World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
95
Citations
44068
World Ranking
9905
National Ranking
960

Neuroscience

D-Index
94
Citations
43586
World Ranking
924
National Ranking
106

Jonathan M. Schott publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jonathan M. Schott sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 595 publications — 97th percentile

97% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Jonathan M. Schott D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jonathan M. Schott sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 94 D-Index — 90th percentile

90% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Jonathan M. Schott is affiliated with University College London in the United Kingdom. Their research primarily focuses on the field of Medicine, with a significant number of publications addressing Psychiatry and Mental Health, Physiology, Neurology, Molecular Biology, and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine, and Imaging.

The scientist's work covers multiple key topics, including:

  • Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Health, Environment, Cognitive Aging
  • Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications
  • Prion Diseases and Protein Misfolding
  • Diet and metabolism studies

Jonathan M. Schott has contributed to a variety of recent papers notable for their impact and collaboration with others in the field. Among these are:

  • "New insights into atypical Alzheimer's disease in the era of biomarkers," 2021, The Lancet Neurology
  • "Alzheimer Disease as a Clinical-Biological Construct-An International Working Group Recommendation," 2024, JAMA Neurology
  • "Exome sequencing identifies rare damaging variants in ATP8B4 and ABCA1 as risk factors for Alzheimer's disease," 2022, Nature Genetics
  • "Mild Cognitive Impairment: the Manchester consensus," 2020, Age and Ageing
  • "Dementia prevention in memory clinics: recommendations from the European task force for brain health services," 2023, The Lancet Regional Health - Europe

The scientist frequently collaborates with several colleagues, including:

  • Marcus Richards
  • Nick C. Fox
  • David M. Cash
  • Sarah-Naomi James
  • William Coath

Jonathan M. Schott's research is published in respected venues with multiple contributions in:

  • Alzheimer's & Dementia
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Journal of Neurology Neurosurgery & Psychiatry
  • Brain
  • Brain Communications

Best Publications

  • Genetic meta-analysis of diagnosed Alzheimer’s disease identifies new risk loci and implicates Aβ, tau, immunity and lipid processing

    Unknown

  • New insights into the genetic etiology of Alzheimer’s disease and related dementias

    Unknown

  • Alzheimer's disease

    Unknown

  • Potassium channel antibody-associated encephalopathy: a potentially immunotherapy-responsive form of limbic encephalitis

    Angela Vincent;Camilla Buckley;Jonathan M. Schott;Ian Baker

  • The emerging spectrum of COVID-19 neurology: clinical, radiological and laboratory findings.

    Ross W Paterson;Ross W Paterson;Rachel L Brown;Laura Benjamin;Laura Benjamin;Ross Nortley;Ross Nortley

  • Faciobrachial dystonic seizures precede Lgi1 antibody limbic encephalitis.

    Sarosh R. Irani;Andrew W. Michell;Bethan Lang;Philippa Pettingill

  • Mapping the evolution of regional atrophy in Alzheimer's disease: Unbiased analysis of fluid-registered serial MRI

    Rachael I. Scahill;Jonathan M. Schott;John M. Stevens;Martin N. Rossor

  • Diagnostic Value of Cerebrospinal Fluid Neurofilament Light Protein in Neurology: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

    Bridel C;van Wieringen Wn;Zetterberg H;Tijms Bm

  • The diagnosis of young-onset dementia

    Martin N Rossor;Nick C Fox;Catherine J Mummery;Jonathan M Schott

  • Posterior cortical atrophy

    Sebastian J Crutch;Manja Lehmann;Manja Lehmann;Jonathan M Schott;Gil D Rabinovici

  • Strategic roadmap for an early diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease based on biomarkers

    Giovanni B Frisoni;Marina Boccardi;Frederik Barkhof;Kaj Blennow;Kaj Blennow

  • Consensus classification of posterior cortical atrophy

    Sebastian J. Crutch;Jonathan M. Schott;Gil D. Rabinovici;Melissa Murray

  • New insights into atypical Alzheimer's disease in the era of biomarkers.

    Jonathan Graff-Radford;Keir X X Yong;Liana G Apostolova;Femke H Bouwman

  • Uncovering the heterogeneity and temporal complexity of neurodegenerative diseases with Subtype and Stage Inference

    Alexandra L Young;Razvan V Marinescu;Neil P Oxtoby;Martina Bocchetta

  • Imaging cerebral atrophy: normal ageing to Alzheimer's disease

    Nick C Fox;Jonathan M Schott

  • Frontotemporal dementia with the C9ORF72 hexanucleotide repeat expansion: clinical, neuroanatomical and neuropathological features

    Colin J. Mahoney;Jon Beck;Jonathan D. Rohrer;Tammaryn Lashley

  • Clinical variables and biomarkers in prediction of cognitive impairment in patients with newly diagnosed Parkinson's disease: a cohort study

    Anette Schrag;Uzma Faisal Siddiqui;Zacharias Anastasiou;Daniel Weintraub;Daniel Weintraub

  • Faciobrachial dystonic seizures: the influence of immunotherapy on seizure control and prevention of cognitive impairment in a broadening phenotype

    Sarosh R. Irani;Charlotte J. Stagg;Jonathan M. Schott;Clive R. Rosenthal

  • Epidemiological, clinical, and genetic characteristics of early-onset parkinsonism.

    Anette Schrag;Jonathan M Schott

  • Serum neurofilament light chain protein is a measure of disease intensity in frontotemporal dementia

    Jonathan D. Rohrer;Ione O.C. Woollacott;Katrina M. Dick;Emilie Brotherhood

  • Large C9orf72 hexanucleotide repeat expansions are seen in multiple neurodegenerative syndromes and are more frequent than expected in the UK population.

    Jon Beck;Mark Poulter;Davina Hensman;Jonathan D. Rohrer

  • Attenuation correction synthesis for hybrid PET-MR scanners: application to brain studies.

    Ninon Burgos;M. Jorge Cardoso;Kris Thielemans;Marc Modat

  • Clinical and neuroanatomical signatures of tissue pathology in frontotemporal lobar degeneration

    Jonathan D. Rohrer;Tammaryn Lashley;Jonathan M. Schott;Jane E. Warren

Frequent Co-Authors

Nick C. Fox
Nick C. Fox University College London
Henrik Zetterberg
Henrik Zetterberg University of Gothenburg
Martin N. Rossor
Martin N. Rossor University College London
Jason D. Warren
Jason D. Warren University College London
Sebastian J. Crutch
Sebastian J. Crutch University College London
Sebastien Ourselin
Sebastien Ourselin King's College London
Jonathan D. Rohrer
Jonathan D. Rohrer University College London
Marcus Richards
Marcus Richards University College London
Marc Modat
Marc Modat King's College London
Kaj Blennow
Kaj Blennow University of Gothenburg

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Jonathan M. Schott

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles