motivational Model of Video Game Engagement

    Andrew K. Przybylski;C. Scott Rigby;Richard M. Ryan

  • The association between adolescent well-being and digital technology use

    Amy Orben;Andrew K Przybylski

  • Can you connect with me now? How the presence of mobile communication technology influences face-to-face conversation quality:

    Andrew K. Przybylski;Netta Weinstein

  • A Large-Scale Test of the Goldilocks Hypothesis: Quantifying the Relations Between Digital-Screen Use and the Mental Well-Being of Adolescents

    Andrew K. Przybylski;Netta Weinstein

  • Can Nature Make Us More Caring? Effects of Immersion in Nature on Intrinsic Aspirations and Generosity:

    Netta Weinstein;Andrew K. Przybylski;Richard Michael Ryan

  • Scholars’ open debate paper on the World Health Organization ICD-11 Gaming Disorder proposal

    Espen Aarseth;Anthony M. Bean;Huub Boonen;Michelle Colder Carras

  • Social media’s enduring effect on adolescent life satisfaction

    Amy Orben;Tobias Dienlin;Andrew K Przybylski

  • Screens, Teens and Psychological Well-Being: Evidence from three time-use diary studies

    Amy Orben;Andrew K. Przybylski

  • Internet Gaming Disorder: Investigating the Clinical Relevance of a New Phenomenon

    Andrew K. Przybylski;Netta Weinstein;Kou Murayama

  • The index of autonomous functioning: Development of a scale of human autonomy

    Netta Weinstein;Andrew K. Przybylski;Richard M. Ryan

  • The Ideal Self at Play The Appeal of Video Games That Let You Be All You Can Be

    Andrew K. Przybylski;Netta Weinstein;Kou Murayama;Martin F. Lynch

  • Electronic Gaming and Psychosocial Adjustment

    Andrew K. Przybylski

  • Competence-impeding Electronic Games and Players' Aggressive Feelings, Thoughts, and Behaviors

    Andrew K. Przybylski;Edward L. Deci;C. Scott Rigby;Richard M. Ryan

  • Windows of developmental sensitivity to social media

    Unknown

  • A weak scientific basis for gaming disorder: Let us err on the side of caution

    Antonius J. van Rooij;Christopher J. Ferguson;Michelle Colder Carras;Daniel Kardefelt-Winther

  • Having to versus Wanting to Play: Background and Consequences of Harmonious versus Obsessive Engagement in Video Games

    Andrew K. Przybylski;Netta Weinstein;Richard Michael Ryan;C. Scott Rigby

  • The Motivating Role of Violence in Video Games

    Andrew K. Przybylski;Richard Michael Ryan;C. Scott Rigby

  • A weak scientific basis for gaming disorder: Let us err on the side of caution

    Antonius J. van Rooij;Christopher J. Ferguson;Michelle Colder Carras;Daniel Kardefelt-Winther

Frequent Co-Authors

Netta Weinstein
Netta Weinstein University of Reading
Richard M. Ryan
Richard M. Ryan Australian Catholic University
Kou Murayama
Kou Murayama University of Reading
Emily A. Holmes
Emily A. Holmes Uppsala University
John R. Geddes
John R. Geddes University of Oxford
Christopher J. Ferguson
Christopher J. Ferguson Stetson University
Catherine J. Harmer
Catherine J. Harmer University of Oxford
Irene Tracey
Irene Tracey University of Oxford
Susan Michie
Susan Michie University College London
Helen Christensen
Helen Christensen University of New South Wales

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in Social Sciences and Humanities opens the door to a wide variety of online study options and career paths. Many students are drawn to fields like social work, psychology, and behavioral analysis due to their strong societal impact and growing job opportunities.

If you are interested in becoming a social worker, consider exploring msw programs that provide flexibility and affordability. For those who value time efficiency, masters in social work accelerated programs can help you enter the workforce more quickly without sacrificing educational quality.

Another promising path is behavior analysis. Gaining bcba certification programs allows graduates to work in growing sectors like education and healthcare, providing essential services to individuals and families.

For psychology enthusiasts seeking quick entry into rewarding careers, the fastest psychology degree programs online can help you efficiently gain the credentials needed for counseling, research, or human resources roles. Each of these online pathways is designed to be accessible, flexible, and aligned with current industry demands.

Best Scientists Citing Andrew K. Przybylski

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles