World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Mathew P. White

Mathew P. White

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 61 3301 3042 12 11 150 24686

Mathew P. White publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Mathew P. White between 1998 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Mathew P. White published across 28 years, from 1998 to 2025, averaging 9.2 papers a year. Output peaked at 28 publications in 2023. 49 of the 258 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20 25
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1998 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 28. Peak 28 publications in 2023. 1998: 1 publication 1999: 0 publications 2000: 0 publications 2001: 0 publications 2002: 2 publications 2003: 1 publication 2004: 1 publication 2005: 1 publication 2006: 2 publications 2007: 4 publications 2008: 2 publications 2009: 1 publication 2010: 6 publications 2011: 3 publications 2012: 7 publications 2013: 13 publications 2014: 11 publications 2015: 10 publications 2016: 14 publications 2017: 13 publications 2018: 17 publications 2019: 22 publications 2020: 22 publications 2021: 19 publications 2022: 9 publications 2023: 28 publications 2024: 27 publications 2025: 22 publications
1998 2025

258 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Mathew P. White: publications per year, 1998 to 2025
Year Publications
1998 1
1999 0
2000 0
2001 0
2002 2
2003 1
2004 1
2005 1
2006 2
2007 4
2008 2
2009 1
2010 6
2011 3
2012 7
2013 13
2014 11
2015 10
2016 14
2017 13
2018 17
2019 22
2020 22
2021 19
2022 9
2023 28
2024 27
2025 22
Total 258
Download as CSV

Mathew P. White publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mathew P. White sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 141–150 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 150 publications — 49th percentile

49% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597 150
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Mathew P. White D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mathew P. White sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 60–61 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 61 D-Index — 71st percentile

71% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321 61
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Mathew P. White is affiliated with the University of Vienna in Austria and works primarily within the field of Environmental Science. Their research spans multiple subfields including Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis, Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law, Sociology and Political Science, Global and Planetary Change, and Social Psychology. The main topics explored in their work focus on Urban Green Space and Health, Environmental Education and Sustainability, Land Use and Ecosystem Services, Urban Agriculture and Sustainability, Noise Effects and Management, Urban Heat Island Mitigation, and Place Attachment and Urban Studies.

White has contributed to numerous publications, with frequent appearances in:

  • Journal of Environmental Psychology
  • Environmental Research
  • The Science of The Total Environment
  • Scientific Reports
  • Landscape and Urban Planning

Some of their recent papers include:

  • "Nature contact, nature connectedness and associations with health, wellbeing and pro-environmental behaviours" (2020, Journal of Environmental Psychology)
  • "Contact with blue-green spaces during the COVID-19 pandemic lockdown beneficial for mental health" (2020, The Science of The Total Environment)
  • "Blue space, health and well-being: A narrative overview and synthesis of potential benefits" (2020, Environmental Research)
  • "Associations between green/blue spaces and mental health across 18 countries" (2021, Scientific Reports)
  • "What is the best way of delivering virtual nature for improving mood? An experimental comparison of high definition TV, 360° video, and computer generated virtual reality" (2020, Journal of Environmental Psychology)

The body of their work shows an emphasis on understanding the health and well-being impacts of natural environments such as green and blue spaces. This includes exploring both direct contact with nature and the psychological benefits of virtual nature experiences.

Collaborations have been frequent with several coauthors, including:

  • Lewis R. Elliott
  • Sabine Pahl
  • Mark Nieuwenhuijsen
  • Lora E. Fleming
  • Gregory N. Bratman

This network suggests interdisciplinary connections spanning environmental psychology, public health, and urban planning. White's research contributes to understanding how natural environments influence human health outcomes, urban sustainability, and policy development.

Best Publications

  • Do we really know what makes us happy? A review of the economic literature on the factors associated with subjective well-being

    Paul Dolan;Tessa Peasgood;Mathew White

  • Nature and mental health: An ecosystem service perspective.

    Gregory N. Bratman;Christopher B. Anderson;Marc G. Berman;Bobby Cochran

  • Would You Be Happier Living in a Greener Urban Area? A Fixed-Effects Analysis of Panel Data

    Mathew P. White;Ian Alcock;Benedict W. Wheeler;Michael H. Depledge

  • Spending at least 120 minutes a week in nature is associated with good health and wellbeing

    Mathew P. White;Ian Alcock;James Grellier;Benedict W. Wheeler

  • Blue space: The importance of water for preference, affect, and restorativeness ratings of natural and built scenes

    Mathew White;Amanda Smith;Kelly Humphryes;Sabine Pahl

  • Attention Restoration Theory: A systematic review of the attention restoration potential of exposure to natural environments

    Heather Ohly;Mathew P. White;Benedict W. Wheeler;Alison Bethel

  • Longitudinal Effects on Mental Health of Moving to Greener and Less Green Urban Areas

    Ian Alcock;Mathew P. White;Benedict W. Wheeler;Lora E. Fleming

  • Outdoor blue spaces, human health and well-being: A systematic review of quantitative studies.

    Mireia Gascon;Mireia Gascon;Wilma Zijlema;Wilma Zijlema;Cristina Vert;Cristina Vert;Mathew P. White

  • Risk interpretation and action: A conceptual framework for responses to natural hazards

    J. Richard Eiser;Ann Bostrom;Ian Burton;David M. Johnston

  • Contact with blue-green spaces during the COVID-19 pandemic lockdown beneficial for mental health.

    Sarai Pouso;Ángel Borja;Lora E. Fleming;Erik Gómez-Baggethun

  • How Can Measures of Subjective Well-Being Be Used to Inform Public Policy?:

    Paul Dolan;Mathew P. White

  • Feelings of restoration from recent nature visits

    Mathew P. White;Sabine Pahl;Katherine Ashbullby;Stephen Herbert

  • Does living by the coast improve health and wellbeing

    Benedict W. Wheeler;Mathew White;Will Stahl-Timmins;Michael H. Depledge

  • Blue space, health and well-being: A narrative overview and synthesis of potential benefits.

    Mathew P. White;Mathew P. White;Lewis R. Elliott;Mireia Gascon;Bethany Roberts

  • Accounting for the Richness of Daily Activities

    Mathew P. White;Paul Dolan

  • Beyond greenspace: an ecological study of population general health and indicators of natural environment type and quality

    Benedict W. Wheeler;Rebecca Lovell;Sahran L. Higgins;Matthew P. White

  • Associations between green/blue spaces and mental health across 18 countries

    Mathew P. White;Mathew P. White;Lewis R. Elliott;James Grellier;James Grellier;Theo Economou

  • Coastal proximity, health and well-being: results from a longitudinal panel survey.

    Mathew P. White;Ian Alcock;Benedict W. Wheeler;Michael H. Depledge

  • Natural environments and subjective wellbeing: Different types of exposure are associated with different aspects of wellbeing

    Mathew P. White;Sabine Pahl;Sabine Pahl;Benedict W. Wheeler;Michael H. Depledge

  • Are Some Natural Environments More Psychologically Beneficial Than Others? The Importance of Type and Quality on Connectedness to Nature and Psychological Restoration:

    Kayleigh J. Wyles;Kayleigh J. Wyles;Mathew P. White;Caroline Hattam;Sabine Pahl

  • BlueHealth : A study programme protocol for mapping and quantifying the potential benefits to public health and well-being from Europe's blue spaces

    James Grellier;James Grellier;Mathew P. White;Maria Albin;Maria Albin;Simon Bell

Frequent Co-Authors

Benedict W. Wheeler
Benedict W. Wheeler University of Exeter
Sabine Pahl
Sabine Pahl University of Vienna
Michael H. Depledge
Michael H. Depledge University of Exeter
Charles Abraham
Charles Abraham University of Exeter
Mark J. Nieuwenhuijsen
Mark J. Nieuwenhuijsen Barcelona Institute for Global Health
Jon May
Jon May Plymouth University
Sotiris Vardoulakis
Sotiris Vardoulakis University of Canberra
Jackie Andrade
Jackie Andrade Plymouth University
Anja S. Göritz
Anja S. Göritz University of Freiburg
Paul Dolan
Paul Dolan London School of Economics and Political Science

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in psychology opens the door to a diverse range of online programs and rewarding career pathways. One popular option is becoming a Marriage and Family Therapist (MFT), a role that is vital in supporting individuals, couples, and families through life’s challenges.

Each state has unique requirements to become an MFT. If you’re interested in practicing in Tennessee, explore the specific steps on how to become an mft in Nashville. For those drawn to the vibrant culture of Louisiana, you can find detailed guidance on how to become a marriage and family therapist in New Orleans.

New York City and Newark offer their own pathways and licensing processes. To get started, check how to become an mft in New York City or review the requirements for how to become a marriage and family therapist in Newark.

With online psychology degrees booming, you can study flexibly while preparing for meaningful work in counseling, mental health, education, and more. Exploring state-specific pathways will help you find the right fit for your goals.

Best Scientists Citing Mathew P. White

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles