World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 80 1457 1301 169 155 423 21296

Marcus Richards publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Marcus Richards between 1970 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Marcus Richards published across 56 years, from 1970 to 2025, averaging 11.2 papers a year. Output peaked at 55 publications in 2023. 74 of the 629 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30 40 50
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1970 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 55. Peak 55 publications in 2023. 1970: 1 publication 1971: 0 publications 1972: 0 publications 1973: 0 publications 1974: 0 publications 1975: 0 publications 1976: 0 publications 1977: 0 publications 1978: 0 publications 1979: 0 publications 1980: 0 publications 1981: 0 publications 1982: 0 publications 1983: 0 publications 1984: 0 publications 1985: 3 publications 1986: 2 publications 1987: 1 publication 1988: 0 publications 1989: 0 publications 1990: 2 publications 1991: 4 publications 1992: 14 publications 1993: 16 publications 1994: 5 publications 1995: 5 publications 1996: 6 publications 1997: 4 publications 1998: 4 publications 1999: 8 publications 2000: 4 publications 2001: 9 publications 2002: 10 publications 2003: 10 publications 2004: 5 publications 2005: 7 publications 2006: 6 publications 2007: 9 publications 2008: 10 publications 2009: 12 publications 2010: 12 publications 2011: 13 publications 2012: 23 publications 2013: 23 publications 2014: 13 publications 2015: 20 publications 2016: 19 publications 2017: 31 publications 2018: 25 publications 2019: 43 publications 2020: 42 publications 2021: 42 publications 2022: 37 publications 2023: 55 publications 2024: 45 publications 2025: 29 publications
1970 2025

629 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Marcus Richards: publications per year, 1970 to 2025
Year Publications
1970 1
1971 0
1972 0
1973 0
1974 0
1975 0
1976 0
1977 0
1978 0
1979 0
1980 0
1981 0
1982 0
1983 0
1984 0
1985 3
1986 2
1987 1
1988 0
1989 0
1990 2
1991 4
1992 14
1993 16
1994 5
1995 5
1996 6
1997 4
1998 4
1999 8
2000 4
2001 9
2002 10
2003 10
2004 5
2005 7
2006 6
2007 9
2008 10
2009 12
2010 12
2011 13
2012 23
2013 23
2014 13
2015 20
2016 19
2017 31
2018 25
2019 43
2020 42
2021 42
2022 37
2023 55
2024 45
2025 29
Total 629
Download as CSV

Marcus Richards publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Marcus Richards sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 421–430 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 423 publications — 95th percentile

95% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50 423
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Marcus Richards D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Marcus Richards sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 80–81 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 80 D-Index — 88th percentile

88% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120 80
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Marcus Richards is affiliated with University College London in the United Kingdom. Their work primarily spans the field of Medicine, with a specialized focus on Psychiatry and Mental Health, Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis, General Health Professions, and Physiology.

Their research covers a variety of key topics, including:

  • Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Health disparities and outcomes
  • Health, Environment, Cognitive Aging
  • Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Birth, Development, and Health
  • Employment and Welfare Studies
  • Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications

Marcus Richards has contributed to several publication venues, notably:

  • Alzheimer's & Dementia
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • The Lancet Healthy Longevity
  • Journal of Neurology Neurosurgery & Psychiatry
  • Neurology

Frequent coauthors include Jonathan M. Schott, Sarah-Naomi James, David M. Cash, William Coath, and Nick C. Fox.

Selected recent papers authored by Marcus Richards include:

  • Psychological Distress Before and During the COVID-19 Pandemic Among Adults in the United Kingdom Based on Coordinated Analyses of 11 Longitudinal Studies, 2022, JAMA Network Open
  • Autism in England: assessing underdiagnosis in a population-based cohort study of prospectively collected primary care data, 2023, The Lancet Regional Health - Europe
  • OUP accepted manuscript, 2020, Brain
  • Reported sleep duration reveals segmentation of the adult life-course into three phases, 2022, Nature Communications
  • The Dementias Platform UK (DPUK) Data Portal, 2020, European Journal of Epidemiology

Best Publications

  • Temperament: Early developing personality traits

    Unknown

  • The Influence of Age and Sex on Genetic Associations with Adult Body Size and Shape: A Large-Scale Genome-Wide Interaction Study

    Thomas W. Winkler;Anne E. Justice;Mariaelisa Graff;Llilda Barata

  • Birth weight and cognitive function in the British 1946 birth cohort: longitudinal population based study

    Marcus Richards;Rebecca Hardy;Diana Kuh;Michael E J Wadsworth

  • The Dynamic Relationship Between Physical Function and Cognition in Longitudinal Aging Cohorts

    Sean A. P. Clouston;Sean A. P. Clouston;Paul Brewster;Diana Kuh;Diana Kuh;Marcus Richards;Marcus Richards

  • Lifetime Antecedents of Cognitive Reserve

    Marcus Richards;Amanda Sacker

  • A life course approach to cognitive reserve: a model for cognitive aging and development?

    Marcus Richards;Ian J. Deary

  • Interrater reliability of the unified Parkinson's disease rating scale motor examination

    Marcus Richards;Karen Marder;Lucien Cote;Richard Mayeux

  • Does active leisure protect cognition? Evidence from a national birth cohort.

    Marcus Richards;Rebecca Hardy;Michael E.J Wadsworth

  • Effect of 2-y n−3 long-chain polyunsaturated fatty acid supplementation on cognitive function in older people: a randomized, double-blind, controlled trial

    Alan D Dangour;Elizabeth Allen;Diana Elbourne;Nicky Fasey

  • Cohort Profile: Updating the cohort profile for the MRC National Survey of Health and Development: a new clinic-based data collection for ageing research

    Diana Kuh;Mary Pierce;Judith Adams;John Deanfield

  • Mortality in adults aged 26-54 years related to socioeconomic conditions in childhood and adulthood: post war birth cohort study.

    Diana Kuh;Rebecca Hardy;Claudia Langenberg;Marcus Richards

  • The life course prospective design: an example of benefits and problems associated with study longevity.

    M.E.J Wadsworth;S.L Butterworth;R.J Hardy;D.J Kuh

  • Birthweight, postnatal growth and cognitive function in a national UK birth cohort

    Marcus Richards;Rebecca Hardy;Diana Kuh;Michael E J Wadsworth

  • The Columbia University Scale for Psychopathology in Alzheimer's disease.

    Devangere P. Devanand;Lisa Miller;Marcus Richards;Karen Marder

  • Cigarette smoking and cognitive decline in midlife: evidence from a prospective birth cohort study.

    Marcus Richards;Martin J. Jarvis;Neil Thompson;Michael E. J. Wadsworth

  • Associations between blood pressure across adulthood and late-life brain structure and pathology in the neuroscience substudy of the 1946 British birth cohort (Insight 46): an epidemiological study.

    Christopher A Lane;Josephine Barnes;Jennifer M Nicholas;Carole H Sudre

  • Hormone replacement therapy to maintain cognitive function in women with dementia

    Eef Hogervorst;Kristine Yaffe;Marcus Richards;Felicia A.H. Huppert

  • Using a birth cohort to study ageing: representativeness and response rates in the National Survey of Health and Development

    M. Stafford;S. Black;I. Shah;R. Hardy

  • Cognitive ability in childhood and cognitive decline in mid-life: longitudinal birth cohort study

    Marcus Richards;Beverly Shipley;Rebecca Fuhrer;Michael E J Wadsworth

  • Hormone replacement therapy for cognitive function in postmenopausal women.

    A Lethaby;E Hogervorst;M Richards;A Yesufu

  • Assessing patient dependence in Alzheimer's disease.

    Yaakov Stern;Steven M. Albert;Mary Sano;Marcus Richards

  • Lifetime antecedents of cognitive reserve

    M Richards;A Sacker;IJ Deary

Frequent Co-Authors

Diana Kuh
Diana Kuh University College London
Rebecca Hardy
Rebecca Hardy University College London
Andrew Wong
Andrew Wong University College London
Jonathan M. Schott
Jonathan M. Schott University College London
Nick C. Fox
Nick C. Fox University College London
Yaakov Stern
Yaakov Stern Columbia University
David L. Thomas
David L. Thomas Johns Hopkins University
Marc Modat
Marc Modat King's College London
Richard Mayeux
Richard Mayeux Columbia University
Mai Stafford
Mai Stafford University College London

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in psychology opens the door to several related online degrees and diverse career pathways, especially in fields like social work, counseling, and human services. For those looking to specialize or switch directions, online social work programs offer a practical route to impactful careers, often complementing a psychology background.

Affordability is a key consideration when selecting a program. Many students seek the most affordable social work degree programs in Little Rock or explore the cheapest social work degrees in Massachusetts as budget-friendly options. There are also attractive choices across the country, such as the most affordable social work degree programs in Madison and the cheapest social work programs in Marion.

Graduates with these degrees can pursue roles in clinical settings, schools, community organizations, and beyond. By choosing an affordable, accredited online program, you can tailor your learning to your schedule while building a strong foundation for a rewarding, flexible career in mental health and social support.

Best Scientists Citing Marcus Richards

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles