World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Sally M. Gainsbury

Sally M. Gainsbury

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 51 5302 4919 308 300 184 7788

Sally M. Gainsbury publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Sally M. Gainsbury between 2006 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Sally M. Gainsbury published across 20 years, from 2006 to 2025, averaging 11.2 papers a year. Output peaked at 23 publications in 2020. 18 of the 223 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2006 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 23. Peak 23 publications in 2020. 2006: 1 publication 2007: 0 publications 2008: 0 publications 2009: 0 publications 2010: 13 publications 2011: 19 publications 2012: 14 publications 2013: 17 publications 2014: 13 publications 2015: 21 publications 2016: 16 publications 2017: 14 publications 2018: 11 publications 2019: 17 publications 2020: 23 publications 2021: 15 publications 2022: 7 publications 2023: 4 publications 2024: 6 publications 2025: 12 publications
2006 2025

223 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Sally M. Gainsbury: publications per year, 2006 to 2025
Year Publications
2006 1
2007 0
2008 0
2009 0
2010 13
2011 19
2012 14
2013 17
2014 13
2015 21
2016 16
2017 14
2018 11
2019 17
2020 23
2021 15
2022 7
2023 4
2024 6
2025 12
Total 223
Download as CSV

Sally M. Gainsbury publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Sally M. Gainsbury sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 181–190 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 184 publications — 64th percentile

64% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397 184
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Sally M. Gainsbury D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Sally M. Gainsbury sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 50–51 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 51 D-Index — 56th percentile

56% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445 51
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Sally M. Gainsbury is affiliated with the University of Sydney in Australia. Their research primarily spans the field of Psychology, with a significant focus on Clinical Psychology. The scientist's work also extends to related subfields including Sociology and Political Science, Marketing, Accounting, and Economics and Econometrics.

The main topics of their research include Gambling Behavior and Treatments, Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology, Consumer Market Behavior and Pricing, Impact of Technology on Adolescents, Financial Literacy, Pension and Retirement Analysis, Digital Games and Media, and Digital Mental Health Interventions.

Frequent co-authors in their publications include:

  • Alex Blaszczynski
  • Thomas B. Swanton
  • Robert Heirene
  • Kahlil S. Philander
  • Joël Billieux

The scientist's research has been published in a variety of journals, with the most frequent publication venues being:

  • International Gambling Studies
  • Journal of Gambling Studies
  • Psychology of Addictive Behaviors
  • Frontiers in Psychiatry
  • Current Addiction Reports

Among their recent papers are:

  • "Binge-Watching: What Do we Know So Far? A First Systematic Review of the Evidence," published in 2020 in Current Addiction Reports
  • "Testing the spectrum hypothesis of problematic online behaviors: A network analysis approach," published in 2022 in Addictive Behaviors
  • "Impacts of the COVID-19 Shutdown on Gambling Patterns in Australia: Consideration of Problem Gambling and Psychological Distress," published in 2020 in Journal of Addiction Medicine
  • "Impact of Gambling Supply Reduction During COVID-19 Shutdowns on Gambling Problems and Gambling Behaviour in Australia: A National Longitudinal Study," published in 2021 in Journal of Gambling Studies
  • "Accuracy of self-reported gambling frequency and outcomes: Comparisons with account data," published in 2021 in Psychology of Addictive Behaviors

Best Publications

  • Online Gambling Addiction: the Relationship Between Internet Gambling and Disordered Gambling

    Sally M. Gainsbury

  • Professional Help-Seeking for Gambling Problems: Awareness, Barriers and Motivators for Treatment

    Sally M Gainsbury;Nerilee Hing;Niko Suhonen

  • A systematic review of Internet-based therapy for the treatment of addictions.

    Sally Melissa Gainsbury;Sally Melissa Gainsbury;Alex Blaszczynski

  • A digital revolution: Comparison of demographic profiles, attitudes and gambling behavior of Internet and non-Internet gamblers

    Sally Gainsbury;Robert Wood;Alex Russell;Nerilee Hing

  • How the Internet is Changing Gambling: Findings from an Australian Prevalence Survey

    Sally M. Gainsbury;Sally M. Gainsbury;Alex Russell;Alex Russell;Nerilee Hing;Robert Wood

  • The prevalence and determinants of problem gambling in Australia: assessing the impact of interactive gambling and new technologies.

    Sally M Gainsbury;Alex Russell;Nerilee Hing;Robert Wood

  • The impact of internet gambling on gambling problems: a comparison of moderate-risk and problem internet and non-internet gamblers

    Sally M Gainsbury;Alex Russell;Nerilee Hing;Robert Wood

  • Do advertising and promotions for online gambling increase gambling consumption? An exploratory study

    Nerilee Hing;Lorraine Cherney;Alex Blaszczynski;Sally M. Gainsbury

  • Gambling on sport sponsorship: a conceptual framework for research and regulatory review

    Matthew Lamont;Nerilee Hing;Sally Gainsbury

  • A taxonomy of gambling and casino games via social media and online technologies

    Sally M. Gainsbury;Nerilee Hing;Paul H. Delfabbro;Daniel L. King

  • Unfair play? Video games as exploitative monetized services: An examination of game patents from a consumer protection perspective

    Daniel L. King;Daniel L. King;Paul H. Delfabbro;Sally M. Gainsbury;Michael Dreier

  • Internet Gambling: Current Research Findings and Implications

    Sally Gainsbury

  • Consumer attitudes towards Internet gambling: Perceptions of responsible gambling policies, consumer protection, and regulation of online gambling sites

    Sally Gainsbury;Jonathan Parke;Niko Suhonen

  • Binge-Watching: What Do we Know So Far? A First Systematic Review of the Evidence

    Maèva Flayelle;Pierre Maurage;Kim Ridell Di Lorenzo;Claus Vögele

  • How risky is Internet gambling? A comparison of subgroups of Internet gamblers based on problem gambling status

    Sally M. Gainsbury;Alex Russell;Robert T. Wood;Nerilee Hing

  • Chasing losses in online poker and casino games: characteristics and game play of Internet gamblers at risk of disordered gambling.

    Sally M. Gainsbury;Niko Suhonen;Jani Saastamoinen

  • Technology-mediated addictive behaviors constitute a spectrum of related yet distinct conditions: A network perspective

    Stéphanie Baggio;Vladan Starcevic;Joseph Studer;Olivier Simon

  • Review of self-exclusion from gambling venues as an intervention for problem gambling

    Sally M. Gainsbury

  • Maintaining and losing control during internet gambling: A qualitative study of gamblers’ experiences

    Nerilee Hing;Lorraine Cherney;Sally Gainsbury;Dan Lubman

  • Crime and Gambling Disorders: A Systematic Review

    A. Adolphe;L. Khatib;C. van Golde;Sally M. Gainsbury

  • Internet gambling policy in critical comparative perspective: the effectiveness of existing regulatory frameworks

    Sally M Gainsbury;Robert Wood

  • Limit your time, gamble responsibly: setting a time limit (via pop-up message) on an electronic gaming machine reduces time on device

    Hyoun S. Kim;Michael J. A. Wohl;Melissa J. Stewart;Travis Sztainert

Frequent Co-Authors

Alex Blaszczynski
Alex Blaszczynski University of Sydney
Nerilee Hing
Nerilee Hing Central Queensland University
Paul Delfabbro
Paul Delfabbro University of Adelaide
Daniel King
Daniel King Flinders University
Dan I. Lubman
Dan I. Lubman Monash University
Joël Billieux
Joël Billieux University of Lausanne
Vladan Starcevic
Vladan Starcevic University of Sydney
Jeffrey L. Derevensky
Jeffrey L. Derevensky McGill University
Nicki A. Dowling
Nicki A. Dowling Deakin University
David C. Hodgins
David C. Hodgins University of Calgary

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring psychology in the USA opens doors to a wide range of online degrees and career pathways. Many students move into closely related fields, such as speech-language pathology, which combines insights from psychology, linguistics, and healthcare. This field not only requires a strong academic background but also adherence to state-specific certification requirements.

Aspiring speech-language pathologists must understand varying state guidelines. For instance, Virginia slp certification requirements involve obtaining a relevant degree, completing supervised clinical practice, and passing national exams. Similarly, the Washington speech pathologist certification requirements require applicants to finish a master's program, fulfill clinical hours, and clear the Praxis test.

Every state adds its own details to the process. The West Virginia speech pathologist certification requirements emphasize educational standards and ongoing education, while slp requirements in Wisconsin include background checks and state-specific exams. Understanding these pathways helps students choose the right online programs and plan for a fulfilling career in allied health professions.

Best Scientists Citing Sally M. Gainsbury

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles