World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
116
Citations
59538
World Ranking
434
National Ranking
56

Richard N. Henson publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Richard N. Henson sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 342 publications — 87th percentile

87% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Richard N. Henson D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Richard N. Henson sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 116 D-Index — 96th percentile

96% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Richard N. Henson is affiliated with the MRC Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit in the United Kingdom. Their research primarily spans the fields of Neuroscience and Medicine, with significant contributions to subfields such as Cognitive Neuroscience, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Psychiatry and Mental Health, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, as well as Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis.

The scientist's work focuses extensively on topics including Functional Brain Connectivity Studies, Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research, Neural Dynamics and Brain Function, Memory and Neural Mechanisms, Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications, Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications, and Memory Processes and Influences.

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Richard N. Henson include James B. Rowe, Kamen A. Tsvetanov, Rogier Kievit, Ethan Knights, and David Bartrés-Faz.

Publications are regularly found in a variety of venues, particularly bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), Neurobiology of Aging, NeuroImage, Alzheimer's & Dementia, and eLife.

Recent papers authored or co-authored by Richard N. Henson include:

  • Individual variations in 'brain age' relate to early-life factors more than to longitudinal brain change, 2021, eLife
  • Noradrenergic-dependent functions are associated with age-related locus coeruleus signal intensity differences, 2020, Nature Communications
  • Educational attainment does not influence brain aging, 2021, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
  • The effects of age on resting-state BOLD signal variability is explained by cardiovascular and cerebrovascular factors, 2020, Psychophysiology
  • A predictive account of how novelty influences declarative memory, 2021, Neurobiology of Learning and Memory

Best Publications

  • A voxel-based morphometric study of ageing in 465 normal adult human brains.

    Catriona D. Good;Ingrid S. Johnsrude;John Ashburner;Richard N.A. Henson;Richard N.A. Henson

  • A voxel-based morphometric study of ageing in 465 normal adult human brains

    C.D. Good;I.S. Johnsrude;J. Ashburner;R.N.A. Henson

  • Repetition and the brain: neural models of stimulus-specific effects

    Kalanit Grill-Spector;Richard Henson;Alex Martin

  • Frontal lobes and human memory: Insights from functional neuroimaging

    P. C. Fletcher;R. N. A. Henson

  • Cerebral asymmetry and the effects of sex and handedness on brain structure: a voxel-based morphometric analysis of 465 normal adult human brains.

    Catriona D. Good;Ingrid S. Johnsrude;John Ashburner;Richard N. A. Henson;Richard N. A. Henson

  • Recollection and Familiarity in Recognition Memory: An Event-Related Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study

    Richard N. A. Henson;M. D. Rugg;T. Shallice;O. Josephs

  • How schema and novelty augment memory formation.

    Marlieke T.R. van Kesteren;Marlieke T.R. van Kesteren;Dirk J. Ruiter;Guillén Fernández;Guillén Fernández;Richard N. Henson

  • Neuroimaging studies of priming.

    R.N.A Henson

  • Short-term memory for serial order: the start-end model

    Richard N.A. Henson

  • Classical and Bayesian inference in neuroimaging: applications.

    Karl J. Friston;Daniel E. Glaser;Richard N. A. Henson;Stefan J. Kiebel

  • Neuroimaging evidence for dissociable forms of repetition priming.

    R. Henson;T. Shallice;Raymond J. Dolan

  • The Cambridge Centre for Ageing and Neuroscience (Cam-CAN) data repository: Structural and functional MRI, MEG, and cognitive data from a cross-sectional adult lifespan sample.

    Jason R. Taylor;Nitin Williams;Rhodri Cusack;Tibor Auer

  • Stochastic designs in event-related fMRI.

    K.J. Friston;E. Zarahn;O. Josephs;R.N.A. Henson

  • Good practice for conducting and reporting MEG research

    Joachim Gross;Sylvain Baillet;Gareth R. Barnes;Richard N. A. Henson

  • The Cambridge Centre for Ageing and Neuroscience (Cam-CAN) study protocol: a cross-sectional, lifespan, multidisciplinary examination of healthy cognitive ageing

    Meredith A Shafto;Lorraine K Tyler;Marie Dixon;Jason R Taylor;Jason R Taylor

  • Multiple sparse priors for the M/EEG inverse problem

    Karl J. Friston;Lee M. Harrison;Jean Daunizeau;Stefan J. Kiebel

  • EEG and MEG data analysis in SPM8.

    Vladimir Litvak;Jérémie Mattout;Stefan J. Kiebel;Christophe Phillips

  • Morphing Marilyn into Maggie dissociates physical and identity face representations in the brain

    Pia Rotshtein;Richard N A Henson;Alessandro Treves;Jon Driver

  • Right prefrontal cortex and episodic memory retrieval: a functional MRI test of the monitoring hypothesis

    R. N. Henson;T. Shallice;Raymond J. Dolan

  • Multiple levels of visual object constancy revealed by event-related fMRI of repetition priming

    P. Vuilleumier;R. N. Henson;J. Driver;Raymond J. Dolan

  • Guidelines for reporting an fMRI study

    Russell A. Poldrack;Paul C. Fletcher;Richard N. Henson;Keith J. Worsley

  • Neural response suppression, haemodynamic repetition effects, and behavioural priming.

    R.N.A Henson;M.D Rugg

Frequent Co-Authors

James B. Rowe
James B. Rowe University of Cambridge
Raymond J. Dolan
Raymond J. Dolan University College London
Karl J. Friston
Karl J. Friston University College London
Rogier A. Kievit
Rogier A. Kievit Donders Institute
Michael D. Rugg
Michael D. Rugg The University of Texas at Dallas
Lorraine K. Tyler
Lorraine K. Tyler University of Cambridge
Edward T. Bullmore
Edward T. Bullmore King's College London
Jon S. Simons
Jon S. Simons University of Cambridge
Tim Shallice
Tim Shallice University College London
Andrew J. Calder
Andrew J. Calder University of Cambridge

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a career in neuroscience opens up diverse opportunities, thanks to the increasing availability of online bachelor's degree programs. These flexible options allow you to study at your own pace and can be a cost-effective route to a reputable qualification.

Many neuroscience graduates pursue roles in research, healthcare, and technology, often linking their studies to some of the highest paying degrees available today. Allied majors like biomedical engineering, pharmacy, and computer science are also among the highest paid college majors, providing strong career and salary prospects.

Cost is a major consideration for many students. Fortunately, there are online colleges that take financial aid, helping to make an advanced education in neuroscience more affordable. Evaluating your online degree options carefully can help you find a program that fits both your budget and your career ambitions.

Best Scientists Citing Richard N. Henson

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles