World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
77
Citations
21512
World Ranking
1654
National Ranking
80

Daniel King publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Daniel King sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 289 publications — 86th percentile

86% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Daniel King D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Daniel King sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 77 D-Index — 86th percentile

86% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Daniel King is affiliated with Flinders University in Australia and has a substantial presence in the fields of Psychology and Social Sciences. Their research primarily focuses on areas including Clinical Psychology, Sociology and Political Science, Education, Applied Psychology, and Cognitive Neuroscience.

The researcher has authored a series of recent papers, published mostly in 2020, addressing topics such as problematic internet use, gaming disorder, and behavioral addictions. Notable papers include:

  • Preventing problematic internet use during the COVID-19 pandemic: Consensus guidance (2020, Comprehensive Psychiatry)
  • Global prevalence of gaming disorder: A systematic review and meta-analysis (2020, Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry)
  • Problematic online gaming and the COVID-19 pandemic (2020, Journal of Behavioral Addictions)
  • Which conditions should be considered as disorders in the International Classification of Diseases (ICD-11) designation of "other specified disorders due to addictive behaviors"? (2020, Journal of Behavioral Addictions)
  • Screening and assessment tools for gaming disorder: A comprehensive systematic review (2020, Clinical Psychology Review)

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Daniel King include:

  • Paul Delfabbro
  • Joël Billieux
  • Marc N. Potenza
  • Martin Parker
  • Zsolt Demetrovics

Their publication record highlights several key journals where their work appears frequently:

  • Journal of Behavioral Addictions (30 publications)
  • International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction (12 publications)
  • Addictive Behaviors (11 publications)
  • Computers in Human Behavior (11 publications)
  • International Gambling Studies (9 publications)

Daniel King's research topics span significant and varied areas such as the impact of technology on adolescents, gambling behavior and treatments, sexuality, behavior, and technology, child development and digital technology, digital mental health interventions, digital games and media, and cognitive aspects like mind wandering and attention.

  • Impact of Technology on Adolescents
  • Gambling Behavior and Treatments
  • Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology
  • Child Development and Digital Technology
  • Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Digital Games and Media
  • Mind wandering and attention

In addition to journal articles, Daniel King has contributed to the academic landscape through book publications. These include works published by Oxford University Press and eBooks:

  • Organizational Behaviour (2022, Oxford University Press)
  • : (2020, eBooks)

Best Publications

  • Preventing problematic internet use during the COVID-19 pandemic: Consensus guidance.

    Orsolya Király;Marc N. Potenza;Dan J. Stein;Daniel L. King

  • Global prevalence of gaming disorder: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

    Matthew Wr Stevens;Diana Dorstyn;Paul H Delfabbro;Daniel L King

  • Problematic online gaming and the COVID-19 pandemic.

    Daniel L. King;Paul H. Delfabbro;Joel Billieux;Marc N. Potenza

  • Toward a consensus definition of pathological video-gaming: a systematic review of psychometric assessment tools.

    Daniel L. King;Maria C. Haagsma;Paul H. Delfabbro;Michael Gradisar

  • Video Game Structural Characteristics: A New Psychological Taxonomy

    Daniel King;Paul Delfabbro;Mark Griffiths

  • Working towards an international consensus on criteria for assessing Internet Gaming Disorder: a critical commentary on Petry et al (2014)

    Mark D. Griffiths;Antonius J. Van Rooij;Daniel Kardefelt-Winther;Vladan Starcevic

  • The cognitive psychology of Internet gaming disorder.

    Daniel L. King;Paul H. Delfabbro

  • Gaming disorder: Its delineation as an important condition for diagnosis, management, and prevention

    John B. Saunders;Wei Hao;Jiang Long;Daniel L. King

  • Video Game Addiction: Past, Present and Future

    Mark D. Griffiths;Daria J. Kuss;Daniel L. King

  • Which conditions should be considered as disorders in the International Classification of Diseases (ICD-11) designation of “other specified disorders due to addictive behaviors”?

    Matthias Brand;Matthias Brand;Hans-JÜrgen Rumpf;Zsolt Demetrovics;Astrid MÜller

  • The convergence of gambling and digital media: implications for gambling in young people.

    Daniel King;Paul Delfabbro;Mark Griffiths

  • Assessing clinical trials of Internet addiction treatment: A systematic review and CONSORT evaluation

    Daniel L. King;Paul H. Delfabbro;Mark D. Griffiths;Michael Gradisar

  • Screening and assessment tools for gaming disorder: A comprehensive systematic review.

    Daniel L. King;Samuel R. Chamberlain;Natacha Carragher;Joel Billieux

  • Family factors in adolescent problematic Internet gaming: A systematic review

    Luke A. Schneider;Daniel L. King;Paul H. Delfabbro

  • Manifesto for a European research network into Problematic Usage of the Internet.

    N A Fineberg;N A Fineberg;N A Fineberg;Z Demetrovics;D J Stein;K Ioannidis

  • Including gaming disorder in the ICD-11: The need to do so from a clinical and public health perspective.

    Hans Jürgen Rumpf;Sophia Achab;Sophia Achab;Joël Billieux;Henrietta Bowden-Jones

  • The Cognitive Psychopathology of Internet Gaming Disorder in Adolescence

    Daniel L. King;Paul H. Delfabbro

  • Cognitive–behavioral therapy for Internet gaming disorder: A systematic review and meta-analysis

    Matthew W.R. Stevens;Daniel L. King;Diana Dorstyn;Paul H. Delfabbro

  • The impact of prolonged violent video-gaming on adolescent sleep: an experimental study.

    Daniel L. King;Daniel L. King;Michael Gradisar;Aaron Drummond;Nicole Lovato

  • Treatment of Internet gaming disorder: An international systematic review and CONSORT evaluation.

    Daniel L. King;Paul H. Delfabbro;Anise M.S. Wu;Young Yim Doh

  • Withdrawal symptoms in internet gaming disorder: A systematic review.

    Dean Kaptsis;Daniel L. King;Paul H. Delfabbro;Michael Gradisar

Frequent Co-Authors

Paul Delfabbro
Paul Delfabbro University of Adelaide
Joël Billieux
Joël Billieux University of Lausanne
Mark D. Griffiths
Mark D. Griffiths Nottingham Trent University
Marc N. Potenza
Marc N. Potenza Yale University
Matthias Brand
Matthias Brand University of Duisburg-Essen
Zsolt Demetrovics
Zsolt Demetrovics Flinders University
Sally M. Gainsbury
Sally M. Gainsbury University of Sydney
Nerilee Hing
Nerilee Hing Central Queensland University
Naomi A. Fineberg
Naomi A. Fineberg University of Hertfordshire
Hans-Jürgen Rumpf
Hans-Jürgen Rumpf University of Lübeck

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Deciding to study psychology online opens up a range of affordable options across the United States. Many institutions now provide flexible, fully online bachelor's degrees tailored for students balancing work, family, or other commitments. Programs like the cheapest online psychology bachelor's in Florida offer quality education at lower tuition rates, allowing more students to pursue their interests.

Affordability and program access are key priorities for many prospective psychology majors. Those living in Georgia can explore opportunities such as the cheapest online psychology bachelor's in Georgia, while options like the Minnesota cheapest online psychology bachelor's degree ensure students in the Midwest have cost-effective choices as well.

In the Northeast, programs like the affordable online psychology bachelor's degrees in New York allow learners to gain the credentials needed for various pathways. Graduates can move into counseling, research, human resources, education, or continue on to advanced degrees for clinical practice or specialized fields. Choosing the right online program is a crucial first step toward a rewarding psychology career.

Best Scientists Citing Daniel King

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles