World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Mathew P. White

Mathew P. White

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
61
Citations
24686
World Ranking
3301
National Ranking
12

Mathew P. White publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mathew P. White sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 150 publications — 49th percentile

49% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Mathew P. White D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mathew P. White sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 61 D-Index — 71st percentile

71% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Mathew P. White is affiliated with the University of Vienna in Austria and works primarily within the field of Environmental Science. Their research spans multiple subfields including Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis, Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law, Sociology and Political Science, Global and Planetary Change, and Social Psychology. The main topics explored in their work focus on Urban Green Space and Health, Environmental Education and Sustainability, Land Use and Ecosystem Services, Urban Agriculture and Sustainability, Noise Effects and Management, Urban Heat Island Mitigation, and Place Attachment and Urban Studies.

White has contributed to numerous publications, with frequent appearances in:

  • Journal of Environmental Psychology
  • Environmental Research
  • The Science of The Total Environment
  • Scientific Reports
  • Landscape and Urban Planning

Some of their recent papers include:

  • "Nature contact, nature connectedness and associations with health, wellbeing and pro-environmental behaviours" (2020, Journal of Environmental Psychology)
  • "Contact with blue-green spaces during the COVID-19 pandemic lockdown beneficial for mental health" (2020, The Science of The Total Environment)
  • "Blue space, health and well-being: A narrative overview and synthesis of potential benefits" (2020, Environmental Research)
  • "Associations between green/blue spaces and mental health across 18 countries" (2021, Scientific Reports)
  • "What is the best way of delivering virtual nature for improving mood? An experimental comparison of high definition TV, 360° video, and computer generated virtual reality" (2020, Journal of Environmental Psychology)

The body of their work shows an emphasis on understanding the health and well-being impacts of natural environments such as green and blue spaces. This includes exploring both direct contact with nature and the psychological benefits of virtual nature experiences.

Collaborations have been frequent with several coauthors, including:

  • Lewis R. Elliott
  • Sabine Pahl
  • Mark Nieuwenhuijsen
  • Lora E. Fleming
  • Gregory N. Bratman

This network suggests interdisciplinary connections spanning environmental psychology, public health, and urban planning. White's research contributes to understanding how natural environments influence human health outcomes, urban sustainability, and policy development.

Best Publications

  • Do we really know what makes us happy? A review of the economic literature on the factors associated with subjective well-being

    Paul Dolan;Tessa Peasgood;Mathew White

  • Nature and mental health: An ecosystem service perspective.

    Gregory N. Bratman;Christopher B. Anderson;Marc G. Berman;Bobby Cochran

  • Would You Be Happier Living in a Greener Urban Area? A Fixed-Effects Analysis of Panel Data

    Mathew P. White;Ian Alcock;Benedict W. Wheeler;Michael H. Depledge

  • Spending at least 120 minutes a week in nature is associated with good health and wellbeing

    Mathew P. White;Ian Alcock;James Grellier;Benedict W. Wheeler

  • Blue space: The importance of water for preference, affect, and restorativeness ratings of natural and built scenes

    Mathew White;Amanda Smith;Kelly Humphryes;Sabine Pahl

  • Attention Restoration Theory: A systematic review of the attention restoration potential of exposure to natural environments

    Heather Ohly;Mathew P. White;Benedict W. Wheeler;Alison Bethel

  • Longitudinal Effects on Mental Health of Moving to Greener and Less Green Urban Areas

    Ian Alcock;Mathew P. White;Benedict W. Wheeler;Lora E. Fleming

  • Nature contact, nature connectedness and associations with health, wellbeing and pro-environmental behaviours

    Leanne Martin;Leanne Martin;Mathew P. White;Anne Hunt;Miles Richardson

  • Outdoor blue spaces, human health and well-being: A systematic review of quantitative studies.

    Mireia Gascon;Mireia Gascon;Wilma Zijlema;Wilma Zijlema;Cristina Vert;Cristina Vert;Mathew P. White

  • Risk interpretation and action: A conceptual framework for responses to natural hazards

    J. Richard Eiser;Ann Bostrom;Ian Burton;David M. Johnston

  • Contact with blue-green spaces during the COVID-19 pandemic lockdown beneficial for mental health.

    Sarai Pouso;Ángel Borja;Lora E. Fleming;Erik Gómez-Baggethun

  • How Can Measures of Subjective Well-Being Be Used to Inform Public Policy?:

    Paul Dolan;Mathew P. White

  • Feelings of restoration from recent nature visits

    Mathew P. White;Sabine Pahl;Katherine Ashbullby;Stephen Herbert

  • Does living by the coast improve health and wellbeing

    Benedict W. Wheeler;Mathew White;Will Stahl-Timmins;Michael H. Depledge

  • Blue space, health and well-being: A narrative overview and synthesis of potential benefits.

    Mathew P. White;Mathew P. White;Lewis R. Elliott;Mireia Gascon;Bethany Roberts

  • Accounting for the Richness of Daily Activities

    Mathew P. White;Paul Dolan

  • Beyond greenspace: an ecological study of population general health and indicators of natural environment type and quality

    Benedict W. Wheeler;Rebecca Lovell;Sahran L. Higgins;Matthew P. White

  • Associations between green/blue spaces and mental health across 18 countries

    Mathew P. White;Mathew P. White;Lewis R. Elliott;James Grellier;James Grellier;Theo Economou

  • Coastal proximity, health and well-being: results from a longitudinal panel survey.

    Mathew P. White;Ian Alcock;Benedict W. Wheeler;Michael H. Depledge

  • Natural environments and subjective wellbeing: Different types of exposure are associated with different aspects of wellbeing

    Mathew P. White;Sabine Pahl;Sabine Pahl;Benedict W. Wheeler;Michael H. Depledge

  • Are Some Natural Environments More Psychologically Beneficial Than Others? The Importance of Type and Quality on Connectedness to Nature and Psychological Restoration:

    Kayleigh J. Wyles;Kayleigh J. Wyles;Mathew P. White;Caroline Hattam;Sabine Pahl

  • BlueHealth : A study programme protocol for mapping and quantifying the potential benefits to public health and well-being from Europe's blue spaces

    James Grellier;James Grellier;Mathew P. White;Maria Albin;Maria Albin;Simon Bell

Frequent Co-Authors

Benedict W. Wheeler
Benedict W. Wheeler University of Exeter
Sabine Pahl
Sabine Pahl University of Vienna
Michael H. Depledge
Michael H. Depledge University of Exeter
Charles Abraham
Charles Abraham University of Exeter
Mark J. Nieuwenhuijsen
Mark J. Nieuwenhuijsen Barcelona Institute for Global Health
Jon May
Jon May Plymouth University
Sotiris Vardoulakis
Sotiris Vardoulakis University of Canberra
Jackie Andrade
Jackie Andrade Plymouth University
Anja S. Göritz
Anja S. Göritz University of Freiburg
Paul Dolan
Paul Dolan London School of Economics and Political Science

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in psychology opens the door to a diverse range of online programs and rewarding career pathways. One popular option is becoming a Marriage and Family Therapist (MFT), a role that is vital in supporting individuals, couples, and families through life’s challenges.

Each state has unique requirements to become an MFT. If you’re interested in practicing in Tennessee, explore the specific steps on how to become an mft in Nashville. For those drawn to the vibrant culture of Louisiana, you can find detailed guidance on how to become a marriage and family therapist in New Orleans.

New York City and Newark offer their own pathways and licensing processes. To get started, check how to become an mft in New York City or review the requirements for how to become a marriage and family therapist in Newark.

With online psychology degrees booming, you can study flexibly while preparing for meaningful work in counseling, mental health, education, and more. Exploring state-specific pathways will help you find the right fit for your goals.

Best Scientists Citing Mathew P. White

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles