World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Felicia A. Huppert

Felicia A. Huppert

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 83 1262 1115 53 51 188 28292
Medicine 86 14102 13278 464 453 172 28064

Felicia A. Huppert publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Felicia A. Huppert between 1967 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Felicia A. Huppert published across 59 years, from 1967 to 2025, averaging 3.6 papers a year. Output peaked at 13 publications in 2008. 1 of the 214 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1967 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 13. Peak 13 publications in 2008. 1967: 1 publication 1968: 1 publication 1969: 1 publication 1970: 0 publications 1971: 0 publications 1972: 1 publication 1973: 0 publications 1974: 0 publications 1975: 1 publication 1976: 1 publication 1977: 1 publication 1978: 2 publications 1979: 1 publication 1980: 0 publications 1981: 2 publications 1982: 1 publication 1983: 0 publications 1984: 1 publication 1985: 0 publications 1986: 2 publications 1987: 1 publication 1988: 1 publication 1989: 2 publications 1990: 1 publication 1991: 4 publications 1992: 2 publications 1993: 4 publications 1994: 5 publications 1995: 9 publications 1996: 6 publications 1997: 10 publications 1998: 11 publications 1999: 6 publications 2000: 10 publications 2001: 2 publications 2002: 5 publications 2003: 6 publications 2004: 8 publications 2005: 3 publications 2006: 11 publications 2007: 7 publications 2008: 13 publications 2009: 11 publications 2010: 11 publications 2011: 9 publications 2012: 2 publications 2013: 8 publications 2014: 6 publications 2015: 2 publications 2016: 2 publications 2017: 3 publications 2018: 3 publications 2019: 1 publication 2020: 5 publications 2021: 6 publications 2022: 0 publications 2023: 1 publication 2024: 0 publications 2025: 1 publication
1967 2025

214 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Felicia A. Huppert: publications per year, 1967 to 2025
Year Publications
1967 1
1968 1
1969 1
1970 0
1971 0
1972 1
1973 0
1974 0
1975 1
1976 1
1977 1
1978 2
1979 1
1980 0
1981 2
1982 1
1983 0
1984 1
1985 0
1986 2
1987 1
1988 1
1989 2
1990 1
1991 4
1992 2
1993 4
1994 5
1995 9
1996 6
1997 10
1998 11
1999 6
2000 10
2001 2
2002 5
2003 6
2004 8
2005 3
2006 11
2007 7
2008 13
2009 11
2010 11
2011 9
2012 2
2013 8
2014 6
2015 2
2016 2
2017 3
2018 3
2019 1
2020 5
2021 6
2022 0
2023 1
2024 0
2025 1
Total 214
Download as CSV

Felicia A. Huppert publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Felicia A. Huppert sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 181–190 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 188 publications — 65th percentile

65% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397 188
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Felicia A. Huppert D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Felicia A. Huppert sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 82–83 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 83 D-Index — 89th percentile

89% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112 83
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Felicia A. Huppert is affiliated with the University of Sydney in Australia and has conducted extensive research primarily in the field of psychology. Their work spans several subfields including social psychology, clinical psychology, health, general health professions, and demography.

The main topics of their research focus on psychological well-being and life satisfaction, mindfulness and compassion interventions, health disparities and outcomes, health, psychology, and well-being, religion, spirituality, and psychology, resilience and mental health, as well as workplace spirituality and leadership.

Frequent publication venues for their research include the Academy of Management Proceedings, Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, Ethical Theory and Moral Practice, PsycTESTS Dataset, and the Australian Journal of Management.

Among their recent papers are:

  • Well-being is more than happiness and life satisfaction: a multidimensional analysis of 21 countries (2020, Health and Quality of Life Outcomes)
  • The Virtue of Self-Compassion (2021, Ethical Theory and Moral Practice)
  • An RCT Evaluation of the Effectiveness of a Mindfulness and Positive Psychology Intervention (2023, Academy of Management Proceedings)
  • Compassion at Work: Looking at the Heart of Organizations (2020, Academy of Management Proceedings)
  • Well-Being Profile (2020, PsycTESTS Dataset)

The scientist has worked collaboratively with several frequent coauthors, including:

  • Anya Johnson
  • Shanta Dey
  • Greg Fairbrother
  • Nickolas Yu
  • Helena Nguyen

Felicia A. Huppert's research covers multiple dimensions of psychological well-being, with a particular emphasis on mindfulness, compassion, and mental health resilience. Their contributions include both theoretical analyses and practical intervention evaluations within diverse settings such as workplaces and international populations.

Best Publications

  • CAMDEX. A standardised instrument for the diagnosis of mental disorder in the elderly with special reference to the early detection of dementia.

    Martin Roth;E. Tym;C. Q. Mountjoy;Felicia A. Huppert

  • Flourishing Across Europe : Application of a New Conceptual Framework for Defining Well-Being

    Felicia A. Huppert;Timothy T. C. So

  • Psychological Well-being: Evidence Regarding its Causes and Consequences†

    Felicia A Huppert

  • The mental wealth of nations

    John Beddington;Cary L. Cooper;John Field;Usha Goswami

  • Well-being is more than happiness and life satisfaction: a multidimensional analysis of 21 countries

    Kai Ruggeri;Kai Ruggeri;Eduardo Garcia-Garzon;Áine Maguire;Sandra Matz

  • Evidence for the independence of positive and negative well-being: implications for quality of life assessment.

    Felicia A. Huppert;Joyce E. Whittington

  • The health and lifestyle survey. Preliminary report of a nationwide survey of the physical and mental health, attitudes and lifestyle of a random sample of 9,003 British adults.

    B. D. Cox;M. Blaxter;A. L. J. Buckle;N. P. Fenner

  • A controlled trial of mindfulness training in schools: The importance of practice for an impact on well-being

    Felicia A. Huppert;Daniel M. Johnson

  • The GPCOG: A New Screening Test for Dementia Designed for General Practice

    Henry Brodaty;Dimity Pond;Nicola M. Kemp;Georgina Luscombe

  • Effectiveness of the Mindfulness in Schools Programme: non-randomised controlled feasibility study.

    Willem Kuyken;Katherine Weare;Obioha C. Ukoumunne;Rachael Vicary

  • Measuring well-being across Europe: Description of the ESS Well-being Module and preliminary findings

    Felicia A. Huppert;Nic Marks;Andrew E. Clark;Johannes Siegrist

  • Improvement in Mood and Fatigue after Dehydroepiandrosterone Replacement in Addison’s Disease in a Randomized, Double Blind Trial

    Penelope J. Hunt;Eleanor M. Gurnell;Felicia A. Huppert;Christine Richards

  • The Science of Well-Being

    Felicia A. Huppert;Nick Baylis;Barry Keverne

  • Psychometric evaluation and predictive validity of Ryff's psychological well-being items in a UK birth cohort sample of women

    Rosemary A Abbott;George B Ploubidis;Felicia A Huppert;Diana Kuh

  • The efficacy of mindfulness‐based stress reduction on mental health of breast cancer patients: a meta‐analysis

    Nor Zuraida Zainal;Nor Zuraida Zainal;Sara Booth;Felicia A. Huppert

  • Prevalence of depressive symptoms and syndromes in later life in ten European countries: The SHARE study

    Erico Castro-Costa;Michael Dewey;Robert Stewart;Sube Banerjee

  • Population-based study of the prevalence and presentation of dementia in adults with Down's syndrome.

    Anthony J. Holland;Johnny Hon;Felicia A. Huppert;Fran Stevens

  • Incidence and course of dementia in people with Down's syndrome: findings from a population-based study.

    A. J. Holland;J. Hon;F. A. Huppert;F. Stevens

  • Recognition memory in amnesic patients: effect of temporal context and familiarity of material.

    Felicia A. Huppert;Malcolm Piercy

  • CAMCOG—A concise neuropsychological test to assist dementia diagnosis: Socio-demographic determinants in an elderly population sample

    Felicia A. Huppert;Carol Brayne;Caroline Gill;E. S. Paykel

Frequent Co-Authors

Carol Brayne
Carol Brayne University of Cambridge
Eugene S. Paykel
Eugene S. Paykel University of Cambridge
Tom Dening
Tom Dening University of Nottingham
Daniel T. O'Connor
Daniel T. O'Connor University of California, San Diego
David J. Llewellyn
David J. Llewellyn University of Exeter
Marcus Richards
Marcus Richards University College London
Kenneth M. Langa
Kenneth M. Langa University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
David Melzer
David Melzer University of Exeter
Anthony J. Holland
Anthony J. Holland University of Cambridge
George B. Ploubidis
George B. Ploubidis University College London

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Interested in becoming a licensed counselor after studying psychology in the USA? Aspiring professionals can pursue online psychology degrees, which may prepare them for roles in counseling, therapy, research, or clinical practice. However, it’s important to understand that licensure requirements differ across states, often mandating specific coursework, supervised experience, and examinations.

For example, students interested in practicing in the Southeast should review the Georgia licensed professional counselor requirements to ensure their program aligns with state standards. On the other hand, those considering relocating to the Pacific islands need to look into the lpc licensure requirements in Hawaii.

The Midwest and Northwest have their own processes, as seen in the details for lpc licensure requirements in Idaho and information about lpc licensure requirements in Illinois. Before enrolling in any online psychology program, be sure to check your target state’s licensing board for current guidelines. This proactive approach can help you select the right degree, expedite your pathway to licensure, and open doors to a rewarding career in mental health.

Best Scientists Citing Felicia A. Huppert

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles