World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 77 1654 1484 80 76 289 21512

Daniel King publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Daniel King between 1986 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Daniel King published across 41 years, from 1986 to 2026, averaging 12.7 papers a year. Output peaked at 48 publications in 2021. 30 of the 522 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30 40
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1986 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 48. Peak 48 publications in 2021. 1986: 1 publication 1987: 0 publications 1988: 1 publication 1989: 0 publications 1990: 0 publications 1991: 0 publications 1992: 0 publications 1993: 0 publications 1994: 0 publications 1995: 0 publications 1996: 3 publications 1997: 0 publications 1998: 0 publications 1999: 0 publications 2000: 0 publications 2001: 0 publications 2002: 0 publications 2003: 0 publications 2004: 0 publications 2005: 0 publications 2006: 3 publications 2007: 3 publications 2008: 8 publications 2009: 13 publications 2010: 17 publications 2011: 10 publications 2012: 21 publications 2013: 23 publications 2014: 28 publications 2015: 20 publications 2016: 27 publications 2017: 38 publications 2018: 33 publications 2019: 45 publications 2020: 41 publications 2021: 48 publications 2022: 45 publications 2023: 38 publications 2024: 26 publications 2025: 28 publications 2026: 2 publications
1986 2026

522 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Daniel King: publications per year, 1986 to 2026
Year Publications
1986 1
1987 0
1988 1
1989 0
1990 0
1991 0
1992 0
1993 0
1994 0
1995 0
1996 3
1997 0
1998 0
1999 0
2000 0
2001 0
2002 0
2003 0
2004 0
2005 0
2006 3
2007 3
2008 8
2009 13
2010 17
2011 10
2012 21
2013 23
2014 28
2015 20
2016 27
2017 38
2018 33
2019 45
2020 41
2021 48
2022 45
2023 38
2024 26
2025 28
2026 2
Total 522
Download as CSV

Daniel King publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Daniel King sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 281–290 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 289 publications — 86th percentile

86% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139 289
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Daniel King D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Daniel King sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 76–77 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 77 D-Index — 86th percentile

86% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132 77
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Daniel King is affiliated with Flinders University in Australia and has a substantial presence in the fields of Psychology and Social Sciences. Their research primarily focuses on areas including Clinical Psychology, Sociology and Political Science, Education, Applied Psychology, and Cognitive Neuroscience.

The researcher has authored a series of recent papers, published mostly in 2020, addressing topics such as problematic internet use, gaming disorder, and behavioral addictions. Notable papers include:

  • Preventing problematic internet use during the COVID-19 pandemic: Consensus guidance (2020, Comprehensive Psychiatry)
  • Global prevalence of gaming disorder: A systematic review and meta-analysis (2020, Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry)
  • Problematic online gaming and the COVID-19 pandemic (2020, Journal of Behavioral Addictions)
  • Which conditions should be considered as disorders in the International Classification of Diseases (ICD-11) designation of "other specified disorders due to addictive behaviors"? (2020, Journal of Behavioral Addictions)
  • Screening and assessment tools for gaming disorder: A comprehensive systematic review (2020, Clinical Psychology Review)

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Daniel King include:

  • Paul Delfabbro
  • Joël Billieux
  • Marc N. Potenza
  • Martin Parker
  • Zsolt Demetrovics

Their publication record highlights several key journals where their work appears frequently:

  • Journal of Behavioral Addictions (30 publications)
  • International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction (12 publications)
  • Addictive Behaviors (11 publications)
  • Computers in Human Behavior (11 publications)
  • International Gambling Studies (9 publications)

Daniel King's research topics span significant and varied areas such as the impact of technology on adolescents, gambling behavior and treatments, sexuality, behavior, and technology, child development and digital technology, digital mental health interventions, digital games and media, and cognitive aspects like mind wandering and attention.

  • Impact of Technology on Adolescents
  • Gambling Behavior and Treatments
  • Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology
  • Child Development and Digital Technology
  • Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Digital Games and Media
  • Mind wandering and attention

In addition to journal articles, Daniel King has contributed to the academic landscape through book publications. These include works published by Oxford University Press and eBooks:

  • Organizational Behaviour (2022, Oxford University Press)
  • : (2020, eBooks)

Best Publications

  • Preventing problematic internet use during the COVID-19 pandemic: Consensus guidance.

    Orsolya Király;Marc N. Potenza;Dan J. Stein;Daniel L. King

  • Global prevalence of gaming disorder: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

    Matthew Wr Stevens;Diana Dorstyn;Paul H Delfabbro;Daniel L King

  • Problematic online gaming and the COVID-19 pandemic.

    Daniel L. King;Paul H. Delfabbro;Joel Billieux;Marc N. Potenza

  • Toward a consensus definition of pathological video-gaming: a systematic review of psychometric assessment tools.

    Daniel L. King;Maria C. Haagsma;Paul H. Delfabbro;Michael Gradisar

  • Video Game Structural Characteristics: A New Psychological Taxonomy

    Daniel King;Paul Delfabbro;Mark Griffiths

  • Working towards an international consensus on criteria for assessing Internet Gaming Disorder: a critical commentary on Petry et al (2014)

    Mark D. Griffiths;Antonius J. Van Rooij;Daniel Kardefelt-Winther;Vladan Starcevic

  • The cognitive psychology of Internet gaming disorder.

    Daniel L. King;Paul H. Delfabbro

  • Gaming disorder: Its delineation as an important condition for diagnosis, management, and prevention

    John B. Saunders;Wei Hao;Jiang Long;Daniel L. King

  • Video Game Addiction: Past, Present and Future

    Mark D. Griffiths;Daria J. Kuss;Daniel L. King

  • The convergence of gambling and digital media: implications for gambling in young people.

    Daniel King;Paul Delfabbro;Mark Griffiths

  • Assessing clinical trials of Internet addiction treatment: A systematic review and CONSORT evaluation

    Daniel L. King;Paul H. Delfabbro;Mark D. Griffiths;Michael Gradisar

  • Screening and assessment tools for gaming disorder: A comprehensive systematic review.

    Daniel L. King;Samuel R. Chamberlain;Natacha Carragher;Joel Billieux

  • Family factors in adolescent problematic Internet gaming: A systematic review

    Luke A. Schneider;Daniel L. King;Paul H. Delfabbro

  • Manifesto for a European research network into Problematic Usage of the Internet.

    N A Fineberg;N A Fineberg;N A Fineberg;Z Demetrovics;D J Stein;K Ioannidis

  • Including gaming disorder in the ICD-11: The need to do so from a clinical and public health perspective.

    Hans Jürgen Rumpf;Sophia Achab;Sophia Achab;Joël Billieux;Henrietta Bowden-Jones

  • The Cognitive Psychopathology of Internet Gaming Disorder in Adolescence

    Daniel L. King;Paul H. Delfabbro

  • Cognitive–behavioral therapy for Internet gaming disorder: A systematic review and meta-analysis

    Matthew W.R. Stevens;Daniel L. King;Diana Dorstyn;Paul H. Delfabbro

  • The impact of prolonged violent video-gaming on adolescent sleep: an experimental study.

    Daniel L. King;Daniel L. King;Michael Gradisar;Aaron Drummond;Nicole Lovato

  • Treatment of Internet gaming disorder: An international systematic review and CONSORT evaluation.

    Daniel L. King;Paul H. Delfabbro;Anise M.S. Wu;Young Yim Doh

  • Withdrawal symptoms in internet gaming disorder: A systematic review.

    Dean Kaptsis;Daniel L. King;Paul H. Delfabbro;Michael Gradisar

Frequent Co-Authors

Paul Delfabbro
Paul Delfabbro University of Adelaide
Joël Billieux
Joël Billieux University of Lausanne
Mark D. Griffiths
Mark D. Griffiths Nottingham Trent University
Marc N. Potenza
Marc N. Potenza Yale University
Matthias Brand
Matthias Brand University of Duisburg-Essen
Zsolt Demetrovics
Zsolt Demetrovics Flinders University
Sally M. Gainsbury
Sally M. Gainsbury University of Sydney
Nerilee Hing
Nerilee Hing Central Queensland University
Naomi A. Fineberg
Naomi A. Fineberg University of Hertfordshire
Hans-Jürgen Rumpf
Hans-Jürgen Rumpf University of Lübeck

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Deciding to study psychology online opens up a range of affordable options across the United States. Many institutions now provide flexible, fully online bachelor's degrees tailored for students balancing work, family, or other commitments. Programs like the cheapest online psychology bachelor's in Florida offer quality education at lower tuition rates, allowing more students to pursue their interests.

Affordability and program access are key priorities for many prospective psychology majors. Those living in Georgia can explore opportunities such as the cheapest online psychology bachelor's in Georgia, while options like the Minnesota cheapest online psychology bachelor's degree ensure students in the Midwest have cost-effective choices as well.

In the Northeast, programs like the affordable online psychology bachelor's degrees in New York allow learners to gain the credentials needed for various pathways. Graduates can move into counseling, research, human resources, education, or continue on to advanced degrees for clinical practice or specialized fields. Choosing the right online program is a crucial first step toward a rewarding psychology career.

Best Scientists Citing Daniel King

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles